Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Schuurman

Publications and source records attributed to R Schuurman.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Absence of human metapneumovirus co-infection in cases of severe respiratory syncytial virus infection.

It has been suggested that co-infection of human metapneumovirus (hMPV) in severe respiratory syncytial (RSV) virus bronchiolitis is very common. To evaluate the epidemiology of hMPV co-infection in children with severe lower respiratory tract infection caused by RSV virus. This was an observational cohort study in which hMPV and RSV viral load was measured by RT-PCR in tracheal specimens from the target population. hMPV could not be detected in any of the 30 mechanically ventilated children with RSV lower respiratory tract infection. Our study suggests that hMPV co-infection is not very common in severe RSV lower respiratory tract infection.

Child↗

Application of UL144 molecular typing to determine epidemiology of cytomegalovirus infections in preterm infants.

Sequence analysis of the UL144 gene of human cytomegalovirus (CMV) was used to investigate the epidemiology of CMV infections in preterm infants. Nosocomial transmission of CMV from congenitally infected infant to preterm twins was excluded based on distinct molecular profiles of CMV strains. Indistinguishable molecular profiles between strains from the mother and the infant indicated postnatal acquisition of CMV through breastfeeding.

Base Sequence↗

Increased risk of early virological failure in non-European HIV-1-infected patients in a Dutch cohort on highly active antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare early and late responses to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in European and non-European HIV-1 infected patients in a Dutch cohort. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the response to HAART of 216 previously treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients using the University Medical Centre Utrecht HIV database. African (n=51), Asian (n=7), and Central/South American (n=6) patients were classified as non-European, and others as European (n=152). Early failure was defined as a viral load that remained above 400 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL after 6 months of treatment with HAART. Late-phase failure was determined in patients who were successfully treated in the early phase and was defined as two consecutive viral load measurements above 400 copies/mL, a new AIDS-defining event or death. RESULTS: In the early phase, four of 152 (2.6%) European and eight of 64 (12.5%) non-European patients failed HAART. A significant increased risk of virological failure in the early phase of treatment was observed for non-Europeans as compared to Europeans (odds ratio 4.6; 95% confidence interval 1.1-20.2). Low serum drug levels in the absence of resistant virus were often seen at the time of early failure. No difference in late-phase failure was observed between the two groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.6; 95% confidence interval 0.3-1.2). CONCLUSIONS: Non-European patients had a 4.6 times higher risk of virological failure than their European counterparts in the first 6 months of treatment with HAART. This failure seemed to be associated with low serum drug levels at the time of failure. However, if HAART was successful in the early phase, response rates in the late phase were similar for Europeans and non-Europeans.

Adult↗

Updated European recommendations for the clinical use of HIV drug resistance testing.

In most European countries, HIV drug resistance testing has become a routine clinical tool. However, its practical implementation in a clinical context is demanding. The European HIV Drug Resistance Panel was established to make recommendations to clinicians and virologists on this topic and to propose quality control measures. The panel recommends resistance testing for the following indications: i) drug-naive patients with acute or recent infection; ii) therapy failure, including suboptimal treatment response, when treatment change is considered; iii) pregnant HIV-1-infected women and paediatric patients with detectable viral load when treatment initiation or change is considered; and iv) genotype source patient when post-exposure prophylaxis is considered. In addition, for drug-naive patients with chronic infection in whom treatment is to be started, the panel suggests that resistance testing should be strongly considered and recommends testing the earliest sample for drug resistance if suspicion of resistance is high or prevalence of resistance in this population exceeds 10%. The panel does not favour genotyping over phenotype, however it is anticipated that genotyping will be used more often because of its greater accessibility, lower cost and faster turnaround time. For the interpretation of resistance data, clinically validated systems should be used to the greatest extent possible. It is mandatory that laboratories performing HIV resistance tests take regular part in quality assurance programs. Similarly, it is necessary that HIV clinicians and virologists take part in continuous education and meet regularly to discuss problematic clinical cases. Indeed, resistance test results should be used in the context of all other clinically relevant information for predicting therapy response. The panel also encourages the timely collection of epidemiological information to estimate the impact of transmission of resistant HIV and the prevalence of HIV-1 non-B subtypes in the different European countries.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

Transient relapses ("blips") of plasma HIV RNA levels during HAART are associated with drug resistance.

