PubMed1976
More complete understanding of the disturbances in the regulation of ventilation in disease must await techniques which can estimate the neural output of the respiratory centers and also the neural inputs. Some of these techniques, such as diaphragmatic electromyography, offer the prospect of clinical usefulness even now and newer techniques, such as mouth occlusion pressure, are promising but have just begun to be evaluated in disease. Despite the limited ability of current techniques to clearly distinguish abnormal central nervous system function of ventilatory control from peripheral mechanical limitations to ventilation, a useful interpretation of clinical tests of ventilatory responsiveness may be gained by an awareness of the many physiologic and pathogenetic factors which are interposed by disease. These factors may reinforce or diminish both stimuli and response. In chronic disease states, these modifying factors must be identified and evaluated for their role in altered ventilatory responsiveness. Frequently, therapeutic measures can induce substantial effects on these modifying factors, whereas primary disturbances of central nervous system function may be difficult to alter. For the above reasons, tests of ventilatory responsiveness which provide information focussed only on the normality or abnormality of responsiveness to CO2 breathing from measurement of minute ventilation and alveolar PCO2 in an unsteady state, as in the CO2 rebreathing test, may, in a patient, require the addition of tests which allow more complete evaluation of these modifying factors. The state of arterial blood gases, hydrogen ion concentration, bicarbonate concentration, pulmonary function, ventilatory response to exercise, as well as understanding of the state of body temperature, catecholamine secretion, the functional state of the muscles of ventilation, as well as the resistances to ventilation are all a necessary part of the evaluation.