Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R M Califf

Publications and source records attributed to R M Califf.

At least 379 records · Page 21Linked to original sources

Intracranial hemorrhage risk and new thrombolytic therapies in acute myocardial infarction.

Thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has reduced mortality at the expense of additional intracranial hemorrhages. To determine whether this trade-off has been optimized, a decision analysis was performed using pooled data to determine the further reductions in mortality required to justify increased intracranial hemorrhage rates from more potent thrombolytic and adjunctive antithrombotic regimens that intravenous streptokinase. Pooled data from large clinical trials suggest that streptokinase has a 0.07% nonfatal intracranial hemorrhage rate. Approximately 54% of these result in major/moderate disability and 46% in recovery or minor residual. The early mortality rate in all AMI patients treated with thrombolytic therapy is 9.8%; it is 6.8% in patients with inferior wall AMI and 17.9% in elderly patients. If a new thrombolytic regimen provides a 1% absolute reduction in early mortality compared with streptokinase therapy, approximately a > or = 3.2% nonfatal intracranial hemorrhage rate is justified to obtain this survival benefit. For a 10% relative reduction in mortality risk, the maximal acceptable nonfatal intracranial hemorrhage rates are 2.2% for inferior wall AMI, 3.2% for all patients and 5.9% for elderly patients. Whereas intracranial hemorrhage is a catastrophic complication of thrombolytic therapy in the treatment of patients with AMI, thrombolytic regimens that result in significantly higher rates of intracranial hemorrhage than those observed with streptokinase may be preferable at surprisingly smaller additional reductions in mortality. In addition to evaluating new thrombolytic and antithrombotic regimens, this analysis, in conjunction with models that predict patient-specific intracranial hemorrhage risks and mortality benefits from thrombolytic therapy, can provide a framework for matching AMI patients with optimal thrombolytic regimens.

Aged↗

Effects of coronary angioplasty, coronary bypass surgery, and medical therapy on employment in patients with coronary artery disease. A prospective comparison study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare return-to-work rates after coronary angioplasty, coronary bypass surgery, and medical therapy in patients with coronary disease. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care referral center. PATIENTS: Between March 1986 and June 1990, we enrolled 1252 patients who were younger than 65 years, who had not had previous coronary revascularization, and who were employed. All patients were followed for 1 year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: One-year employment status. RESULTS: After 1 year, 84% of patients who had coronary angioplasty were still working compared with 79% of patients who had bypass surgery and with 76% of patients who received medicine. After adjusting for the more favorable baseline characteristics of patients who had angioplasty (less severe coronary artery disease, better left ventricular function, and less functional impairment), however, no significant differences were noted in 1-year employment rates among the three groups. These adjusted 1-year return-to-work rates were 84% for angioplasty, 80% for surgery, and 79% for medicine (P > 0.05). In a random subset of 72 patients, 23 patients who had angioplasty returned to work after a median of 18 days (mean, 27 days) compared with 54 days (mean, 67 days) for 24 patients having bypass surgery and with 14 days (mean, 45 days) for 25 patients receiving medicine (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had coronary angioplasty were able to return to work earlier than those who had bypass surgery, but by 1 year no significant difference was noted in employment rates. Neither revascularization strategy improved employment rates when compared with initial treatment using medical therapy.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

Scorecard cardiovascular medicine. Its impact and future directions.

Public release of operator-specific data for cardiovascular procedures has set a new precedent, introducing the "scorecard" era. Justification exists for public disclosure, but the mechanics of appropriate data release are complex from a clinical, statistical, and logistic standpoint. Scorecard medicine may appropriately promote regionalization of medical centers and consolidation of services, but unless the process is directed effectively, it may impair the development of new treatments because of a more restrictive clinical practice environment. We propose revamping our current system to facilitate rapid and accurate access to outcome data in the local practice environment so that improvement in practice occurs on a voluntary basis rather than in response to punitive restrictions. A rational plan needs to be developed for dealing with high-risk patients, perhaps through compensation in regression models used to calculate expected outcomes, and for the start-up of novice physicians. Special provisions are needed to promote clinical research. Before procedures are done, it would be ideal to provide a full disclosure informed consent, whereby the physician reports operator-specific data and the patient's decision-making process is facilitated. Overall, appropriate implementation of scorecards could ultimately lead to a substantial improvement in the quality of U.S. cardiovascular medicine.

