Biomedical subjects

R L Theriault

Publications and source records attributed to R L Theriault.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

A single-gene biomarker identifies breast cancers associated with immature cell type and short duration of prior breastfeeding.

The pathogenesis of breast cancers that do not express estrogen receptors or Her-2/neu receptors (ER-/HER2- phenotype) is incompletely understood. We had observed markedly elevated gene expression of gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptor subunit pi (GABApi, GABRP) in some breast cancers with ER-/HER2- phenotype. In this study, transcriptional profiles (TxPs) were obtained from 82 primary invasive breast cancers by oligonucleotide microarrays. Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to measure GABApi gene expression in a separate cohort of 121 invasive breast cancers. GABApi gene expression values from TxP and RT-PCR were standardized and compared with clinicopathologic characteristics in the 203 patients. GABApi gene expression was increased in 16% of breast cancers (13/82 TxP, 20/ 121 RT-PCR), particularly in breast cancers with ER-/HER2- phenotype (60%), and breast cancers with basal-like genomic profile (60%). The profile of genes coexpressed with GABApi in these tumors was consistent with an immature cell type. In multivariate linear regression analysis, the level of GABApi gene expression was associated with ER-/HER2- phenotype (P < 0.0001), younger age at diagnosis (P = 0.0003), and shorter lifetime duration of breastfeeding (< or = 6 months) in all women (P = 0.017) and specifically in parous women (P = 0.013). GABApi gene expression was also associated with combinations of high grade with ER-/HER2- phenotype (P = 0.002), and with Hispanic ethnicity (P = 0.036). GABApi gene expression is increased in breast cancers of immature (undifferentiated) cell type and is significantly associated with shorter lifetime history of breastfeeding and with high-grade breast cancer in Hispanic women.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗

PubMed2001

Female patients with breast carcinoma age 30 years and younger have a poor prognosis: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to analyze the outcome of treatment in young women with breast carcinoma who were treated at a single institution and to develop a clearer understanding of the natural history of the disease in these women. METHODS: One hundred eighty-five women age < or = 30 years in whom a diagnosis of invasive breast carcinoma was made between October 1985 and September 1995 were identified in the Tumor Registry data base. Patient data were obtained by chart review. All female patients with breast carcinoma who were age > 30 years and who were identified in the same data base and received treatment during the same period served as the control population. The stage-stratified overall survival (OS) rate for the study patients was compared with the OS rate for both the control population and patients in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). RESULTS: Of 185 patients, 11% presented with Stage I disease, 45% presented with Stage II disease, 38% presented with Stage III disease, and 6% presented with Stage IV disease. Twenty-nine percent of patients with Stage I disease received adjuvant therapy, and 84% of patients with Stage II disease and 96% of patients with Stage III disease received either adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Among patients with Stage I disease, 8 patients underwent mastectomy and 13 patients underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Among patients with Stage II disease, 66 patients underwent mastectomy and 17 patients underwent BCS. Among patients with Stage III disease, 65 patients underwent mastectomy and 5 patients underwent BCS. The 5-year OS rate was 87% for patients with Stage I disease, 60% for patients with Stage II disease, 42% for patients with Stage III disease, and 16% for patients with Stage IV disease. Compared with the control patients and those in the NCDB, there was a trend toward worse OS rates in women age < or = 30 years. CONCLUSIONS: Women who are diagnosed with breast carcinoma at an age < or = 30 years appear to have a poorer prognosis compared with that for their older counterparts.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

Cationic liposome-mediated E1A gene transfer to human breast and ovarian cancer cells and its biologic effects: a phase I clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Preclinical studies have demonstrated that the adenovirus type 5 E1A gene is associated with antitumor activities by transcriptional repression of HER-2/neu and induction of apoptosis. Indeed, E1A gene therapy is known to induce regression of HER-2/neu-overexpressing breast and ovarian cancers in nude mice. Therefore, we evaluated the feasibility of intracavitary injection of E1A gene complexed with DC-Chol cationic liposome (DCC-E1A) in patients with both HER-2/neu-overexpressing and low HER-2/neu-expressing breast and ovarian cancers in a phase I clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An E1A gene complexed with DCC-E1A cationic liposome was injected once a week into the thoracic or peritoneal cavity of 18 patients with advanced cancer of the breast (n = 6) or ovary (n = 12). RESULTS: E1A gene expression in tumor cells was detected by immunohistochemical staining and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. This E1A gene expression was accompanied by HER-2/neu downregulation, increased apoptosis, and reduced proliferation. The most common treatment-related toxicities were fever, nausea, vomiting, and/or discomfort at the injection sites. CONCLUSION: These results argue for the feasibility of intracavitary DCC-E1A administration, provide a clear proof of preclinical concept, and warrant phase II trials to determine the antitumor activity of the E1A gene.