INTRODUCTION: In a large number of patients on HAART who achieved plasma HIV RNA levels below the limit of detection (50 copies/ml), transient relapses of HIV RNA levels ("blips") are observed. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether relapses of plasma HIV RNA during HAART are associated with development of drug resistance. METHODS: Plasma samples from 15 patients with a transient viral load relapse during HAART were studied. All regimens contained lamivudine (3TC). We used an ultrasensitive sequence approach to analyze the presence of drug resistance mutations during the relapse. RESULTS: The median plasma HIV RNA load of the relapse was 76 copies/ml (range 50-1239). In 11 of 15 cases, a genotype of HIV could be obtained. Mutations in the RT and protease gene conferring resistance to one or more drugs were observed in 8 of 11 patients, 6 of whom had the M184V substitution. During a median follow-up of 27 months after the relapse, plasma HIV RNA levels remained undetectable in 13 of 15 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma HIV RNA blips during HAART can be associated with selection of drug-resistant HIV. This indicates that viral replication may occur during HAART, probably caused by a temporary decrease in active drug concentrations. A blip containing only wild-type virus is not necessarily caused by viral replication. In this situation the raise of HIV RNA could also originate from release of wild-type viruses, caused by activation of the latent virus reservoir. Independent of the mechanism, blips did not preclude successful inhibition of viral replication during 2-year follow-up in the majority of these cases.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

[HIV-1 therapy in the Netherlands; virological and immunological response to antiretroviral therapy].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of treatment of HIV-1 infection with combination therapy consisting of since 1996 in the Netherlands available protease and reverse transcriptase inhibitors. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: In an observational clinical cohort of HIV-1-infected individuals, the short-term successful treatment end point of antiviral therapy including at least one antiretroviral drug licensed in the Netherlands since July 1, 1996 (protease inhibitors and reverse transcriptase inhibitors), was HIV-1 RNA plasma levels < or = 500 copies/ml (virological success). Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify prognostic markers for therapy success. The study included 2,148 infected individuals with a median follow-up of 135 weeks of treatment; 1,049 had been pre-treated with antiretroviral drugs before starting their new regimen and 1,099 were treatment naive. RESULTS: Plasma HIV-1 RNA levels < or = 500 copies/ml at 24 weeks of treatment were seen in 61% of all patients. The chance of therapy success for naive patients was twice that for pre-treated patients (relative risk: 1.8; p < or = 0.001). Following the first 24 weeks, the chance of virological success was higher in the naive group (78% versus 63%; p < or = 0.001), and the number of naive patients failing therapy after initial success was smaller compared to pre-treated patients (22% versus 45%; p < or = 0.001). In the naive group, the CD4+ T-cell number increased from 239 to 440 (x 10(6) cells/l) in case of success, and decreased from 150 to 320 in case of treatment failure. HIV-1 related morbidity declined from 0.26 to 0.05 and mortality dropped from 0.07 to 0.03 per person-year of follow-up. Regimens were changed at least once in 76% of patients. Toxicity and therapy failure were the main reasons for regimen changes in naive and pre-treated patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: A combination of antiretroviral drugs, including at least one of the drugs licensed since 1996, led to a drop in HIV-1 plasma concentrations. Morbidity and mortality also decreased. The chance of a better immunological and virological response to the new drug regimens was greatest in therapy-naive patients.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

Simultaneous detection of influenza viruses A and B using real-time quantitative PCR.

Since influenza viruses can cause severe illness, timely diagnosis is important for an adequate intervention. The available rapid detection methods either lack sensitivity or require complex laboratory manipulation. This study describes a rapid, sensitive detection method that can be easily applied to routine diagnosis. This method simultaneously detects influenza viruses A and B in specimens of patients with respiratory infections using a TaqMan-based real-time PCR assay. Primers and probes were selected from highly conserved regions of the matrix protein gene of influenza virus A and the hemagglutinin gene segment of influenza virus B. The applicability of this multiplex PCR was evaluated with 27 influenza virus A and 9 influenza virus B reference strains and isolates. In addition, the specificity of the assay was assessed using eight reference strains of other respiratory viruses (parainfluenza viruses 1 to 3, respiratory syncytial virus Long strain, rhinoviruses 1A and 14, and coronaviruses OC43 and 229E) and 30 combined nose and throat swabs from asymptomatic subjects. Electron microscopy-counted stocks of influenza viruses A and B were used to develop a quantitative PCR format. Thirteen copies of viral RNA were detected for influenza virus A, and 11 copies were detected for influenza virus B, equaling 0.02 and 0.006 50% tissue culture infective doses, respectively. The diagnostic efficacy of the multiplex TaqMan-based PCR was determined by testing 98 clinical samples. This real-time PCR technique was found to be more sensitive than the combination of conventional viral culturing and shell vial culturing.

