Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R W Byhardt

Publications and source records attributed to R W Byhardt.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Phase III trial of androgen suppression using goserelin in unfavorable-prognosis carcinoma of the prostate treated with definitive radiotherapy: report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 85-31.

PURPOSE: Although androgen suppression results in a tumor response/remission in the majority of patients with carcinoma of the prostate, its potential value as an adjuvant has not been substantiated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 1987, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) initiated a randomized phase III trial of adjuvant goserelin in definitively irradiated patients with carcinoma of the prostate. A total of 977 patients had been accessioned to the study. Of these, 945 remained analyzable: 477 on the adjuvant arm and 468 on the observation arm. RESULTS: Actuarial projections show that at 5 years, 84% of patients on the adjuvant goserelin arm and 71% on the observation arm remain without evidence of local recurrence (P < .0001). The corresponding figures for freedom from distant metastases and disease-free survival are 83% versus 70% (P < .001) and 60% and 44% (P < .0001). If prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level greater than 1.5 ng is included as a failure (after > or = 1 year), the 5-year disease-free survival rate on the adjuvant goserelin arm is 53% versus 20% on the observation arm (P < .0001). The 5-year survival rate (for the entire population) is 75% on the adjuvant arm versus 71% on the observation arm (P = .52). However, in patients with centrally reviewed tumors with a Gleason score of 8 to 10, the difference in actuarial 5-year survival (66% on the adjuvant goserelin arm v 55% on the observation arm) reaches statistical significance (P = .03). CONCLUSION: Application of androgen suppression as an adjuvant to definitive radiotherapy has been associated with a highly significant improvement in local control and freedom from disease progression. At this point, with a median follow-up time of 4.5 years, a significant improvement in survival has been observed only in patients with centrally reviewed tumors with a Gleason score of 8 to 10.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1996

Recombinant human interferon-beta (rHuIFN-beta) and radiation therapy for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.

Fifteen patients with stage II, IIIA, and IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) received subcutaneous (s.c.) recombinant, glycosylated, human interferon-beta 1a (Rebif; rHuIFN-beta 1a) on each day of conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (RT) given in 2.0 Gy fractions to 60 Gy in 6 weeks. The rHuIFN-beta 1a was generated in CHO cells by recombinant DNA technology and is identical to natural IFN-beta produced by fibroblasts in primary sequence and glycosylation. Cohorts of three patients each were treated with escalating doses of rHuIFN-beta 1a: 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 24 MIU/m2 per treatment day. Acute toxicity was assessed according to modified WHO criteria; late toxicity was graded using RTOG late toxicity criteria. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of rHuIFN-beta 1a was defined as the dose level immediately below that in which dose-limiting toxicity occurred in > or = two of six patients. Immunomodulatory effects and antigenicity of rHuIFN-beta 1a were assessed by 2-5A synthetase, beta 2-microglobulin, and neopterin levels and by measurement of anti-rHuIFN-beta antibodies, respectively. Fourteen of fifteen patients experienced grades 1-3 acute (early) toxicity (< or = 90 days), which was primarily gastrointestinal: dysphagia/esophagitis (14/15), nausea/vomiting (12/15), anorexia (7/15), and liver transaminasemia (6/15). One of three patients treated with 24 MIU/m2 per treatment day (total rHuIFN-beta 1a dose 672 MIU) died of complications secondary to pneumonia, sepsis, adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and radiation pneumonitis. Twelve patients were evaluable for late toxicity (> 90 days). Maximum toxicity was grade 0 in five patients, grade 1 in four patients, and grade 5 in one patient (radiation pneumonitis). Clinical responses from the combination were 1/15 CR, 6/15 PR, 6/15 stable disease, and 1/15 progressive disease. The MTD of rHuIFN-beta 1a has been estimated at 12 MIU/m2 per treatment day when given daily during conventional RT to 60 Gy in 6 weeks. Biologic response by rHuIFN-beta 1a alone was reflected by significant and dose-related increases in 2-5A synthetase, beta 2-microglobulin, and neopterin. Radiation therapy alone had no effect on these immune response parameters and did not diminish their augmentation by rHuIFN-beta 1a. There was no association of biologic modulation with clinical response or survival.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Concurrent chemoradiation therapy with oral etoposide and cisplatin for locally advanced inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer: radiation therapy oncology group protocol 91-06.

