Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R W Valachovic

Publications and source records attributed to R W Valachovic.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Trends in allied dental education: an analysis of the past and a look to the future.

Allied dental healthcare providers have been an integral part of the dental team since the turn of the 19th century. Like dental education, allied dental education's history includes a transition from apprenticeships and proprietary school settings to dental schools and community and technical colleges. There are currently 258 dental assisting programs, 255 dental hygiene programs, and 28 dental laboratory technology programs according to the American Dental Association's Commission on Dental Accreditation. First-year enrollment increased 9.5 percent in dental hygiene education from 1994/95 to 1998/99, while enrollment in dental assisting programs declined 7 percent and declined 31 percent in dental laboratory technology programs during the same period. Program capacity exceeds enrollment in all three areas of allied dental education. Challenges facing allied dental education include addressing the dental practicing community's perception of a shortage of dental assistants and dental hygienists and increasing pressure for career tracks that do not require education in ADA Commission on Dental Accreditation accredited programs. The allied dental workforce may also be called upon for innovative approaches to improve access to oral health care and reduce oral health care disparities. In addition, allied dental education programs may face challenges in recruiting faculty with the desired academic credentials. ADEA is currently pursuing initiatives in these and other areas to address the current and emerging needs of allied dental education.

Credentialing↗

ADEA annual survey of clinic fees and revenue: 1998-1999 academic year.

The American Dental Education Association's 1998-1999 Survey of Clinic Fees and Revenue obtained data by which to report, by school, clinic revenue information per undergraduate student. Fifty of the fifty-five U.S. dental schools responded to the survey. The median revenue per third-year student was $6,313. It was $11,680 for fourth-year students. Clinic revenue data was also obtained by type of postdoctoral program. The postdoctoral general dentistry programs had the highest per student clinic revenues, at over $59,000 per AEGD student and almost $35,000 per student of GPR programs. Other areas of the survey provided information regarding clinic fees by type of program, levels of uncompensated care by type of program, clinic revenue by source of payment, and dental school fees as a percent of usual and customary private practice fees.

Dental Clinics↗

Dental school vacant budgeted faculty positions: academic year 2000 - 2001.

The 1999 Report of the AADS President's Task Force on the Future of Dental School Faculty (1) drew attention to the situation dental schools are experiencing in attracting and retaining faculty. A year 2000 ADEA Association Report on faculty shortages indicated the number of vacant budgeted positions was approaching 400 (2). The year 2000 - 2001 ADEA survey of vacant budgeted positions indicates a further four percent increase in vacant budgeted positions. Over 73 percent of the vacancies were in the clinical sciences. Of identified full time faculty separations in the 2000-2001 ADEA Survey of Dental Educators (3), almost 34 percent were due to retirements; 33 percent were faculty moves to other schools; and a little over 18 percent were moves to enter private practice. Almost three percent of identified faculty separations were from deaths. It is anticipated that, with a further "graying" of an already aged dental school faculty, retirements will further exacerbate the problem of faculty vacancies and the ability to attract and retain new faculty. There is needed urgency in implementing strategies and recommendations provided in the 1999 President's Report and the 2000 Association Report.

Age Factors↗

Dental school faculty shortages increase: an update on future dental school faculty.

The 1999 publication of the American Association of Dental Schools (AADS) President s Task Force on Future Dental School Faculty revealed a crisis in the shortages of dental school faculty. Stakeholders from around the nation have used the AADS Task Force report to address the crisis. In addressing one of the AADS Task Force recommendations, the American Dental Education Association (ADEA), formerly AADS, gathered additional data through a new survey of dental school deans to elucidate the current state of faculty shortages. Based on this research, ADEA projects that the number of unfilled budgeted faculty positions in U.S. dental schools now approaches 400. Survey respondents identified retirement as the leading reason for full-time faculty separations, while separation to enter private practice was the second most frequent reason for leaving the institution. Offering a salary competitive with that of private practice was identified as the most critical factor in recruiting future faculty. A number of short and long-range strategies to recruit and retain faculty are presented. Ultimately, the dental school faculty shortage places in jeopardy the general and oral health of the public.

Budgets↗

U.S. dental school applicants and enrollees: a ten year perspective.

