[Radiotherapy in the treatment of malignant nasosinusal neoplasms. The experience of the Trento Cancer Center].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to R Valdagni.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
From February 1981 to September 1981, 16 patients (19 fields) with histologically proven malignancy (10 squamous carcinoma, 4 melanoma, 1 adenocarcinoma, 1 chordoma) were treated with hyperthermia combined with radiotherapy or chemotherapy (1 patient). There were 5 females and 11 males; average age was 65 years, range 45 to 94 years; 15 patients had a Karnofsky index greater than 50%. Hyperthermia (42.5 44.0 degrees C) was induced by 250 MHz to 1 GHz microwaves (BSD - 1000 Unit). Thermometry was performed by means of non-perturbing probes placed in intratumorally inserted catheters and by measurement of skin temperatures. After hyperthermia plus radiotherapy (18 fields), 9 patients showed 100% response, 5 a volume regression of more than 50%, 3 less than 50% and 1 no change. After chemotherapy plus hyperthermia, 1 patient showed no change. No significant side effects were observed (3 skin burns in 147 hyperthermia treatment sessions).
INTRODUCTION: Neck node metastases from an unknown primary carcinoma represent an infrequent but challenging problem for oncologists. The management of such patients is controversial, but radiotherapy alone or as part of a multimodal approach is often indicated. Patients with inoperable lesions usually receive radiotherapy alone at palliative doses. In an attempt to increase local control in patients with locally advanced neck disease from an unknown primary carcinoma, local hyperthermia was combined with definitive radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 1982 and 1993, radiotherapy and local microwave hyperthermia were used to treat 15 patients with metastatic neck nodes from an unknown primary site. The patients had previously undergone only biopsy or fine needle biopsy, and showed no signs of metastases beyond the clavicle. Radiation to the nodes and the potentially primary sites in the head and neck was delivered by a 6 MV linear accelerator or a Cobalt 60 unit, to a total dose of 57.50-74.40 Gy (median 70 Gy). Hyperthermia was added using a BSD 1000 unit at an operating frequency of 280-300 MHz for 2-7 sessions (mean 3.1; median 2) at a desired minimum temperature of 42.5 degrees C. Two patients also received i.v. cisplatin 20 mg/m2/week as a radiosensitizer. RESULTS: Nine patients achieved a complete, and four a partial response for an overall response rate of 86.5%. Acute and late toxicity was mild: four patients experienced pain during hyperthermia, two moist cutaneous desquamation, and one cutaneous necrosis. The actuarial probability of maintaining local control at 5 years is 64.5% and the actuarial overall survival 29%. Five patients developed distant metastases and died of disease, two experienced nodal recurrence and two died of other unrelated causes. CONCLUSION: The addition of local microwave hyperthermia to radiotherapy in the treatment of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the neck in patients with an unknown primary site leads to good local control with moderate toxicity. No definite conclusions are possible because of the small number of patients involved in this phase II trial.
INTRODUCTION: A correlation between node hypodensity assessed by means of computer tomography (CT) and resistance to both chemotherapy and radiation therapy (XRT) in advanced head and neck tumours has been suggested in the literature. The outcome of a retrospective series of 50 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and cervical nodes metastases treated with combined hyperthermia (HT) and definitive XRT was reviewed to investigate if node density confirmed its prognostic value. MATERIALS AND METHOD: For all patients, a pre-treatment contrasted CT scan performed at the Institution between 1987-1993 was available. The density of the largest node (> 2cm) was compared to that of adjacent nuchal muscles. Nodes with hypodense areas present in more than one third of the total volume were considered necrotic nodes. RESULTS: The patients were divided in two groups (with and without nodal necrosis), well balanced in terms of potential prognostic factors. No significant difference in overall nodal response rate, local control and survival was found in the two groups of patients. CONCLUSION: Nodal density assessed by contrasted CT scan in the series did not result in a significant prognostic factor in patients with SCC node metastases treated with HT and XRT. It is suggested that HT could act as a radiosensitizer in the treatment of hypodense (at CT scan) metastatic nodes overcoming the radioresistance of necrotic, presumably hypoxic nodal metastases.