Adenovirus E1A Proteins↗

PubMed2001

Phase I study of stealth liposomal doxorubicin in combination with gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We conducted a single-institution phase I clinical trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and define the toxic effects of stealth liposomal doxorubicin in combination with gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were eligible if they had disease progression with no limit on prior number of chemotherapy regimens. Prior treatment with liposomal doxorubicin and/or gemcitabine was not allowed. The starting dose of liposomal doxorubicin was 20 mg/m(2) on day 1 only with a 20% dose escalation of the previous mg/m(2) dose until MTD was reached. Gemcitabine was given as a fixed dose of 800 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: We treated 27 patients of whom six had never received chemotherapy for their disease. Most had had visceral involvement as their dominant site of disease. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression, which included neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. However, neither neutropenic fever nor episodes of bleeding were major occurrences. Significant antitumor activity was also observed with a total of two complete and seven partial responses. The recommended phase II dose is liposomal doxorubicin 24 mg/m(2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. CONCLUSION: The combination of liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine is an active and well tolerated regimen when administered on a 21-day schedule. Myelosuppression limited further dose escalation, however, it did not increase the incidence of neutropenic fever. Significant antitumor activity seen in heavily and minimally pretreated patients warrants further evaluation of this combination.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Long-term results of combined-modality therapy for locally advanced breast cancer with ipsilateral supraclavicular metastases: The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.

PURPOSE: To determine outcomes in local-regional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) who present with ipsilateral supraclavicular metastases and who are treated with combined-modality therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy patients with regional stage IV LABC, which is defined by our institution as LABC with ipsilateral supraclavicular adenopathy without evidence of distant disease, received treatment on three prospective trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil, or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone. Patients then received local therapy that consisted of either total mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or segmental mastectomy and ALND before or after irradiation. Patients with no response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy. After completion of local therapy, chemotherapy was continued for four to 15 cycles, followed by radiotherapy. Patients older than 50 years who had estrogen receptor-positive tumors received tamoxifen for 5 years. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 11.6 years (range, 4.8 to 22.6 years). Disease-free survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 34% and 32%, respectively. The median disease-free survival was 1.9 years. Overall survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 41% and 31%, respectively. The median overall survival was 3.5 years. The overall response rate (partial and complete responses) to induction chemotherapy was 89%. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular metastases but no other evidence of distant metastases warrant therapy administered with curative intent, ie, combined-modality therapy consisting of chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. Patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular metastases should be included in the stage IIIB category of the tumor-node-metastasis classification because their clinical course and prognosis are similar to those of patients with stage IIIB LABC.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

The evolving role of bisphosphonates.

Bisphosphonates, analogs of pyrophosphate, bind to bone at sites of active bone remodeling. In clinical settings of rapid bone turnover and/or excessive osteolytic activity, they have been shown to have beneficial clinical effects. These settings include Paget's disease of bone, osteoporosis from a variety of clinical causes, and malignant bone disease. Bisphosphonate inhibition of osteolysis in cancer has been shown to be effective therapy for malignancy-associated hypercalcemia and as adjunctive therapy for the delay or prevention of cancer-related skeletal morbidity, including bone pain, pathologic fractures, and need for radiation therapy. Animal models of bone metastasis prevention by bisphosphonate treatment have provided the preclinical background for the adjuvant use of bisphosphonates in primary cancers. The success of these clinical trials has provided strong impetus for new research on bone disease and malignancy, as well as the development and testing of new and more potent bisphosphonates. Semin Oncol 28:284-290.

Bone Neoplasms↗

PubMed2001

Phase I-II vinorelbine (Navelbine) by continuous infusion in patients with metastatic breast cancer: cumulative toxicities limit dose escalation.

Vinorelbine (Navelbine) has significant activity against breast carcinoma and is less neurotoxic than vinblastine. Because vinblastine has improved activity when administered by continuous infusion, we conducted a Phase I-II study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vinorelbine when given by continuous infusion and the response rates to it in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients. Between April 1994 and August 1997, 87 patients were entered in the study. All were female and had proven metastatic breast cancer. Ninety-five percent of them had received prior doxorubicin treatment, and 74% had received prior paclitaxel treatment. In Phase I of the study, all patients received 8 mg of vinorelbine by intravenous (i.v.) bolus followed by a continuous infusion of vinorelbine over 96 hr. When the MTD was determined, patients were entered in the Phase II arm to assess treatment responses and cumulative toxic reactions. In the Phase I arm (43 patients, 182 cycles), we determined the MTD of vinorelbine to be 8 mg by i.v. bolus followed by a continuous infusion of 11 mg/m2/day over 4 days. The dose-limiting toxic reaction was grade 3-4 granulocytopenia in 35% of the cycles and neutropenic fever in 15% of the cycles. Forty-four patients (193 cycles) were treated at the MTD. Seven (16%) of them had a response (2 complete responses, 5 partial responses). The median durations of response and survival were 4.3 and 8.6 months, respectively. However, cumulative toxic reactions (neutropenic fever and stomatitis) in 22 patients (50%) required dose reductions. A continuous infusion of vinorelbine can be safely administered but with a narrow therapeutic index because of cumulative toxic reactions. We recommend a modified MTD of vinorelbine: 8 mg by i.v. bolus followed by a continuous infusion of 10 mg/m2/day over 4 days. However, this treatment schedule offers no apparent advantage over the commonly used weekly vinorelbine schedule.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Capecitabine for 5-fluorouracil-resistant brain metastases from breast cancer.

