Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Sean Morrison

Publications and source records attributed to R Sean Morrison.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Brain dysfunction: another burden for the chronically critically ill.

BACKGROUND: Chronic critical illness is a devastating syndrome of prolonged respiratory failure and other derangements. To our knowledge, no previous research has addressed brain dysfunction in the chronically critically ill, although this topic is important for medical decision making. METHODS: We studied a prospective cohort of 203 consecutive, chronically critically ill adults transferred to our hospital's respiratory care unit (RCU) after tracheotomy for failure to wean. We measured prevalence and duration of coma and delirium during RCU treatment using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit with the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale. To assess survivors (at 3 and 6 months after RCU discharge), we used a validated telephone Confusion Assessment Method. RESULTS: Before hospitalization, most (153 [75.4%]) of the 203 patients in the study were at home, completely independent (115 [56.7%]), and cognitively intact (116 [82.0%]). In the RCU, 61 (30.0%) were comatose throughout the stay. Approximately half of patients (66 of 142) who were not in coma were delirious. Patients spent an average of 17.9 days (range, 1-153 days) in coma or delirium (average RCU stay, 25.6 days). Half of survivors (79 of 160) had one of these disturbances at RCU discharge. At 6 months, three fourths (151) of the study patients were dead or institutionalized; of 85 survivors, 58 (68.2%) were too profoundly impaired to respond to telephone cognitive assessment, and 53 (62.4%) were dependent in all activities of daily living. CONCLUSIONS: Severe, prolonged, and permanent brain dysfunction is a prominent feature of chronic critical illness. These data, together with previous reports of symptom distress and rates of mortality and institutionalization, describe burdens for chronically critically ill patients receiving continued life-prolonging treatment and for their families.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Improving the management of pain in hospitalized adults.

BACKGROUND: Pain is a major quality issue. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a series of interventions on pain management. METHODS: This controlled clinical trial (April 1, 2002, to February 28, 2003) involved the staggered implementation of 3 interventions into 2 blocks of matched hospital units. The setting was an 1171-bed hospital. A total of 3964 adults were studied. Interventions included education, standardized pain assessment using a 1- or 4-item (enhanced) pain scale, audit and feedback of pain scores to nursing staff, and a computerized decision support system. The main outcome measures were pain assessment and severity and analgesic prescribing. RESULTS: Units using enhanced pain scales had significantly higher pain assessment rates than units using 1-item pain scales (64% vs 32%; P<.001), audit and feedback of pain results was associated with increases in pain assessment rates compared with units in which audit and feedback was not used (85% vs 64%; P<.001), and the addition of the computerized decision support system was associated with significant increases in pain assessment only when compared with units without audit and feedback (79% vs 64%; P<.001). The enhanced pain scale was associated with significant increases in prescribing of World Health Organization step 2 or 3 analgesic for patients with moderate or severe pain compared with the 1-item scale (83% vs 66%; P=.01). The interventions did not improve pain scores. CONCLUSIONS: A clinically meaningful pain assessment instrument combined with either audit and feedback or a computerized decision support system improved pain documentation to more than 80%. The enhanced pain scale was associated with improved analgesic prescribing. Future interventions should be directed toward altering physician behavior related to titration of opioid analgesics.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Early ambulation after hip fracture: effects on function and mortality.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the relationship between inpatient bed rest and functional outcomes. We examined how immobility is associated with function and mortality in patients with hip fracture. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 532 patients 50 years and older, who were treated with surgery after hip fracture in 4 hospitals in New York. We collected information from hospital visits, medical records, and interviews. "Days of immobility" was defined as days until the patient moved out of bed beyond a chair. Follow-up was obtained on function (using the Functional Independence Measure) at 2 and 6 months and on survival at 6 months. RESULTS: Patients with hip fracture experienced an average of 5.2 days of immobility. Compared with patients with a longer duration of immobility (ie, at the 90th percentile) in adjusted analyses, patients at the 10th percentile of immobility had lower 6-month mortality (-5.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -10.9% to -1.0%) and better Functional Independence Measure score for locomotion (0.99 points; 95% CI, 0.3 to 1.7 points, with higher values indicating better function), but there was no significant difference in locomotion by 6 months (0.58 points; 95% CI, -0.3 to 1.4 points). The adverse association of immobility was strongest in patients using personal assistance or supervision with locomotion at baseline (difference in 6-month mortality between the 90th and 10th percentile of immobility was -17.1% [P = .004] for this group and only 1.2% [P = .38] for patients independent in locomotion at baseline). CONCLUSION: In patients with hip fracture, delay in getting the patient out of bed is associated with poor function at 2 months and worsened 6-month survival.