Follow-Up Studies↗

Comparison of quantitative and qualitative PCR assays for cytomegalovirus DNA in plasma.

We analyzed the performance characteristics of the qualitative AMPLICOR CMV Test (Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, Calif.) and quantitative COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR Test (Roche Molecular Systems) assays and compared the performance of the AMPLICOR quantitative assay with an in-house-developed cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA PCR assay. The quantitative AMPLICOR assay was found to be more sensitive than the qualitative AMPLICOR assay. The quantitative AMPLICOR assay has a lower limit of sensitivity of 400 CMV DNA copies/ml of plasma and is linear to 50,000 CMV DNA copies/ml of plasma. Compared to the in-house PCR assay, the AMPLICOR quantitative assay gave lower viral load values at all concentrations tested, but the difference between the two assays was not consistent across the entire dynamic range of the AMPLICOR quantitative assay. At the lower end of the assay, the viral load values obtained with the in-house PCR assay were three- to fivefold (0.5 to 0.7 log units) higher than those measured with the AMPLICOR assay. At higher input concentrations, the differences between the two assays approached 10-fold. This direct comparison of the in-house assay and the quantitative AMPLICOR assay provides the ability to compare previously published in-house data with an assay widely available for future research and clinical monitoring of patients with CMV infections.

Cytomegalovirus↗

Laboratory guidelines for the practical use of HIV drug resistance tests in patient follow-up.

HIV drug resistance is one of the major limitations in the successful treatment of HIV-infected patients using currently available antiretroviral combination therapies. When appropriate, drug susceptibility profiles should be taken into consideration in the choice of a specific combination therapy. Guidelines recommending resistance testing in certain circumstances have been issued. Many clinicians have access to resistance testing and will increasingly use these results in their treatment decisions. In this document, we comment on the different methods available, and the relevant issues relating to the clinical application of these tests. Specifically, the following recommendations can be made: (i) genotypic and phenotypic HIV-1 drug resistance analyses can yield complementary information for the clinician. However, insufficient information currently exists as to which approach is preferable in any particular clinical setting; (ii) when HIV-1 drug resistance testing is required, it is recommended that testing be performed on plasma samples obtained before starting, stopping or changing therapy, on samples that have a viral load above the detection limit of the resistance test; (iii) the panel recommends that genotypic and phenotypic HIV-1 drug resistance testing for clinical purposes be performed in a certified laboratory under strict quality control and quality assurance standards; and (iv) the panel recommends that resistance testing laboratories provide clinicians with resistance reports that include a list of drug-related resistance mutations (genotype) and/or a list of drug-related fold resistance values (phenotype), with interpretations of each by an experienced virologist. The interpretation of genotypic and phenotypic analysis is a complex and developing science, and in order to understand HIV-1 drug resistance reports, communication between the requesting clinician and the expert that interpreted the resistance report is recommended.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

2,2'-bipyridine lariat calixcrowns: a new class of encapsulating ligands forming highly luminescent Eu3+ and Tb3+ complexes

A new class of calix[4]arene crown ethers with one or two bipyridines appended to the polyether ring (lariat calixcrowns) have been designed and synthesized; the luminescence properties of their Eu3+ and Tb3+ complexes have been studied in acetonitrile. In this solvent, long lifetimes for the metal emitting states and high metal-luminescence intensities obtained upon ligand excitation have been observed in both Eu3+ and Tb3+ complexes. The association constants in methanol have been determined for some of the complexes studied.

Journal Article↗

Blinded, multicenter quality control study for the quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA in plasma by the Belgian AIDS reference laboratories.

