Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Lieberman

Publications and source records attributed to R Lieberman.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Chemoprevention of superficial bladder cancer.

The development, evaluation and approval of promising agents for bladder cancer prevention (chemoprevention)depends upon the rational integration of four key components: a) Agents (pharmaceuticals, biologics and nutrients); b) Biomakers (intermediate endpoints that predict for clinical response and risk reduction; c) Cohorts (well defined high risk target populations d) Designs (efficient trial designs linked to the clinical phase of development). The promise of this overall strategy is the ability to conduct faster, smaller and more cost effective trials which incorporate validated surrogate endpoints rather than conventional clinical endpoints (cancer incidence, recurrence and survival). Current National Cancer Institute (NCI) phase III bladder cancer chemopreventive trials in progress are described. Since most patients with superficial (transitional cell) bladder cancer present with early disease (Ta, T1, Tis lesions) that frequently recurs and is easily accessible by serial cystoscopy and urine cytology, bladder cancer serves as a powerful clinical for conducting prevention trials of new agents for a tobacco related malignancy.

Anticarcinogenic Agents↗
PubMed2001

Executive Summary of the National Cancer Institute Workshop: Highlights and recommendations.

Prostate cancer chemoprevention represents a relatively new and promising strategy for reducing the immense public health burden of this devastating cancer of men in the United States and Western societies. Chemoprevention is defined as the administration of agents (drugs, biologics, and natural products) that modulate (inhibit) one or more steps in the multistage carcinogenesis process culminating in invasive adenocarcinoma of the prostate. In 2000, there were an estimated 170,000 new cases of prostate cancer and 31,000 deaths in the United States. During the past decade, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) organized the chemoprevention research program and began testing the first generation of promising agents (eg, 4-(hydroxy)-fenretinide [4-HPR], difluoromethylornithine [DFMO], antiandrogens) in high-risk cohorts and launched the first-large scale US phase 3 primary prevention trial, known as Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT-1), in 18,000 average-risk men (age more than 55 years and prostate-specific antigen [PSA] less than 3 ng/mL) treated for 7 years with finasteride or placebo. In the summer of 1998, the NCI Prostate Cancer Progress Review Group (PRG) Report to the director of NCI was published in response to the leadership of the prostate cancer advocacy community in conjunction with Congress. To further elucidate and address critical issues identified in this report and to develop a research agenda for the newly created Prostate and Urologic Cancer Research Group in the Division of Cancer Prevention at NCI, the NCI organized the workshop "New Clinical Trial Strategies for Prostate Cancer Chemoprevention." The major objectives were to promote understanding and cooperation among the NCI, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), academia, pharmaceutical industry, and the public regarding new opportunities for clinical prevention trials for prostate cancer. The workshop was divided into three concurrent breakout panels and a fourth joint integrative panel. The workshop addressed multiple key areas identified in the PRG report in the following panels: (1) Molecular Targets and Promising Agents in Clinical Development; (2) Intermediate Endpoint Biomarkers for Prevention Trials; (3) High-Risk Study Populations for Prevention Trials, and (4) Preventive Clinical Trial Designs and Regulatory Issues. Expert panelists were drawn from leading academic, pharmaceutical, and government scientists in basic research and clinical investigation. Key pharmaceutical, biotechnology, academic, and National Institutes of Health scientists presented overviews of their new agents and products in clinical development (representing the next generation of promising agents). Senior FDA physicians from the Center for Drugs and Center for Biologics presented on current standards for new drug and biologic approval for chemoprevention efficacy. Some of the key topics included recent advances in the state of knowledge of promising agents in the clinic based on molecular targets as well as bottlenecks in drug development for pharmaceutical sponsors; strategic modulable biomarkers that can serve as primary endpoints in phase 1/2 trials to assess preventive efficacy; high-risk cohorts with precancer (high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia) and representative clinical trial designs that are ready for immediate translation into efficient prevention trials, such as Bayesian sequential monitoring for early assessment of biologic activity and factorial designs for assessment of multiagent combinations. Finally, each expert panel generated recommendations for areas of future research emphasizing opportunities and infrastructure needs.

Anticarcinogenic Agents↗
PubMed2001

Agents, biomarkers, and cohorts for chemopreventive agent development in prostate cancer.