Aged, 80 and over↗
PubMed2006

Palliative care and pain management.

Palliative care aims to improve quality of life and relieve suffering for patients with advanced illness and those close to them by specifically addressing communication, symptom management, coordination of care, psychosocial and spiritual realms, grief and bereavement support, and legal and ethical concerns. It has an interdisciplinary focus and may co-exist with curative and life-prolonging treatment. Palliative care is a key component of appropriate, routine medical care, especially for clinicians caring for older adults. In revisiting Mrs. B, the many needs of a typical elderly patient are apparent, as are the gaps in the current level of care. A discussion of prognosis and goals of care is a potential starting point. This includes obtaining input from an oncologist with regard to treatment options for Mrs. B's metastatic breast cancer and her pathologic hip fracture. Soliciting her treatment goals in the context of her chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and significant recent decline is the next challenge. Pain, dyspnea, constipation, anorexia, and anxiety could then be addressed with pointed assessment and symptom-specific management. Code status discussion, communication with her support network, and care coordination for her increased care needs would follow. Hospice should be introduced as a potential option. Advance care planning might also be initiated. Psychological and spiritual support needs could also be explored in time. Clearly, there is much to be done for Mrs. B and her loved ones in clarifying and coordinating whatever path comes to be. Older patients and their families face prolonged courses of chronic disease and gradual decline. Physicians caring for these patients need to be expert in the domains of palliative care so these patients and their families can receive the best quality of care while they are still living full lives and later as they approach the end of life.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed2006

Pain and ethnicity in the United States: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that racial and ethnic disparities exist in access to effective pain treatment. PURPOSE: To review evidence of these disparities and provide recommendations for care and further research. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: We conducted a MEDLINE search using the MeSH terms of ethnic groups, minority groups, pain, analgesia, and analgesics. We included studies describing current practice patterns, utilization of available treatments, treatment outcomes, and patient and provider knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. RESULTS: Our search identified 35 journal articles describing the effect of patient race and ethnicity on pain assessment and management. Three studies on pain assessment revealed that minority patients are more likely to have their pain underestimated by providers and less likely to have pain scores documented in the medical record compared to whites. Eleven of 17 studies found that African Americans and Hispanics are less likely to receive opioid analgesics and more likely to have their pain untreated compared to white patients. Three studies revealed that minority patients are more likely to have negative pain management index (PMI) scores-undertreated pain-compared to whites. Patient-related, provider-related, and pharmacy-related barriers to effective pain management were identified. CONCLUSION: The majority of studies reveal racial and ethnic disparities in access to effective pain treatment akin to disparities found in other medical services. Quality improvement initiatives that improve treatment of pain for all patients according to established guidelines should decrease disparities by race or ethnicity. Educational interventions should aim to improve patient-provider communication regarding pain and its treatment and should provide support around substance abuse issues. Further research is needed to examine pain treatment outcomes and to determine whether health care system factors lead to these disparities.

