Osteoarthritis of the knee.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Richard C Dart.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Controversy exists concerning whether abuse of oxycodone will increase after the introduction of generic controlled-release (CR) oxycodone. We evaluated the effect of FDA approval of generic CR oxycodone on the misuse/abuse of oxycodone, hydrocodone, methadone and morphine utilizing data from eight poison control centers (PCC). PCC intentional exposure (IE) reason codes were used as measures of abuse. Opioid-specific quarterly IE rates (per 100,000 population and per 10,000 patients) were calculated for 1 year before and after approval (March 24, 2004). Changes in regression slopes (1 year before to 1 year after) and in IE rates (1 quarter before to 1 quarter after) were analyzed using Poisson regression. The regression slopes for oxycodone, methadone and morphine did not change after approval but decreased significantly for hydrocodone. None of the prescription opioids' IE rates significantly increased after approval. When changes in oxycodone's IE rates were compared to the other opioids, no statistically significant differences were found, indicating a lack of time-opioid interaction. These results did not vary when population rates or patient rates were used. PCC data indicate that approval of generic CR oxycodone was not followed by an immediate unfavorable effect on the misuse/abuse of oxycodone.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of over-the-counter analgesic overuse in a sample of emergency department (ED) patients. METHODS: We conducted a survey of a convenience sample of patients presenting to an urban, academic ED. Research associates questioned patients about the use of pain or cold medications containing ibuprofen, acetaminophen, naproxen, or aspirin. Patients who reported using medications with these ingredients in the 72 hours before their visit were asked about the specific medications, daily dose, and reason for medication use. The daily dose of these 4 analgesics was determined and classified as within or above the manufacturers' recommended over-the-counter dose range. RESULTS: Three hundred seven of 546 (56%) surveyed patients had reported using a medication containing one of these ingredients. Thirty-seven patients (6.2%; 95% confidence interval 4.5% to 8.6%) reported exceeding the manufacturer's recommended daily dose at some point in the 3 days preceding their ED visit. CONCLUSION: Although our study was limited by the use of a convenience sample, we found a potentially significant rate of patients who reported taking excessive doses of over-the-counter analgesics.
Inhalant abuse of methanol-containing products has increased over the last decade. We performed a prospective observational study of 7 subjects who presented to an ED after inhalant abuse of methanol-containing hydrocarbon products. Four patients had a methanol level greater than 24 mg/dL and 2 had an anion gap greater than 17 mEq/L. The mean formic acid level was 71 microg/mL, and 1 patient had a level considered high enough to induce retinal toxicity (>200 microg/mL). No patient had an abnormal ophthalmologic examination. All patients were treated with intravenous folate, 2 received alcohol dehydrogenase blockade, and no patient received hemodialysis or intravenous bicarbonate. All patients' acidosis resolved within 4 hours. The methanol and formic acid levels are lower than those reported after methanol ingestion. These preliminary data suggest that inhalant abusers of methanol products may have significantly elevated methanol and formic acid levels, but are at low risk for methanol induced complications of visual dysfunction and refractory acidosis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The objective of this guideline is to assist poison center personnel in the appropriate out-of-hospital triage and initial management of patients with suspected ingestions of acetaminophen. An evidence-based expert consensus process was used to create this guideline. This guideline applies to ingestion of acetaminophen alone and is based on an assessment of current scientific and clinical information. The expert consensus panel recognizes that specific patient care decisions may be at variance with this guideline and are the prerogative of the patient and the health professionals providing care. The panel's recommendations follow. These recommendations are provided in chronological order of likely clinical use. The grade of recommendation is provided in parentheses. 1) The initial history obtained by the specialist in poison information should include the patient's age and intent (Grade B), the specific formulation and dose of acetaminophen, the ingestion pattern (single or multiple), duration of ingestion (Grade B), and concomitant medications that might have been ingested (Grade D). 2) Any patient with stated or suspected self-harm or who is the recipient of a potentially malicious administration of acetaminophen should be referred to an emergency department immediately regardless of the amount ingested. This referral should be guided by local poison center procedures (Grade D). 