Biomedical subjects

R Rettenbach

Publications and source records attributed to R Rettenbach.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2000

Perceptual learning in visual search generalizes over tasks, locations, and eyes.

In a visual search task, targets containing elementary features are detected in parallel, while a serial search is necessary for the detection of a target without a feature, or for targets containing conjunctions of features. In this study, we re-investigated the role of practice in visual search tasks, using an uncued visual search paradigm. Under some circumstances, initially serial tasks can become parallel with practice. Perceptual learning of feature search tasks is rapid (a few hundreds of trials are sufficient to transform serial into parallel search), long-lasting (a learned task is retained over several months), but far less specific than learning of other visual tasks (see also Sireteanu & Rettenbach, 1995a [Vision Research, 35, 2037-2043]). Learning transfers from one task to another, from one location in the visual field to another, and between the two eyes of a given subject, even if the subject has reduced stereopsis. Search for a conjunction of orientation and colour becomes more efficient, suggesting that a different search strategy emerges after prolonged practice. These results suggest that learning of visual search tasks modifies neural structures located at a high level in the visual pathway, involving different, presumably more central neural circuits, than the learning of visual discriminations and hyperacuity.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed1999

Do deaf people see better? Texture segmentation and visual search compensate in adult but not in juvenile subjects.

The research concerning the visual perception in deaf subjects has led to contradictory results: Deaf subjects have been reported to show enhanced visual perceptual skills compared to hearing subjects (Neville & Lawson, 1987). On the other hand, there are indications that acoustic deprivation may produce an inferiority in all sensory modalities (Myklebust, 1964). These contradictions may be due to methodological differences: The investigators selected different conditions (e.g. attentive/nonattentive) and various samples of deaf subjects (e.g., different age, language, and aetiology groups). In our study, we tested a large sample of deaf subjects with texture segmentation and visual search conditions, which allowed us to differentiate between visual processing with and without attentional load. All deaf subjects had profound hearing loss within the first year of life. Our results suggest that the visual processing capacity of deaf children and adolescents does not exceed that of age- and gender-matched hearing subjects. Rather, deaf school children show deficits in visual processing in conditions with and without attentional load. Age (6 to 20 years), language used (oral, sign, oral + sign), and aetiology for deafness (genetic, maternal rubella, perinatal, infection in the first year of life, unknown) did not consistently influence the results. The deficits in visual processing were partially compensated for in adult deaf subjects. The performances of deaf and hearing adults in trials that could be solved preattentively did not differ statistically significantly, but in attention-dependent trials the deaf subjects were more efficient than the hearing controls. We conclude that visual compensation for deafness is limited to attention-dependent tasks and does not develop until adulthood.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1998

Parallel visual search is not always effortless.

Serial visual search can become parallel with practice. We tested whether this parallelisation is accompanied by a transition from an attentive to a pre-attentive and thus effortless mode of visual perception. While psychophysiological indicators of attentional effort (galvanic skin conductance, muscle tonus) reflected the distinction between serial and parallel search modes, they did not follow the perceptual changes during learning. Despite the perceptual parallelisation with practice, the attentional load remained high for initially serial tasks.

Attention↗

PubMed1996

[Texture discrimination and visual search: development, learning and plasticity].

BACKGROUND: The abilities to segment coherent surfaces out of a discrepant background (texture segmentation) and to localize single objects out of a complex scene (visual search) are believed to occur at a peripheral level in the cortical visual pathway. AIM OF THE STUDY: Are texture segmentation and visual search innate or acquired? Can these abilities be improved in adulthood by learning? Does a disturbed early visual experience (strabismus, amblyopia) lead to a reduction of these abilities? RESULTS: Texture segmentation and visual search undergo a protracted development which continues well into adulthood. Even in adult observers, these abilities can be improved with practice. Learning is enduring, but not specific: It can be transferred from one task to another and between the two eyes of a given subject (including the two eyes of stereoblind subjects). DISCUSSION: We conclude that learning of texture segmentation and visual search does not involve the specific features of a visual scene, but rather reflects an improved strategy of localizing visual objects in a cluttered environment. This type of learning probably occurs at a very high level of cortical processing.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1995

Perceptual learning in visual search: fast, enduring, but non-specific.

Visual search has been suggested as a tool for isolating visual primitives. Elementary "features" were proposed to involve parallel search, while serial search is necessary for items without a "feature" status, or, in some cases, for conjunctions of "features". In this study, we investigated the role of practice in visual search tasks. We found that, under some circumstances, initially serial tasks can become parallel after a few hundred trials. Learning in visual search is far less specific than learning of visual discriminations and hyperacuity, suggesting that it takes place at another level in the central visual pathway, involving different neural circuits.

Discrimination, Psychological↗