Applications to dental schools increased throughout the 1990s until 1997. In 1998 this pattern reversed, and the number of dental school applicants has dropped each year since that time and continues to decline through the application cycle for the 2001-2002 first-year class. Possible reasons for the decline in applications include an abundance of financially rewarding career opportunities fueled by the robust U.S. economy, a reluctance by college students to assume more educational debt, an unfavorable view of healthcare careers in the light of managed care and declining federal reimbursement, and assumptions about the difficulty of gaining admittance to dental school given the high academic achievement of those who have been admitted in recent years. A national decline in the applicant pool does not necessarily translate into a decline for any given dental school. The quality of applicants, judged by grade point averages and Dental Admissions Test scores, is high. Nevertheless, the recent drop in dental school applicants is a cause for concern. Because recruitment must be approached as a process that takes years to yield results, stakeholders in dental education need to sustain vigorous recruiting efforts even in the best of times.

Career Choice↗

An association perspective: responding to the American Dental Association's future of dentistry project.

In response to the American Dental Association's (ADA) Future of Dentistry Project, the American Dental Education Association (ADEA) provided its perspective on the most critical issues facing the dental profession. ADEA responded in six areas, each corresponding to the areas of focus in the ADA project. The comments in this Association Report reflect those provided to the six panels conducting the project.

American Dental Association↗

Report of the ADEA president's task force on the Surgeon General's report on oral health. American Dental Education Association.

In response to the first-ever Surgeon General's report on oral health, released on May 25, 2000, ADEA President Rowland A. Hutchinson, D.D.S., M.S., appointed a task force to study the report from the perspective of dental education. The task force was charged with making recommendations to the ADEA Board of Directors as to the Association's message to members and the general public, the Association's role in addressing oral health disparities, the legislative and policy implications of the report, and areas of collaboration between ADEA and others in the dental and health professions. The task force reviewed the report and made five recommendations, including increasing public awareness of the report's messages, promoting collaborative activities with a goal of improving America's oral health, and providing leadership in the drive to promote the incorporation of new science in dental education. The task force also identified numerous ADEA initiatives that address issues related to the Surgeon General's report.

Community-Institutional Relations↗

Making science clinically relevant.

Clinical practice requires a sound foundation in the basic and clinical sciences. However, the traditional dental curriculum often separates the two in a variety of ways that reduce their integration. The basic sciences are commonly taught in the first two years by a basic science faculty with inconsistent integration with clinical dental practice. The clinical sciences are often taught by faculty who may not be actively involved in research-related activities. The curriculum is dense and is difficult to modify to adapt to evolving scientific discovery and application. The 1995 IOM report focuses much of its attention on these issues. The Harvard School of Dental Medicine has dramatically modified its curriculum twice in the recent past to more closely integrate the basic and clinical sciences and to promote the clinical relevance of the basic sciences. The class entering in 1980 began a five-year D.M.D. program that was designed to decompress the curriculum and increase experiences that enhance scientific and clinical integration. The class entering in 1994 initiated a four-year program that uses a problem-based learning design throughout the entire curriculum. Strategies for integrating the clinical and the basic sciences along with research training and experience were developed and implemented in both programs.

Clinical Competence↗

The regulation of dental licensing: the dark ages?

Current state laws regulating the licensure of dentists place severe restrictions upon the freedom of movement of practitioners. Most state laws were enacted during a period when a strong rationale for regulating public health and welfare existed. Today, these laws hamper the free movement of dentists and are anachronisms in an era of national standards and practices. The authors contend that the extant laws rest upon outdated assumptions and serve economic and protectionist goals rather than public health and safety. This Article examines the history and application of the traditional justifications for state licensure and their present ramifications. The authors suggest that replacing the current regulatory system with a national clinical examination and a national licensure program will best serve the interests of the public and the dental profession.

Dental Care↗

Dentofacial development in long-term survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. A comparison of three treatment modalities.

