Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Richard A Schatz

Publications and source records attributed to Richard A Schatz.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Early- and medium-term outcomes after paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation for sirolimus-eluting stent failure.

The optimal treatment for sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) restenosis is not known. This study evaluated the safety and clinical outcome of paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) implantation for SES restenosis. From March 2004 to July 2005, PESs were implanted in 125 patients with 140 lesions with SES restenosis. Acute and 6-month clinical outcomes were determined through review of the medical record and/or telephone interview. In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization) occurred in 14 patients (11.2%), driven entirely by postprocedure non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. At a mean clinical follow-up of 7.2 +/- 1.8 months, the incidence of target lesion revascularization (TLR) was 14.0%, and the rate of major adverse cardiac events was 17.2%. Subacute thrombosis occurred in 2 patients (1.6%). Length of PES implanted, postprocedure diameter stenosis, and total occlusion of the target lesion were independent predictors of TLR. In patients with de novo SES restenosis, TLR was only 8.7%. In conclusion, at medium-term follow-up, PES implantation for SES failure appears to be safe and effective, although efficacy is decreased in the setting of total occlusions, greater residual diameter stenosis, and longer PESs.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for de novo saphenous vein graft lesions.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients undergoing sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for de novo lesions within saphenous vein grafts (SVGs). Although the incidence of restenosis following sirolimus-eluting stenting (SES) of native coronary arteries is low, the efficacy of SES to treat de novo lesions within SVGs has not been well studied. A total of 35 patients underwent SES implantation of 39 lesions during 36 procedures. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 6 months following the index procedure. The mean bypass graft age was 10.1 +/- 6.5 years (range, 0-23 years). In-hospital major adverse cardiac events [death, myocardial infarction, thrombosis, or target vessel revascularization (TVR)] occurred in four patients (11%). Clinical follow-up was obtained in 100% of patients (mean follow-up, 7.5 +/- 2.2 months). There was one cardiac death, presumed due to stent thrombosis. TVR occurred in only two patients (6%). Myocardial infarction (MI) occurred in four patients (11%), all attributable to a nontarget vessel. The combined endpoint of death, MI, or TVR occurred in seven patients (20%). Freedom from death, nonfatal MI, thrombosis, or any revascularization was 65%. Early experience indicates sirolimus-eluting stents for de novo saphenous vein graft lesions have a low (6%) rate of clinically driven target vessel revascularization. By 7-month follow-up, event-free survival is limited primarily by disease in nontarget vessels.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Long-term (2-year) clinical events following transthoracic intramyocardial gene transfer of VEGF-2 in no-option patients.

BACKGROUND: The short-term clinical impact of intramyocardial gene transfer (GT) of the angiogenic protein vascular endothelial growth factor-2 (VEGF-2) has been previously reported to significantly reduce Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina class and to prolong exercise treadmill test (ETT) time. We describe the safety and long-term events (>1 year) in consecutive, nonrandomized, patients who received intramyocardial VEGF-2. METHODS: Thirty patients with intractable CCS class III or IV angina and no options for revascularization underwent direct intramyocardial GT of VEGF-2 naked DNA via limited thoracotomy at total doses of 0.2, 0.8, or 2.0 mg. Patients were followed for clinical events after 1 year by hospital records, follow-up visits or telephone contact. Due to one perioperative death, 29 patients were followed. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 751 +/- 102.5 days (range 459-959) there were four deaths (13.8%), five myocardial infarctions (MIs) (17.2%), and seven revascularization procedures (24.1%). There were 15 hospitalizations in 12 patients. At the end of the follow-up period no patient (0%) had CCS class IV angina, 3 patients (11.5%) had class III angina, and 23 (88.5%) had class I to II angina. There were two new diagnoses of cancer. CONCLUSION: Transthoracic intramyocardial injection of VEGF-2 is associated with an improvement of symptoms of angina in the majority of patients beyond the first year of treatment. Major clinical events such as death, MI, and repeat revascularization are uncommon during the first year but more frequent after 1 year at a rate consistent with the severity of underlying disease in this population with advanced atherosclerosis. The majority of events were the result of progression of disease in areas of the heart remote from the site of GT. A large randomized trial is planned to determine the efficacy of intramyocardial VEGF-2 injections in inoperable patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

One-year follow-up of direct myocardial gene transfer of vascular endothelial growth factor-2 using naked plasmid deoxyribonucleic acid by way of thoracotomy in no-option patients.