PURPOSE: Patients with locally advanced inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have a poor clinical outcome. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the merit of chemotherapy administered concurrently with hyperfractionated thoracic radiation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-nine patients with inoperable NSCLC were enrolled onto a multicenter phase II trial of concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Treatment consisted of two cycles of oral etoposide 100 mg/d (50 mg/d if body-surface area [BSA] < 1.70 m2), intravenous cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, and hyperfractionated radiation therapy 5 days per week (1.2 Gy twice daily > 6 hours apart; total 69.6 Gy). RESULTS: Seventy-six assessable patients with a Karnofsky performance status > or = 60 and adequate organ function who had received no prior therapy were evaluated for clinical outcome and toxic effects. After a minimum follow-up duration of 21 months, the 1- and 2-year survival rates and the median survival duration were 67%, 35%, and 18.9 months overall; they were 70%, 42%, and 21.1 months for patients with weight loss of < or = 5%. Toxicity was significant; 57% developed grade 4 hematologic toxicity, 53% grade 3 or 4 esophagitis, and 25% grade 3 or 4 lung toxicity. However, only 6.6% of patients had grade 4 or lethal nonhematologic toxicity, which included three treatment-related deaths (two of pneumonitis and one of renal failure). CONCLUSION: Concurrent chemoradiation therapy with oral etoposide and cisplatin plus hyperfractionated radiation therapy is feasible. The survival outcome from this regimen compares favorably with that of other chemoradiation trials and even of multimodality trials that have included surgery.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1995

The evolution of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) protocols for nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Over the past 2 decades, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) has played a significant role in clarifying the role of radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). RTOG lung cancer research has evolved over this time period through a systematic succession of investigations. For unresectable NSCLC, the dependence of local tumor control and survival on total dose of standard fractionation RT, as well as pretreatment performance characteristics, was demonstrated in initial RTOG trials. Subsequently, further radiation dose intensification was tested using altered fractionation RT to total doses up to 32% higher than standard RT to 60 Gy, given as either hyperfractionation or accelerated fractionation, while attempting to retain acceptable normal tissue toxicity. These higher doses required rethinking of established RT techniques and limitations, as well as careful surveillance of acute and late toxicity. A survival advantage was shown for hyperfractionation to 69.6 Gy, in favorable performance patients, compared to 60 Gy. Further testing of high dose standard RT will use three-dimensional, conformal techniques to minimize toxicity. RTOG further extended the theme of treatment intensification for unresectable NSCLC by evaluating combined chemotherapy (CT) and RT. Improved local control and survival was shown for induction CT followed by standard RT to 60 Gy, compared to standard RT (60 Gy) and altered fractionation RT (69.6 Gy). The intent of current studies is to optimize dose and scheduling of combined CT and standard RT, as well as combined CT and altered fractionation RT. Noncytotoxic RT adjuvants, such as hypoxic cell sensitizers, nonspecific immune stimulants, and biologic response modifiers have also been studied. Resectable NSCLC has also been an RTOG focus, with studies of preoperative and postoperative RT, CT, and CT/RT, including the prognostic value of serum and tissue factors. RTOG studies have yielded incremental improvements in treatment outcome for NSCLC, better understanding of the disease dynamics, and a strong foundation for future investigations.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗
PubMed1995

Randomized phase I/II trial of two variants of accelerated fractionated radiotherapy regimens for advanced head and neck cancer: results of RTOG 88-09.