Ninety-seven children who were diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia before 10 years of age and treated with chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy plus 1800-cGy cranial irradiation (RT), or chemotherapy plus 2400-cGy RT were evaluated for effects of therapy on dentofacial development. All patients were seen at least 5 years postdiagnosis. Dental abnormalities were determined from panoramic radiographs, and craniofacial evaluations were made from lateral cephalometric radiographs. Ninety-one (94%) of all patients and 41 (100%) of patients younger than 5 years of age at diagnosis had abnormal dental development. The severity of these abnormalities was greater in children who received treatment before 5 years of age and in those who received RT. Observed dental abnormalities included tooth agenesis, arrested root development, microdontia, and enamel dysplasias. Craniofacial abnormalities occurred in 18 of 20 (90%) of those patients who received chemotherapy plus 2400-cGy RT before 5 years of age. Mean cephalometric values of this group showed significant deficient mandibular development. The results of this study suggest that the severity of dentofacial-developmental abnormalities secondary to antileukemia therapy are related to the age of the patient at the initiation of treatment and the use of cranial RT.

Adolescent↗

Statistical methods for comparing dental diagnostic procedures.

In dental diagnosis, there are typically two or more clinical diagnostic procedures which may be used either independently or jointly to reach a conclusion regarding the presence of a particular disease in a patient. To determine which of these diagnostic procedures are more accurate, statistical methods may be applied to research data in which the true health status as well as the diagnosis provided by each clinical procedure are available on each observation. Results arising from this type of analysis can be of great interest to clinicians when the diagnostic procedures themselves are costly, painful, or even potentially harmful to the patient. Considered here is the special situation encountered in dental research in which each patient can have multiple concurrent cases of a certain disease such as caries, for then the statistical evaluation of diagnostic procedures is even further complicated. This report describes several statistical approaches for comparing the efficacy of diagnostic tests and illustrates their application on data from a study of diagnostic radiographs for dental caries.

Adult↗

Efficacy of dental radiographic practices: options for image receptors, examination selection, and patient selection.

Many technical factors and treatment philosophies affect the way dental radiology is practiced. Some, like minimum tube filtration, are legislated. Others, like proper darkroom techniques, are universally acknowledged as essential. Still others, like the selection of an image receptor and the selection of the type of examination, are the subject of much discussion and debate. This article addresses some of the more controversial options and choices facing dental practitioners by reviewing the standard assessment techniques available to help make appropriate decisions, by summarizing and analyzing available data, and by offering recommendations for practice.

Efficiency↗

Clinical indicators of radiographically detectable dental diseases in the adult patient.

A comprehensive analysis of the relationship between clinical observations in dental patients without symptoms and oral disease as detected by full-mouth and panoramic dental radiographs in a large population of patients has never been reported. Knowledge of these relationships is necessary in the design of a diagnostic decision process (clinical algorithm) that can predict which patients require dental radiographs for the diagnosis of dental caries or periodontal disease to be confirmed or refined. An accurate clinical algorithm could reduce the number of radiographs that are taken of certain routinely seen dental patients without symptoms, thus reducing unnecessary exposure x-radiation as well as potentially reducing health care costs for these patients. A sample of 602 adult men on whom a complete series of panoramic, posterior bitewing, and periapical dental radiographs and an independent oral examination were performed provided the opportunity to evaluate the relationship between clinically observed oral disease indicators and independent radiographic evidence of dental caries and periodontal disease. The analysis suggests that combinations of several clinical indicators can predict with some success which patients without symptoms will benefit most from oral radiographs. The presence of several carious lesions on oral examination was the best predictor of radiographic detection of dental caries. Clinical indicators tht appear to predict radiographic evidence of periodontal disease are clinical measures of pocket depth, mobility, and the patient's denture status. An important finding is that because of the high prevalence of gingivitis and plaque, these indicators were not related to radiographic evidence of periodontal disease.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

Longitudinal radiographic analysis of carious lesion progression.

Information on the rate at which carious lesions progress through the enamel of human teeth in an adult population was obtained from dental radiographs taken at 3-yr intervals, over a 10-yr period on 602 men. Clinical measures of calculus deposition, plaque accumulation, gingival inflammation, tooth mobility, periodontal pocket depth, and gingival recession were studied to find predictors that might be of value to the clinician for determining how frequently radiographs should be taken. We estimate that 50% of the enamel lesions on mesial and distal surfaces, if left untreated, would not progress into the dentin until 73 months had elapsed after the lesion was initiated. Significant differences in the progression rate were associated with the arch and tooth type. Patient age, number of decayed or filled surfaces, degree of gingival inflammation, amount of recession, and plaque accumulation were positively associated with more rapid caries progression, while greater numbers of teeth present were predictive of slower disease progression.

Adult↗