PubMed1980
We have used a pattern-reversing chequerboard (1 degree squares, or smaller: 84 per cent contrast, or less: 2 to 16 reversals/sec: field size 22 degrees x 16 degrees: mean luminance 50 cd/m2) to evoke responses from the eyes of young adults and children. ERGs were recorded with gold foil electrodes, which did not interfere with the normal optics. All patients were affected accurately. The fixation point was adjusted so that squinters received the stimulus on corresponding areas of each retina. The normal ERG obtained is 1.5 to 3 mu V in amplitude, and in thirteen normal subjects right and left eyes gave equal responses. The extreme asymmetry detected was c. 10 per cent. In all amblyopes, including children of 6 years old and upwards, satisfactory recordings were obtained. In most amblyopes, the response from the affected eye was 50 per cent or less of the response from the fellow eye. In all cases of failure to respond to treatment, the asymmetry was highly significant. In adults, occluding the screen area corresponding to the area of amblyopic suppression, reduces the ERG in the fellow eye, but does not reduce the ERG in the amblyopic eye. We conclude that amblyopic retina produces very little electrical activity that we can record. The timing, response to frequency of stimulation, and other parameters in the pattern ERG are dissimilar from those in the ERG produced by small changes of luminance. We have little evidence about the class of cell generating the response we observe, but evidently there is peripheral abnormality in the visual system even of amblyopic children.