Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Tannock

Publications and source records attributed to R Tannock.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Psychiatric, psychosocial, and cognitive functioning of female adolescents with ADHD.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the psychiatric, psychosocial, and cognitive functioning of female adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in comparison with female controls and males with ADHD. Female controls were also compared with male controls to verify gender differences in a nonclinical sample. METHOD: One hundred seven adolescents from Southern Ontario aged 13 to 16 were included: 24 females with ADHD, 35 males with ADHD, 28 control females, and 20 control males. All were assessed with semistructured interviews, questionnaires, and tests of achievement and intellectual functioning. RESULTS: After controlling for parental education and estimated Full Scale IQ, females with ADHD were more impaired than control females in depression, anxiety, distress, teacher relationships, stress, attributional styles, and locus of control and on all cognitive and achievement measures. Females with ADHD were more impaired than males with ADHD in self-reported anxiety, distress, depression, locus of control, and vocabulary scores. These group differences were confirmed by higher ratings by parents and teachers in symptoms of psychopathology. Males with ADHD were more impaired in processing speed. Some gender differences (locus of control and vocabulary scores) were eliminated when controlling for ADHD severity. The absence of any differences between male and female controls indicates gender differences were specific to the clinical groups. CONCLUSION: Females with ADHD are at high risk for more psychological impairment than both males with ADHD and control females. The identified psychosocial problems point to areas for intervention.

Achievement↗

DSM-IV internal construct validity: when a taxonomy meets data.

The use of DSM-IV based questionnaires in child psychopathology is on the increase. The internal construct validity of a DSM-IV based model of ADHD, CD, ODD, Generalised Anxiety, and Depression was investigated in 11 samples by confirmatory factor analysis. The factorial structure of these syndrome dimensions was supported by the data. However, the model did not meet absolute standards of good model fit. Two sources of error are discussed in detail: multidimensionality of syndrome scales, and the presence of many symptoms that are diagnostically ambiguous with regard to the targeted syndrome dimension. It is argued that measurement precision may be increased by more careful operationalisation of the symptoms in the questionnaire. Additional approaches towards improved conceptualisation of DSM-IV are briefly discussed. A sharper DSM-IV model may improve the accuracy of inferences based on scale scores and provide more precise research findings with regard to relations with variables external to the taxonomy.

Adolescent↗

Further evidence from haplotype analysis for linkage of the dopamine D4 receptor gene and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Several studies have suggested a possible association of a polymorphism at the dopamine D4 receptor gene and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder [LaHoste et al., 1996; Rowe et al., 1998; Smalley et al., 1998; Sunohara et al., submitted; Swanson et al., 1998]. The allele reported to be associated with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the allele with seven copies of the 48 bp repeat in the third exon. We extend our study of the dopamine D4 gene and ADHD by testing for linkage using two additional polymorphisms in the dopamine D4 receptor gene and a polymorphism in the closely linked gene, tyrosine hydroxylase. We also searched for two previously reported deletions, a 13 bp and a 21 bp deletion in the first exon. We examined the haplotypes of three polymorphisms of the D4 receptor gene and observed biased transmission of two of these haplotypes. Our findings further support the role of the dopamine D4 gene in ADHD.

Adolescent↗

Linkage study of two polymorphisms at the dopamine D3 receptor gene and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Data from animal studies suggest that the dopamine D3 receptor gene may have a role in locomotion and behavioral regulation. Therefore, this gene has been suggested as a candidate for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The dopamine D3 receptor gene (DRD3) has two common polymorphisms, one in exon I that changes a Serine to Glycine (Ser9Gly) and alters the recognition site for the restriction enzyme MscI [Lannfelt et al., 1992]. The other common polymorphism is located in intron 5 and results in the change of a restriction site for MspI [Griffon et al., 1996]. We investigated the possibility of linkage of the dopamine D3 receptor gene in 100 small, nuclear families consisting of a proband with ADHD, their parents, and affected siblings. We examined the transmission of the alleles of each of these polymorphisms and the haplotypes of both polymorphisms using the transmission disequilibrium test [Spielman et al., 1993]. We did not observe biased transmission of the alleles at either polymorphism or any haplotype. Our findings using this particular sample do not support the role of the dopamine D3 gene in ADHD. Am. J. Med. Genet. (Neuropsychiatr. Genet.) 96:114-117, 2000.

