Transdermal oestradiol and cardiovascular risk factors.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to R Sitruk-Ware.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) is very effective in relieving many menopausal symptoms such as hot flushes, night sweats, urogenital atrophy and psychological disturbances. Moreover, it is effective in the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis and has a favourable effect on some risk factors for cardiovascular disease in the long term, via several mechanisms including mediating effects on the lipid profile. Most of these beneficial effects are maintained with transdermal estradiol therapy, involving the use of a cutaneous delivery system attached to the skin which delivers a controlled rate of estradiol over a period of up to 4 days. However, the clear demonstration of a favourable effect on some risk factors for cardiovascular disease remains to be established. Transdermal administration of estradiol appears to be at least as effective as oral conjugated estrogen therapy on most of the end-points which have been evaluated, but allows a lower dose to be used, avoiding some of the metabolic adverse effects experienced with oral treatment. Endocrinological adverse effects, such as breast tenderness, breakthrough bleeding and fluid retention, are similar in both treatments, and can be minimised by dose adjustments in most cases. The most common adverse effects related to transdermal therapy are local skin reactions at the site of application. These are usually mild and transient in nature, and can be overcome by changing the site of application. Serious risks of transdermal therapy appear to be the same as those for other forms of ERT, namely an increased risk of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer with estrogen therapy alone. However, combination therapy involving the sequential administration of a progestogen has been shown to substantially reduce the risk of endometrial proliferation. The potential increased risk of breast cancer has been controversial and appears to be minimal with ERT. The role of progestogens on breast cancer risk remains controversial, but the data to date do not indicate any significant change in risk when progestogens are added to ERT.
The benefits of oestrogen replacement therapy (ERT) have been widely recognized. However, among the drawbacks ascribed to ERT, metabolic disturbances have been observed, particularly after oral administration of oestrogens. Therefore, other routes of delivering oestrogens have been developed. The advantages of delivering drugs through the skin for systemic therapy have been widely recognized and represent a growing sector in drug development. Transdermal delivery of steroids is also a rapidly expanding field and in various clinical situations where hormonal replacement therapy is needed this route of administration is a real breakthrough, considering the relative toxicity of some steroids when given orally. Percutaneous application of steroids has been proven successful in various disorders. Various occlusive transdermal systems have also been designed, all of them aimed at achieving a constant release rate of the molecules contained in their reservoir through the intact skin. The skin itself, and especially the outermost layer, the stratum corneum, can play the role of a reservoir and a rate-controlling membrane. In the field of reproductive hormones, so far, oestradiol, progesterone and testosterone have been demonstrated to be good candidates for transdermal delivery. The effectiveness and the acceptability of transdermal delivery of oestradiol in postmenopausal women have been demonstrated. All the beneficial effects of oestrogen therapy can be achieved through skin delivery, e.g. symptoms relief as well as osteoporosis prevention.
A large number of publications on oral contraceptives (OC) can be found in the medical literature. These reports deal not only with mode of action or efficacy of OCs but also with side effects. Adverse drug reactions (ADR) are not accepted nor acceptable from a population of young women free of disease who expect from their mode of contraception to be fully efficient and devoid from side effects. In most instances, side effects observed with OCs as well as their efficacy are related to the total dose of steroïds contained in the combination, to the balance between the estrogen and the progestin content and to the specific characteristics of the molecules. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality reported in OC users have been related firstly to the ethinylestradiol (EE) and as a first step, the estrogen dose has been reduced in the OCs synthesized in the 70s. Later on, cardiovascular risk has been correlated to lipid profile changes and progestins with androgenic properties have been made responsible for cardiovascular events reported in OC users. In order to minimize the incidence of ADRs and to induce beneficial changes in lipid patterns, new progestational molecules devoid of androgenic properties have been recently synthesized. Three compounds called "third generation" progestins, derived from levonorgestrel are presently available in Europe. These three gonane progestins demonstrate affinity for the androgenic receptor, but when administered together with EE do not oppose the estrogenic effect observed on protein markers such as the Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG) or the High Density Lipoprotein (HDL).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
During the past 10 years an extensive literature has been generated concerning the risks and benefits of hormonal replacement therapy in post-menopausal women. Although some of the questions have been answered during this period, controversy about the risk of breast cancer continues. This paper attempts to evaluate the risk of breast cancer in the light of epidemiological, experimental and histological findings. An interpretation of the available data and practical therapeutic recommendations are given. It is concluded that no change in the currently recommended schedule of combined sequential estrogen progestin therapy is necessary at this stage.