PURPOSE: To establish the feasibility of performing split-course accelerated hyperfractionation (AHFX-S) and concomitant boost accelerated fractionation radiotherapy (AFX-C) for advanced head and neck cancer in a multi-institutional cooperative trial setting and to evaluate the tumor clearance rate and acute and late toxicity of these fractionation schedules. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between February 1989 and January 1990, 75 patients with Stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were randomized to receive: (a) AHFX-S: 1.6 Gy/fraction, twice daily (6-h interval), 5 days/week, to a total dose of 67.2 Gy/42 fractions/6 weeks, with a 2-week rest after 38.4 Gy; or (b) AFX-C: 1.8 Gy/fraction/day, 5 daily fractions/week to 54 Gy/30 fractions/6 weeks to a large field and 1.5 Gy/fraction/day to a boost field, 6 h after large field treatment during the last 11 treatment days, to a total dose of 70.5 Gy/41 fractions/6 weeks. Acute and late toxicities were scored according to the RTOG normal tissue reaction scales and tumor clearance was evaluated at completion of therapy and at regular intervals thereafter. RESULTS: Of the 70 analyzable patients, 38 received AHFX-S and 32 received AFX-C. The two arms were balanced with respect to sex, age, T-stage, and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). However, the AHFX-S arm had a higher proportion of oropharyngeal primaries (63% vs. 44%), and Stage IV disease (82% vs. 50%) and lower proportion of oral cavity lesions (3% vs. 22%) and N0 disease (16% vs. 31%) than the AFX-C arm. The median follow-up was 2 years (range: 0.03-4.87 years). Tolerance of both variants of accelerated fractionated radiotherapy was satisfactory. There was no significant difference in local-regional control, disease-free survival, or survival between the two arms. The 2-year local-regional failure rate, survival, and disease-free survival was 50, 50, and 40%, respectively, for the entire group of patients. Acute radiation mucositis was increased in both arms. There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3 acute toxicities (63% vs. 56%) and grade 3 (14% vs. 14%) or grade 4 (6% vs. 17%) late toxicities. Permanent grade 4 late toxicity was observed in 6 and 7% of the patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Results of this randomized Phase I/II trial showed that the two accelerated fractionated schedules studied can be successfully given in a multi-institutional cooperative trial. There was no significant difference in acute or late toxicities, local-regional control, disease-free survival, or survival in this small scale study. Therefore, a Phase III trial comparing the relative efficacy of these two accelerated fractionation schedules against standard fractionation and hyperfractionation has been activated.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗
PubMed1995

Concurrent hyperfractionated irradiation and chemotherapy for unresectable nonsmall cell lung cancer. Results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 90-15.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials of hyperfractionated radiation therapy and induction chemotherapy followed by standard radiation therapy have shown improved survival in patients with unresectable nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Radiosensitization may improve local tumor control when chemotherapy is given concurrently with hyperfractionated radiation therapy, but also may increase toxicity. A Phase I/II trial, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 90-15, was designed to evaluate whether this strategy could improve survival with acceptable toxicity and be part of a Phase III trial of chemoradiation sequencing. METHODS: Vinblastine (5 mg/M2 weekly x 5 weeks) and cisplatin (75 mg/M2 days 1, 29, and 50) were given during twice-daily irradiation (1.2 Gy, 6 hours apart) to 69.6 Gy in 58 fractions in 6 weeks. Eligible patients had American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage II (unresected) or IIIA-B NSCLC and Karnofsky performance status 70 or greater; there were no weight loss restrictions. RESULTS: Of 42 eligible patients, 76% had greater than 5% weight loss, 45% had T4 primary tumors, and 62% were Stage IIIB. All protocol treatment was completed in 53%. Acute toxicity was predominantly hematologic with 19 of 42 (45%) having Grade 4 toxicity or higher, three (7%) with septic death. Ten of 42 (24%) had Grade 3 or higher esophagitis. There were two (4.7%) patients with Grade 3 or higher (1 lung and 1 esophagus) and two (4.7%) with Grade 4 or higher (1 lung and 1 hematologic) late toxicities. Median survival time was 12.2 months, with an overall 1-year survival of 54%, an estimated 2 year survival of 28% and a 1-year progression free survival of 38%. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with unresectable nonsmall cell lung cancer, who were not selected on the basis of weight loss, concurrent hyperfractionated irradiation and chemotherapy had more intense acute toxicity than hyperfractionation alone, but late toxicity was acceptable. One and 2-year survival rates were 54 and 28%, respectively.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1995

Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 88-08 and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 4588: preliminary results of a phase III trial in regionally advanced, unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Regionally advanced, surgically unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer represents a disease with an extremely poor prognosis. External-beam irradiation to the primary tumor and regional lymphatics is generally accepted as standard therapy. The use of more aggressive radiation regimens and the addition of cytotoxic chemotherapy to radiotherapy have yielded conflicting results. Recently, however, results from clinical trials using innovative irradiation delivery techniques or chemotherapy before irradiation have indicated that patients treated with protocols that incorporate these modifications may have higher survival rates than patients receiving standard radiation therapy. PURPOSE: On the basis of these results, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)-Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) elected to conduct a phase III trial comparing the following regimens: 1) standard radiation therapy, 2) induction chemotherapy followed by standard radiation therapy, and 3) twice-daily radiation therapy. METHODS: Patients with surgically unresectable stage II, IIIA, or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer were potential candidates. Staging was nonsurgical. Patients were required to have a Karnofsky performance status of 70 or more and weight loss less than 5% for 3 months prior to entry into the trial, to be older than 18 years of age, and to have no metastatic disease. Of the 490 patients registered in the trial, 452 were eligible. The disease in 95% of the patients was stage IIIA or IIIB. More than two thirds of the patients had a Karnofsky performance status of more than 80. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 60 Gy of radiation therapy delivered at 2 Gy per fraction, 5 days a week, over a 6-week period (standard radiation therapy); induction chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin (100 mg/m2) on days 1 and 29 and 5 mg/m2 vinblastine per week for 5 consecutive weeks beginning on day 1 with cisplatin, followed by standard radiation therapy starting on day 50; or 69.6 Gy delivered at 1.2 Gy per fraction twice daily (hyperfractionated radiation therapy). RESULTS: Toxicity was acceptable, with four treatment-related deaths. Three patients subsequently died of chronic pulmonary complications. Compliance with protocol treatment was acceptable. One-year survival (%) and median survival (months) were as follows: standard radiation therapy--46%, 11.4 months; chemotherapy plus radiotherapy--60%, 13.8 months; and hyperfractionated radiation therapy--51%, 12.3 months. The chemotherapy plus radiotherapy arm was statistically superior to the other two treatment arms (logrank P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: In "good-risk" patients with surgically unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer, induction chemotherapy followed by irradiation was superior to hyperfractionated radiation therapy or standard radiation therapy alone, yielding a statistically significant short-term survival advantage.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Flow cytometric quantification of the proliferation-associated nuclear antigen p105 and DNA content in advanced head & neck cancers: results of RTOG 91-08.

PURPOSE: p105 is a proliferation-associated nuclear antigen which identifies proliferating but not resting cells. The objectives of this Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) protocol (91-08) were: (1) to correlate tumor proliferative potential estimated using the p105 assay and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) analysis with treatment outcome in patients irradiated for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck; and (2) to evaluate the potential of p105 labeling indices as a predictive assay. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Paraffin blocks of pretreatment biopsies of the primary tumor or metastatic neck nodes of patients with Stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with radiotherapy alone in three previous RTOG protocols (79-13, 79-15, and 83-13) were retrospectively obtained. From these paraffin blocks, areas of tumor were selected based on histological examinations and sectioned. Nuclei suspensions were then prepared and processed for p105 antibody and DNA staining and subsequent flow cytometric quantification of p105 labeling indices and DNA content and correlation with local-regional control and survival. RESULTS: Paraffin blocks of tumor biopsies from 148 out of a total of 598 eligible patients were available. Of these, 143 were analyzable. The median and (range) of p105 labeling index (LI-C), p105 labeling index of cells in S phase (LI-S), and p105 antigen density (AD) were: 66.6 (3.85-99.5), 9 (1.55-36), and 93.2 (7.4-628.5), respectively. Deoxyribonucleic acid was diploid in 67 (47%), aneuploid in 22 (15%) and mixed aneuploid/diploid in 54 (38%) patients. There was a strong correlation between AD and DNA ploidy. Antigen density was above median in 91.5% of the aneuploid or mixed aneuploid/diploid tumors, but only in 8.5% of the diploid tumors. Patients with aneuploid or mixed aneuploid/diploid tumors had significantly greater local-regional failures than patients with diploid tumors (p = .0180). Those with p105 LI-C below the median or p105 AD above the median also had significantly greater local-regional failures (p = .0500 and p = .0167, respectively). Patients with p105 AD below the median had significantly better survival than those above the median (p = .0444), although there was no significant difference in survival with respect to DNA ploidy or p105 LI-C. Multivariate analyses showed that T-stage (p = .0001) and p105 AD (p = .0044) were significant prognostic factors for local-regional control, and T-stage (p = .0080), N-stage (p = .0021), primary site (p = .0110), and p105 AD (p = .0326) were significant prognostic factors for survival. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that flow cytometric quantitation of the proliferation-associated nuclear antigen p105 and DNA content of pretreatment tumor biopsies may be a potentially useful predictive assay in patients irradiated for advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1994