Cardiology↗

Randomized trials of directional coronary atherectomy: implications for clinical practice and future investigation.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared and contrasted the randomized trials of directional atherectomy and coronary angioplasty for de novo native coronary artery lesions. BACKGROUND: The results of two randomized trials, the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT) and the Canadian Coronary Atherectomy Trial (CCAT), comparing initial and intermediate-term outcome of directional coronary atherectomy and conventional coronary angioplasty in de novo native vessels, have been reported. In CAVEAT any coronary artery segment that could be treated by either technique was included; in CCAT only nonostial proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenoses were studied. METHODS: The primary end point was 6-month angiographic restenosis. Clinical outcome end points at 6 months included death, myocardial infarction, emergency bypass surgery and abrupt closure. RESULTS: Initial angiographic success rates were significantly improved with directional coronary atherectomy compared with conventional angioplasty (89% vs. 80% for CAVEAT; 98% vs. 91% for CCAT). Also, the initial improvement in minimal lumen diameter and final immediate postprocedural residual diameter stenosis were better with atherectomy. In CCAT, there was no difference in initial complications; in CAVEAT, non-Q wave myocardial infarction rates and abrupt closure were increased with atherectomy. Despite improved success rates and better lumen achieved with atherectomy, in CCAT there was no difference in angiographic restenosis (46% for directional atherectomy vs. 43% for angioplasty). In CAVEAT, in a prespecified subset analysis involving the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery, restenosis was both significantly and clinically less for directional atherectomy (51% vs. 63%). For non-left anterior descending coronary artery segments, there was no difference. CONCLUSIONS: These studies document the difference between achievement of an excellent initial angiographic result and the longer term issue of clinical restenosis. Widespread use of directional coronary atherectomy to treat lesions that would be well treated by angioplasty in an attempt to decrease restenosis rates substantially does not appear indicated by the data. In individual lesions, directional atherectomy should be selected with the view toward optimizing initial results. Further trials are needed to determine whether more aggressive or better targeted directional coronary atherectomy may improve not only the initial gain but the long-term outcome as well.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

Predicting the risk of abrupt vessel closure after angioplasty in an individual patient.

OBJECTIVES: We proposed to examine the relation between angiographic morphologic characteristics and abrupt closure after coronary angioplasty and to develop an empirically based risk stratification system. BACKGROUND: Certain lesion morphologic characteristics are associated with higher rates of abrupt closure after coronary angioplasty. Previous approaches have been limited by relatively small sample sizes and an inability to combine multiple characteristics to predict risk in an individual patient. METHODS: Lesion morphology was determined for 779 lesions in 658 patients undergoing an elective first angioplasty. Abrupt closure occurred in 63 lesions (8.1%). Variables associated with abrupt closure were identified by univariate and stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis, and internal validity was assessed by use of bootstrapping. An empirically based scoring system was developed by assigning different weights to each predictive characteristic and was then validated. RESULTS: Almost all lesion characteristics previously labeled "adverse" were associated with an increased risk of abrupt closure, but only total occlusion, location at a branch point, increasing lesion length, evidence for thrombus and right coronary artery location were statistically significant independent predictors. Despite the large sample size, the study was underpowered to detect even a 50% increase in risk with many characteristics. Using a scoring system, we assigned each lesion a specific risk of abrupt closure. The distribution of risk was broad, with 20% of patients having < or = 2.5% risk and 25% having > 10% risk. Internal validation techniques revealed that when 10% of patients were randomly eliminated from the sample in multiple iterations, the risk estimates varied, again pointing to the need for a larger sample. CONCLUSIONS: Empirically based weighting of lesion characteristics could quantify the risk of abrupt closure for individual patients, but a very large sample will be required to understand the interplay of complex lesion characteristics in altering expected outcomes.

