Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Romberg

Publications and source records attributed to R Romberg.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Mechanism-based PK/PD modeling of the respiratory depressant effect of buprenorphine and fentanyl in healthy volunteers.

The objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship of buprenorphine and fentanyl for the respiratory depressant effect in healthy volunteers. Data on the time course of the ventilatory response at a fixed P(ET)CO(2) of 50 mm Hg and P(ET)O(2) of 110 mm Hg following intravenous administration of buprenorphine and fentanyl were obtained from two phase I studies (50 volunteers received buprenorphine: 0.05-0.6 mg/70 kg and 24 volunteers received fentanyl: 0.075-0.5 mg/70 kg). The PK/PD correlations were analyzed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. A two- and three-compartment pharmacokinetic model characterized the time course of fentanyl and buprenorphine concentration, respectively. Three structurally different PK/PD models were evaluated for their appropriateness to describe the time course of respiratory depression: (1) a biophase distribution model with a fractional sigmoid E(max) pharmacodynamic model, (2) a receptor association/dissociation model with a linear transduction function, and (3) a combined biophase distribution-receptor association/dissociation model with a linear transduction function. The results show that for fentanyl hysteresis is entirely determined by the biophase distribution kinetics, whereas for buprenorphine hysteresis is caused by a combination of biophase distribution kinetics and receptor association/dissociation kinetics. The half-time values of biophase equilibration (t(1/2, k(eo))) were 16.4 and 75.3 min for fentanyl and buprenorphine, respectively. In addition, for buprenorphine, the value of k(on) was 0.246 ml/ng/min and the value of k(off) was 0.0102 min(-1). The concentration-effect relationship of buprenorphine was characterized by a ceiling effect at higher concentrations (intrinsic activity alpha=0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50-0.62), whereas fentanyl displayed full respiratory depressant effect (alpha=0.91, 95% CI: 0.19-1.62).

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Buprenorphine induces ceiling in respiratory depression but not in analgesia.

BACKGROUND: We measured the effect of two weight adjusted i.v. doses (0.2 mg per 70 kg and 0.4 mg per 70 kg) of the potent opioid buprenorphine on analgesia and respiratory depression in healthy volunteers. The aim of the study was to compare buprenorphine's behaviour with respect to the occurrence of ceiling (or apparent maximum) in these typical micro-opioid protein-(MOP) receptor effects. METHODS: Ten subjects (5 males) received 0.2 mg per 70 kg, 10 others (5 males) 0.4 mg per 70 kg i.v. buprenorphine. Steady-state inspired minute ventilation at a fixed end-tidal Pco(2) of 7 kPa was measured before drug infusion and at regular intervals after drug infusion. Experimental pain was induced using transcutaneous electrical stimulation and a gradually increasing current. Pain tolerance was measured at regular intervals before and after drug infusion. The studies lasted 8 h. RESULTS: After infusion of the drug ventilation showed a rapid decline and reached peak depression between 150 and 180 min after drug administration. This effect was dose-independent with respect to timing and magnitude. At peak respiratory depression minute ventilation was 13.1 (sd 1.8) litre min(-1) in the 0.2 mg group vs 12.0 (sd 1.3) litre min(-1) in the 0.4 mg group (n.s.). At buprenorphine 0.2 mg a small short-lived analgesic effect was observed with a maximum increase in pain tolerance current of 6.7 (sd 2.8) mA occurring at 75 min after drug administration. Peak analgesic effect was 29% above baseline current. In contrast, buprenorphine 0.4 mg caused a large and long-lived analgesic effect with a maximum increase in pain tolerance current of 23.8 (sd 7.4) mA occurring at 130 min after drug administration. Peak analgesic effect was 160% above baseline current (0.4 vs 0.2 mg, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: While buprenorphine's analgesic effect increased significantly, respiratory depression was similar in magnitude and timing for the two doses tested. We conclude that over the dose range tested buprenorphine displays ceiling in respiratory effect but none in analgesic effect.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Comparison of the respiratory effects of intravenous buprenorphine and fentanyl in humans and rats.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence from animal studies suggesting the existence of a ceiling effect for buprenorphine-induced respiratory depression. To study whether an apparent ceiling effect exists for respiratory depression induced by buprenorphine, we compared the respiratory effects of buprenorphine and fentanyl in humans and rats. METHODS: In healthy volunteers, the opioids were infused i.v. over 90 s and measurements of minute ventilation at a fixed end-tidal PCO2 of 7 kPa were obtained for 7 h. Buprenorphine doses were 0.7, 1.4, 4.3 and 8.6 microg kg(-1) (n=20 subjects) and fentanyl doses 1.1, 2.1, 2.9, 4.3 and 7.1 microg kg(-1) (n=21). Seven subjects received placebo. In rats, both opioids were infused i.v. over 20 min, and arterial PCO2 was measured 5, 10, 15 and 20 min after the start of fentanyl infusion and 30, 150, 270 and 390 min after the start of buprenorphine infusion. Doses tested were buprenorphine 0, 100, 300, 1000 and 3000 microg kg(-1) and fentanyl 0, 50, 68 and 90 microg kg(-1). RESULTS: In humans, fentanyl produced a dose-dependent depression of minute ventilation with apnoea at doses > or = 2.9 microg kg(-1); buprenorphine caused depression of minute ventilation which levelled off at doses > or = 3.0 microg kg(-1) to about 50% of baseline. In rats, the relationship of arterial PCO2 and fentanyl dose was linear, with maximum respiratory depression at 20 min (maximum PaCO2 8.0 kPa). Irrespective of the time at which measurements were obtained, buprenorphine showed a non-linear effect on PaCO2, with a ceiling effect at doses > 1.4 microg kg(-1). The effect on PaCO2 was modest (maximum value measured, 5.5 kPa). CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm a ceiling effect of buprenorphine but not fentanyl with respect to respiratory depression.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Comparison of morphine-6-glucuronide and morphine on respiratory depressant and antinociceptive responses in wild type and mu-opioid receptor deficient mice.