Dose intensity of radiation therapy in non-small cell carcinoma of the lung: a review of RTOG data and strategies.

Prospective trials exploring questions of dose intensity for control of the local-regional tumor have been conducted by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group for 20 years. Early studies established radiation therapy with a total dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions as standard (STD) for unresectable non-small cell carcinomas of the lung (NSCCL). Hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFX) with 1.2 Gy twice daily permitted higher total doses without increased normal tissue effects and led to comparison of STD vs. HFX (total dose 69.6 Gy in 58 fractions). Induction chemotherapy followed by STD, induction followed by concurrent chemotherapy and STD, and concurrent chemotherapy and HFX, have been explored in successive trials. Preliminary results of STD combined with chemotherapy suggest that increases in dose intensity increase local-regional control and survival. Confirmatory trials of increased dose intensity by combining chemotherapy with STD and HFX have been completed or are progressing.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1994

Prostate cancer: are racial differences in clinical stage and survival explained by differences in symptoms?

PURPOSE: To better understand racial differences in data for patients referred for definitive treatment of biopsy-proved adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two groups of patients were defined for further analysis. Group 1 comprised all patients who received definitive external beam irradiation of prostatic carcinoma; group 2 comprised all patients with prostatic carcinoma referred between January 1988 and December 1992 for examination at the first clinical indication of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. All patients were evaluated for age, race (black vs white), differentiation of tumor, date of diagnosis, and clinical stage. RESULTS: In group 1, black patients were significantly younger and presented with disease at higher clinical stage but equivalent grade and survival compared with white patients. In group 2, black patients were significantly younger and had similar differentiation of tumor but with significantly higher clinical stage compared with white patients and more often had obstructive symptoms and less often had been screened for elevated prostate-specific antigen levels. CONCLUSION: Black patients should undergo earlier screening for prostate cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1993

Interruptions of high-dose radiation therapy decrease long-term survival of favorable patients with unresectable non-small cell carcinoma of the lung: analysis of 1244 cases from 3 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials.

PURPOSE: To determine if prolonged treatment time adversely affects survival for patients with inoperable non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients enrolled on three randomized studies (RTOG 8311, 8321, 8403) between 1983-1989 formed the database. Previous analyses found that the addition of thymosin (8321) or prophylactic cranial irradiation (8403) failed to prolong survival: both studies used thoracic irradiation with standard fractionation to 55-60 Gy in 30 fractions. In 8311, patients were treated by hyperfractionated radiation therapy to randomly assigned total doses of 60.0 Gy, 64.8 Gy, 69.6 Gy, 74.4 Gy or 79.2 Gy, 1.2 Gy twice daily, 5 days per week. Patients analyzed received +/- 4% of the assigned total dose and lived > 90 days (to ensure that all patients would have completed treatment). Completion < 5 days beyond protocol specifications was classified as "per protocol." Elapsed treatment time exceeding specifications by 5-9 days was a minor deviation, 10-13 days was a major deviation-acceptable, and > or = 14 days was a major deviation-unacceptable. Absolute survival was the endpoint to evaluate the effect of delays. The log rank statistic was used to test for survival differences in the univariate setting, the Cox regression model was used in the multivariate setting. RESULTS: Of 293 patients treated with standard fractionation, eight (2.7%) had deviations from the specified treatment time (six minor, two major-acceptable). With hyperfractionation, 90 (15%) patients had deviations (40 minor, 21 major-acceptable, 29 major-unacceptable). As the assigned dose increased, the deviation rate increased (9.7% for 60.0 Gy vs. 20.8% for 79.2 Gy). Survivals for hyperfractionation patients with any deviations in treatment time were significantly shorter than those treated "per protocol" (p = 0.16): estimated 2- and 5-years rates were 24% and 10% versus 13% and 3%, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed the delay effect to be entirely in patients treated with 69.6 Gy or higher; there was also dependence upon the patients' prognosis. In patients with favorable prognosis (KPS 90-100, weight loss < or = 5%, no N3), the difference in survival was pronounced (33% and 15% vs. 14% and 0% at 2- and 5-years, respectively). Such differences were not found in patients with unfavorable prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Interruptions delaying completion of planned radiation therapy were more frequent with higher total doses (> or = 69.6 Gy). Favorable patients (high KPS, little weight loss, < N3 nodal metastasis) had markedly adverse effects on long-term survival associated with delays to completion of the planned total dose.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

