Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

Rachel Williams

Publications and source records attributed to Rachel Williams.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Polymerase-inhibitor drug synergy and mutational signatures in different epithelial cell models of RSVA and hPIV3 infection.

Despite the huge global health burden presented by respiratory viruses, effective broad-spectrum antiviral therapeutic options remain limited. Here we evaluated the antiviral activity of four RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) inhibitors, remdesivir, ribavirin, favipiravir, and molnupiravir, as monotherapy or dual-drug combinations against respiratory syncytial virus (subtype A, RSVA) and human parainfluenza (serotype 3, hPIV3) using epithelial cell lines and primary human airway culture models. Remdesivir showed the greatest potency across both viruses, while ribavirin and favipiravir also demonstrated inhibition. Molnupiravir was active against RSVA but not hPIV3. Several dual-drug combinations, including remdesivir-favipiravir, remdesivir-molnupiravir and favipiravir-molnupiravir, produced marked synergy against RSVA, and more limited synergy for hPIV3. Antiviral efficacy was validated in primary airway epithelial cultures, where effective concentrations preserved epithelial integrity and attenuated viral disruption of ciliary function. Across both viruses, increasing antiviral exposure was associated with dose-dependent signature mutagenesis. Antivirals induced significantly higher RSVA mutation burden in the primary airway model. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of RdRp inhibitor combinations for RSVA and hPIV3, provide mechanistic insight through antiviral-related mutational signatures, and demonstrate advantages of the primary human airway culture model for development of effective multi-drug regimens and broad-spectrum antiviral preparedness.

Journal Article

Impact of BRCA1/2 status on young women's sexual function, relationships, and reproduction after predictive genetic testing.

The experiences and outcomes for women identified with a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant during young adulthood are qualitatively described but not well quantified. This study investigated the impact of BRCA1/2 status on women's reproduction, intimate partner relationships, and sexual functioning. Australian women aged 18-40 years who had predictive BRCA1/2 testing, received either a positive or negative result, and had no personal cancer history, completed an online survey that used a case-control design. Outcome measures included childbearing, use of reproductive technologies, relationship status, and sexual functioning. 579 women participated (62.0% with a BRCA1/2 PV; 38.0% without a BRCA1/2 PV). More women with a BRCA1/2 PV had children compared to those who did not (49.0% c.f., 40.5%; p = 0.045). BRCA1/2 status did not predict whether women were partnered at survey completion (Odds Ratio 1.20; 95% CI 0.80, 1.78) or their sexual functioning over the previous month (β-coefficient -0.08; 95% CI -1.15, 0.98). Women with a BRCA1/2 PV were more likely to have children after genetic testing (OR 1.83: 95% CI 1.05, 3.21) and were more likely to have a greater number of children after genetic testing (β-coefficient 0.41; 95% CI 0.10, 0.73) compared to women without a BRCA1/2 PV, after adjustment for confounders. Receiving a positive predictive BRCA1/2 result is associated with an increased likelihood of childbearing and having a greater number of children compared to receiving a negative predictive BRCA1/2 result. These findings contribute to the evidence base to inform long-term follow-up for women after predictive BRCA1/2 testing.

Humans

Effectiveness of rapid SARS-CoV-2 genome sequencing in supporting infection control for hospital-onset COVID-19 infection: Multicentre, prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Viral sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 has been used for outbreak investigation, but there is limited evidence supporting routine use for infection prevention and control (IPC) within hospital settings. METHODS: We conducted a prospective non-randomised trial of sequencing at 14 acute UK hospital trusts. Sites each had a 4-week baseline data collection period, followed by intervention periods comprising 8 weeks of 'rapid' (<48 hr) and 4 weeks of 'longer-turnaround' (5-10 days) sequencing using a sequence reporting tool (SRT). Data were collected on all hospital-onset COVID-19 infections (HOCIs; detected &#x2265;48 hr from admission). The impact of the sequencing intervention on IPC knowledge and actions, and on the incidence of probable/definite hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 2170 HOCI cases were recorded from October 2020 to April 2021, corresponding to a period of extreme strain on the health service, with sequence reports returned for 650/1320 (49.2%) during intervention phases. We did not detect a statistically significant change in weekly incidence of HAIs in longer-turnaround (incidence rate ratio 1.60, 95% CI 0.85-3.01; p=0.14) or rapid (0.85, 0.48-1.50; p=0.54) intervention phases compared to baseline phase. However, IPC practice was changed in 7.8 and 7.4% of all HOCI cases in rapid and longer-turnaround phases, respectively, and 17.2 and 11.6% of cases where the report was returned. In a 'per-protocol' sensitivity analysis, there was an impact on IPC actions in 20.7% of HOCI cases when the SRT report was returned within 5 days. Capacity to respond effectively to insights from sequencing was breached in most sites by the volume of cases and limited resources. CONCLUSIONS: While we did not demonstrate a direct impact of sequencing on the incidence of nosocomial transmission, our results suggest that sequencing can inform IPC response to HOCIs, particularly when returned within 5 days. FUNDING: COG-UK is supported by funding from the Medical Research Council (MRC) part of UK Research & Innovation (UKRI), the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) (grant code: MC_PC_19027), and Genome Research Limited, operating as the Wellcome Sanger Institute. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT04405934.

Humans