Chemoprevention is the use of agents to slow progression of, reverse, or inhibit carcinogenesis thereby lowering the risk of developing invasive or clinically significant disease. With its long latency, high incidence and significant morbidity and mortality, prostate cancer is a relevant target for chemoprevention. Developing rational chemopreventive strategies for prostate cancer requires well-characterized agents, suitable cohorts, and reliable intermediate biomarkers of cancer. Chemopreventive agent requirements are experimental or epidemiologic data showing efficacy, safety on chronic administration, and a mechanistic rationale for activity. Current promising agents include antiandrogens and antiestrogens; steroid aromatase inhibitors; retinoids and their modulators; 5alpha-reductase inhibitors; vitamins D, E, and analogs; selenium compounds; carotenoids; soy isoflavones; dehydroepiandrostenedione and analogs; 2-difluoromethylornithine; lipoxygenase inhibitors; apoptosis inducers; and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Identifying biomarkers and validating them as surrogate endpoints for cancer incidence are critical for prostate chemoprevention trials. Potentially useful biomarkers for prostate chemoprevention are associated with histologic, proliferative, differentiation-related, biochemical, and genetic/regulatory features of prostatic disease. In that the prostate is not easily visualized, critical issues also include adequacy and consistency of tissue sampling. Various drugs for the chemoprevention of prostate cancer are now under evaluation in phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials. Cohort selection should be based on various patient characteristics (stage of the disease, previous cancers or premalignant lesions, or high risk factors) and should be conducted within the context of standard treatment.

Anticarcinogenic Agents↗
PubMed2001

Computer-assisted image analysis-derived intermediate endpoints.

The development of prostatic lesions undergoes a slow progression. To establish efficacy of chemopreventive intervention it is therefore necessary to define surrogate endpoint biomarkers. Such biomarkers should be sensitive in their ability to indicate response. They should be objective, ie, the result of measurement, and numerically defined so that a statistical validation of response is possible. They should be able to indicate not only a halt of progression of a lesion, but also a reversal of progression. The spatial and statistical distribution of nuclear chromatin in the secretory and luminal cells in prostatic intraepithelial neoplastic lesions has been shown to be well defined. It can be represented by a set of features. These have been used to define a progression curve along which progression or regression of a lesion can be assessed. One could define a fixed endpoint, or one might choose to accept a statistically significant regression along the progression curve as criterion for chemopreventive efficacy. Expected difficulties could arise from lesion heterogeneity, as it would affect the sampling, and from multifocal lesions of differing progressions. Lesion heterogeneity thus limits the precision with which regression could be detected. These problems might be partially overcome by observations taken in histologically normal appearing regions of the prostate. The nuclear chromatin pattern of secretory cell nuclei measured in such tissue regions from prostates harboring intraepithelial or malignant lesions has been shown to exhibit distinctive changes from the chromatin pattern seen in secretory cell nuclei from prostates free from any such lesions. These changes appear to be expressed in the tissue up to a substantial distance from a lesion. The expression of changes in the nuclear chromatin suggests the existence of an intraepithelial preneoplastic lesion that can be detected by biomarkers, but which is not apparent from visual microscopic inspection. Since chemoprevention might be expected to be most effective at the earliest stages of lesion development, the assessment of such early alterations is seen as highly relevant to efforts to validate the efficacy of chemopreventive intervention.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗
PubMed2001

Preprostatectomy: A clinical model to study stromal-epithelial interactions.

The preprostatectomy setting serves as a valuable clinical model for early developmental clinical trials for evaluating promising agents for chemoprevention. In the preprostatectomy model, study agents are administered between the diagnostic biopsy for prostate cancer and definitive therapy. The prostatic tissue that is available after prostatectomy allows for biomarker evaluation of all the components of the prostate, including the glandular epithelium, blood vessels, and the stroma. This provides an opportunity to study the reciprocal interactions between the stroma and the epithelium. Morphologic studies suggest that prostatic stromal cells play a critical role in affecting the growth and maturation of prostatic epithelium. Experimental studies in tissue culture show that carcinoma-associated stromal cells can promote prostatic carcinogenesis, and normal stromal cells may be able to inhibit prostatic carcinogenesis by inducing differentiation and decreasing the proliferation of the epithelium. Although the complex molecular mechanisms through which stroma modulates the epithelial cell phenotype remain to be elucidated, there are several well-characterized signaling pathways, such as for growth factors and steroid hormones, that are likely to contribute to the modulation of transformed epithelial cells. There is evidence of an association between increased serum levels of IGF-I and an increased risk of prostate cancer. The IGF system appears to play an important role in the development of prostate cancer by modulation of paracrine pathways, and also by modulation of the concentrations of different stromal and epithelial IGFBP, which are differentially expressed in the epithelium and stroma. Nerve growth factor is capable of stimulating a proliferative response via a high affinity Trk receptor present in normal and malignant prostate epithelia, and alternatively can mediate apoptosis via the low affinity p75NTR receptor that is progressively lost from the malignant prostate. As the role of each stromal element involved in carcinogenesis becomes further defined, these elements offer promising targets for new chemopreventive strategies.