Aged↗

Randomized evaluation of coronary angioplasty for early TIMI 2 flow after thrombolytic therapy for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: a new look at an old study. The Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Patients who have suffered acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and have been treated with intravenous thrombolytic agents resulting in early 'patent' [Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 2-3 flow grade] arteries have been shown not to benefit from early percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Recent data, however, suggest that the clinical outcome of patients with early TIMI 2 flow is decidedly inferior to that of patients with TIMI 3 flow, raising the question whether early PTCA might be beneficial for patients with TIMI 2 flow. The clinical utility of PTCA for this particular subset of patients has never been assessed. METHODS: We analyzed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery by contrast ventriculography and clinical outcome in Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Phase I (TAMI-I) study patients with initial TIMI 2 flow grade, determined by blinded core laboratory analysis. RESULTS: No differences were observed between baseline demographic data for the 49 patients randomly assigned to undergo early PTCA compared with that from the 59 patients randomly assigned to receive early medical therapy. Patients were 56 +/- 11 years of age (mean +/- SD), 80% were men, the time from onset of chest pain to catheterization was 268 +/- 71 min, 42% had anterior AMI, and 42% had multivessel disease. Ninety minute baseline LVEF to prehospital discharge LVEF was minimally better in the group randomly assigned to undergo PTCA (51 +/- 12 to 52 +/- 11% versus 55 +/- 10 to 53 +/- 12%, P = 0.06). This contrasted with findings in patients with TIMI 3 flow grade at baseline, which showed a relative benefit for patients randomly assigned to receive early medical therapy (54 +/- 10 to 54 +/- 8% for PTCA, versus 55 +/- 10 to 58 +/- 8% for medical therapy, P = 0.01). Among patients with TIMI 2 flow grade there were no differences in in-hospital death or congestive heart failure (6.1 versus 1.7%, P = 0.25 and 18.4 versus 23.7%, P = 0.50, PTCA versus medical therapy, respectively). CONCLUSION: We conclude that (1) PTCA of infarct-related arteries with TIMI 2 flow grade may modestly improve recovery of left ventricular function, and (2) widespread application of PTCA in this setting should be deferred, pending demonstration that this benefit outweighs the risks of PTCA.

Aged↗

Recombinant hirudin for unstable angina pectoris. A multicenter, randomized angiographic trial.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery thrombosis plays an important pathophysiological role in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. To date, heparin and thrombolytic therapy has not provided complete or consistent benefit. We hypothesized that recombinant hirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, would prevent accumulation of coronary artery thrombus in a manner superior to heparin. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with rest ischemic pain, abnormal ECG, and baseline angiogram indicating a > or = 60% stenosis of a culprit coronary artery or saphenous vein graft with visual appearance of thrombus were randomized to one of two different doses of heparin (either a target activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT] of 65 to 90 or 90 to 110 seconds) or one of four doses of hirudin (0.05, 0.10, 0.20, or 0.30 mg.kg-1.h-1 infusion) in a dose-escalating protocol. After 72 to 120 hours of study drug, a repeat coronary angiogram was obtained, and the paired studies underwent quantitative analysis. The primary end point was change in the average cross-sectional area of the culprit lesion. Other efficacy end points also involved changes in culprit lesion dimensions and TIMI flow grade. Recombinant hirudin led to a dose-dependent elevation of aPTT that appeared to plateau at the 0.2-mg/kg dose. A higher proportion of hirudin-treated patients had their aPTT within a 40-second range (16% heparin versus 71% hirudin, P < .001). Overall, the 116 patients treated with hirudin tended to show more improvement than the 50 patients receiving heparin relative to the primary efficacy variable--the average cross-sectional area (P = .08)--as well as minimal cross-sectional area (P = .028), minimal luminal diameter (P = .029), and percent diameter stenosis (P = .07). CONCLUSIONS: Recombinant hirudin appears to be a promising antithrombotic intervention compared with heparin for inhibition of coronary artery thrombus. Large-scale comparative trials are warranted.

Angina, Unstable↗

Continuing evolution of therapy for coronary artery disease. Initial results from the era of coronary angioplasty.

