Does JCAHO see the truth? How nurses can alert JCAHO surveyors to staffing problems.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to R M Gallagher.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The prevalence of pain peaks in middle age and decreases thereafter, according to most epidemiologic studies of complaints of pain. However, this apparent decrease in pain in older adults may be a statistical artifact. Eighty to 85% of persons experience a significant health problem that predisposes them to pain at some time after age 65. With aging, patients experience less frequent head, abdominal, and chest pain and more frequent joint pain. Women are more likely to report musculoskeletal pain and multiple pain sites than men, but there are no gender differences for reports of chest and abdominal pain. Many patients with chronic pain have clinically significant depressive symptoms and low self-reported quality-of-life scores.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The author emphasizes that pain is an important public health problem that demands attention. He discusses ineffective management and its causes, administrative and socioeconomic problems perpetuating poor care, problems in technology transfer, organizational models, specialists and subspecialists, and other topics.
This article addresses a systematic approach to the treatment of chronic pain. The first section presents a biopsychosocial model of pain. The second section presents an application of the biopsychosocial approach to the clinical assessment and management of clinical cases with chronic pain.
This study tests whether facial pain or associated symptoms and disorders aggregates in first degree relatives of those with myofascial temporomandibular disorders (M/TMD). We randomly selected one first degree relative of 106 probands with a lifetime history of M/TMD and one first degree relative of 118 acquaintance control probands with no history of M/TMD. Relatives were directly interviewed about the lifetime occurrence of a broad range of painful and non-painful health conditions and symptoms. Analyses revealed that rates of facial pain, symptoms of TMDs, and a range of other musculoskeletal conditions were not significantly different in first degree relatives of M/TMD probands and first degree relatives of controls. In addition, proband descriptors of facial pain severity or disability did not significantly predict the likelihood of having a first degree relative with one or more TMD-related symptoms. These results indicate that M/TMD is not a familial disorder.
A number of explanations have been proposed to account for findings that rates of depression are elevated in persons with chronic, non-malignant pain disorders (CNPDs); for example, that CNPDs are variants of depression (e.g. 'masked depression'), that the stress of living with CNPDs contribute to the onset of depression ('diathesis-stress'), or that the correlation of CNPDs and depression is a methodological artifact of studying treatment-seeking samples. These alternative hypotheses are tested for one specific CNPD, chronic myofascial face pain, using a family study methodology. The procedure was to conduct direct psychiatric interviews with 106 patients with a history of carefully diagnosed myofascial face pain, 118 acquaintance controls without personal histories of myofascial face pain, and a random sample of adult first degree relatives of these case and control probands. The probands were further subdivided into four roughly equal samples consisting of cases with and without personal histories of major depressive disorder (MDD), and controls with and without personal histories of MDD. Dates of initial onsets of myofascial face pain and MDD in patient probands were obtained from interviews and records. The main results were that, compared to control probands without personal histories of MDD, MDD and depressive spectrum disorders (DSD) were elevated in the first degree relatives of control probands with personal histories of early onset MDD, but not in the first degree relatives of myofascial face pain probands with or without personal histories of early or late onset MDD. This outcome is consistent with the hypothesis that living with chronic myofascial face pain contributes to elevated rates of depression. It is inconsistent with the alternative hypotheses that this CNPD is a variant of depression or that the elevated MDD rates are simply an artifact of selection into treatment. The implications of these results and additional results consistent with them are discussed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Many millions of Americans suffer chronic medical conditions complicated by both depression and pain. Chronic pain disorders may be classified as being caused by one or more mechanisms, such as nociceptive (inflammatory), neuropathic (peripheral and central), and myofascial, each associated with a complex substrate of neurophysiologic changes. Specific treatment approaches have been developed for different pain mechanisms. Because all pain sensation is personal and subjective, all pain is affected to some degree by emotional states, and, therefore, by psychosocial factors. Major depression commonly complicates chronic pain and adds to impairment and disability. There is evidence that patients with depression occurring after the onset of chronic pain have the same rates of affective disorders in family members as in the general population, and significantly lower rates than in families of patients with major depression alone. This suggests that it is the stress of living with chronic pain, not personal or family predisposition, that causes depression in these patients. Optimal treatment includes treatment of both pain and depression, together with a focus on symptom control and functional restoration.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: To familiarize the contemporary surgeon with the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and appropriate management of suppurative intracranial complications of sinusitis. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: All patients admitted to the University of Virginia Health Sciences Center with a diagnosis of intracranial suppuration between 1992 and 1997 were reviewed. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-six cases were identified, of which 15 patients had 22 suppurative intracranial complications of sinusitis. These were epidural abscess (23%), subdural empyema (18%), meningitis (18%), cerebral abscess (14%), superior sagittal sinus thrombosis (9%), cavernous sinus thrombosis (9%), and osteomyelitis (9%). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of suppurative intracranial complications of sinusitis requires a high index of suspicion and confirmation by imaging. Central to the success of treatment is the management of the primary source of sepsis within the paranasal sinuses in combination with neurosurgical drainage and intravenous antibiotics. This approach has resulted in a mortality rate of 7% and morbidity of 13%, which compare favorably with previous series.