BACKGROUND: Morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) is a metabolite of morphine with potent analgesic properties. The influence of M6G on respiratory and antinociceptive responses was investigated in mice lacking the micro -opioid receptor (MOR) and compared with morphine. METHODS: Experiments were performed in mice lacking exon 2 of the MOR (n=18) and their wild type (WT) littermates (n=20). The influence of M6G and morphine on respiration was measured using whole body plethysmography during three elevations of inspired carbon dioxide. Antinociception was assessed using tail flick and hotplate tests. RESULTS: In WT but not null mutant mice, a dose-dependent depression of the slope of the ventilatory carbon dioxide response was observed after M6G and morphine. Similarly, both opioids were devoid of antinociceptive effects in null mutant mice, but showed potent dose-dependent analgesia in WT animals. Potency differences between M6G and morphine in WT mice were of the same order of magnitude for analgesia and respiration. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that the desired (antinociceptive) and undesired (respiratory depression) effects of M6G and morphine are linked to the same gene product; that is the MOR. Other opioid- and non-opioid-receptor systems may play a minor role in the actions of M6Gs and morphine. The clinical implications of our findings are that any agent acting at the MOR will invariably cause (potent) analgesia in combination with (variable) respiratory depression.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed2002

[The effect of anesthetics on control of respiration].

Ventilatory control in humans depends on complex mechanisms which aim to maintain a cellular CO2-, O2- and H(+)-homeostasis under physiological conditions. This regulation is based on chemical control which predominantly acts via peripheral chemoreceptors in the carotid bodies and central chemoreceptors in the ventral medulla of the brainstem on the one hand, and behavioural control on the other, by which it is possible to adapt respiration to conditions of daily living. The influence of anaesthesia and related conditions may depress respiration and have a sustained effect on ventilatory control. Perioperative respiratory depression remains a serious clinical problem in perioperative medicine. This review will give an overview of ventilatory control and discuss the most relevant responses, describe the effects of pain, anaesthetics and opioids on ventilatory control and their interaction. The current body of knowledge is put into perspective to identify patients at risk for perioperative respiratory depression.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed2001

