Biomedical subjects

Ranjan Batra

Publications and source records attributed to Ranjan Batra.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Responses of neurons in the ventral nucleus of the lateral lemniscus to sinusoidally amplitude modulated tones.

Fluctuations in the amplitude of a sound play an important role in our perception of pitch and acoustic space, but their neural analysis has not been fully elucidated. The ventral nucleus of the lateral lemniscus (VNLL) has been implicated in the processing of such temporal features of a sound. This study examines responses of neurons in the VNLL of unanesthetized rabbits to sinusoidally amplitude modulated tones, a type of stimulus that has often been used to investigate encoding of temporal information. Modulation transfer functions of responses were calculated in two ways: based on discharge rates (rMTFs) and on synchronization to the envelope (tMTFs). Among the variety of rMTFs, two types were readily identifiable: flat and band-pass. The responses of neurons exhibiting these types of rMTF differed in several ways. Neurons with flat rMTFs typically had moderate rates of spontaneous activity, sustained responses to short tone bursts, and low-pass or band-pass tMTFs. Neurons with band-pass rMTFs typically had low spontaneous activity, onset responses to short tone bursts, and flat tMTFs. The vast majority synchronized strongly to the modulation envelope. The best modulation frequencies of neurons with band-pass rMTFs extended from 14 to 283 Hz. The presence of neurons with band-pass rMTFs in the VNLL suggests that this nucleus plays a role in converting the temporal code for modulation frequency used in lower structures into a rate-based code for use higher in the auditory pathway. The substantial number of neurons with more complex modulation transfer functions indicates that the VNLL has other functions.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2005

Sensitivity to interaural time differences in the dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus of the unanesthetized rabbit: comparison with other structures.

Interaural time differences, a cue for azimuthal sound location, are first encoded in the superior olivary complex (SOC), and this information is then conveyed to the dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus (DNLL) and inferior colliculus (IC). The DNLL provides a strong inhibitory input to the IC and may serve to transform the coding of interaural time differences (ITDs) in the IC. Consistent with the projections from the SOC, the DNLL and IC had similar distributions of peak- and trough-type neurons, characteristic delays, and best ITDs. The ITD tuning widths of DNLL neurons were intermediate between those of the SOC and IC. Further sharpening is seen in the auditory thalamus, indicating that sharpening mechanisms are not restricted to the midbrain. The proportion of neurons that phase-locked to the tones delivered to each ear progressively decreased from the SOC to the auditory thalamus. The degree of phase-locking for a large majority of DNLL neurons was too weak to support their involvement in processing monaural inputs to generate a sensitivity to ITDs. The response rates of DNLL neurons were on average approximately 60% greater than in the IC or SOC, indicating that the inhibitory input provided to the IC by the DNLL is robust.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2004

Cross correlation by neurons of the medial superior olive: a reexamination.

Initial analysis of interaural temporal disparities (ITDs), a cue for sound localization, occurs in the superior olivary complex. The medial superior olive (MSO) receives excitatory input from the left and right cochlear nuclei. Its neurons are believed to be coincidence detectors, discharging when input arrives simultaneously from the two sides. Many current psychophysical models assume a strict version of coincidence, in which neurons of the MSO cross correlate their left and right inputs. However, there have been few tests of this assumption. Here we examine data derived from two earlier studies of the MSO and compare the responses to the output of a computational model. We find that the MSO is not an ideal cross correlator. Ideal cross correlation implies a strict relationship between the precision of phase-locking of the inputs and the range of ITDs to which a neuron responds. This relationship does not appear to be met. Instead, the modeling implies that a neuron responds over a wider range of ITDs than expected from the inferred precision of phase-locking of the inputs. The responses are more consistent with a scheme in which the neuron can also be activated by the input from one side alone. Such activation degrades the tuning of neurons in the MSO to ITDs.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2003

Topography of interaural temporal disparity coding in projections of medial superior olive to inferior colliculus.

Neurons in the medial superior olive encode interaural temporal disparity, and their receptive fields indicate the location of a sound source in the azimuthal plane. It is often assumed that the projections of these neurons transmit the receptive field information about azimuth from point to point, much like the projections of the retina to the brain transmit the position of a visual stimulus. Yet this assumption has never been verified. Here, we use physiological and anatomical methods to examine the projections of the medial superior olive to the inferior colliculus for evidence of a spatial topography that would support transmission of azimuthal receptive fields. The results show that this projection does not follow a simple point-to-point topographical map of receptive field location. Thus, the representation of sound location along the azimuth in the inferior colliculus most likely relies on a complex, nonlinear map.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2002

Transformations in processing interaural time differences between the superior olivary complex and inferior colliculus: beyond the Jeffress model.

