Surgical removal of pseudotumoral calcified bursitis of the shoulder in a patient with hemodialysis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to R M Flipo.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the occurrence of bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to determine the factors influencing bone loss (particularly the usefulness of bone turnover markers) over an 18-month period. METHODS: A total of 51 patients were studied, 6 men and 45 females (of whom 35 were menopausal). Their mean age was 56 +/- 10 years and the mean RA duration was 12 +/- 10 years. Twenty-eight (55%) were receiving corticosteroids (10 mg/day for a mean duration of 6 +/- 5 years). Several clinical and biological parameters reflecting disease activity or severity were recorded both at the 0 and 18-month investigations. Bone turnover was assessed at baseline by measuring the serum levels of 4 biological markers. Three of them reflected bone formation, i.e., procollagen type I C-terminal propepeptide (PICP), procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) and osteocalcin (OC). The fourth, procollagen type I-C terminal telopeptide (ICTP), reflected bone resorption. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry both at the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) at baseline and 18 months later. RESULTS: Bone loss occurred both at the LS: 2.1%, [95% CI: 0.8%-3.4%, P < 0.005] and femoral neck: 3.1%, [95% CI: 1.1%-5.1%, P < 0.005]. Bone loss was markedly increased for postmenopausal women at the FN: 5.3% [95% CI: 2.9%-7.6%, P < 0.005]. Bone loss was not statistically significantly different between users and non-users of steroids. Bone loss at the LS was significantly correlated with both osteocalcin (r = 0.51, P < 0.01) and ICTP levels (r = 0.32, P < 0.05). FN bone loss was correlated with the osteocalcin level only (r = 0.34, P < 0.05). Fast losers (bone loss at the LS above the median) had higher OC (P < 0.01) and ESR (P < 0.05) levels at baseline as compared with slow losers (bone loss at the LS below the median). CONCLUSION: Bone loss occurs in RA particularly at the FN and seems to be influenced by increased bone turnover and high levels of inflammation.
OBJECTIVES: To determine areas of agreement and disagreement among experts in the interpretation of the published criteria for RA (ACR) and spondylarthropathies ( ESSG). METHODS: Thirty-two experts (16 from France and 16 from 10 other countries) replied anonymously to a mailed questionnaire. RESULTS: Tenosynovitis and 'sausage-like' painless swelling of the toes were considered as criteria for RA by 18 and 14 experts, respectively. The definition of symmetry differed widely among experts (symmetry of only one group of joints was sufficient for 13). Twenty-five experts considered erosions of other joints than the wrists and fingers as a criterion for RA, 17 thought that fulfilment of criteria could be achieved cumulatively, and 19 would appreciate clarifications of the current criteria. Among possible clarifications for RA, it was frequently recommended that morning stiffness and nodules be eliminated and that new marker antibodies, X-rays of the feet, and exclusion criteria be added. Twenty-three of the 29 experts who gave an opinion (79%) agreed with the notion of SP in the absence of axial signs and sacroiliitis, 26/31 (84%) indicated that a patient can have both RA and SP, and 19/30 (63%) thought that RA and SP could be regarded as syndromes more than diseases. Only 5/32 experts relied more on the criteria than on their clinical judgement in diagnosing RA. CONCLUSIONS: There would seem to be a needfor the optimisation of RA and ESSG criteria, particularly within the context of early arthritis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: To study bone mass and the factors that influence bone mass in rheumatoid arthritis patients versus controls. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 85 patients (73 women) with a mean age of 57 +/- 11 years and a mean disease duration of 13 +/- 9 years were compared to 85 age- and sex-matched controls. Among the patients, 62 (76%) had positive rheumatoid factor tests and 51 (60%) were receiving steroid therapy, with a mean daily dose of 10 +/- 4 mg and a mean duration of 7 +/- 6 years. The following parameters were determined: morning stiffness duration, painful and swollen joint counts, Lee's and Ritchie's indices, Health Assessment Questionnaire score, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein. Bone mineral density was measured at the lumbar spine and femoral neck using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (Sophos L-XRA). RESULTS: In the nonsteroid-treated patients, bone mineral density was similar to that in controls at the lumbar spine but was decreased by 8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-14.2%) at the femoral neck (0.76 +/- 0.14 g/cm2 versus 0.83 +/- 0.15 g/cm2; P = 0.03). Decreases of 11.5% (95% CI, 8.1-14.9%) at the lumbar spine and 10.4% (95% CI, 6.4-14.4%) at the femoral neck were found in the steroid-treated patients versus the nonsteroid-treated patients. In the patient group, femoral neck bone mineral density was significantly negatively correlated with age (r = -0.5), the Heath Assessment Questionnaire score (r = -0.27), and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (r = -0.25), whereas only the first two variables were significantly correlated with lumbar bone mineral density. A multiple linear regression model including age, glucocorticoid use, rheumatoid factor, the Health Assessment Questionnaire score, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate was constructed and adjusted for the number of variables. This model explained 44.7% of the variance of femoral neck bone mineral density. CONCLUSION: Rheumatoid arthritis is associated with a decrease in bone mass that is most marked in patients with active and/or severe disease and in those who take glucocorticoids.