Ethnicity↗
PubMed2006

Factors associated with reductions in patients' analgesia at hospital discharge.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the patterns of opioid prescribing and the factors associated with reductions in the potency of patients' analgesic medications at the time of hospital discharge. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: Two hundred forty-four patients (171 surgical and 73 nonsurgical) hospitalized in an urban academic medical center who have experienced moderate or severe pain and who are taking opioid analgesics prior to discharge. OUTCOME: Step-down (or reduction) in the potency of patients' analgesic medication at the time of discharge. A step-down is defined as the analgesic medication that a patient is prescribed for outpatient analgesia at the time of discharge being less potent then the last pain medication administered to that patient just prior to hospital discharge. RESULTS: Thirty-three percent of all patients had reductions in the potency of their opioid pain medication at the time of discharge (36% for surgical and 26% for nonsurgical patients). For nonsurgical patients, we found a trend toward Hispanic ethnicity being an independent risk factor for having a step-down in analgesic potency at discharge (odds ratio [OR]: 3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9-14.9). CONCLUSION: Physicians frequently reduce the potency of hospitalized patients' pain medications at discharge and Hispanic patients may be at increased risk of this occurring. Further research is needed to determine if the reductions in analgesic potency we observed are associated with poor posthospital pain outcomes.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Cost and utilization outcomes of patients receiving hospital-based palliative care consultation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare per diem total direct, ancillary (laboratory and radiology) and pharmacy costs of palliative care (PC) compared to usual care (UC) patients during a terminal hospitalization; to examine the association between PC and ICU admission. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational cost analysis using a VA (payer) perspective. SETTING: Two urban VA medical centers. MEASUREMENTS: Demographic and health characteristics of 314 veterans admitted during two years were obtained from VA administrative data. Hospital costs came from the VA cost accounting system. ANALYSIS: Generalized linear models (GLM) were estimated for total direct, ancillary and pharmacy costs. Predictors included patient age, principal diagnosis, comorbidity, whether patient stay was medical or surgical, site and whether the patient was seen by the palliative care consultation team. A probit regression was used to analyze probability of ICU admission. Propensity score matching was used to improve balance in observed covariates. RESULTS: PC patients were 42 percentage points (95% CI, -56% [corrected] to -31%) less likely to be admitted to ICU. Total direct costs per day were $239 (95% CI, -387 to -122) lower and ancillary costs were $98 (95% CI, -133 to -57) lower than costs for UC patients. There was no difference in pharmacy costs. The results were similar using propensity score matching. CONCLUSION: PC was associated with significantly lower likelihood of ICU use and lower inpatient costs compared to UC. Our findings coupled with those indicating better patient and family outcomes with PC suggest both a cost and quality incentive for hospitals to develop PC programs.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Medication utilization in an urban homebound population.

BACKGROUND: The number of medically homebound adults has grown with the aging of the U.S. population, yet little is known about their health care utilization. We sought to characterize the health status and medication utilization of an urban cohort of homebound adults and to identify factors associated with medication use in this population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 415 patients enrolled in a primary care program for homebound adults in New York City during October 2002. Numbers of medications were obtained from formularies corroborated by home visits. For patients without prescription insurance, medication out-of-pocket costs were estimated according to average wholesale pricing. Sociodemographic and disease characteristics were obtained by chart abstraction. RESULTS: The median age was 83 years (range 25-106 years). Seventy-seven percent of patients were female, 63% were non-white, and 28% spoke Spanish. Sixty-four percent of patients had Medicaid. The cohort had a mean of 8.2 (range 1-27, standard deviation 4.5) medications prescribed per month. Multivariate analysis showed that increasing age was associated with fewer medications (p <.001). Charlson comorbidity score was positively associated with number of medications (p <.001), whereas Activities of Daily Living score, a measure of functional dependence, was not. Twenty-seven percent of the cohort lacked prescription drug coverage. The total number of medications per month among the uninsured patients was 7.4 (standard deviation 4.4). Estimated median monthly out-of-pocket cost for the uninsured patients was dollar 223 (range dollar 1-dollar 1512). CONCLUSIONS: For homebound patients without prescription drug coverage, medication use may represent substantial financial burden. Additional research is needed to determine whether out-of-pocket medication costs represent a barrier to care in this population.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2006

