R Orecchia — Page 6 | Search PubMed

PubMedDate not supplied

[High-dose-rate brachytherapy. The indications, technic and preliminary results].

The authors report their experience of high dose brachytherapy technique (HDR), relative to the first period of work, especially regarding treatment indications and preliminary clinical results. Twenty eight patients were examined, 12 of them with esophageal carcinoma, 7 biliary tract carcinoma, 6 skin of the face and 3 head and neck carcinoma. HDR brachytherapy was the first treatment in 20 cases; the other 8 cases were recurrences after previous irradiation. The HDR treatment had a curative purpose in 15 patients and was palliative in the other 13. Brachytherapy doses ranged from 20 to 30 Gy for curative treatments, with 4-8 fractions; 1 fraction was used for palliative radiotherapy, with doses from 5 to 10 Gy. The results were satisfactory. Local control was achieved in 5/6 patients affected with cholangiocarcinoma of the biliary tract and in 6/6 patients with skin neoplasia. In esophageal cancer, 9/12 patients treated with palliative, disobstructive purpose, showed dysphagia remission in 89% of the cases; the remission was maintained in 7 patients (78%), with 9 months median follow-up. HDR brachytherapy was then proved, during this first period of clinical application, as a valid and safe therapeutic method. It also allowed to extend the application field of brachytherapy, with new indications, as in esophageal neoplasias and biliary tract carcinomas.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[High-dose-rate brachytherapy in esophageal carcinoma: the Italian experience].

The results are reported of HDR intracavitary brachytherapy in 134 esophageal carcinoma patients (110 men and 24 women) treated in 10 Italian centers. Forty-one patients received radical treatment and brachytherapy was often combined with external irradiation and/or chemotherapy. Clinical response rates follow: 56% complete remissions, 34% partial remissions, 10% no response/disease progression and not assessed. Ninety-three patients underwent palliative treatment: dysphagia was reduced in 80% of them and pain was reduced in 71% of them. Treatment-induced esophageal damage consisted in G3-G4 esophagitis (5% of patients), strictures (10%) and fistulas (3%). Complication rates were correlated with fraction dose (9.5% complications for fraction doses < 500 cGy, 20% with doses ranging 500-800 cGy and 38% with fraction doses > 800 cGy). Moreover, the esophagus was more severely injured when small tubes were used (24% with tubes phi < 2 mm, 19% with tubes phi 2-6 mm and 5% with tubes phi > 6 mm). When external irradiation was combined with brachytherapy, dysphagia was more relieved than with brachytherapy alone (89% vs. 71%), with no increase in complication rates. Also the chemotherapy-brachytherapy combination improved swallowing more than brachytherapy alone (88% vs. 79%) and once again complication rates did not increase. To conclude, in the radical treatment of esophageal carcinoma, HDR brachytherapy permits higher radiation doses to be delivered, with fair complication rates. As for palliative treatment, HDR brachytherapy is safe, has low morbidity and provides adequate relief of dysphagia in 80% of patients. We suggest the use of tubes phi > 6 mm and fraction doses ranging 5-6 Gy.

Adult↗