Response surface modeling of alfentanil-sevoflurane interaction on cardiorespiratory control and bispectral index.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory depression is a serious side effect of anesthetics and opioids. The authors examined the influence of the combined administration of sevoflurane and alfentanil on ventilatory control, heart rate (HR), and Bispectral Index (BIS) in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Step decreases in end-tidal partial pressure of oxygen from normoxia into hypoxia (approximately 50 mmHg) at constant end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (approximately 48 mmHg) were performed in nine male volunteers at various concentrations of alfentanil and sevoflurane, ranging from 0 to 50 ng/ml for alfentanil and from 0 to 0.4 end-tidal concentration (ET%) for sevoflurane, and with various combinations of alfentanil and sevoflurane. The alfentanil-sevoflurane interactions on normoxic resting (hypercapnic) ventilation (Vi), HR, hypoxic Vi, and HR responses and BIS were assessed by construction of response surfaces that related alfentanil and sevoflurane to effect using a population analysis. RESULTS: Concentration-effect relations were linear for alfentanil and sevoflurane. Synergistic interactions were observed for resting Vi and resting HR. Depression of Vi by 25% occurred at 38 +/- 11 ng/ml alfentanil (population mean +/- SE) and at 0.7 +/- 0.4 ET% sevoflurane. One possibility for 25% reduction when alfentanil and sevoflurane are combined is 13.4 ng/ml alfentanil plus 0.12 ET% sevoflurane. Additive interactions were observed for hypoxic Vi and HR responses and BIS. Depression of the hypoxic Vi response by 25% occurred at 16 +/- 1 ng/ml alfentanil and 0.14 +/- 0.05 ET% sevoflurane. The effect of sevoflurane on the BIS (25% reduction of BIS occurred at 0.45 +/- 0.08 ET%) was independent of the alfentanil concentration. CONCLUSIONS: Response surface modeling was used successfully to analyze the effect of interactions between two drugs on respiration. The combination of alfentanil and sevoflurane causes more depression of Vi and HR than does the summed effect of each drug administered separately. The effects of combining alfentanil and sevoflurane on hypoxic Vi and HR responses and BIS could be predicted from the separate dose-response curves. Over the dose range tested, the hypoxic response is more sensitive to the effects of anesthetics and opioids relative to resting ventilation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Atom-selective bond breaking in a chemisorbed homonuclear molecule induced by core excitation: N2/Ru(001)

We observe photochemical selectivity for N 1s to pi(*) excitations of chemisorbed N2. By narrow bandwidth synchrotron radiation we selectively excite one of the two atoms of the molecule. Photon stimulated desorption of neutral N atoms predominates for excitations of the N atom close to the surface, whereas excitation of the outer atom ejects predominantly N02 and small amounts of N+, demonstrating the predominant breaking of the inner or outer bond, respectively, of the N2 adsorbate. Analysis on the basis of previously obtained decay electron spectra after atom-selective excitation can explain the mechanism of localized bond breaking.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2000

Sex differences in morphine analgesia: an experimental study in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Animal and human studies indicate the existence of important sex-related differences in opioid-mediated behavior. In this study the authors examined the influence of morphine on experimentally induced pain in healthy male and female volunteers. METHODS: Young healthy men and women (10 of each sex) received intravenous morphine (bolus 0.1-mg/kg dose followed by an infusion of 0.030 mg. kg-1. h-1 for 1 h). Pain threshold and pain tolerance in response to a gradual increase in transcutaneous electrical stimulation, as well as plasma concentrations of morphine and its major metabolites (morphine-6-glucuronide and morphine-3-glucuronide) were determined at regular intervals up to 7 h after the start of morphine infusion. A population pharmacodynamic model was used to analyze the morphine-induced changes in stimulus intensity. The improvement of the model fits by inclusion of covariates (sex, age, weight, lean body mass) was tested for significance. The model is characterized by baseline current, a rate constant for equilibrium between plasma and effect-site morphine concentrations (ke0), and analgesic potency (AC50, or the morphine concentration causing a 100% increase in stimulus intensity for response). RESULTS: The inclusion of the covariates age, weight, and lean body mass did not improve the model fits for any of the model parameters. For both pain threshold and tolerance, a significant dependency on sex was observed for the parameters ke0 (pain threshold: 0.0070 +/- 0.0013 (+/- SE) min-1 in men vs. 0.0030 +/- 0. 0005 min-1 in women; pain tolerance: 0.0073 +/- 0.0012 min-1 in men vs. 0.0024 +/- 0.0005 min-1 in women) and AC50 (pain threshold: 71.2 +/- 10.5 nm in men vs. 41.7 +/- 8.4 nm in women; pain tolerance: 76. 5 +/- 7.4 nm in men vs. 32.9 +/- 7.9 nm in women). Baseline currents were similar for both sexes: 21.4 +/- 1.6 mA for pain threshold and 39.1 +/- 2.3 mA for pain tolerance. Concentrations of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide, and morphine-6-glucuronide did not differ between men and women. CONCLUSIONS: These data show sex differences in morphine analgesia, with greater morphine potency but slower speed of onset and offset in women. The data are in agreement with observations of sex differences in morphine-induced respiratory depression and may explain higher postoperative opioid consumption in men relative to women.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

One intact son.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Attitude to Health↗