A matched case-control study in a population of urban, non-menopaused women living in Paris was performed between 1983 and 1985 to investigate the risk of breast cancer (BC) in relation to various factors with a particular interest in the effect of the use of oral contraceptive (OC) and the existence of cyclical mastalgia (CM). Two hundred and ten non-menopaused women, less than 45 years old, with newly diagnosed BC were compared to 210 controls from the same geographic area matched on year of birth, age, education level and age at first full term pregnancy (FFTP), when justified. The adjusted Relative Risk of BC (RRa) was significantly increased for a total duration of OC use longer than 72 months (RRa 2.80; 95% CI 1.56-5.01), as well as the RRa for OC use above 48 months before FFTP (3.26 95% CI 1.37-7.76) and, to a lesser extent, the RRa for OC use above 48 months after FFTP (2.02 95% CI 1.07-3.84) respectively. Adjustment was performed on familial history of BC, personal history of Benign Breast Disease (BBD), age at menarche. A previous history of cyclical mastalgia was found to be associated with an increased risk of BC. The significant increase remained after adjustment on the previously mentioned confounding factors and OC use: RRa 2.12; 95% CI (1.31-3.43). Under a precise definition related to the hormonal environment, mastalgia appear to be an interesting marker of breast cell susceptibility, the importance of which can only be validated by prospective studies.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Recent epidemiological studies indicate that replacement therapy with oestrogens reduces the cardiovascular risk in postmenopausal women. This protective effect has been ascribed to oestrogen-induced metabolic variations, and notably to the rise of HDL-cholesterol levels observed after oral administration of oestrogens. Recently, long term studies have shown that parenterally administered oestrogens (implants, percutaneous or transdermal administration) have the same effect on blood lipid profile as oral oestrogen over a period of 6 months or more. Factors other than blood lipid changes should be studied in an attempt to elucidate the exact mechanism through which postmenopausal oestrogen administration may reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases.
The possible role of oestrogens in modifying the occurrence of ischaemic heart disease and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in general in postmenopausal women has long been controversial. Analysis of the literature indicates a difference between the epidemiological studies published before 1980 and those published recently. In the former, the risk in women using oestrogen replacement therapy (ERT) was either unchanged or increased when compared with those women who did not use ERT. In the latter the trend has changed and a clear protective effect of ERT has been shown. These contradictory results might be explained by a change in prescribing habits, using lower oestrogen doses and selecting women with no risk factor for CVD as candidates for long-term ERT.
RU486, a potent antiprogesterone steroid was administered to 124 women requesting therapeutic abortion. All were less than 49 days from their last menstrual period. Ten of these subjects (Group I) received high doses of RU486 in a decremental dose regimen (400, 300, 200 and 100 mg/day) over 4 successive days and 14 received 50 mg/day for 7 days (Group II). A further 50 subjects (Group III) received 100 mg/day for seven days and the remaining 50 subjects (Group IV) received 450 mg in a single dose. In the first three groups, half the daily dose was given in the morning and the remainder in the evening. Blood was collected before, and on Days 4 and 7 and then once a week after commencing therapy until disappearance of circulating beta HCG. In addition to beta HCG, estradiol-17 beta (E2), progesterone (P), cortisol, and various metabolic and hematological parameters were measured. Plasma RU486 concentrations were also assayed in Group II, III and IV subjects on Day 7 of therapy and in some cases on Days 14 and 21. Ultrasonography was performed in all cases on Day 1 and on Day 14. All the patients bled within five days following RU486 administration, for 1 to 21 days. A complete abortion occurred in 60% in Group I, 50% in Group II, 86% in Group III, and 80% in Group IV. The difference between the last two groups and the first two was significant at p less than 0.01. The non-responders were submitted to a uterine vacuum aspiration. A stepwise discriminant analysis was performed and indicated that the best predictors of the outcome of therapy were beta HCG values and the gestational sac diameter. With these criteria, the prediction was accurate in 86.4% of the cases. The best results were obtained in the cases where the ultrasonic measurement of gestational sac was under 10 mm in diameter and the initial beta HCG values under 15,000 mIU/ml. Among the observed side effects were moderate pelvic cramps (20.9%), nausea (27%), fainting (4.8%); 61.3% of the women complained of fatigue. Heavy bleeding occurred in 15.3% of the women but only one of them required blood transfusion. In the patients with complete abortion, beta HCG values decreased to below 500 mIU/ml by Day 14 (but in 11 cases values fell below 2,000 mIU/ml only by Day 21). Plasma estradiol and progesterone also fell. Cortisol levels increased during therapy especially in subjects of Group I, but returned to basal values after termination of treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