Interaural time differences (ITDs) are used to localize sounds and improve signal detection in noise. Encoding ITDs in neurons depends on specialized mechanisms for comparing inputs from the two ears. Most studies have emphasized how the responses of ITD-sensitive neurons are consistent with the tenets of the Jeffress model. The Jeffress model uses neuronal coincidence detectors that compare inputs from both sides and delay lines so that different neurons achieve coincidence at different ITDs. Although Jeffress-type models are successful at predicting sensitivity to ITDs in humans, in many respects they are a limited representation of the responses seen in neurons. In the superior olivary complex (SOC), ITD-sensitive neurons are distributed across both the medial (MSO) and lateral (LSO) superior olives. Similar response types are found in neurons sensitive to ITDs in two signal types: low-frequency sounds and envelopes of high-frequency sounds. Excitatory-excitatory interactions in the MSO are associated with peak-type responses, and excitatory-inhibitory interactions in the LSO are associated with trough-type responses. There are also neurons with responses intermediate between peak- and trough-type. In the inferior colliculus (IC), the same basic types remain, presumably due to inputs arising from the MSO and LSO. Using recordings from the SOC and IC, we describe how the response types can be described within a continuum that extends to very large values of ITD, and compare the functional organization at the two levels.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2002

Monaural and binaural processing in the ventral nucleus of the lateral lemniscus: a major source of inhibition to the inferior colliculus.

The ventral nucleus of the lateral lemniscus (VNLL) is a major source of input to the inferior colliculus. This paper reviews recent studies of neural responses in the VNLL of the unanesthetized rabbit. The VNLL has generally been viewed as a monaural nucleus, with its neurons responding primarily to stimulation of the contralateral ear. In the rabbit, the VNLL is divided into a medial division (VNLLm) comprising neurons intercalated in the medial limb of the lemniscus, a compact lateral division (VNLLl), and a dorsal division. The VNLLm contains an abundance of neurons sensitive to interaural temporal disparities (ITDs), one of the major binaural cues for sound localization. These neurons respond only at the onset of tones, and therefore appear to encode the ITDs of transients. Even in the VNLLl, many neurons are sensitive to binaural stimulation. The VNLLl contains a variety of neurons with different discharge patterns, the two most common of which are sustained and onset. The discharge patterns, frequency-tuning and dynamic ranges of VNLLl neurons indicate that this division is able to supply the inferior colliculus with a variety of inputs, each serving a different function in the analysis of sound.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2002

Processing of interaural temporal disparities in the medial division of the ventral nucleus of the lateral lemniscus.

The medial division of the ventral nucleus of the lateral lemniscus (VNLLm) contains a specialized population of neurons that is sensitive to interaural temporal disparities (ITDs), a potent cue for sound localization along the azimuth. Unlike many ITD-sensitive neurons elsewhere in the auditory system, neurons in the VNLLm respond only at the onset of tones. An onset response may be significant for behavior because, under echoic conditions, tones require sharp onsets for accurate localization. In contrast, noise can generally be localized even with gradual onsets, presumably because transients occur at random intervals in noise. We recorded responses of neurons in the VNLLm to tones and noise in unanesthetized rabbits. We found that although tones elicited a transient response, noise elicited a sustained response as if it was a sequence of transients. The responses to tones indicate that these neurons represent a secondary stage in the processing of ITDs. The onset response to tones was only weakly synchronized to the phase of the tone, indicating that neurons in the VNLLm inherit their sensitivity to ITDs from their inputs. The latencies were short (~8 ms), implying that the ITD sensitivity is derived from ascending inputs. Most neurons in the VNLLm discharged maximally at the same ITD at all frequencies, a characteristic shared with neurons of the medial superior olive. However, the latency of neurons in the VNLLm to interaurally delayed stimuli is linked strongly to the timing of the contralateral stimulus. This suggests that these neurons receive a suprathreshold, contralateral input that is modulated by a subthreshold input conveying information about ITDs. Other stations in the auditory pathway contain a subset of neurons that respond transiently to tones and are sensitive to ITDs. These neurons may represent a novel pathway that assists in localizing sounds in the presence of reflections.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2002

Sources of the scalp-recorded amplitude-modulation following response.

The scalp-recorded amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR) is gaining recognition as an objective audiometric tool, but little is known about the neural sources that underlie this potential. We hypothesized, based on our human studies and single-unit recordings in animals, that the scalp-recorded AMFR reflects the interaction of multiple sources. We tested this hypothesis using an animal model, the unanesthetized rabbit. We compared AMFRs recorded from the surface of the brain at different locations and before and after the administration of agents likely to enhance or suppress neural generators. We also recorded AMFRs locally at several stations along the auditory neuraxis. We conclude that the surface-recorded AMFR is indeed a composite response from multiple brain generators. Although the response at any modulation frequency can reflect the activity of more than one generator, the AMFRs to low and high modulation frequencies appear to reflect a strong contribution from cortical and subcortical sources, respectively.

Acoustic Stimulation↗