We report a case in which brain metastases originating from breast cancer responded to treatment with oral capecitabine. The metastases had progressed and Karnofsky performance status deteriorated despite whole brain irradiation, hormonal treatment, and systemic chemotherapy that included 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). In contrast, 2 months of treatment with oral capecitabine produced a partial response, documented by lesion size on magnetic resonance imaging and an improvement in performance status; both measures continued to improve during 11 months of capecitabine treatment.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Phase II study of paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma refractory to standard chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The authors conducted a single institution Phase II clinical trial to determine whether paclitaxel had antitumor activity in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma that was refractory to standard chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with metastatic breast carcinoma were eligible for the study if they had disease progression after at least 2 prior chemotherapy regimens. Patients who had received three prior regimens were treated in a separate cohort. All patients were required to have received doxorubicin in the past and were not eligible if they had received prior therapy with paclitaxel. The starting dose of paclitaxel for low risk patients was 175 mg/m2, administered as a 24-hour continuous infusion; the starting dose of paclitaxel was 150 mg/m2 for patients who had received > or = 3 prior regimens. Therapy was given every 3 weeks and continued for at least 2 courses unless there was evidence of rapidly progressing disease, for at least 3 courses if there was no change in disease and Grade 3 or 4 (based on National Cancer Institute toxicity criteria) toxicity was not noted, and for 6 courses beyond the maximum response in patients who demonstrated complete or partial responses and showed no evidence of disease progression. RESULTS: Sixty-eight of 69 patients entered in the study were evaluable for response: 35 patients who had received 2 prior chemotherapy regimens for Stage IV disease and 33 patients who had received > or =3 prior regimens. A partial response was observed in 7 patients who had received 2 prior regimens, for an objective response rate of 20% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 14-26%). In the group who had received > or = 3 prior regimens, a total of 6 partial responses were observed, for an objective response rate of 18% (95% CI, 12-23%). The median response duration was 8.2 months (range, 2.7-10.1 months) for the group who had received 2 prior regimens and 5.8 months (range, 2.1-9.5 months) for patients who received > or = 3 prior regimens. Responses were noted in patients with anthracycline-resistant tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel was active in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast carcinoma, including anthracycline-resistant breast carcinoma.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Combined modality treatment of locally advanced breast carcinoma in elderly patients or patients with severe comorbid conditions using tamoxifen as the primary therapy.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the objective response rate and possibility of breast-conserving surgery using neoadjuvant tamoxifen in the multimodality treatment, including surgery and radiotherapy, of elderly or frail patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma. METHODS: Forty-seven patients age > 75 years or age < 75 years with comorbid conditions and locally advanced breast carcinoma were treated with neoadjuvant tamoxifen (20 mg/day) for 3-6 months. This was followed by surgery and radiotherapy when feasible and adjuvant tamoxifen for 5 years or until disease recurrence. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 72 years (range, 48-86 years). Approximately 22% had T3 lesions, 57% had T4 lesions, 22% were Stage II (AJCC Manual for Staging Cancer, 3rd edition), and 78% were Stage III. Eighty percent were estrogen receptor positive. After 6 months of treatment with neoadjuvant tamoxifen, a response rate of 47% was observed, including a complete response rate of 6%. Twenty-nine patients (62%) were rendered free of disease by surgery, including 5 with breast-conserving procedures. After a median follow-up of 40 months, 23 patients (49%) remained disease free. The median survival time had not been reached at the time of last follow-up. No major toxicity was observed, with the exception of one patient who developed a possible tamoxifen-related Stage I endometrial carcinoma. The estimated 2-year and 5-year progression free and overall survival rates were 50% and 41%, and 83% and 59%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study show that neoadjuvant tamoxifen was effective in the treatment of elderly or frail patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma with estrogen receptor positive tumors, and resulted in a reasonable response rate, including complete responses and good overall survival.