The potential benefits of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) for postmenopausal women are now generally recognised, and no scientist involved in this field of research will deny the gratifying results of hormone therapy. However, in the risk-benefit equation the adverse effects of ERT must be carefully considered. Most of the harmful adverse effects of ERT have been related firstly to the absence of progestational balance, and secondly to the fact that most of the estrogens previously available for clinical use were artificial and administered orally, resulting in intensive hepatic metabolism, leading to metabolic disturbances. The need for the addition of progestogen leads also to consideration of the adverse effects of these substances. During the past decade therapeutic improvements have been achieved. Knowledge about the different types of steroids now available, the right choice of dosage and duration of therapy according to the needs of the patient, and the new alternative delivery systems improves day by day. Various steroids are now available for clinical use. Among the estrogens, orally administered drugs, natural derivatives of estradiol, and nonoral drugs delivered by injection, implant, vaginal ring or cream, ointment or transdermal system are at the prescriber's disposal. Among the progestogens available to the prescriber and recommended to be added to ERT, the molecules derived from testosterone [norethisterone (norethindrone), norgestrel] are less prescribed than the molecules derived from progesterone (didrogesterone) or from 17-hydroxyprogesterone (medroxyprogesterone acetate). In menopausal therapy the latter derivatives from progesterone or 17-hydroxyprogesterone are preferable, but low doses of any type of progestogen could be both protective of the target organs and devoid of harmful effects. Careful consideration of contraindications of treatment and regular follow-up are prerequisites for safe therapy. Recent epidemiological data now demonstrate clearly that the use of ERT under these conditions affords protection against osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease. Clear benefits to women's health may therefore be obtained from the adequate choice and surveillance of therapy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The advantages of delivering drugs through the skin for systemic therapy have been widely recognized and represent a growing sector in drug development. Transdermal delivery of steroids is also a rapidly expanding field and in various clinical situations where hormonal replacement therapy is needed this route of administration is a real breakthrough, considering the relative toxicity of some steroids when given orally. Various transdermal systems have been designed, all of them aimed at achieving a constant release rate of the molecules contained in their reservoir through the intact skin. The skin itself, and especially the outermost layer, the stratum corneum, can play the roles of a reservoir and a rate-controlling membrane. So far, estradiol, progesterone and testosterone have been demonstrated to be good candidates for transdermal delivery. The effectiveness and the acceptability of transdermal delivery of estradiol in postmenopausal women have been demonstrated. The efficacy of topical administration of progesterone in patients with benign breast disease has also been proved. More recently, the high rate of acceptability and efficacy of transdermal testosterone in male hypogonadism has been demonstrated. The transdermal delivery of steroids is therefore expected to make a significant impact on the quality of patient care both in men and in women.
In a case-control study, 178 women diagnosed with fibroadenoma (FA) between 1976 and 1982 were compared with 178 age-matched controls in order to assess the risk factors for FA. Women who had a previous diagnosis of breast disease were excluded. The odds ratios (OR) of FA were calculated for different risk factors of breast disease from bivariate analysis as well as multivariate regression analysis. The highest ORs were found for a previous premenstrual mastalgia before first childbirth and a familial history (FH) of breast cancer (BC). Oral contraceptive (OC) use before a first full-term pregnancy (FFTP) does not modify this risk. Also current use of standard oral contraceptives (SOC) containing 50 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol per pill appeared to be protective and the correlation with FA was negative. These findings underline: (a) the predictive value of premenstrual mastalgia for the subsequent development of breast disease; (b) only current high-dose OC use is protective.
The possible role played by oestrogens in modifying the occurrence of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) in particular and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in general in post-menopausal women has long been controversial. Analysis of the literature reveals a difference between the findings of epidemiological studies published before 1980 and those published more recently. In the former, it was reported that the risk in women using oestrogen replacement therapy (ERT) either remained unchanged or increased in relation to that in non-users. In the latter, the trend changed and ERT was shown to have a definite protective effect. These contradictory results might be explained by a change in prescribing habits, involving the use of lower oestrogen doses and the selection of women with no CVD risk factors as recipients of long-term ERT. The protective effects of ERT have been attributed to metabolic changes induced by oestrogens, namely the increase in high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol observed after oral therapy. Recently, long-term studies using non-oral oestrogens delivered either by implant, or the percutaneous or transdermal routes have indicated the same favourable changes in lipid profiles as seen with oral ERT, provided follow-up is maintained for at least 6 mth. Factors other than lipids that are involved in CVD should also be evaluated in order to clarify the mechanism via which ERT affords cardiovascular protection in post-menopausal women.
RU 486 has wide potential utility as an abortifacient drug when used within the first 6 weeks of pregnancy and has the ability to induce an abortion in about 80% of subjects. Administration of low doses of prostaglandins together with RU 486 increases the success rate. It is possible that alterations in metabolism of RU 486 may explain non-responsiveness to the drug in some women. Mid-luteal phase administration of RU 486 produces bleeding within 72 h and in one-third of subjects there was luteolysis with decrease in serum FSH, oestradiol and progesterone concentrations. Administration of RU 486 in the late luteal phase does not disturb menstrual cycle length, bleeding patterns, ovulation, or hormonal parameters in treatment or posttreatment cycles. However, the drug alone cannot be used as a 'menses regulator' or 'once monthly pill' since some pregnancies do continue. Possibly the efficacy of RU 486 may be enhanced when it is combined with prostaglandins or other agents. Administration of RU 486 in the follicular phase blocks ovulation, delays the LH surge, and is associated with low concentrations of oestradiol. This is presumably the result of gonadotrophin inhibition.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.