Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Langman

Publications and source records attributed to R Langman.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Alloreactive cytotoxic T-cell function, peptide nonspecific.

The recognition requirements necessary for murine alloreactive cytotoxic T-cells to carry out their effector function has been investigated using target cells that express a unique class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-peptide pair. The human cell line T2 and the murine cell line RMA-S are defective in peptide transport components needed to effectively express stable MHC class I molecules at the cell surface. When T2 cells were infected with a vaccinia virus that encoded the Kd gene and provided with a Kd-motif peptide from the nucleoprotein of influenza virus (NPP), these cells could be lysed by polyclonal allo Kd-reactive cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL). Similar results were obtained with the murine RMA-S-Kd cell line, transfected with cDNA able to express some 'empty' Kd that is heat-labile. Adding another Kd-motif peptide from influenza virus haemagglutinin (HAP) stabilized the surface expression of Kd and allowed the RMA-S-Kd cells to be lysed before or after heat shock. At 27 degrees C anti-Kd alloreactive CTL-lysed target cells in the presence and absence of HAP peptide. Alloreactive CTL appear to have a more stringent requirement for a high density of MHC class I on cell surfaces relative to peptide-specific MHC-restricted CTL. We conclude that while Kd-restricted CTL activity is strictly peptide-specific, anti-Kd-specific alloreactivity is MHC allele-specific, but peptide-nonspecific. This conclusion is at odds with the Standard Model of T-cell receptor (TCR) function, but consistent with the predictions of a Competing Model of TCR function.

Animals↗

Is the establishing of tolerance to self obligatorily MHC restricted?

The prevailing paradigm used to interpret how T cells recognize antigen treats antigen processing as obligatory because the T cell antigen receptor complex can only detect antigen located in a "groove" found on MHC-encoded restricting elements. The vast majority of experimental systems used to analyze how T cells recognize antigen depend on induced T cells executing their effector functions, and it is agreed without exception that this event is MHC restricted. However, to date, the extrapolation of the obligatory MHC restriction of effector function to the level of the antigen-responsive T cell that makes the tolerance induction decision, depends not on experiment, but on theoretical constructs. The few experiments designed to test whether tolerance is MHC restricted are open to several interpretations, only one of which is consistent with the view that all antigen recognition events must be MHC restricted. If it can be shown that tolerance is not obligatorily MHC restricted, then the pillar of the prevailing paradigm will have fallen. The experiments described here throw into serious doubt the evidence that has been used to conclude that tolerance is obligatorily MHC restricted.

Animals↗

The priming of cytotoxic T-cell precursors is strictly helper T cell-dependent.

Allogeneic chimaeras that utilize C.B-17 SCID mice (H-2d) as recipients of MHC mismatched bone marrow from C57B1/6 (H-2b) or SJL/J (H-2s) mice have been used to provide experimental evidence demonstrating the necessity for a direct interaction between an effector T helper and the cytotoxic T-cell precursor in order to generate cytotoxic effector T cells specific for the minor histocompatibility (H) antigens of DBA/2 (H-2d) mice. No effect of helpers specific for antigen-processed or not-presented on antigen-presenting cells could be observed. Allo-chimaeras that contain T cells bearing H-2s, and which are restricted to H-2d, make a cytotoxic T-cell response to minor H antigens which is H-2d restricted if, and only if, cloned anti-H-2s effector T helpers are present during the in vivo priming step. Cloned anti-H-2d effector helpers, which are without effect in the allo-chimaeras, do provide a strong helper activity when tested in normal H-2d mice. These findings cannot be reconciled with a strict single recognitive model of restrictive antigen recognition, but they are consistent with a dual recognitive model, which incorporates many of the features of the single recognitive model.

Animals↗