Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R S Remis

Publications and source records attributed to R S Remis.

38 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

The epidemiology of HIV and AIDS in Canada: current perspectives and future needs.

There is little doubt the HIV epidemic is of enormous public health importance for Canadians. Currently, it is estimated that between one and two in 1,000 adult Canadians are infected with HIV. Compared to other industrialized countries, Canada is a country of intermediate incidence. Much effort has gone into developing and maintaining the AIDS surveillance system as well as carrying out HIV seroprevalence studies in selected populations. In spite of under-reporting of AIDS cases (estimated to be 12-25%), the available data provide a general picture of the HIV epidemic in Canada. Nevertheless, a number of questions remain unanswered, and we need more information to plan preventive interventions and provide services to persons who are already infected. In this article, we present a brief overview of the epidemiology of AIDS and HIV in Canada. We identify some disturbing trends in the epidemic and reiterate the need for more information to improve our preventive efforts and help set research priorities to help plan future studies.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

Improved disease reporting: a randomized trial of physicians.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if a heightened, passive surveillance system increases the number of physicians reporting two notifiable diseases during a six-month period. METHODS: We conducted a randomized trail among 145 community-based primary care physicians in two counties in Eastern Ontario. Intervention group physicians received a three-part intervention aimed at improving their communication with the health unit to whom all physicians are mandated to report notifiable diseases. The control group physicians remained part of the usual disease reporting system. The outcome was assessed by a relative risk comparing the number of physicians reporting among the intervention group to that in the control group. RESULTS: Seventy physicians received the intervention and 75 physicians were in the control group. The relative risk for the number of physicians reporting at least one case was 5.9 (95% CI 2.6-13.2). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention had an impact on reporting of notifiable diseases by physicians.

Chickenpox↗