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity↗

Confirmation of an inhibitory control deficit in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

The objective of this study was to determine whether deficient inhibitory control distinguishes children with a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity (ADHD) disorder, conduct disorder (CD), and comorbid ADHD + CD from normally developing children. Participants were rigorously diagnosed children (age 7 to 12 years) with ADHD (N = 72), CD (N = 13) or ADHD + CD (N = 47) and 33 control children (NC). We studied inhibitory control using the stop-signal paradigm, a laboratory task that assessed the ability to inhibit an ongoing action. The ADHD group had significantly impaired inhibitory control compared to NC, CD, and ADHD + CD children. These results indicate that children with ADHD have deficient inhibition as measured in the stop-signal paradigm and that ADHD occurring in the presence of ADHD + CD may represent a phenocopy of CD rather than a variant of ADHD.

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity↗

Naming speed performance and stimulant effects indicate effortful, semantic processing deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

This study investigated rapid automatized naming and effects of stimulant medication in school-age children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with and without concurrent reading disorder (RD). Two ADHD groups (67 ADHD only; 21 ADHD + RD) and a control group of 27 healthy age-matched peers were compared on four variables: color naming speed, letter naming speed, phonologic decoding, and arithmetic computation. Discriminant function analysis (DFA) was conducted to predict group membership. The four variables loaded onto two discriminant functions with good specificity: phonologic decoding, letter naming speed, and arithmetic defined the first function; color naming speed defined the second function. Both ADHD groups were significantly slower in color naming than controls, but did not differ from one another. DFA correctly classified 96% of the control group, 91% of ADHD + RD, and 82% of ADHD only. A subset of children in the ADHD groups participated subsequently in an acute, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial with three single doses (10, 25, 20 mg) of methylphenidate. Methylphenidate selectively improved color-naming speed but had no effect on the speed of naming letters or digits. These findings challenge the tenet that naming speed deficits are specific to RD and implicate naming speed deficits associated with effortful semantic processing in ADHD, which are improved but not normalized by stimulant medication.

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity↗

Identification of DNA variants in the SNAP-25 gene and linkage study of these polymorphisms and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

The gene for the synaptic vesicle docking fusion protein, synaptosomal-associated protein of 25 kDa (SNAP-25), has been implicated in the etiology of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) based on the mouse mutant strain coloboma. This neutron-irradiation induced mouse strain is hemizygous for the deletion of the SNAP-25 gene and displays spontaneous hyperactivity that is responsive to dextroamphetamine. Because of these characteristics, this strain has been suggested to be a mouse model for ADHD. We identified using single stranded conformational polymorphism analysis (SSCP) four DNA sequence variants in the 3' untranslated region of the human SNAP-25 gene. We searched for polymorphisms in the 3' untranslated region because the intron/exon structure of this gene has not yet been determined. We tested for linkage of this gene and ADHD using two of the identified polymorphisms that change a restriction enzyme recognition site. We examined the transmission of the alleles of each of these polymorphisms and the haplotypes of both polymorphisms using the transmission disequilibrium test in a sample of 97 small nuclear families consisting of a proband with ADHD, their parents, and affected siblings. We observed biased transmission of the haplotypes of the alleles of these two polymorphisms. Our findings are suggestive of a role of this gene in ADHD.

Adolescent↗

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and the gene for the dopamine D5 receptor.

A recent study has suggested a possible association of a polymorphism near the dopamine D5 receptor gene (DRD5) and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. The polymorphism studied was a (CA)n repeat located in the cosmid containing the D5 receptor gene2 and the allele that was reported to be associated with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was the 148-bp allele. In this study we sought to replicate this finding by testing for biased transmission of the alleles at this same polymorphism in a sample of 92 families with an ADHD proband. We did not observe significant evidence for biased transmission of the 148-bp allele, however we did observe biased transmission of two other alleles, the 136-bp allele and the 146-bp allele. For these two alleles the bias was for these two alleles not to be transmitted to the ADHD children. The number of informative transmissions for these two alleles was small, therefore it would be premature to make any conclusions from our study concerning the role of DRD5 in ADHD.