BACKGROUND: Survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and medical therapy in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) has been studied in both randomized trials and observational treatment comparisons. Over the past decade, the use of coronary angioplasty (PTCA) has increased dramatically, without guidance from either randomized trials or prospective observational comparisons. The purpose of this study was to describe the survival experience of a large prospective cohort of CAD patients treated with medicine, PTCA, or CABG. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study was designed as a prospective nonrandomized treatment comparison in the setting of an academic medical center (tertiary care). Subjects were 9263 patients with symptomatic CAD referred for cardiac catheterization (1984 through 1990). Patients with prior PTCA or CABG, valvular or congenital disease, nonischemic cardiomyopathy, or significant (> or = 75%) left main disease were excluded. Baseline clinical, laboratory, and catheterization data were collected prospectively in the Duke Cardiovascular Disease Databank. All patients were contacted at 6 months, 1 year, and annually thereafter (follow-up 97% complete). Cardiovascular death was the primary end point. Of this cohort, 2788 patients were treated with PTCA (2626 within 60 days) and 3422 with CABG (3080 within 60 days). Repeat or crossover revascularization procedures were counted as part of the initial treatment strategy. Kaplan-Meier survival curves (both unadjusted and adjusted for all known imbalances in baseline prognostic factors) were used to examine absolute survival differences, and treatment pair hazard ratios from the Cox model were used to summarize average relative survival benefits. For the latter, a 13-level CAD prognostic index was used to examine the relation between survival and revascularization as a function of CAD severity. The effects of revascularization on survival depended on the extent of CAD. For the least severe forms of CAD (ie, one-vessel disease), there were no survival advantages out to 5 years for revascularization over medical therapy. For intermediate levels of CAD (ie, two-vessel disease), revascularization was associated with higher survival rates than medical therapy. For less severe forms of two-vessel disease, PTCA had a small advantage over CABG, whereas for the most severe form of two-vessel disease (with a critical lesion of the proximal left anterior descending artery), CABG was superior. For the most severe forms of CAD (ie, three-vessel disease), CABG provided a consistent survival advantage over medicine. PTCA appeared prognostically equivalent to medicine in these patients, but the number of PTCA patients in this subgroup was low. CONCLUSIONS: In this first large-scale, prospective observational treatment comparison of PTCA, CABG, and medicine, we confirmed the previously reported survival advantages for CABG over medical therapy for three-vessel disease and severe two-vessel disease. For less severe CAD, the primary treatment choices are between medicine and PTCA. In these patients, there is a trend for a relative survival advantage with PTCA, although absolute survival differences were modest. In this setting, treatment decisions should be based not only on survival differences but also on symptom relief, quality of life outcomes, and patient preferences.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

Intravenous Fluosol in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Results of the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction 9 Trial. TAMI 9 Research Group.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to determine the safety and potential efficacy of an intravenous perfluorochemical emulsion (Fluosol) as an adjunct reperfusion therapy aimed at preventing reperfusion injury for patients with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (430) were randomized in a prospective open-labeled study, 213 to receive Fluosol and 217 to receive no Fluosol, along with 100 mg of tissue-type plasminogen activator given over 3 hours. Major end points included global ejection fraction, regional wall motion analysis, infarct size as measured by tomographic thallium imaging, and a composite clinical outcome measure. Baseline patient and angiographic characteristics were similar in the two groups. No significant difference in global ejection fraction (52% without Fluosol, 51% with Fluosol) or regional wall motion (-2.4 SD/chord with Fluosol, -2.2 SD/chord without Fluosol) was demonstrated in patients receiving Fluosol versus those not receiving Fluosol, nor was there a significant difference in thallium infarct size. Although Fluosol-treated patients with anterior infarction had an insignificantly lower mean infarct size (18.7% of the left ventricle) compared with patients with anterior infarction not treated with Fluosol (21.2% of left ventricle), this trend was not evident in the median infarct size values (22% versus 17%), left ventricular ejection fraction values (46% without Fluosol, 47% with Fluosol), or regional wall motion (-2.5 SD/chord in both groups). Rates of death and stroke were no different in the two groups; however, patients who received Fluosol experienced less recurrent ischemia. Patients receiving intravenous Fluosol had more transient congestive heart failure and pulmonary edema, perhaps because of necessary fluid administration. There was no difference in hemorrhagic complications between the two study groups. CONCLUSIONS: When given with a thrombolytic agent, Fluosol was not associated with improvement in ventricular systolic function, reduction in thallium infarct size, or overall clinical outcome. Fluosol was, however, associated with a reduction in ischemic complications and with an increase in pulmonary edema and congestive heart failure.