Androgens↗
PubMed2001

Design considerations for efficient prostate cancer chemoprevention trials.

Prostate cancer, even with its substantial public health impact of 180,400 new cases and 31,900 deaths estimated for 2000, still has a very low annual incidence (0.27% for men 34.4 years and older), which makes designing and conducting efficient prostate cancer prevention trials a challenge. Definitive prevention trials with cancer endpoints, such as the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT), Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT), and Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT), require long trial duration (up to 12 years) and large sample size (up to 32,400 subjects) to accomplish their objectives. This article discusses design concepts for potential prostate cancer prevention trials that require fewer years, subjects, and resources to complete. Design elements, such as high-risk populations, randomization, surrogate endpoints, including quality-of-life endpoints, masking/blinding, and various clinical/statistical designs (including 1-way layout, all-versus-none, factorial, and adaptive designs), are discussed, along with the ultimate goal of gaining US Food and Drug Administration approval for prostate-cancer preventive agents that can improve public health by reducing prostate cancer incidence and mortality.

Anticarcinogenic Agents↗
PubMed2001

Bayesian monitoring of a phase 2 chemoprevention trial in high-risk cohorts for prostate cancer.

The objective of phase 2 cancer chemoprevention trials is to evaluate whether a chemopreventive agent will cause significant modulation of intermediate endpoint biomarkers (IEB) in patients at high risk for the disease. A phase 2 chemoprevention trial of 4-hydroxyphenyl retinamide (4-HPR) versus placebo was conducted in men with a histologic diagnosis of early prostate cancer and scheduled to have radical prostatectomy. A Bayesian monitoring method was used to sequentially monitor this trial for evidence of biological activity or ineffectiveness based on a single IEB variable. Different prior distributions were used and posterior distributions were obtained to calculate the probability that treatment differences are greater than or less than a predetermined clinically significant effect. The interim analysis of transforming growth factor-alpha expression indicated a high probability of insufficient biological activity of 4-HPR on this IEB. This study demonstrates the potential utility of Bayesian methods in the decision-making process in the conduct of phase 2 chemoprevention trials.

Anticarcinogenic Agents↗
PubMed2001

Prostate cancer chemoprevention: Strategies for designing efficient clinical trials.

A chemoprevention (CP) strategy has evolved for conducting efficient clinical trials for prostate cancer (PCa) prevention. It integrates five key components, including agents, biomarkers, cohorts, designs, and endpoints. The rationale for the CP strategy relates to the natural history of prostate cancer. There is a wide array of natural and synthetic agents that hold promise for inhibiting, reversing, or modulating the transition from normal to precancer and from precancer to cancer. These agent classes include antiandrogens, antiestrogens, phytoestrogens, antioxidants, anti-inflammatory (proapoptotic) agents, antiproliferation/antidifferentiation agents, signal transduction modulators of receptor tyrosine kinase and ras farnesylation, antiangiogenesis agents, insulinlike growth factor (IGF)-1, peroxisome proliferator-activator receptor modulators (-gamma and -delta), and gene-based interventions. Biomarkers and endpoints are guided by the level of evidence required (eg, phase 1, 2, 3). Two candidate surrogate endpoints (SE) based on histology are high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and computer-assisted image analysis of dysplastic lesions. Phase 1 trials use standard endpoints of safety, pharmacokinetics and limited pharmacodynamics. Phase 2 trials use endpoints of modulation of biomarkers and correlation with histology. Phase 3 trials use endpoints of clinical benefit, such as cancer incidence reduction and quality of life. Validation of a biomarker as a SE involves correlation of the biomarker with clinical benefit. Cohorts (target populations) for phase 2/3 trials include the general population of men over age 50 with a normal prostate-specific antigen (PSA), subjects with a strong family history of PCa, subjects with elevated PSA/negative biopsy, and subjects with HGPIN/negative biopsy. These at-risk populations reflect key individual risk factors (age, race, serum PSA [free/total]; serum IGF-1/IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-3; 1, 25(OH)(2) D3; family history of PCa; carriers of PCa susceptibility genes [ELAC2, CYP3A4, SRD5A2, etc.]; and histology such as atypia and HGPIN) that could be combined into a multivariate risk model for PCa. The probability of cancer risk (recurrence) is a key factor that impacts on the clinical trial design (power, sample size, and primary endpoint). Multivariate predictive mathematical models for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy by decreasing sample size and time to clinical outcomes maximize trial efficiency and identify the patients most likely to benefit from secondary prevention. The two large primary prevention trials, Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial/Seleninium and Vitamin E Chemoprevention Trial (PCPT/ SELECT), in low- and average-risk subjects have sample sizes of 18,000 to 32,000, with a treatment duration of 7 years to detect a 25% reduction in biopsy-proven PCa. Subjects with HGPIN have the highest known cancer risk (approximately 50% at 3 years), and thus require a small sample size (n = 450) to detect a 33% reduction in cancer incidence. A schema involving three sequential trials for agent registration is described. In summary, a CP strategy that incorporates well-defined agents, clinical and validated SE, and high-risk cohorts defined by genetic and acquired risk factors in a series of well-designed randomized controlled trials provides an efficient pathway for evaluating and approving new agents for PCa prevention.