This phase I open label, dose-escalating study shows that gene transfer of vascular endothelial growth factor-2 naked deoxyribonucleic acid by direct myocardial injection by way of thoracotomy in patients with Canadian Cardiovascular Society class 3 or 4 angina is feasible and safe. The procedure is well tolerated, with few major adverse cardiac events at 1 year, and without complications directly related to gene expression. In this prospective, nonblinded study, the procedure is associated with clinical improvement; however, there was no angiographic evidence of angiogenesis and there is a great potential for a sham or placebo effect in the study patients. A randomized phase III trial is underway that will help determine the efficacy of vascular endothelial growth factor-2 gene transfer in "no-option" patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Pilot trial of oral rapamycin for recalcitrant restenosis.

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus-coated stents are a promising new therapy for restenosis. We treated a select group of patients at especially high risk for restenosis with oral sirolimus. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were treated with an oral sirolimus-loading dose of 6 mg after coronary angioplasty, followed by 2 mg/d for 4 weeks. Serum electrolytes, lipid profile, renal panel, and complete blood cell count were measured at 1, 3, and 5 weeks after drug initiation. Oral sirolimus was prescribed to 22 patients who had a total of 28 lesions and were at high risk for restenosis. Of the 22 study patients, 11 (50%) discontinued oral sirolimus early because of side effects or laboratory abnormalities. Hypertriglyceridemia and leukopenia were the most frequent adverse events, occurring in 3 patients each. All adverse drug effects were reversible after discontinuation. Follow-up was obtained in 100% of patients at a mean of 9.9+/-1.8 months, ranging from 6.5 to 11.8 months. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) occurred in 15 of 28 lesions (53.6%) and 13 of 22 patients (59.1%). There was no difference in TLR for patients receiving a complete course of sirolimus (n=8; 72.7%) compared with patients who terminated treatment prematurely (n=5; 45.5%; P=NS). Clinically driven repeat cardiac catheterization was obtained in 15 (68.2%) patients; restenosis (>50% diameter stenosis at follow-up) was present in 13 (86.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Oral sirolimus does not appear to provide benefit to patients with recalcitrant restenosis. Adverse drug effects are frequent, underscoring the importance of local drug delivery to achieve high tissue concentrations without systemic adverse drug effects.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2002

Five-year clinical follow-up after intracoronary radiation: results of a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Several clinical trials indicate that intracoronary radiation is safe and effective for treatment of restenotic coronary arteries. We previously reported 6-month and 3-year clinical and angiographic follow-up demonstrating significant decreases in target lesion revascularization (TLR) and angiographic restenosis after gamma radiation of restenotic lesions. The objective of this study was to document the clinical outcome 5 years after treatment of restenotic coronary arteries with catheter-based iridium-192 (192Ir). METHODS AND RESULTS: A double-blind, randomized trail compared 192Ir to placebo sources in patients with restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Over a 9-month period, 55 patients were enrolled; 26 were randomized to 192Ir and 29 to placebo. At 5-year follow-up, TLR was significantly lower in the 192Ir group (23.1% versus 48.3%; P=0.05). There were 2 TLRs between years 3 and 5 in patients in the 192Ir group and none in patients in the placebo group. The 5-year event-free survival rate (freedom from death, myocardial infarction, or TLR) was greater in 192Ir-treated patients (61.5% versus 34.5%; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Despite apparent mitigation of efficacy over time, there remains a significant reduction in TLR at 5 years and an improvement in event-free survival in patients treated with intracoronary 192Ir. The early clinical benefits after intracoronary gamma radiation with 192Ir seem durable at 5-year clinical follow-up.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Phase 1/2 placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-escalating trial of myocardial vascular endothelial growth factor 2 gene transfer by catheter delivery in patients with chronic myocardial ischemia.