3) Activated charcoal can be considered if local poison center policies support its prehospital use, a toxic dose of acetaminophen has been taken, and fewer than 2 hours have elapsed since the ingestion (Grade A). Gastrointestinal decontamination could be particularly important if acetylcysteine cannot be administered within 8 hours of ingestion. Acute, single, unintentional ingestion of acetaminophen: 1) Any patient with signs consistent with acetaminophen poisoning (e.g., repeated vomiting, abdominal tenderness in the right upper quadrant or mental status changes) should be referred to an emergency department for evaluation (Grade D). 2) Patients less than 6 years of age should be referred to an emergency department if the estimated acute ingestion amount is unknown or is 200 mg/kg or more. Patients can be observed at home if the dose ingested is less than 200 mg/kg (Grade B). 3) Patients 6 years of age or older should be referred to an emergency department if they have ingested at least 10 g or 200 mg/kg (whichever is lower) or when the amount ingested is unknown (Grade D). 4) Patients referred to an emergency department should arrive in time to have a stat serum acetaminophen concentration determined at 4 hours after ingestion or as soon as possible thereafter. If the time of ingestion is unknown, the patient should be referred to an emergency department immediately (Grade D). 5) If the initial contact with the poison center occurs more than 36 hours after the ingestion and the patient is well, the patient does not require further evaluation for acetaminophen toxicity (Grade D). Repeated supratherapeutic ingestion of acetaminophen (RSTI): 1) Patients under 6 years of age should be referred to an emergency department immediately if they have ingested: a) 200 mg/kg or more over a single 24-hour period, or b) 150 mg/kg or more per 24-hour period for the preceding 48 hours, or c) 100 mg/kg or more per 24-hour period for the preceding 72 hours or longer (Grade C). 2) Patients 6 years of age or older should be referred to an emergency department if they have ingested: a) at least 10 g or 200 mg/kg (whichever is less) over a single 24-hour period, or b) at least 6 g or 150 mg/kg (whichever is less) per 24-hour period for the preceding 48 hours or longer. In patients with conditions purported to increase susceptibility to acetaminophen toxicity (alcoholism, isoniazid use, prolonged fasting), the dose of acetaminophen considered as RSTI should be greater than 4 g or 100 mg/kg (whichever is less) per day (Grade D). 3) Gastrointestinal decontamination is not needed (Grade D). Other recommendations: 1) The out-of-hospital management of extended-release acetaminophen or multi-drug combination products containing acetaminophen is the same as an ingestion of acetaminophen alone (Grade D). However, the effects of other drugs might require referral to an emergency department in accordance with the poison center's normal triage criteria. 2) The use of cimetidine as an antidote is not recommended (Grade A).
BACKGROUND: Animal studies suggest that tricyclic antidepressant antibody fragments (TCA Fab) may be a useful therapy for tricyclic antidepressant poisoning. The objective of this study is to determine if TCA Fab increases total serum TCA levels without raising free serum TCA levels in human overdose patients, indicating that TCA Fab effectively binds TCA. METHODS: This was a prospective, dose escalation study of patients with mild to moderate TCA poisoning. Patients were treated with an escalating intravenous infusion totaling 7 or 14 gm of TCA Fab. The outcomes of interest were serum TCA levels (total and free), worsening of TCA toxicity, and adverse effects. RESULTS: Seven patients were treated with Fab. Infusion of TCA Fab was associated with a dramatic increase in total serum TCA levels, while free TCA levels fell in both dosing groups. There were no significant changes in QRS duration, heart rate or mean arterial pressure associated with the Fab Infusion. Worsening of TCA toxicity did not occur despite marked elevation of total serum TCA concentrations. The two patients with the greatest prolongation of QRS showed a prompt shortening in their QRS duration temporally associated with the Fab infusion. Mild wheezing was observed in one asthmatic patient. CONCLUSIONS: 1) TCA Fab raises total serum TCA levels while lowering free levels in TCA poisoned patients; 2) no toxic effects were associated with the increase in TCA levels and no severe adverse effects were observed during the hospital course following Fab infusion.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Although some antidotes are rarely used, they have an important, potentially life-saving role in the treatment of toxic exposures. The timely and judicious use of an antidote can prevent death and shorten hospitalization as well as reduce the patient's pain and suffering. Although their importance is recognized, sufficient stocking of antidotes remains a problem.