Adolescent↗

Pharmacodynamics of chimeric glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin antiplatelet antibody Fab 7E3 in high-risk coronary angioplasty.

BACKGROUND: Thrombosis has been implicated as central to the clinical complications of coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Chimeric monoclonal 7E3 Fab (c7E3 Fab) is the first of a new class of antiplatelet drugs directed at the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin. This study was performed to determine the pharmacodynamics of c7E3 Fab administration during PTCA and to gain an initial clinical experience with this novel agent. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study was a multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation study conducted in two stages. Enrollment included 56 patients scheduled for elective PTCA who were estimated to be at moderate to high risk of sustaining ischemic complications. All patients were given aspirin and heparin. The study drug was given at least 10 minutes before PTCA. In stage 1, increasing bolus doses of c7E3 Fab were given to 15 patients; a bolus dose of 0.25 mg/kg was found to result in blockade of > 80% of the receptors and reduce platelet aggregation to < 20% compared with baseline, establishing this dose as that necessary to sufficiently suppress platelet activity. In stage 2, additional c7E3 Fab was administered by continuous infusion to 32 patients for progressively longer periods of time (up to 24 hours) to confirm that platelet inhibition could be maintained with prolonged drug infusion. Also, 9 patients otherwise meeting entry criteria were given placebo. There were no thrombotic events among patients receiving c7E3 Fab. Overall procedural and clinical success and complication rates as well as rates of bleeding were statistically similar among groups. However, minor bleeding was more frequent with administration of the active drug. CONCLUSIONS: The novel antiplatelet agent c7E3 Fab can be administered during PTCA in combination with aspirin and heparin. Suppression of platelet activity is dose dependent and can be maintained for up to 24 hours. Further evaluation will be required to determine the extent of improvement in ischemic complication and restenosis rates and to provide additional insight into the safety profile of this potent monoclonal platelet antibody.

Abciximab↗

Mortality within 24 hours of thrombolysis for myocardial infarction. The importance of early reperfusion. The GUSTO Investigators, Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries.

BACKGROUND: A paradoxical increased risk of death has been reported during the first 24 hours after thrombolysis for myocardial infarction. The mechanism of this phenomenon is not known, nor is its relation to the success or failure of reperfusion. The present study was a prospectively designed analysis of deaths occurring within the first 24 hours in the GUSTO trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: There were 41,021 patients enrolled in GUSTO, a randomized comparison of streptokinase with intravenous or subcutaneous heparin, accelerated tissue-type plasminogen activator (TPA), and combination of streptokinase and TPA. An angiographic mechanistic substudy examined reperfusion (using the TIMI flow grading criteria) 90 minutes after the assigned thrombolytic regimen was begun in 1567 patients. There were 1125 deaths (2.8%) within 24 hours ("early deaths") and 1726 additional deaths (4.2%) after 24 hours but within 30 days ("later deaths"). At the time of presentation, the most potent predictors of early death were hypotension and sinus tachycardia. In a multiple logistic regression model, lower systolic blood pressure, shorter height, higher heart rate, and the absence of prior smoking distinguished early death from later death. Reinfarction occurred in 26 patients (2.4%), shock in 572 patients (52%), atrioventricular block in 308 patients (28%), and tamponade in 106 patients (10%) dying early compared with 262 (15%), 788 (46%), 396 (23%), and 74 (4%) respective patients dying later. There were no differences in early mortality among the thrombolytic regimens for the first 6 hours after randomization. By 24 hours, however, mortality was 2.89% for streptokinase recipients, 2.84% for combination therapy recipients, and 2.36% for accelerated TPA recipients (P = .005). There was little difference among patients with differing flow grades in the infarct artery during the first 4 hours, although mortality was 2.35% for patients with flow grade 0 or 1, 2.92% for patients with flow grade 2, and 0.89% for patients with flow grade 3. CONCLUSIONS: Even with aggressive management regimens, mortality within the first 24 hours accounted for a large proportion of postthrombolytic deaths. Patients dying early were more likely to present with pump failure than were those dying later and were more likely to diet of events related to left ventricular dysfunction, although cardiac tamponade also accounted for a significant minority of these deaths. Thus, the severity of the clinical presentation rather than the underlying risk factors predicts early mortality. Based on the angiographic substudy data, it appears that rather than hastening early mortality, successful restoration of complete antegrade flow in the infarct-related artery protects against early death.