BACKGROUND: This phase 1/2 study investigated the safety of percutaneous catheter-based gene transfer of naked plasmid DNA encoding for vascular endothelial growth factor 2 (phVEGF2) to left ventricular (LV) myocardium in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating study of inoperable patients with class III or IV angina. METHODS AND RESULTS: A steerable deflectable 8F catheter with a 27-gauge needle at its distal tip was advanced percutaneously to the endocardial surface of the LV in 19 patients (age, 61+/-2 years) with chronic myocardial ischemia who were not candidates for conventional revascularization. Patients were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive 6 injections (total volume, 6.0 mL) of placebo or phVEGF2 in doses of 200 microg (n=9), 800 microg (n=9), or 2000 microg (n=1) guided by LV electromechanical (NOGA) mapping with a gene-to-placebo ratio of 2:1. A total of 114 LV injections were delivered and caused no hemodynamic alterations, sustained ventricular arrhythmias, ECG evidence of infarction, or ventricular perforation. End-point analysis at 12 weeks disclosed a statistically significant improvement in Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina class in phVEGF2-treated versus placebo-treated patients (-1.3 versus -0.1, P=0.04). Remaining efficacy end points--including change in exercise duration (91.8 versus 3.9 seconds), functional improvement by > or =2 CCS classes (9 of 12 versus 1 of 6), and Seattle Angina Questionnaire data--all showed strong trends favoring efficacy of phVEGF2 versus placebo treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This phase 1/2, double-blind, randomized trial provides preliminary data that support safety of phVEGF2 catheter-mediated myocardial gene transfer. The statistically significant reduction in anginal class and strong positive trends for remaining end points suggest that a larger phase 2/3 trial is warranted.

Angina Pectoris↗
PubMed2002

Coronary intervention in the diabetic patient: improved outcome following stent implantation compared with balloon angioplasty.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic patients undergoing coronary interventional procedures are at increased risk of restenosis and adverse clinical events. The relative impact of stents compared with balloon angioplasty on the outcome of percutaneous intervention in diabetics remains controversial. HYPOTHESIS: The goal of this study was to determine whether stent placement was superior to balloon angioplasty in reducing restenosis of diabetic patients undergoing coronary intervention. METHODS: The STRESS Trial was a prospective randomized comparison of stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of new native coronary lesions. Of 594 randomized patients. 92 (16%) were diabetic. In this substudy analysis of the STRESS Trial, the outcomes after stenting and balloon angioplasty in diabetic patients were compared. The primary endpoint was restenosis as determined by angiography at 6 months. Clinical outcomes at 1 year were assessed. RESULTS: Procedural success was achieved in 82% of diabetic patients assigned to angioplasty and in 100% assigned to stenting (p < 0.01). Compared with angioplasty, stenting resulted in a larger postprocedural lumen diameter (2.34 +/- 0.44 vs. 1.87 +/- 0.52 mm, p < 0.001) and greater acute luminal gain (1.61 +/- 0.47 vs. 1.06 +/- 0.46 mm, p < 0.001). At 6 months, stenting conferred a larger lumen (1.69 +/- 0.57 vs. 1.38 +/- 0.60 mm, p = 0.03) and greater net luminal gain (0.97 +/- 0.55 vs. 0.52 +/- 0.52 mm, p < 0.001). Restenosis occurred in 60% of the angioplasty group and in 24% of the stent group (p < 0.01). This was accompanied by a lower need for repeat target vessel revascularization after stenting (31 vs. 13%, p < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with balloon angioplasty, stent placement in diabetic patients with focal de novo lesions resulted in superior procedural results, reduced restenosis, and improved clinical outcome with fewer repeat revascularization procedures.

Angioplasty, Balloon↗