Differences between late-responding (slowly proliferating) normal tissues and early-responding (rapidly proliferating) normal tissues and tumor cells and the event of tumor cell repopulation occurring during treatment have essentially led to the development of altered fractionation schemes. Altered fractionation regimens mainly refer to schedules utilising two or more (small dose) fractions per day for part of or for the entire treatment course. It must be underlined that a true standard or conventional fractionation regimen does not exist: no schedule is universally recognised as the standard of reference to be compared with. However, continental European and U.S. conventional regimens are the considered control arm with which the new experimental regimens have to be compared. For this reason they are generally recognised as the standards. The basic rationale for hyperfractionated or accelerated regimens respectively lies in the possibility (a) to deliver higher total doses reducing late-responding normal tissue damage, (b) to deliver total doses in a reduced overall treatment time to defeat tumor clonogen repopulation. Multiple fractions per day should not be delivered with interfraction intervals smaller than 6 hours. Clinical results of phase I-II and limited but convincing phase III randomised trials suggest that a therapeutic benefit can be achieved with new altered regimens.
AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Accuracy and reproducibility of patient setup during radiotherapy for prostate cancer were investigated in two different Institutions (A and B), within their Quality Assurance programs. The purpose of the study was to evaluate and compare setup accuracy and reproducibility in Institutions A and B, which adopt different patient positioning and treatment techniques for prostate irradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of portal localization films taken during the treatment course was performed: 30 and 21 patients in Institutes A and B, respectively, entered the study. In Institute A, patients were treated in a prone position, utilizing an individualized immobilization cast (either an alpha cradle or a heat and vacuum-formed cellulose acetate cast) with an open table top and individual abdominal wall compressor to minimize small bowel irradiation; a 5-field conformal technique was used. In Institute B, patients were treated in a supine position without any immobilization device; a 6-field BEV-based technique (conformal only for patients treated with a radical aim) was adopted. A total of 598 portal films (420 from Institute A and 178 from Institute B) were analyzed. The mean number of films per patient was 12 (range, 4-29). Systematic and random setup errors were estimated utilizing the statistical method suggested by Bijhold et al. (1992). RESULTS: When patients with a mean (systematic) error larger than 5, 8 and 10 mm in craniocaudal, lateral and posterior-anterior directions, respectively, were compared, no statistically significant difference between the two groups was observed. Similarly, when comparing portal films, a significant difference (P <0.01) appeared only in the craniocaudal direction (errors > 5 mm: Institute A = 24%; Institute B = 11%). In both Institutes, the SD of random and systematic error distribution ranged from 1.8 to 4.2 mm, with a small prevalence of systematic errors. Only for craniocaudal shifts in Institute A was the random error larger than the systematic error, and it was significantly worse than in Institute B (1 SD, 4.2 mm in Institute A vs 1.8 mm in Institute B). CONCLUSIONS: Setup errors observed in Institutes A and B were similar and in accord with data reported in the literature. In Institute B, satisfactory geometrical treatment quality was achieved without patient immobilization. In Institute A, the goal of minimizing small bowel irradiation and prostate motion through the aforementioned technique, which makes patient position less comfortable, did not seem to considerably increase daily setup uncertainty.
AIMS AND BACKGROUND: In spite of the fact that ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is a frequently encountered clinical problem, there is no consensus about the optimal treatment of clinically occult (i.e., mammographic presentation only) DCIS. Interest in breast conservation therapy has recently increased. Few data are available in Italy on the conservative treatment with surgery and adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective multi-institutional study was performed in 15 Radiation Oncology Departments in northern Italy involving 112 women with subclinical DCIS of the breast treated between 1982 and 1993. Age of the patients ranged between 32 and 72 years (median, 50 years). All of them underwent conservative surgery: quadrantectomy in 89, tumorectomy in 11, and wide excision in 12 cases. The most common histologic subtype was comedocarcinoma (37%). The median pathologic size was 10 mm (range 1 to 55 mm). Axillary dissection was performed in 83 cases: all the patients were node negative. All the patients received adjunctive radiation therapy with 60Co units (77%) or 6 MV linear accelerators (23%) for a median total dose to the entire breast of 50 Gy (mean, 49.48 Gy; range, 45-60 Gy). Seventy-six cases (68%) received a boost to the tumor bed at a dose of 8-20 Gy (median 10 Gy) for a minimum tumor dose of 58 Gy. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 66 months, 8 local recurrences were observed, 4 intraductal and 4 invasive. All recurrent patients had a salvage mastectomy and are alive and free of disease at this writing. The 10-year actuarial overall, cause-specific, and recurrence-free survival was of 98.8%, 100%, and 91%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The retrospective multicentric study, with a local control rate of more than 90% at 10 years with 100% cause-specific survival, showed that conservative surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy is a safe and efficacious treatment for patients with occult, non-palpable DCIS.