Anticarcinogenic Agents↗
PubMed2001

Introduction.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2001

Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer chemoprevention: current status and future directions for agent development.

Prostate cancer chemoprevention is defined as the administration of natural and synthetic agents that inhibit >/=1 steps in the natural history of prostate carcinogenesis. The goal is to find agents that modulate the progression from normal epithelium to dysplasia to high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) to locally invasive cancer and systemic disease. Another important goal for chemoprevention is the maintenance of an androgen-sensitive clinical state and delay of the emergence of androgen independence. There is a strong rationale for androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as a chemoprevention strategy for prostate cancer based on evidence from epidemiologic, experimental, molecular pathophysiologic, and randomized, controlled clinical trials. This includes the fact that HGPIN, the most likely precursor of invasive cancer, is androgen dependent and responds to ADT. Although the large, phase-3 Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) of finasteride versus placebo has established the feasibility and role of ADT for primary prevention, nevertheless, limitations of the anticipated treatment-effect size (eg, 25% reduction) and the potential for selection of androgen resistance provide incentive for finding other effective chemopreventive agents. The availability of novel noncytotoxic pharmaceutical and natural products in clinical development create opportunities for improving the therapeutic index through the principles of combination therapy. The emergence of new powerful tools, such as gene chip complementary DNA microarrays for multiplex gene expression profiling, will accelerate the identification of new molecular targets and the design of rational combinations. Several agent classes have a strong basis for combination with ADT, including antiproliferatives, antioxidant micronutrients (selenium), antiestrogens, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors).

Androgen Antagonists↗
PubMed2001

Early stages of p53-induced apoptosis are reversible.

Apoptosis is a type of physiological cell death that occurs during development, normal tissue homeostasis, or as a result of different cellular insults. The phenotype of an apoptotic cell is relatively consistent in most cases of apoptosis and involves at least changes in the cell membrane, proteolysis of cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins, and eventual destruction of nuclear DNA. Our laboratory is interested in the reversibility of apoptosis. We have initial evidence that DNA repair is activated early in p53-induced apoptosis and may be involved in its reversibility. The present work further strengthens our proposition that p53-induced apoptosis is reversible. We show that p53 activation induces phosphatidylserine (PS) externalization early in apoptosis, and that these early apoptotic cells with externalized PS can be rescued and proliferate if the apoptotic stimulus is removed. In addition, we show that unscheduled DNA synthesis occurs in early apoptotic cells, and that if DNA repair is inhibited by aphidicolin, apoptosis is accelerated. These results confirm that early p53-induced apoptotic cells can be rescued from the apoptotic program, and that DNA repair can modulate that cell death process.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Prostate cancer chemoprevention agents exhibit selective activity against early stage prostate cancer cells.

Preclinical models for the identification of prostate cancer chemoprevention agents are lacking. Based upon the notion that clinically useful chemoprevention agents should exhibit selective activity against early stage disease, studies were undertaken to assess whether chemoprevention agents selectively inhibited the growth of early stage prostate cancer, as compared to late stage cancer. First, a series of cell and molecular studies were performed, which, when taken together, validated the use of a panel of prostate cell lines as a model of the different stages of carcinogenesis. Next, therapeutic responsiveness to ten different cytotoxic or chemoprevention agents was evaluated. Chemoprevention agents exhibited selective activity against normal and early transformed prostate tissue, whereas cytotoxic agents were non-specific. Selective activity against early versus advanced prostate cancer cells is identified as a potential screening method for chemoprevention agents.Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (2001) 4, 81-91

Journal Article↗
PubMed2001

Posterior facet talocalcaneal coalition.