The influence of field size and other treatment factors on pulmonary toxicity following hyperfractionated irradiation for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)--analysis of a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) protocol.

PURPOSE: The risk of pulmonary toxicity, observed in an Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Phase I/II randomized dose escalation trial of hyperfractionated irradiation for nonsmall cell lung cancer, was analyzed with regard to custom vs. hand blocking and compliance to protocol specified treatment field parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: There were 832 evaluable cases analyzed. The protocol required field margins 2 cm beyond primary tumor and involved nodes. In 674, the field margins were considered "per protocol" or as having minor protocol variations. In 94, margins exceeded protocol specification ("excessive margin" group). In this group, the area (cm2) of the effective (blocked) field and the portion including lung was measured from simulator films with a computer scanning device. Based on size and location of the primary and nodal disease, "per protocol" fields were constructed and the area (cm2) of lung included beyond these margins was estimated. Patients from both groups who received less than 30 Gy to normal lung were excluded from analysis of pulmonary toxicity. RESULTS: Grade 1 acute lung toxicity was higher (p = .009) in the "excessive margin" group compared to the "per protocol" group, whereas late lung toxicity was not significantly different (p = .94). The risk of Grade 2 or greater acute toxicity increased as area of excess irradiated lung increased. Overall lung toxicity, defined as the greater of either acute or late toxicity, was evaluated by multivariate analysis, in relation to assigned dose, effective treated field area, and type of shielding. Overall maximum lung toxicity (> or = Grade 2) was significantly greater in the "excessive margin" group, when lung treated beyond protocol margins exceeded an area of 35 cm2, than in the "per protocol" group, but only when the effective treated field size was > or = 180 cm2 (68% vs. 37%; p = .02). This effect was independent of assigned total dose or type of shielding. CONCLUSION: For nonsmall cell lung cancer treated with hyperfractionated irradiation, the risk of overall pulmonary toxicity was increased for patients treated with field sizes in excess of protocol specified margins of tumor coverage in comparison to patients treated with protocol specified margins. This effect was seen only when the area of lung treated beyond protocol margins exceeded 35 cm2 and when the overall field size was below 180 cm2.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗
PubMed1993

A phase I/II study to evaluate accelerated fractionation via concomitant boost for squamous, adeno, and large cell carcinoma of the lung: report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 84-07.