Adolescent↗

Evidence for the serotonin HTR2A receptor gene as a susceptibility factor in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

A recent study demonstrated that treatment of hyperactive mice with psychostimulants and serotonergic agents produced a calming effect that was dependent on serotonergic neurotransmission and was not associated with any changes in extracellular dopamine levels. The complex interaction between the serotonergic and dopaminergic neurotransmitter systems suggests that a balance between the two systems may be necessary for mediating hyperactive behaviour. Defects in serotonin system genes, therefore, may disrupt normal brain serotonin function causing an imbalance between these neurotransmitter systems leading to the development of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Using the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT), the current study assesses for linkage disequilibrium between polymorphisms in the serotonin HTR2A receptor gene and ADHD. One hundred and fifteen families with a total of 143 children diagnosed with ADHD (DSM-IV) were genotyped for the His452 Tyr and the T102C polymorphisms in the serotonin HTR2A receptor gene. TDT analysis revealed a preferential transmission of the 452Tyr allele to the affected offspring (P = 0.03), suggesting linkage disequilibrium of this polymorphism with ADHD. This may open a new door in ADHD molecular genetics research, expanding the existing view of a catecholaminergic hypothesis to include a serotonergic hypothesis and should help elucidate the complex interplay among the neurotransmitter systems in the etiology of ADHD.

Adolescent↗

Phonological processing, not inhibitory control, differentiates ADHD and reading disability.

OBJECTIVE: To test for the distinctiveness of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and reading disability (RD) and the independence of the cognitive domains, inhibition and phonological processing, which are proposed as central to ADHD and RD, respectively, using a classic double dissociation design. METHOD: A 2 (ADHD versus no ADHD) x 2 (RD versus no RD) model was used to examine the cognitive profile of 4 groups of children, aged 7 to 11 years. Two measures of inhibitory control and 3 phonological processing measures were used. RESULTS: The 2 RD groups (RD, ADHD + RD) were significantly impaired relative to the 2 non-RD groups (controls, ADHD) on all phonological processing measures. The 2 ADHD groups were significantly impaired on simple go-task responding relative to the non-ADHD groups and in inhibition. Contrary to predictions, an RD effect on inhibitory control was found on one inhibition measure. The comorbid group (ADHD + RD) generally exhibited the deficits of both single groups in an additive fashion. CONCLUSIONS: These findings question the role of inhibitory control as a unique cognitive marker for ADHD and suggest true comorbidity for children with both ADHD and RD.

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity↗

Does actigraphy differentiate ADHD subtypes in a clinical research setting?

OBJECTIVE: To compare subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (predominantly inattentive and combined types) and a comparison group on an objective measure of activity level (actigraphy). METHOD: Actigraphs were worn by 64 children (49 boys, 15 girls) during a full-day clinical diagnostic assessment; 20 subjects had a diagnosis of ADHD predominantly inattentive type, 22 had ADHD combined type, and 22 were non-ADHD controls. Mean actigraph scores were calculated for two 2-hour intervals, comprising, respectively, a psychometric evaluation in the morning and the completion of a speech and language assessment and research measures in the afternoon. RESULTS: There were no significant group differences in activity level in the morning session. During the afternoon session, children with ADHD were significantly more active than controls, but there were no differences between ADHD subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: These data partially support specifications in the DSM-IV regarding hyperactivity in ADHD; however, they also indicate that situational and/or temporal factors may affect the degree to which hyperactivity is expressed. Furthermore, the findings contradict specifications in the DSM-IV that suggest that children with ADHD combined type should be more hyperactive than children with ADHD predominantly inattentive type.

Attention↗

Dichotic listening and response inhibition in children with comorbid anxiety disorders and ADHD.

OBJECTIVE: To compare children with comorbid anxiety disorders (ANX) and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with children with either pure disorder and normal controls on 2 cognitive measures to elucidate the cognitive basis of this comorbidity. METHOD: Four groups of children aged 8 to 12 years (n = 64 total) were assessed: ANX, ADHD, both conditions (comorbid group), and neither condition (normal control group). Groups were compared on 2 cognitive measures: a measure of auditory emotional perception (dichotic listening task) and a measure of response inhibition (stop task), chosen for their relative specificity for ANX and ADHD, respectively, in previous studies. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses of variance revealed significant group differences on the dichotic listening task (p < .05), with the comorbid group differing from the control group on emotion targets (p < .01) and the ADHD group differing from the control group on word targets (p < .05). On the stop task, the ADHD group appeared slower than the other diagnostic groups on both go and stop-signal reaction times, but differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, children with comorbid ANX and ADHD showed reduced auditory emotion recognition relative to controls but did not show response inhibition deficits. Thus they appeared cognitively distinct from children with either pure disorder.