Effect of inpatient quality of care on functional outcomes in patients with hip fracture.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine the relationship between functional outcome and process of care for patients with hip fracture. RESEARCH DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: We undertook a prospective cohort study in 4 hospitals of 554 patients treated with surgery for hip fracture. MEASUREMENTS: Information on patient characteristics and processes of hospital care collected from the medical record, interviews, and bedside observations. Follow-up information obtained at 6 months on function (using the Functional Independence Measure [FIM]), survival, and readmission. RESULTS: Individual processes of care were generally not associated with adjusted outcomes. A scale of 9 processes related to mobilization was associated with improved adjusted locomotion (P = 0.006), self care (P = 0.022), and transferring (P = 0.007) at 2 months, but the benefits were smaller and not significant by 6 months. These processes were not associated with mortality. The predicted value for the FIM locomotion measure (range, 2-14) at 2 months was 5.9 (95% confidence interval 5.4-6.4) for patients at the 10th percentile of performance on these processes compared with 7.1 (95% confidence interval 6.6, 7.6) at the 90th percentile. Patients who experienced no hospital complications and no readmissions retained the benefits in locomotion at 6 months. Anticoagulation processes were associated with improved transferring at 2 months (P = 0.046) but anticoagulation and other processes of care were not otherwise associated with improved function. DISCUSSION: Our findings indicate the need to attend to all steps in the care of patients with hip fracture. Additionally, functional outcomes were more sensitive markers of improved process of care, compared with 6-month mortality, in the case of hip fracture.

Aged, 80 and over↗
PubMed2006

The effect of emergency department crowding on the management of pain in older adults with hip fracture.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of emergency department (ED) crowding on assessment and treatment of pain in older adults. DESIGN: Retrospective review of ED records from a prospective cohort study. SETTING: Urban, academically affiliated, tertiary medical center. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-eight patients, aged 50 and older, evaluated and hospitalized from the ED with hip fracture. MEASUREMENTS: Patient-related risk factors: age, sex, nursing home residence, ED triage status, dementia, Acute Physiology in Age and Chronic Health Evaluation II physiological score, and RAND comorbidity score. ED crowding risk factors: ED census and mean length of stay. OUTCOMES: documentation of pain assessment, time to pain assessment, time to pain treatment, patients reporting pain receiving analgesia, and meperidine use. RESULTS: Mean age was 83 (range 52-101), 81.0% of patients complained of pain, mean time to pain assessment was 40 minutes (range 0-600), time to treatment was 141 minutes (range 10-525), and mean delay to treatment was 122 minutes (range 0-526). Of those with pain, 35.9% received no analgesia, 7.0% received nonopioids, and 57.0% received opioids. Of those receiving opioids, 32.8% received meperidine. ED crowding at census levels greater than 120% bed capacity was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of documentation of pain assessment (P = .05) and longer times to pain assessment (P = .01). CONCLUSION: Older adults with hip fracture are at risk for underassessment of pain, considerable delays in analgesic administration after pain is identified, and treatment with inappropriate analgesics (e.g., meperidine) in the ED. Higher levels of ED census are significantly associated with poorer pain management.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Preoperative status and risk of complications in patients with hip fracture.

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available on preoperative status and risks for complications for older patients having surgery for hip fracture. Our objective was to identify potentially modifiable clinical findings that should be considered in decisions about the timing of surgery. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study with data obtained from medical records and through structured interviews with patients. A total of 571 adults with hip fracture who were admitted to 4 metropolitan hospitals were included. RESULTS: Multiple logistic regression was used to identify risk factors (including 11 categories of physical and laboratory findings, classified as mild and severe abnormalities) for in-hospital complications. The presence of more than 1 (odds ratio [OR] 9.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8 to 33.0) major abnormality before surgery or the presence of major abnormalities on admission that were not corrected prior to surgery (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.2 to 6.4) was independently associated with the development of postoperative complications. We also found that minor abnormalities, while warranting correction, did not increase risk (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.73). CONCLUSIONS: In this study of older adults undergoing urgent surgery, potentially reversible abnormalities in laboratory and physical examination occurred frequently and significantly increased the risk of postoperative complications. Major clinical abnormalities should be corrected prior to surgery, but patients with minor abnormalities may proceed to surgery with attention to these medical problems perioperatively.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Treatment of pain in older patients.