Sustained release (SR) formulations of paracetamol (acetaminophen) have been introduced in several countries to provide lasting pain relief and reduced risk of rebound pain. However, few studies have evaluated the safety of paracetamol SR formulations. To assess the available published safety data regarding SR formulations of paracetamol, the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were searched from 1980 to June 2003 for published worldwide human experience with paracetamol SR formulations. All publications that included any information about ingestion of any paracetamol SR formulation were systematically reviewed and abstracted by trained staff. The literature searches returned a total of 14 references containing safety data on paracetamol SR. In addition, the Toxic Exposure Surveillance System (TESS) of the American Association of Poison Control Centers (AAPCC) database was searched for human exposure cases. The TESS database yielded 3003 cases from 1994 to 2002 that involved a paracetamol SR product. The available information indicates that the adverse event and safety profile of paracetamol SR is very similar to immediate release (IR) formulations of paracetamol. During therapeutic use, minor effects such as gastrointestinal upset and headache may occur. The rate of these effects varies substantially among studies but overall does not appear to be different between the SR and IR formulations of paracetamol. Overdose with paracetamol SR is expected to cause liver injury similar to overdose with IR formulations. The number of human exposure cases has increased since introduction of the SR formulation; however, sales of the SR formulation amounted to 7.5% of all paracetamol sales but accounted for 2.5% of the cases reported to poison centres. There were two deaths recorded in the TESS database: both were the result of multiple drug ingestion. No cases of death or unusual types of toxicity have been described from an overdose of paracetamol SR alone.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Repeated supratherapeutic ingestion of acetaminophen is potentially lethal but poorly described. We provide the first prospective description of the characteristics, course, and outcome of patients with repeated supratherapeutic ingestion of acetaminophen. METHODS: This was a prospective case series of consecutive patients aged 12 years and older with acetaminophen dosage greater than 4 g per 24 hours referred to our poison center. Acetylcysteine was recommended if serum acetaminophen level exceeded 10 mg/L or aspartate aminotransferase exceeded 50 IU/L. Acetaminophen dosage, demographic factors, treatment, and outcome were recorded using standardized methods. Minimum follow-up was 72 hours. RESULTS: Of 277 patients eligible, 249 patients were enrolled. At presentation, serum aspartate aminotransferase levels less than 50 IU/L were found in 126 patients, aspartate aminotransferase levels of 50 to 1,000 IU/L were present in 47 patients, and aspartate aminotransferase levels were above 1,000 IU/L in 37 patients. No aspartate aminotransferase data were available for 39 patients. No patient with an aspartate aminotransferase level below 50 IU/L at presentation developed hepatotoxicity (aminotransferase >1,000 IU/L). Seven (15%) patients with aspartate aminotransferase levels of 50 to 1,000 IU/L at presentation subsequently developed hepatotoxicity; 1 patient died. Six (16%) patients with aspartate aminotransferase levels above 1,000 IU/L at presentation died or received liver transplants. Study limitations included recall bias, incomplete patient follow-up, and the assumption that absence of clinical signs indicated insignificant liver injury. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the injury caused by acetaminophen repeated supratherapeutic ingestion is apparent at presentation and related to dose magnitude and duration. All patients who developed hepatotoxicity presented with aspartate aminotransferase above 50 IU/L. Determination of serum aspartate aminotransferase and acetaminophen concentrations may allow early discharge from the emergency department.
A bite from a venomous snake is a medical emergency involving not only the affected site but also multiple organ systems. Rapid transport of a snakebite victim to a medical facility is paramount. Management decisions must be based on close clinical monitoring of the potentially erratic envenomation syndrome. Because of the many variables inherent in the management of snakebite victims, consultation with a physician specialist is recommended.
Traditionally, horse-serum-based antivenom has been used in the United States for North American crotaline snake evenomation. Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab (ovine) was approved in 2000 for use in mild to moderate envenomations. The manufacture recommends use within 6 h of envenomation. Published postmarketing retrospective reports describe its use up to 9 h after envenomation. We describe a case of effective use of FabAV 52 h after envenomation with resultant correction of coagulopathy and mild improvement of local symptoms.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.