Posterior facet talocalcaneal coalition is one of the rarest forms of talocalcaneal coalition. When a posterior facet coalition occurs, it typically involves a majority of the posterior facet articular surface. The authors present a rare form of posterior facet talocalcaneal coalition in an 11- year-old girl. A brief review of the literature is provided, along with the case history, including radiographic findings and intraoperative and postoperative illustrations.

Calcaneus↗
PubMed2001

Computerized image analysis of Ki-67 in ductal breast carcinoma in situ.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and determine the staining protocols and computerized image analysis methods that are the most effective combination for performing quantitative analysis of Ki-67. STUDY DESIGN: We compared conventional bright-field light microscopy and refractive optical enhancement methods in combination with various immunodetection and filter enhancement methods, including immunogold in combination with epipolarization refractive optics and enzymatic conversion of chromogenic substrates in combination with optical filter enhancement. Initial Ki-67 tests were performed on lymph node tissues and cultured human breast cells and then applied to 200 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) samples. DCIS acini were digitally acquired, and a region of interest was manually outlined in each one with a digital stylus to include only the cellular component; then the Ki-67 staining index was quantified by segmentation analysis. RESULTS: Although combining epipolarization analysis with immunohistogold staining was the most sensitive detection method, nonspecific binding was too high. The streptavidin-horseradish-peroxidase enzymatic conversion of 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB) in combination with optical enhancement filters was the most effective method tested. Ki-67 stain was associated with dense fibrillar structures of the nucleoli in the less intensely staining nuclei and was most intense in paired nuclei. CONCLUSION: The method of measuring Ki-67 expression by DAB staining combined with optical enhancement filters and quantification via computer-assisted image analysis techniques produced objective and reproducible results. As such, this method can offer (1) less intraobserver and interobserver variability, (2) a digital archival record, and (3) a baseline for digital exchange of information between studies.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2000

Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) phosphorylation is not required for genistein-induced FAK-beta-1-integrin complex formation.

It has previously been shown that changes in the activity of focal adhesion kinase (FAK), and its binding to beta-1-integrin, accompany genistein-induced adhesion of prostate cells. Consumption of genistein world wide is associated with a lower incidence of metastatic prostate cancer. Early human clinical trials of genistein are under way to evaluate genistein's potential causal role in this regard. Though an important cell adhesion-associated signaling molecule, FAK's role in regulating prostate cell adhesion was not clear. Elucidation of this process would provide important information relating to both biology and potential clinical endpoints. It was hypothesized that FAK activation and complex formation are temporally related in prostate cells, and can thus be separated. Significant activation of FAK was demonstrated when cells adhered to fibronectin, as compared to poly-L-lysine, thus demonstrating that beta-1-integrin plays a significant role in activating FAK. Neither FAK activation, nor FAK-integrin complex formation, required beta-1-integrin ligand. However, disruption of the cellular cytoskeleton by cytochalasin D prevented FAK activation, but did not block genistein-induced complex formation. In the face of a disrupted cytoskeleton, signaling through FAK could not be restored through either integrin cross linking, or re-establishment of tensile forces via attachment to solid matrix. These studies demonstrate that FAK-beta-1-integrin complex formation does not require FAK activation, suggesting that it is an early event in prostate cell adhesion. An intact cytoskeleton is necessary for FAK activation. The functional importance of beta-1-integrin in prostate cells is demonstrated. Current findings support plans to test genistein in prostate cancer.

Cell Adhesion↗
PubMed2000

DNA repair is activated in early stages of p53-induced apoptosis.

p53 is a complex molecule involved in apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and DNA repair. Since apoptosis may play an important role in deletion of neoplastic cells, an understanding of the mechanism of p53-induced apoptosis may be critical for possible future therapeutic interventions. Recent evidence suggests that p53-induced apoptosis may involve members of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) family, linking these two cellular events. Our work using a temperature-sensitive p53 construct further analyzes p53-induced apoptosis in cultured murine mammary epithelial cells and also suggests that DNA repair plays a role in that process. Although p21 is induced in our system, apoptosis occurs without a detectable preceding G1 cell cycle arrest and independent of cellular alterations brought on by the temperature shift. In addition, clonogenic assays suggest that early stages of p53-induced apoptosis may be reversible upon removal of the apoptosis stimulus. As a possible explanation for this reversibility, our results show that general DNA repair activity increases early in p53-induced apoptosis. We also show that caspase-3 is activated at a timepoint when colony formation begins to drop, suggesting a possible mechanism for the point of no return in p53-induced apoptosis.

Amino Acid Substitution↗