Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R M Antley

Publications and source records attributed to R M Antley.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1981

Further delineation of the C (trigonocephaly) syndrome.

This communication brings the number of recognized cases of the C (trigonocephaly) syndrome to 11. The pattern of findings includes an anomaly of the anterior cranium and frontal cortex (trigonocephaly), the root of the nose (broad nasal bridge, epicanthus, and short nose), and palate (thick anterior alveolar ridges); abnormalities of the limbs (polysyndactyly, bridged palmar creases, short limbs, and joint dislocations and/or contractures); visceral defects (congenital heart defects, cryptorchidism, and abnormal lobulations of the lungs and kidneys). Auricular, mandibular, skin, and genital abnormalities also occur. Consistent neurological findings are hypotonia, strabismus, and psychomotor retardation; seizures have been reported. Normal chromosomes, normal parents with multiple affected offspring, equal sex ratio of affected individuals, and consanguineous matings all support autosomal recessive inheritance of the C syndrome. In autopsied cases, there has been a suggestion of defective central nervous system myelination. About 1/2 of the case have died within the first year. All survivors have severe to profound mental retardation except for one child who has moderate retardation.

Abnormalities, Multiple↗
PubMed1981

Genetic counseling: a comparison of counselee's genetic knowledge before and after (Part III).

Forty-seven mothers of children with Down syndrome were evaluated on their knowledge of genetic facts pertaining to Down syndrome. We found that more knowledge of this disorder was acquired by counselees before counseling than from counseling. The data show that counseling is most effective in enhancing counselees' knowledge of general genetics, ie, the origin of the extra chromosome in a child with Down syndrome. In contrast, counselees had the most difficulty in learning the recurrence risks for others, including the risks for relatives, siblings, and the population in general. A finding of practical importance is that formal education is inversely related to the amount of information counselees learned from counseling. Mothers with less than a high school education acquired most of their genetic knowledge from counseling, while those with more than a high school education acquired most of this information before counseling.

Down Syndrome↗
PubMed1980

The determinants of mothers' knowledge of the Down syndrome before genetic counseling: part II.

Mothers coming for genetic counseling because they have an infant with the Down syndrome (DS) vary in their amount of knowledge about the cause, recurrence risk, and options for dealing with the recurrence risk. The purpose of this work has been to determine some predictors of the variability in mothers' knowledge of the DS before coming to genetic counseling. Data were collected before counseling through a detailed interview concerning mothers' knowledge of the DS, their demographic background, fertility plan, and attitude toward family planing. These data were "reduced" by multiple-regression analysis, to 7 variables used in a prediction equation for mothers' level of pre-knowledge attainment. These variables were then used to construct a model which was tested by path analysis. Results of analyses showed that about 2/3 of the variance in mothers' pre-knowledge of the DS could be accounted for by 5 independent variables: 1) time from diagnosis to counseling session, 2) date of counseling session, 3) nonreporting of emotional upset, 4) education-occupational status (EOS), and 5) utilization of birth control methods. These findings led to the conclusion that what occurs before counseling is of importance for the outcome of genetic counseling, as measured by the genetic information acquired by the counselees. Some precounseling precedures are suggested on how genetic counselors might be able to gain more control over the important factors that occur before actual counseling.

Down Syndrome↗
PubMed1980

The syndrome of multisynostotic osteodysgenesis with long-bone fractures.

Described here are two patients with a newly recognized syndrome of bone and cartilage maldevelopment which, we believe, results from a single embryonic defect, probably of genetic origin. The cardinal manifestations of this association are craniosynostosis, radiohumeral synostosis (RHS), and femoral bowing. Specific secondary defects include midface hypoplasia with characteristic facial appearance and ears, neonatal femoral fractures, and multiple minor anomalies of the limbs. Though the differential diagnosis includes such disorders as the campomelic syndrome, osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) and certain of acrocephalosyndactyly syndromes, the unique combination of clinical and radiographic abnormalities allows ready differentiation. The cause cannot be determined from these two cases.

Bone Diseases, Developmental↗
PubMed1979

Informing parents.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Down Syndrome↗
PubMed1978

A detailed description of mothers' knowledge before genetic counseling for Down syndrome: Part I.

This study focuses on counselees' knowledge of the Down syndrome before receiving genetic counseling. Data were collected from 47 mothers of children with the Down syndrome using a structured interview of 13 open-ended questions. This instrument was found to be both internally reliable and consistent. Results of this study document the enormous variation of counselees' knowledge of the Down syndrome before genetic counseling and show that this is positively associated with their educational background. Counselees with more than a high school education knew about 60% of the genetic information pertaining to the diagnosis before genetic counseling, while those with less than a high school education knew only 23% of this information before counseling. These results indicate that the better educated counselees are less apt to need to learn basic genetic information and may seek out genetic counseling services for other reasons. Possible motives are seeking knowledge confirmation, emotional support, and personalization of the information.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1978

Development of instruments to measure counselees' knowledge of Down syndrome.

Since approximately 10% of counselees coming to genetics clinics are concerned with Down syndrome, the development of short measures of knowledge of Down syndrome for evaluation could have widespread application. The purpose of this study was to design efficient, self-administered questionnaires of simple vocabulary to measure knowledge and understanding of Down syndrome before and after genetic counseling. Twenty-six previously piloted questions were administered to nurses, graduate students in Medical Genetics, special education teachers, and parents of children with Down syndrome (n = 126). A coefficient alpha of 0.842 indicated strong reliability. The content of the questionnaire was distributed into three categories: genetic knowledge, recurrence risk, and prenatal diagnosis. From the items (1) which had less than 85% correct responses, and (2) which fell into just one of the three categories, 12 questions were selected as a post-test (coefficient alpha of 0.749). Eight additional questions were then extracted (coefficient alpha of 0.56) as a pretest. The pretest predicted 53.3% of the variance of the post-test. The use of these instruments before and after counseling can be an aid in evaluating counseling and in comparing various approaches for effectiveness.

Adult↗
PubMed1976

Psychological responses to genetic counseling for Down's syndrome.

To assess some of the emotional aspects of why parents seek genetic counseling and to measure the effect of genetic counseling in parents of children with Down's syndrome, pre- and post-counseling measures of anxiety, hostility, depression, and self-concept were obtained from 43 parents. Pre-counseling responses were compared with those of normative controls, and pre- and post-counseling scores were compared for areas of significant change. Anxiety, hostility and depression levels were significantly higher in parents seeking counseling than in normative controls (both P less than 0.002). Following genetic counseling, there was a significant lowering of anxiety (P less than 0.0005) and depression (P less than 0.05) along with a significant increase in overall self-concept (P less than 0.01). The study documents the importance of looking at factors related to emotional needs and self-image of parents in genetic counseling.

Adolescent↗