Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Richard C Becker

Publications and source records attributed to Richard C Becker.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Effect of the novel direct factor Xa inhibitor DX-9065a on thrombin generation and inhibition among patients with stable atherosclerotic coronary artery disease.

INTRODUCTION: Thrombin, a pluripotential effector enzyme with prothrombotic, proinflammatory, and mitogenic properties, plays a pivotal role in the pathobiology and clinical expression of atherothrombotic coronary artery disease. Existing anticoagulant drugs have not been shown to attenuate thrombin generation or activity consistently. We sought to investigate the effect of DX-9065a on thrombin generation and inhibition in patients with stable CAD. DX-9065a is a small-molecule, synthetic, direct inhibitor of factor Xa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Peripheral venous blood samples were collected serially during and after administration of either placebo or 1 of 4 weight-adjusted regimens of DX-9065a, in 73 patients with stable CAD participating in the XaNADU-1B study. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: At baseline, the median (25th, 75th) prothrombin activation fragment 1.2 (F1.2) level was 2.56 (2.05, 3.20) nmol/L, and the median d-dimer level was 0.26 (0.19, 0.38) microg FEU/L. There were significant relationships between measured plasma DX-9065a concentrations and both F1.2 (4.9% decrease for each doubling of DX-9065a) (P<0.0001) and d-dimer (5.5% decrease for each doubling of DX-9065a) (P=0.001). F1.2 was suppressed (below baseline) at 96 h after administration of DX-9065a. Coronary thrombotic events did not occur during or after study drug administration. DX-9065a, the first in a class of small-molecule, direct, selective and reversible factor Xa inhibitors, reduces thrombin generation and fibrin formation among patients with stable CAD. The effect is concentration-dependent and persists for at least 96 h following drug cessation, without biochemical or clinical evidence of rebound.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation and a high risk of stroke are not being provided with adequate anticoagulation.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine both treatment gaps and predictors of warfarin use in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients enrolled in a national multicenter study. BACKGROUND: The National Anticoagulation Benchmark Outcomes Report (NABOR) is a performance improvement program designed to benchmark anticoagulation prophylaxis, treatment, and outcomes among participating hospitals. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of inpatients was performed at 21 teaching, 13 community, and 4 Veterans Administration hospitals in the U.S. Patients with an ICD-9-CM code for AF (427.31) were randomly selected. RESULTS: Among the 945 patients studied, the mean age was 71.5 (+/- 13.5) years; 43% were >75 years of age, 54.5% were men, and 67% had a history of hypertension. Most (86%) had factors that stratified them as at high risk of stroke, and only 55% of those received warfarin. Neither warfarin nor aspirin were prescribed in 21% of high-risk patients, including 18% of those with a previous stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolic event. Age >80 years (p = 0.008) and perceived bleeding risk (p = 0.022) were negative predictors of warfarin use. Persistent/permanent AF (p < 0.001) and history of stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolus (p = 0.014) were positive predictors of warfarin use, whereas high-risk stratification was not. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the under-use of warfarin, but also adds to published reports in several regards. It showed that risk stratification, the guidepost for treatment in international guidelines, had little effect on warfarin use, and that age >80 years and AF classification (permanent/persistent) are factors that influence warfarin use.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Antithrombotic therapy practices in US hospitals in an era of practice guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Antithrombotic therapy is efficacious for the prevention of thromboembolic disease, but it necessitates careful risk-benefit assessment. METHODS: Antithrombotic therapy data were retrospectively collected from inpatient medical records at 38 US hospitals. Patients treated for atrial fibrillation, acute myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism and patients given prophylaxis for total knee replacement, total hip replacement, or hip fracture surgery between July 1, 2000, and June 30, 2003, were randomly selected. RESULTS: The medical records of 3778 patients (53.3% men) were included. The mean patient age was 66.1 years. Of patients with atrial fibrillation at high risk for stroke, only 54.7% received warfarin sodium, and 20.6% received neither aspirin nor warfarin. Of patients with acute myocardial infarction, only 75.5% received aspirin on hospital arrival. After orthopedic surgery procedures, only 85.6% of patients received prophylaxis with a parenteral anticoagulant agent or warfarin. In 49.4% of patients with deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or both, unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin use was discontinued before an international normalized ratio of 2.0 or greater was achieved for 2 consecutive days. Patients with deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism were rarely discharged from the hospital with bridge therapy (an injectable anticoagulant agent plus warfarin), although the length of hospitalization was significantly shorter than if discharged taking warfarin alone (4.0 vs 8.1 days; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A significant percentage of hospitalized patients do not receive adequate antithrombotic therapy for the primary and secondary prevention of thromboembolic disease.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Identification, diagnosis and treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis: a registry of prolonged heparin use and thrombocytopenia among hospitalized patients with and without cardiovascular disease. The Complication After Thrombocytopenia Caused by Heparin (CATCH) Registry steering committee.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is estimated to occur in 1-5% of all patients receiving heparin, and 25-50% of such cases develop heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis (HITT) A conservative estimate based only on cardiovascular patients suggests that in the United States approximately 100,000 patients develop thrombocytopenia, and 25-50,000 develop HITT annually. Both HIT and HITT are associated with high morbidity and mortality and represent substantial worldwide public health concerns. REGISTRY DESIGN: The objective of the Complication After Thrombocytopenia Caused by Heparin (CATCH) Registry is to identify the incidence of HIT and/or HITT in patients treated with systemic heparin (unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin) in contemporary practice. Additional objectives include to: (1) provide a comprehensive database of patients with suspected HIT or HITT, (2) monitor and define clinical events, including thrombocytopenia, thrombosis, and mortality among patients treated with prolonged (> 96 hours) heparin, (3) describe the incidence and outcomes of HIT and HITT in patients who are treated with heparin and who develop thrombocytopenia in the Coronary Care Unit setting, and (4) document and characterize current diagnostic and therapeutic strategies of suspected HIT. The unblinded registry will record approximately 5,000 patients at 60-80 US hospitals with either prolonged systemic heparin administration or thrombocytopenia and those with suspected HIT or HITT. Enrollment began in the first quarter 2003 and was completed at the end of 2004. IMPLICATIONS: The registry will provide valuable insights to the incidence and consequences of HIT and HITT that will enable improvements in diagnosis and treatment.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗
PubMed2005

Biomarkers in atrial fibrillation: investigating biologic plausibility, cause, and effect.

Atrial fibrillation, an increasingly common arrhythmia whose prevalence will reach epidemic proportions over the next two decades, is characterized by atrial/atrial appendage inflammation, fibrosis, remodeling, and endocardial thrombosis. Biomarkers measured within the peripheral circulation reflect these pathobiologic events with evidence of heightened thrombin generation and activity, platelet activity, fibrin formation, endocardial injury, inflammatory mediator release, and reduced fibrinolytic potential Unfortunately, the correlation between traditional biomarkers and clinical events is weak at best, as is their ability to predict successful treatment (prevention of cardioembolism) with antithrombotic agents. Future efforts devoted to the investigation of cellular biomarkers will likely provide greater practical yield and insights concerning the development, diagnosis, prognosis, and management of atrial fibrillation.

Atrial Fibrillation↗