PURPOSE: A Phase I/II trial was conducted by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group from 1984 to 1989 for 355 evaluable patients with non-small-cell lung cancer to assess tolerance to and efficacy of accelerated fractionation irradiation via concomitant boost. METHODS AND MATERIALS: "Large" fields (primary tumor and locoregional lymph nodes) received 1.8 Gy followed after 4 to 6 hr by 1.8 Gy two to three times weekly to reduced "boost" fields (primary and involved nodes only). The total doses escalated during the study and started with 63 Gy in 5 weeks (45 Gy "large" field and 18 Gy "boost") for 61 patients. After follow-up for ongoing toxicity assessment, the total dose was increased to 70.2 Gy in 5.5 weeks (50.4 Gy "large" field and 19.8 Gy "boost") for the next 180 patients. The last 114 patients received 70.2 Gy in 5 weeks (45 Gy "large" field and 25.2 Gy "boost"). RESULTS: Pretreatment patient characteristics were well balanced between the three treatment arms. Grade 3 acute toxicity was 7% for the 63 Gy arm; it was 14% and 17% for the two 70 Gy arms. Grade 4 or greater acute toxicities (esophagitis and pneumonitis) were 2 to 3% for all three arms. Late toxicities ranged between 5 and 9% (> or = Grade 3) and 0 to 2% (> or = Grade 4), not statistically different among the three arms. There was no difference between the three regimens in median survival (9 months) or 1-year survival (39 to 44%). However, the 2-year survivals ranged from 16% (63 Gy) to 21% ("shortened" 70.2 Gy). Among 176 patients who had the same criteria as Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocol 84-33 (American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging, 1984, Stage III; Karnofsky performance status 70 to 100; < 6% weight loss), the 2-year survival rates ranged from 18 to 22%. CONCLUSION: Concomitant boost accelerated fractionation irradiation regimens for non-small cell lung cancer may offer improved long-term survival without enhanced late toxicity. While acute toxicity is somewhat increased, further refinement of the relationship of "large" to "boost" field doses may improve the therapeutic ratio. Further Phase I/II testing seems justified and necessary, before concomitant boost accelerated fractionation irradiation is tested in Phase III trials for NSCLC.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1993

Analysis of early and late deaths on RTOG non-small cell carcinoma of the lung trials: comparison with CALGB 8433.

UNLABELLED: In a major study that showed a treatment advantage for induction chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy (CALGB 8433), there was a significantly (P = 0.02) lower proportion of patients dying within 105 days of registration in the chemotherapy/radiation arm than the radiation therapy arm; without this difference, the overall survival was marginally better (P = 0.059) for the chemotherapy/radiation group. A retrospective analysis of RTOG trials sought explanations for the phenomenon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who fit the CALGB eligibility criteria and received radiation therapy alone in four prospective trials of the RTOG conducted between 1983 and 1989 were analyzed to determine factors that distinguished patients dying within 105 days from longer survivors. Two were trials of altered fractionation and two used standard fractionation. Of 683 patients identified, 107 (15.7%) died within 105 days after registration. The log linear model was used to evaluate relationships between death within 105 days and known prognostic factors. Karnofsky performance status (KPS), < 90 vs. > or = 90, was the only factor significantly related to death within 105 days (P = 0.0052). A Cox model with the same factors plus fractionation and total dose found KPS and T-stage associated with overall survival (P = 0.0005 and 0.025, respectively). The choice of the hyperfractionation arm (HFX) for Phase III study (69.6 Gy at 1.2 Gy b.i.d.) was based in part on comparison with standard fractionation (STD) from a concurrent RTOG protocol, 8321. Review of early deaths showed that this HFX arm had a lower proportion of patients dying within 105 days (7.9%) than STD in 8321 (21.0%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗
PubMed1992

Interruptions adversely affect local control and survival with hyperfractionated radiation therapy of carcinomas of the upper respiratory and digestive tracts. New evidence for accelerated proliferation from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 8313.

Hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFX) attempts to overcome tumor proliferation during treatment by permitting higher total doses in the same overall time as standard fractionation. Whereas interruptions, including splits, reduce local control with standard fractionation in carcinoma of the upper respiratory and digestive tracts, HFX might compensate for interruptions. Patients were randomized to receive total doses of 6720, 7200, 7680, and 8160 cGy, using 120 cGy twice daily, 5 days per week. Those analyzed received +/- 4% of assigned total dose and lived 90 days or more. Treatment was completed within 5 days of the time specified for each treatment arm in 233 patients; 48, 80, and 131 patients had delays 14, 10, and 5 days or more, respectively. Locoregional control and survival were significantly (P less than or equal to 0.03) reduced with delays of 5 days or more when corrected for prognostic factors. Late effects of radiation therapy were not affected by interruptions. These data support the hypothesis that proliferation (possibly accelerated) of tumor clonogens during treatment influences the outcome.

Aged↗