OBJECTIVE: In order to evaluate the interlaboratory variation of HIV-1 RNA measurements in plasma, the Belgian AIDS reference laboratories organized a blinded multicenter quality control study. METHODS: Atest panel of coded spiked HIV-1 plasma samples reflecting the dynamic range of the assay was composed and distributed. The HIV-1 RNA concentration of these samples was determined by the eight Belgian AIDS reference laboratories by means of the Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor version 1.5 assay. RESULTS: Analysis of the results demonstrated that there was little interlaboratory variation for the high concentration range (4.0-5.7 log10 copies/mL), never exceeding 0.2 log10 copies/mL. However the standard deviation for the low concentration range (2.6-3.9 log10 copies/mL) reached up to 0.22 log10 copies/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Since interlaboratory variability never reached 0.5 log10 copies/mL and each of the laboratories was able to detect four-fold differences in plasma HIV-1 RNA levels, the Amplicor assay can be used in multicenter studies without a centralized analysis of samples. Furthermore, this well-characterized proficiency panel of spiked plasma samples could be used as a standard in the study of interassay comparisons.

Belgium↗

Evaluation of automated nucleic acid extraction devices for application in HCV NAT.

BACKGROUND: To further improve the safety of the blood supply, various national blood transfusion organizations presently use or are in the process of implementing routine HCV NAT in minipools. According to the Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP) of the European Union, the HCV NAT detection limit of the assay should be 100 IU per mL (270 geq/mL) for testing initial plasma pools. Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI) regulations stipulate that 5000 IU per mL (13,500 geq/mL) must be detected to calculate the amount contributed by individual donations composing the minipool. The sensitivity for HCV RNA extraction achieved by three commercially available laboratory kits was compared. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Nucleic acids from 1-in-3 serial dilutions of an HCV RNA run control (Pelispy, CLB) were extracted with three kits (Cobas Amplicor, Roche Diagnostic Systems; BioRobot 9604, Qiagen; and NucliSens Extractor, Organon Teknika). HCV PCR of all extracts was performed using a second-generation Cobas Amplicor HCV test and the Cobas Amplicor analyzer. RESULTS: The manual Cobas Amplicor, the BioRobot 9604, and the NucliSens Extractor setups allow a 95-percent HCV RNA detection limit of 129, 82, and 12 geq per mL, respectively. The maximal pool size for the manual Cobas Amplicor, the BioRobot 9604, and the NucliSens Extractor kits that would still meet the PEI criteria for HCV NAT in minipools was calculated at 104, 164, and 1125 donations, respectively. CONCLUSION: All three HCV NAT kits evaluated meet the criteria set by CPMP and PEI. The highest sensitivity for HCV NAT screening can be achieved with the high-volume NucliSens Extractor method in combination with the Cobas Amplicor HCV v2.0 test on the Cobas Amplicor analyzer.

Blood Donors↗

Prevalence and characteristics of multinucleoside-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 among European patients receiving combinations of nucleoside analogues.

The prevalence and the genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of multinucleoside-resistant (MNR) human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) variants in Europe were investigated in a multicenter study that involved centers in nine European countries. Study samples (n = 363) collected between 1991 and 1997 from patients exposed to two or more nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and 274 control samples from patients exposed to no or one NRTI were screened for two marker mutations of multinucleoside resistance (the Q151M mutation and a mutation with a 2-amino-acid insertion at codon 69, T69S-XX). Q151M was identified in six of the study samples (1. 6%), and T69S-XX was identified in two of the study samples (0.5%; both of them T69S-SS), but both patterns were absent among control samples. Non-NRTI (NNRTI)-related changes were observed in viral strains from two patients, which displayed the Q151M resistance pattern, although the patients were NNRTI naive. The patients whose isolates displayed multinucleoside resistance had received treatment with zidovudine and either didanosine, zalcitabine, or stavudine. Both resistance patterns conferred broad cross-resistance to NRTIs in vitro and a poor response to treatment in vivo. MNR HIV-1 is found only among multinucleoside-experienced patients. Its prevalence is low in Europe, but it should be closely monitored since it seriously limits treatment options.

Amino Acid Substitution↗

Evolution of lamivudine resistance in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected individuals: the relative roles of drift and selection.

