Developing effective emergency systems for stroke.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to R Swor.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether race, when controlled for income, is an independent predictor of survival to hospital discharge after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). METHODS: Prospective OHCA data were collected over 4 years (1991-1994) from a convenience sample of OHCA patients transported to nine hospitals in three suburban counties. Race was determined from hospital and vital statistics records. The average household income was identified from ZIP codes and used as a marker of socioeconomic status. Demographic data and known predictors of survival were compared between blacks and whites. A logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between race, income, and survival. RESULTS: Of the 1,690 patients, 223 (13%) were blacks and 1,467 (87%) were whites. Average household income was less for blacks than for whites ($40,225 versus $46,193; P < .001), but both populations were affluent by national standards (national percentile ranks were 73% and 88%, respectively). The populations were no different in percentage of witnessed arrests (57% versus 61%; P = .465). Blacks were younger (mean +/- SD, 62 +/- 16 versus 68 +/- 15 years; P < .001); less frequently received bystander CPR (11% versus 20%; P = .002); less often had ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (37% versus 50%; P < .001); and had a shorter advanced life support call-response interval (median, 4 versus 6 minutes; P < .001). The odds ratio for survival (white/black) was .931 (95% confidence interval, .446 to 1.945). CONCLUSION: Race was not found to predict adverse OHCA outcomes in this affluent population.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship of pediatric transport rates per hundred thousand pediatric population (RATE) to socioeconomic status (SES) factors and also mortality in Emergency Medical Services (EMS) systems. DESIGN: Retrospective ecological study. SETTING: Four EMS Medical Control Authorities (MCAs) in Michigan. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (3,792), 0-19 years of age, responded to as a nonscheduled emergency response and transported to a hospital by ambulance. METHODS AND MEASUREMENTS: RATE, economic status (INCOME), private transportation status (VEHICLE), educational status (EDUC), primary care physician availability (PHYS), and EMS disease death rate (EMSDD) were determined for each MCA and analyzed using Spearman rank correlation. RESULTS: RATE between MCAs varied from 325 to 750. RATE was highest in the most urban MCA: its 0-4 RATE was fourfold larger than any other MCA. INCOME, EDUC, and VEHICLE were inversely correlated with transport rate: -1.00, -1.00, -1.00; P < 0.001. Rate was positively correlated with EMSDD: 1.00; P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial variation in RATE between MCAs may be primarily due to the high 0-4 transport rate in the most urban MCA. This study also suggests that higher pediatric EMS system utilization rates may be correlated to higher mortality and also to unavailability of personal transportation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Recognizing that prehospital thrombolytic therapy may provide benefit to certain subsets of patients, the routine prehospital use of thrombolytic agents should be discouraged pending further scientific delineation and documentation of those subgroups. ACEP encourages further investigation to document feasibility, efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and safety of use of these agents in this environment. Detailed education is needed in such areas as contraindications and the mechanics of drug administration. Online medical direction is paramount to the successful use of these agents in the prehospital setting.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether socioeconomic status (SES) or race is associated with adverse outcome after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). METHODS: A convenience sample of OHCA of presumed cardiac origin from seven suburban cities in Michigan, 1991-1996. Median household income (HHI), utilizing patient home address and 1990 census tract data, was dichotomized above and below 1990 state median income. Patient race was dichotomized as black or white. Outcome was defined as survival to hospital discharge (DC). Multiple logistic regression and Pearson's chi2 values were used for analysis. RESULTS: Of 1317 cases with complete data for analysis, the average age was 67.3 +/- 16.0, 939 (71.1%) were white, 587 (44.4%) arrests were witnessed (WIT), and 65 (4.9%) were DC alive. There was no significant difference between races with respect to WIT arrests, V(T)/V(F) arrest rhythms, and a small difference in EMS response interval. Whites were more likely to be above median HHI (57.1 vs. 26.2%, P < 0.001). Adjusted odds ratios for predictors of survival were WIT arrest (OR = 3.76, 95% CI (1.7, 8.2)), V(T)/V(F) (OR = 8.74, 95% CI (3.7, 10.8), but not race (OR = 0.68, 95% CI (0.3, 1.4)) or SES (OR = 1.51, 95% C1 0.8, 2.8). CONCLUSION: In this population, neither race nor SES was independently associated with a worse outcome after OHCA.
INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have documented decreased time to emergency department (ED) thrombolytic therapy with the use of prehospital electrocardiography. PURPOSE: Is the time to ED diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with thrombolytic agents decreased by emergency medical services (EMS) transport when compared with those transported by other means (non-EMS)? DESIGN: Retrospective, case-control study. POPULATION: The AMI patients treated with thrombolytic agents at a 34,000-visit, community hospital ED during 1992. METHODS: Review of records of patients who received thrombolytic therapy for AMI. Statistical analysis was performed using "Student's" t-test and Yates corrected Chi-square (chi 2). RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients received thrombolytic agents for AMI during 1992; 33 arrived by ambulance, 54 arrived by other methods. There were no differences in age, gender, or time of ED arrival among these groups. Ambulance patients received standard advanced life support (ALS) care, but not a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) or thrombolytic agents. Ambulance patients experienced a significantly shorter time to first ECG (12.9 +/- 9.1 min. versus 20.8 +/- 25.3 min.; p = .028) and received thrombolytic therapy sooner than did controls (56.0 +/- 31.5 min. versus 78.0 +/- 63.4 min.; p = .018). There was no difference in time from diagnosis to treatment between these groups. CONCLUSION: Emergency medical services transport of AMI patients in this study decreased time to diagnosis and treatment and may be a confounder in studies that assess the value of field EMS interventions. Non-EMS AMI patients did not receive as rapid diagnosis and treatment, and emergency physicians should evaluate and address this issue in their departments.