Pain in older adults is a highly prevalent problem. While the basis of pain management in older individuals is similar to that for younger patients, it may differ in terms of presentation, assessment, and management. This article explores the basic concepts of pain control with a focus on older patients with cancer and highlights issues clinicians should consider when treating these individuals.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

When critical illness becomes chronic: informational needs of patients and families.

PURPOSE: A large and growing group of intensive care unit survivors are "chronically critically ill," with ongoing respiratory failure and poor outcomes for postdischarge survival and functional recovery. In this qualitative study, we investigated what information is relevant and important for clinician-patient/family communication when critical illness becomes chronic, as indicated by tracheotomy for prolonged mechanical ventilation. METHODS: We conducted focus groups and structured interviews of patients who survived chronic critical illness, of surrogates of such patients and of nonsurvivors, and of clinicians with relevant experience. Discussions were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed using grounded theory. RESULTS: Twenty-five subjects participated (4 survivors, 7 survivors' surrogates, 4 nonsurvivors' surrogates, 10 clinicians). We found broad agreement on 6 major domains of information that are relevant and important: (1) nature of illness/treatments, (2) prognosis, (3) impact of treatment, (4) potential complications, (5) expected care needs after hospitalization, and (6) alternatives to continuation of treatment. Participants endorsed the multidisciplinary family meeting as an effective communication strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Given poor outcomes for most patients and high costs and burdens of treatment, effective communication is essential when critical illness enters a chronic phase. Our findings provide a framework for such communication and a basis for further research.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

The growth of palliative care programs in United States hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Palliative care programs are becoming increasingly common in U.S. hospitals. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the growth of hospital based palliative care programs from 2000-2003 and identify hospital characteristics associated with the development of a palliative care program. DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: Data were obtained from the 2001-2004 American Hospital Association Annual Surveys which covered calendar years 2000-2003. We identified all programs that self-reported the presence of a hospital-owned palliative care program and acute medical and surgical beds. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify characteristics significantly associated with the presence of a palliative care program in the 2003 survey data. RESULTS: Overall, the number of programs increased linearly from 632 (15% of hospitals) in 2000 to 1027 (25% of hospitals) in 2003. Significant predictors associated with an increased likelihood of having a palliative care program included greater numbers of hospital beds and critical care beds, geographic region, and being an academic medical center. Compared to notfor- profit hospitals, VA hospitals were significantly more likely to have a palliative care program and city, county or state and for-profit hospitals were significantly less likely to have a program. Hospitals operated by the Catholic Church, and hospitals that owned their own hospice program were significantly more likely to have a palliative care program than non- Catholic Church-operated hospitals and hospitals without hospice programs respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that although growth in palliative care programs has occurred throughout the nation's hospitals, larger hospitals, academic medical centers, not-for-profit hospitals, and VA hospitals are significantly more likely to develop a program compared to other hospitals.

Data Collection↗
PubMed2005

Health care system factors affecting end-of-life care.

