Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

Richard B Parad

Publications and source records attributed to Richard B Parad.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Parental Perspectives and Experiences with Genetic Testing and Surveillance for Cancer Predisposition in Healthy Young Children.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate parental experiences following diagnosis of a cancer predisposition syndrome (CPS) in childhood and to assess parental perspectives on population-based genomic newborn screening (gNBS) for CPS. STUDY DESIGN: Participants were guardians of children diagnosed with a CPS by age 8, for whom cancer surveillance was recommended, and who had no history of cancer before the CPS diagnosis. Participants completed a demographic survey, genetic knowledge assessment, and a semistructured qualitative interview. Thematic analysis was performed on interview transcripts. Clinical data were abstracted from medical records. RESULTS: We enrolled 25 parents of children with 7 different CPS, including Li-Fraumeni syndrome (43%), familial adenomatous polyposis (14%), nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome (11%), and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (11%). Parents characterized receiving a CPS diagnosis as emotionally challenging but also felt empowered by engagement in proactive cancer surveillance. They identified logistical, emotional, physical, and financial burdens of surveillance; however, most perceived that these burdens were outweighed by the medical and emotional advantages. The majority endorsed implementation of gNBS for pediatric cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS: Parents of presymptomatic children with a CPS experience both psychological distress and benefits following a genetic diagnosis. Despite the burdens of surveillance, parents express support for early genomic identification of cancer risk. These findings have implications for the care of children with CPS and inform implementation of population-based gNBS for CPS.

Humans

Operationalizing the Wilson-Jungner principles for the genomics era: Consensus recommendations from the International Consortium on Newborn Sequencing.

PURPOSE: For decades, the selection of disorders included in newborn screening (NBS) programs has been guided by principles published by Wilson and Jungner in 1968. As research explores the expansion of conditions included in NBS through genomic sequencing, there is a critical need for updated recommendations to address the opportunities and complexities of genomic data. METHODS: The International Consortium on Newborn Sequencing includes leaders from over 16 research projects investigating genomic NBS across the United Kingdom, Europe, United States, and Oceania. Consortium members were invited to participate in a modified Delphi study, aggregating opinion on the selection of conditions for genomic NBS through 3 rounds of online questionnaires, with feedback provided to participants between rounds. RESULTS: In round 1, 94 participants completed the questionnaire, and 10 of 43 statements reached consensus. In round 2, 81 participants completed the questionnaire, and 14 of 27 statements reached consensus. In round 3, 68 participants completed the questionnaire, and all 10 statements reached 72% or more consensus. CONCLUSION: The 10 consensus recommendations developed in this study can guide future research and public health programs performing genomic NBS. This process also identified key areas of participant discordance, highlighting important topics for future research.

Humans