Supracricoid laryngectomy is a new development in the treatment of laryngeal cancer in Australia. It allows the removal of both vocal cords, vestibular folds, and the entire thyroid cartilage including the paraglottic space without the loss of laryngeal function. This technique may offer a significant advance in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx. This paper reviews the surgical management of laryngeal cancer and discusses this new technique with modifications, indications for its use and the advantages of supracricoid laryngectomy. Case reports of seven patients operated on in our institution are included.
BACKGROUND: Despite the benefits of antimigraine medications for patients with migraines, parenteral administration of these drugs has certain disadvantages for at-home patient use. OBJECTIVE: To examine the safety and efficacy of an intranasal spray formulation of dihydroergotamine mesylate in the treatment of migraines. DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with migraines. SETTING: Both private and institutional practice. PATIENTS: A total of 348 patients with a diagnosis of migraine according to International Headache Society criteria were recruited; 310 patients qualified for participation. INTERVENTIONS: Patients self-administered either 2 mg of dihydroergotamine mesylate, 3 mg of dihydroergotamine mesylate, or a placebo for each of 2 moderate to severe migraine headaches using a nasal spray apparatus. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients rated pain severity, functional ability, headache pain relief, incidence and severity of nausea, and the incidence of vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia prior to treatment (base-line) and again at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours after treatment. Recurrences of headache pain within 24 hours were also noted. RESULTS: Self-administration of dihydroergotamine resulted in significant increases in pain relief and functional ability and significant decreases in pain intensity and nausea compared with the placebo. Among patients treated with 2 mg of dihydroergotamine mesylate, 27% considered their migraine resolved (ie, no pain or mild pain) as early as 30 minutes after treatment. By 4 hours after treatment, 70% of these patients' headaches were resolved. Headache pain returned within 24 hours in only 14% of patients whose headaches had been resolved. No serious adverse effects of dihydroergotamine treatment were observed, and the adverse events that did occur were primarily related to the route of administration. The 2-mg dihydroergotamine mesylate dose provided slightly superior pain relief and was associated with fewer adverse events compared with the 3-mg dihydroergotamine mesylate dose. CONCLUSIONS: The present results suggest that intranasal administration of dihydroergotamine represents an important new therapeutic option for migraine sufferers.
Cluster headache is a brutal affliction characterized by excruciating pain with relatively brief, but frequent attacks. Because of the short duration of the attacks and the tremendous intensity of pain, symptomatic analgesics are often not effective. However, inhalation oxygen, while being cumbersome, is reported to be effective in the majority of sufferers. To assess the practical effectiveness and use of analgesics and/or oxygen, a review of 60 cluster patients was conducted. At initial evaluation, 48 patients had accepted oral analgesics and 51 patients accepted inhalation oxygen for breakthrough headaches. After acceptable prophylactic treatment was established, 65% of patients who accepted analgesics continued their use, although most reported only minimal relief. Only 31% of patients who accepted oxygen continued its use, in spite of the fact that most sufferers reported significant relief. From this brief study, it appears that cluster headache patients prefer to use analgesics for reasons that are not solely for relief of pain, and that patients decline the use of oxygen for reasons other than lack of effectiveness.
Sumatriptan, a 5-hydroxytryptamine1, (5-HT1) receptor agonist is an effective abortive agent for migraine headaches. A common side effect in 3% to 7.9% of patients is chest pain. Although most cases of chest pain are not thought to be of cardiac origin, its mechanism is not entirely understood. Rare examples of electrocardiogram changes consistent with transient ischemia have been reported. Isolated instances of angina, arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, and death have been temporally associated with sumatriptan administration. In most cases, it is unclear whether underlying cardiovascular disease existed or contributed to this adverse event. We report the history of a 56-year-old female patient with migraine who experienced a myocardial infarction shortly after using sumatriptan, despite having had a normal cardiovascular evaluation. As she had a normal cardiac catheterization after the event, we find it probable that sumatriptan induced coronary vasospasm and myocardial infarction.