Aged↗

Percutaneous intervention, surgery, and medical therapy: a perspective from the Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Diseases.

Myocardial revascularization improves survival rates and quality of life for patients with symptomatic ischemic heart disease. The less severe the anatomic disease, the smaller the benefit, particularly for survival. Patients with more severe anatomic disease benefit from surgical therapy, in terms of both survival and quality of life. Continuing advances in pharmacological secondary prevention, percutaneous intervention, and surgical treatment mandate continued analysis of contemporary outcomes to provide the best information for rational decision-making.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

Lack of usefulness of prolonged bleeding times in predicting hemorrhagic events in patients receiving the 7E3 glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet antibody. The TAMI Study Group.

Hemorrhagic events remain the most worrisome complication in patients receiving drugs that alter hemostasis for treatment of acute coronary syndromes. The 7E3 Fab monoclonal antibody provides a dose-dependent inhibition of platelet aggregation via the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor. This study examines the correlation of hemostatic parameters with bleeding events in patients receiving intravenous 7E3 while enrolled in acute myocardial infarction and high-risk percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty pilot studies. Patients with acute myocardial infarction received 100 mg of tissue-type plasminogen activator over 3 hours followed by an escalating intravenous bolus dose of murine 7E3 (0.1 mg/kg [n = 5], 0.2 mg/kg [n = 22], 0.15 mg/kg [n = 13], 0.25 mg/kg [n = 20]). Patients in the high-risk angioplasty trial received a chimeric 7E3 bolus (up to 0.25 mg/kg) with (n = 32) or without (n = 15) intravenous continuous infusion of 7E3 (10 micrograms/min for 6 to 24 hours) after elective angioplasty. Patients in both studies received aspirin therapy (325 mg/day) and partial thromboplastin time-guided (1.5 to 2 times normal) heparin infusion. Bleeding events occurred in 34 of 124 patients (27%). The median template bleeding times (minutes) for patients in the groups with bleeding versus no bleeding events in the trials was 13.5 versus 14 and 30 versus 30, respectively (p = NS). In patients with myocardial infarction, a substantial decline in platelet count at 24 hours was associated with bleeding (p = 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗

Long-term outcome following successful reopening of abrupt closure after coronary angioplasty.

Abrupt closure after coronary angioplasty is often successfully treated by repeat dilation. Long-term follow-up, including 6-month repeat catheterization and 12-month clinical evaluation, was obtained in 1,056 patients treated with acute (n = 335) or elective (n = 721) coronary angioplasty to evaluate the long-term impact of successful reopening of abrupt closure. Abrupt closure occurred in 13.5% of patients and was successfully reopened in 58%. Adverse outcomes including restenosis, death, bypass surgery, myocardial infarction and repeat angioplasty were compared between patients with successfully treated abrupt closure and those with successful procedures (residual diameter stenosis < or = 50%) without abrupt closure. For patients with acute angioplasty, the restenosis rates (> 50% diameter stenosis at follow-up) were 64% for those with successfully treated abrupt closure versus 36% for those with successful procedures without abrupt closure (p < 0.01). In addition, subsequent myocardial infarction (12 vs 3%; p = 0.01) and repeat angioplasty (21 vs 10%; p = 0.03) were more frequent in the group with abrupt closure. For patients with elective angioplasty, restenosis was 43% in those with successfully treated abrupt closure versus 45% in those without abrupt closure (p = NS). Subsequent death and myocardial infarction were more frequent in patients with abrupt closure (death: 12 vs 3% [p < 0.01]; myocardial infarction: 13 vs 3% [p < 0.01]). Long-term adverse events are increased in patients with successfully treated abrupt closure compared to those with successful procedures without abrupt closure.