The field of palliative care in the United States developed in response to a public health crisis--namely, poor quality of life for patients with serious illness and their families--and most palliative care research to date has been appropriately focused on identifying patient and family needs and identifying gaps in the current health care system and in the education of our health care professionals. Research has also begun to develop and evaluate new interventions and systems to address these care gaps. Preliminary studies suggest modest benefits of an array of programs designed to deliver palliative care services. These benefits include improved pain and other symptoms, increased family satisfaction, and lower hospital costs. Unfortunately, the validity and reliability of these findings are limited by important methodological weaknesses including small sample sizes, poorly described and nongeneralizable interventions, diverse and nonstandardized outcome measures, and poor study designs (i.e., lack of appropriate control groups, nonblinded designs). Comprehensive and rigorous research is needed to evaluate the effect of well-delineated and generalizable palliative care structures and processes on important clinical and use outcomes. Large multisite studies that have adequate power to detect meaningful differences in clinical and use outcomes, and that use well-defined and generalizable structures and evidence-based care processes, well-defined uniform outcome measures, and analyses that link the outcomes of interest to individual components of the interventions, are needed to guide further development of the field.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

The effect of a social work intervention to enhance advance care planning documentation in the nursing home.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of a multicomponent advance care planning intervention directed at nursing home social workers on identification and documentation of preferences for medical treatments and on patient outcomes. DESIGN: Controlled clinical trial. SETTING: New York City nursing home. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred thirty-nine newly admitted long-term care residents. INTERVENTION: Nursing home social workers were randomized to the intervention or control groups. The intervention consisted of baseline education in advance care planning that incorporated small-group workshops and role play/practice sessions for intervention social workers; structured advance care planning discussions with residents and their proxies at admission, after any change in clinical status, and at yearly intervals; formal structured review of residents' goals of care at preexisting regular team meetings; "flagging" of advance directives on nursing home charts; and feedback to individual healthcare providers of the congruence of care they provided and the preferences specified in the advance care planning process. Control social workers received an educational training session on New York State law regarding advance directives but no additional training or interventions. Subjects were enrolled from January 9, 2001 through May 25, 2003 and followed for 6 months after enrollment. MEASUREMENTS: Nursing home chart documentation of advance directives (healthcare proxies, living wills) and do-not-resuscitate orders; preferences for artificial nutrition and hydration, intravenous antibiotics, and hospitalization; and concordance of treatments received with documented preferences were compared for residents assigned to intervention and control social workers. RESULTS: Intervention residents were significantly more likely than residents in the control group to have their preferences regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (40% vs 20%, P=.005), artificial nutrition and hydration (47% vs 9%, P<.01), intravenous antibiotics (44% vs 9%, P<.01), and hospitalization (49% vs 16%, P<.01) documented in the nursing home chart. Control residents were significantly more likely than intervention residents to receive treatments discordant with their prior stated wishes. Two of 49 (5%) intervention residents received a treatment in conflict with their prior stated wishes (one hospitalization, one episode of intravenous antibiotics), compared with 17 of 96 (18%) control patients (P=.04). CONCLUSION: This generalizable intervention directed at nursing home social workers significantly improved the documentation and identification of patients' wishes regarding common life-sustaining treatments and resulted in a higher concordance between patients' prior stated wishes and treatments received.

Advance Care Planning↗
PubMed2005

The intersection between geriatrics and palliative care: a call for a new research agenda.

Palliative care is interdisciplinary treatment focused on the relief of suffering and achieving the best possible quality of life for patients and their caregivers. It differs for geriatric patients from what is usually appropriate in a younger population because of the nature and duration of chronic illness during old age. In spite of the fact that death occurs far more commonly in older people than in any age group, the evidence base for palliative care in older adults is sparse. Over the coming years, the research foci in the field of geriatrics and palliative care that must be addressed include establishing the prevalence of symptoms in patients with chronic disease; evaluating the association between treatment of symptoms and outcomes; increasing the evidence base for treatment of symptoms; understanding psychological well-being, spiritual well-being, and quality of life of patients and elucidating and alleviating sources of caregiver burden; reevaluating service delivery; adapting research methodologies specifically for geriatric palliative care; and increasing the number of geriatricians trained as investigators in palliative care research. This article discusses specific methods to improve the current situation within each of these seven areas.

Caregivers↗