Anxiety Disorders↗

Linkage of the dopamine D4 receptor gene and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

OBJECTIVE: There is considerable evidence supporting a genetic component in the etiology of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Because stimulant medications act primarily on the dopaminergic system, dopamine system genes are prime candidates for genetic susceptibility factors for ADHD. Previous studies by several groups have observed a significant association of ADHD and an allele with 7 copies of the 48 base pair repeat in the third exon of the dopamine D4 receptor. METHOD: The authors sought to replicate these previous findings by collecting an independent sample of families from Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and confirming this finding in an expanded sample of ADHD families collected from Irvine, California. Using the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT), the authors tested for biased transmission of the 7-repeat allele at the exon III polymorphism of the dopamine D4 receptor locus in these samples of ADHD subjects. RESULTS: Biased transmission of the 7-repeat allele from parents to ADHD probands and their affected siblings was observed in the 2 new samples of families collected in Toronto and Irvine (TDT chi2 = 2.711, 1 df, one-sided p value = .050) and for these samples combined with the 52 families previously reported from Irvine (TDT chi2 = 6.426, 1 df, one-sided p value = .006). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study further support the possibility of a role of the dopamine D4 receptor locus in ADHD.

Adolescent↗

Linkage study of catechol-O-methyltransferase and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder is the most common child psychiatric disorder with a prevalence rate in an Ontario study of 9% in boys and 3% in girls [Szatmari et al., 1989]. This disorder is characterized by problems in the areas of attention, overactivity, impulse control, and distractibility. Strong evidence for a genetic component has been provided from twin, family, and adoption studies [for review see Levy et al., 1998] and molecular genetic studies are in progress by several groups worldwide. The Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) gene is an interesting candidate for ADHD as it is involved in the breakdown of dopamine and norepinephrine, neurotransmitters strongly implicated in the etiology of ADHD. In addition, children with velo-cardio-facial syndrome, a deletion syndrome of the chromosomal region 22q11 where the COMT gene has been localized, often have symptoms of ADHD suggesting this gene may have an etiological role in ADHD. In this study, we have tested for linkage in ADHD families using the functional polymorphism at codon 158 that determines COMT activity [Lachman et al., 1996] and analyzed the data with the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT). A total of 77 nuclear families collected from Toronto were genotyped. We find no evidence for linkage of this polymorphism and ADHD in our sample. Am. J. Med. Genet. (Neuropsychiatr. Genet.) 88:710-713, 1999.

Adolescent↗

Inhibitory control differences following mild head injury.

Complex inhibitory control, defined as the ability to inhibit a planned or ongoing action, was assessed in a sample of individuals with a history of mild head injury, case-matched with normal control subjects for age and gender. This central act of control was assessed using a modification of the stop-signal paradigm. The group with mild head injury took longer to inhibit their on going action and reported more accidents than the normal control subjects. The group that reported having had a mild head injury did not differ in terms of their go reaction time, number of correct responses, handedness, education level, or reported learning disabilities. Limitations of this design and directions for future research are discussed.

Adolescent↗

Spatial and emotional aspects of language inferencing in nonverbal learning disabilities.

Although subtle linguistic deficits have been postulated for children identified with nonverbal learning disabilities (NLD), there is little empirical evidence to support this contention. Two experimental language inferencing measures that have been demonstrated to be problematic for individuals with right hemisphere brain damage (RHBD) and one norm-referenced inferencing task were examined in three groups of children aged 9-13: (1) children with NLD (n = 14), (2) children with verbal impairments (VI) (n = 14), and (3) children without learning disabilities who served as controls (n = 19). The NLD and VI groups did not differ from one another on any of the three measures, indicating a generalized language inferencing deficit in the NLD group. Relative to the control group, however, the NLD group experienced specific difficulties with spatial and emotional inferencing. The implications for right hemisphere involvement in the NLD profile are examined in relation to the effects of working memory on inferential abilities.

Adolescent↗

Development of inhibitory control across the life span.

The stop-signal procedure was used to examine the development of inhibitory control. A group of 275 participants, 6 to 81 years of age, performed a visual choice reaction time (go) task and attempted to inhibit their responses to the go task when they heard a stop signal. Reaction times to the stop and go signals were used to assess performance in inhibition and response execution, respectively. Results indicated the speed of stopping becomes faster with increasing age throughout childhood, with limited evidence of slowing across adulthood. By contrast, strong evidence was obtained for age-related speeding of go-signal reaction time throughout childhood, followed by marked slowing throughout adulthood. Hierarchical regression confirmed that the age-related change in inhibitory control could not be explained by general speeding or slowing of responses. Findings are discussed in regard to the contrast between the development of inhibition and response execution and the utility of the stop-signal procedure.

Adolescent↗