Acute Disease↗

Minimizing the risk of inappropriately administering thrombolytic therapy (Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction [TAMI] study group).

Despite the proven benefits of thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction, concern for its complications, especially in patients misdiagnosed with myocardial infarction, has led to hesitancy in its use. Historical, clinical and electrocardiographic criteria were developed for enrolling patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction into thrombolytic trials by noncardiovascular specialists. The incidence of misdiagnosis of myocardial infarction and the clinical outcomes when these criteria were used were evaluated for 1,387 consecutive patients given thrombolytic therapy. Twenty-five community hospitals and 7 interventional centers were the sites of enrollment. Most patients (63%) were enrolled from community hospitals. Criteria for thrombolytic therapy included: symptoms of acute myocardial infarction < 6 hours but > 20 minutes, and not relieved by nitroglycerin; and ST-segment elevation > or = 1 mm in 2 contiguous leads or ST-segment depression of posterior myocardial infarction. Exclusion criteria reflecting increased risk of bleeding were used. A final diagnosis of myocardial infarction was based on creatinine kinase-MB, electrocardiographic and ventriculographic evaluation. Acute myocardial infarction was misdiagnosed in 20 patients (1.4%; 95% confidence interval 0.8-2.0%). These patients were demographically similar to those with acute myocardial infarction. All misdiagnosed patients survived; no significant adverse events occurred. Thus, in several clinical settings, a simple algorithm with specific criteria was used for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction and administering thrombolytic therapy. The inclusion criteria used in this study led to a low rate of misdiagnosis.

Algorithms↗

Outcome of patients with diabetes mellitus and acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic agents. The Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess outcome in patients with diabetes who received thrombolytic therapy and to determine whether differences in angiographic characteristics may account for the worse outcome observed in diabetic patients. BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes are known to have a worse outcome after acute myocardial infarction than that of patients without diabetes. METHODS: Clinical and angiographic characteristics of the 148 patients with diabetes and the 923 patients without diabetes in the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) trials were examined and analyzed. RESULTS: Patients with diabetes tended to be older (median age 59 vs. 56 years) and to have a higher incidence of hypertension and hyperlipidemia and a lower incidence of cigarette smoking. Patients with diabetes had significantly more severe anatomic disease (66% vs. 46% had multivessel disease, p < 0.0001), similar global left ventricular ejection fraction (49% vs. 51%) and worse noninfarct zone ventricular function (-0.13 vs. 0.32 SD/chord, p = 0.02) than that of nondiabetic patients. Angiographic patency rates at 90 min after thrombolytic therapy were similar in patients with and without diabetes (initial 90-min patency 71% vs. 70%). Diabetic patients had nearly twice the in-hospital mortality rate (11% vs. 6%, p < 0.02) and a higher incidence of pulmonary edema (11% vs. 4%, p = 0.001). Diabetic women had an especially high in-hospital mortality rate (21%). No retinal hemorrhages were observed. Although diabetes as an unadjusted variable was predictive of in-hospital (p < 0.02) and long-term (p = 0.003) mortality, after adjustment for baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics, diabetes was not found to have an independent influence on mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes after myocardial infarction have a worse outcome than that of patients without diabetes despite similar rates of infarct vessel patency. However, diabetes was not found to be an independent risk factor for increased mortality. These findings suggest that diabetes itself is not a major risk factor for poor early outcome after thrombolytic therapy for myocardial infarction; rather, the secondary effects such as more extensive coronary artery disease account for the worse outcome.

Aged↗