In an attempt to improve the control of N3 (TNM-UICC) fixed and inoperable metastatic nodes, local microwave hyperthermia (HT) was combined with radiation therapy (RT). From February 1981 to January 1985, 34 patients, with N3 metastatic nodes from primary tumours in the head and neck, were treated according to two different prospective, non-randomized protocols: 23 patients received HT combined with the first course of conventionally fractionated radical RT (40 Gy + HT--2 week interval--20-30 Gy), and 11 patients received HT combined with palliative RT (20-50 Gy + HT). All the patients were treated with the same microwave applicator (MA-150) on the BSD-1000 unit, at a frequency of 280-300 MHz. Temperatures were measured by means of 2-3 Bowman probes placed within the tumour (core and periphery) and 5-6 probes on the skin surface. HT sessions were delivered after RT (less than 20 min), 2 or 3 times weekly, for a duration of 30 min after steady-state temperatures were obtained. Twenty-seven patients out of 34 were evaluable, with a follow-up of at least 3 months (range 3-39 months; median 10 months). Clinical results at 3 months revealed 59 per cent complete responses, 30 per cent partial responses, and 11 per cent with progressive disease. Analyses of response rates showed: a marginally significant difference (P = 0.095) between RT alone (historical control) and the entire group of patients treated with RT plus HT; a significant difference (P = 0.034) if RT alone is compared with Protocol A (RT greater than or equal to 60 Gy + HT); no significant difference between the two protocols employing HT, despite the different RT doses utilized; no significant differences in response rates, as a function of minimal intratumoural temperatures achieved, number of weekly HT sessions or total number of HT sessions; and a significantly lower response rate for nodes with maximum diameter greater than 6 cm (P = 0.043). No important differences in acute side effects between irradiated and heated regions in the same patient were noted. Late side effects in patients treated with RT plus HT included three cases (9 per cent) of severe fibrosis, possibly as a consequence of excessive maximum tumour temperature (greater than 46 degrees C).
Patients who have inoperable or previously irradiated cervical recurrences, especially if very confined and alone, pose a challenging problem to the clinician. Low-dose irradiation and hyperthermia seems to be a promising method for salvage treatments in previously treated patients. In order to heat the vaginal apex, individualized prototype applicators utilizing commercial microwave antennas were constructed and tested in muscle equivalent phantom. The technical construction of vaginal applicators followed Pierquin's procedure for gynaecological brachy-therapy moulds: (1) a true negative vaginal print in alginate was made; (2) a positive mould in plaster of Paris was then constructed; (3) a negative vaginal print was produced in plaster of Paris and (4) heat moulding of a 0.1 cm thick sheet of cellulose acetate on the plaster mould was accomplished. Interstitial microwave antennas were inserted within the applicator and kept in place using silk wires or Teflon rings. The external part of the applicator was thermally sealed and protected with silicone. This was particularly useful in cases where an inner cooling system was required. Heat patterns in tissue equivalent phantom materials were determined using non-perturbing probes and infrared thermography. An illustrative clinical case is described.
PURPOSE: With the aim of establishing clinical and technical criteria to homogenize radiotherapy practice, a working group of AIRO-Lombardia (Associazione Italiana di Radioterapia Oncologica--Gruppo regionale della Lombardia) has tried to define minimal requirements for radical and postoperative irradiation in prostate cancer. The document has been structured in such a way as to be also of interest to the urological and medical oncology communities. METHODS: The working group, composed of representatives of most of the regional radiotherapy departments in the Lombardy region, had monthly meetings during 1996 and 1997. The document on minimal requirements has been derived from the participants' combined experience and knowledge, from review of the literature, and from a 1995 regional survey on current practice of prostate irradiation. RESULTS: Minimal requirements for radical and postoperative irradiation of prostate cancer have been defined with respect to treatment strategies, pre-treatment diagnostic evaluation and staging, treatment prescription, preparation and execution, and quality assurance procedures. CONCLUSION: Standards of reference for minimal requirements in prostate cancer irradiation adapted to the regional structures and resources have been defined.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.