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) rapidly develops resistance to lamivudine during monotherapy, typically resulting in the appearance at position 184 in reverse transcriptase (RT) of isoleucine instead of the wild-type methionine (M184I) early in therapy, which is later replaced by valine (M184V). M184V reduces viral susceptibility to drug in vitro by approximately 100-fold, but also results in a lower processivity of RT. We show that a drop in absolute viral fitness associated with the outgrowth of M184V results in a drop in viral load only in individuals with high CD4(+) counts, from whom we estimate the relative fitness of M184V in the presence of drug to be approximately 10% of that of the wild type prior to therapy. The timing of emergence of the M184V mutant varies widely between infected individuals. From analysis of the frequency of M184I and M184V mutants determined at multiple time points in seven individuals during lamivudine therapy, we estimated the fitness advantage of M184V over M184I during therapy to be approximately 23% on average. We have also estimated the average ratio of the frequencies of the two mutants prior to therapy to be 0. 2:1, with a range from 0.12:1 to 0.33:1. We have found that the differences between individuals in the rate of evolution of lamivudine resistance arise due to genetic drift affecting the relative frequency of M184I and M184V prior to therapy. These results show that stochastic effects can be significant in HIV evolution, even when there is large fitness difference between mutant and wild-type variants.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

Carbamazepine--indinavir interaction causes antiretroviral therapy failure.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of antiretroviral therapy failure caused by an interaction between carbamazepine and indinavir. CASE SUMMARY: A 48-year-old HIV-positive white man was treated with antiretroviral triple therapy, consisting of indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine. His HIV-RNA (viral load) became undetectable (<400 copies/mL) less than two months after this therapy was started; this was confirmed one month later. Shortly after the start of antiretroviral therapy, the patient developed herpes zoster, which was treated with famciclovir. Tramadol was initially prescribed for postherpetic neuralgia; however, this was substituted with carbamazepine due to insufficient analgesic effect. Indinavir plasma concentrations decreased substantially during carbamazepine therapy. Carbamazepine was stopped after 2.5 months and, two weeks later, the HIV-RNA was detectable (6 x 103 copies/mL). Resistance for lamivudine was observed in that blood sample; resistance for zidovudine might have been present, and resistance to indinavir was not detected. A few months later, a further increase of the HIV-RNA occurred (300 x 103 copies/mL), after which the therapy was switched to a new antiretroviral regimen containing nevirapine, didanosine, and stavudine. DISCUSSION: Physicians may prescribe carbamazepine for HIV-infected patients to treat seizures or postherpetic neuralgia, which are complications of opportunistic infections such as herpes zoster or toxoplasmosis. Carbamazepine is a potent enzyme inducer, predominantly of the CYP3A enzyme system, while HIV-protease inhibitors such as indinavir are substrates for and inhibitors of CYP3A. Therefore, an interaction between these drugs could be expected. A low dose of carbamazepine (200 mg/d) and the usual dose of indinavir (800 mg q8h) in our patient resulted in carbamazepine concentrations within the therapeutic range for epilepsy treatment; indinavir concentrations dropped substantially. The virologic, resistance, and plasma drug concentration data, as well as the chronology of events, are highly indicative of antiretroviral treatment failure due to the interaction between carbamazepine and indinavir. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant use of carbamazepine and indinavir may cause failure of antiretroviral therapy due to insufficient indinavir plasma concentrations. Drugs other than carbamazepine should be considered to prevent this interaction. Amitriptyline or gabapentin are alternatives for postherpetic neuralgia; valproic acid or lamotrigine are alternatives for seizures. When alternate drug therapy is not possible, dosage adjustments, therapeutic drug monitoring, and careful clinical observation may help reduce adverse clinical consequences.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

Increased fitness of drug resistant HIV-1 protease as a result of acquisition of compensatory mutations during suboptimal therapy.

OBJECTIVE: It is thought as a consequence of continuous replication, HIV-1 has acquired an optimal fitness state and that suboptimal antiretroviral therapy selects for drug resistant variants which show impaired fitness in the absence of the drug. In this paper we studied the evolution and fitness of viral populations appearing in a patient who received protease monotherapy. METHODS: Two factors contributing to fitness, drug resistance and protease catalytic activity, were studied at the enzymatic and virological level. RESULTS: The first drug resistant viral variants that were selected in vivo harboured one to three protease substitutions. These mutants showed reduced protease activity and consequently a reduction in viral replication capacity. During continued in vivo replication of these viruses in the presence of the drug, novel variants harbouring additional substitutions in the viral protease appeared. These variants did not display any further increase in drug resistance but demonstrated clearly increased protease activity. Consequently the replication capacity of these viruses was raised to a level at which they replicated better than the original wild-type virus. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the viral population in the patient does not have to represent the fittest possible variants, and thus antiretroviral therapy may drive the viral population first through a lower fitness level and then to a higher fitness level.

Amino Acid Sequence↗