Age Factors↗

PubMed2000

High-dose chemotherapy for high-risk primary breast cancer: an on-site review of the Bezwoda study.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy with progenitor-cell rescue for women with breast cancer is a controversial issue. Although historically controlled trials have suggested a survival advantage for high-dose chemotherapy, several randomised studies have yet to confirm this advantage. Two studies, however, by Bezwoda, of patients with high-risk and metastatic disease, seemed to show a significant survival advantage for high-dose compared with conventional-dose chemotherapy for metastatic and high-risk primary breast cancer. METHODS: To corroborate the study results before starting a large international confirmatory study, a US team did an on-site review of records for patients in the high-risk study. Limited numbers of records were made available for review, all of which were for patients who received the high-dose-chemotherapy regimen. FINDINGS: There was much disparity between the reviewed records and the data presented at two international meetings. In addition, the reviewers saw no signed informed consent, and the institutional review committee had no record of approval for the investigational therapy. After the site visit, Bezwoda admitted scientific misconduct by using a different control chemotherapy regimen from that described in presented data. INTERPRETATION: The Bezwoda study should not be used as the basis for further trials to test the efficacy of the cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, etoposide regimen for high-dose chemotherapy in women with high-risk primary breast cancer. This review validates the essential nature of on-site audits, especially in single-institution studies.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed2000

Pamidronate prevents skeletal complications and is effective palliative treatment in women with breast carcinoma and osteolytic bone metastases: long term follow-up of two randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Pamidronate therapy previously has been shown to reduce skeletal complications effectively for up to 12 months in breast carcinoma patients with bone metastases. The current study data provide further follow-up results regarding the effects of long term (up to 24 months) pamidronate treatment in women with breast carcinoma and osteolytic metastases. METHODS: Follow-up results from two prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled intervention trials conducted at academic and community oncology centers were combined to provide a large data set with which to evaluate the long term efficacy and safety of pamidronate therapy. Seven hundred fifty-four women with Stage IV breast carcinoma and osteolytic metastases were randomized to the 2 treatment arms of the trial. Three patients were excluded from the intent-to-treat population for the analysis. A total of 751 evaluable patients were randomized to receive either a 90-mg intravenous pamidronate infusion (367 patients) or a placebo infusion (384 patients) every 3-4 weeks. The primary outcome measures were skeletal morbidity rate (events/year), proportion of patients developing a skeletal complication, and time to first skeletal complication. RESULTS: Of the 367 women receiving pamidronate, 115 (31.3%) completed the trial and 81 (22.1%) discontinued the study due to adverse events. Of the 384 women who received placebo, 100 (26.0%) completed the study and 76 (19.8%) discontinued the study due to adverse events. The skeletal morbidity rate was 2.4 in the pamidronate group and 3.7 in the placebo group (P < 0.001). In the pamidronate group, 186 of the 367 patients (51%) had skeletal complications compared with 246 of the 384 patients in the placebo group (64%) (P < 0.001). The median time to first skeletal complication was 12.7 months in the pamidronate group and 7 months in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Six patients treated with pamidronate discontinued treatment due to drug-related adverse events. Pain and analgesic scores were significantly worse in the placebo group compared with those patients in the pamidronate group. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, monthly infusions of 90 mg of pamidronate as a supplement to antineoplastic therapy were found to be well tolerated and superior to antineoplastic therapy alone in preventing skeletal complications and palliating symptoms for at least 24 months in breast carcinoma patients with osteolytic bone metastases.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Randomized trial of high-dose chemotherapy and blood cell autografts for high-risk primary breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled studies have reported encouraging outcomes for patients with high-risk primary breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell support. We conducted a prospective randomized trial to compare standard-dose chemotherapy with the same therapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with 10 or more positive axillary lymph nodes after primary breast surgery or patients with four or more positive lymph nodes after four cycles of primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy were eligible. All patients were to receive eight cycles of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin (Adriamycin), and cyclophosphamide (FAC). Patients were stratified by stage and randomly assigned to receive two cycles of high-dose cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin with autologous hematopoietic stem cell support or no additional chemotherapy. Tamoxifen was planned for postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive tumors and chest wall radiotherapy was planned for all. All P values are from two-sided tests. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (48 after primary surgery and 30 after primary chemotherapy) were registered. Thirty-nine patients were randomly assigned to FAC and 39 to FAC followed by high-dose chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 6.5 years, there have been 41 relapses. In intention-to-treat analyses, estimated 3-year relapse-free survival rates were 62% and 48% for FAC and FAC/high-dose chemotherapy, respectively (P =.35), and 3-year survival rates were 77% and 58%, respectively (P =.23). Overall, there was greater and more frequent morbidity associated with high-dose chemotherapy than with FAC; there was one septic death associated with high-dose chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: No relapse-free or overall survival advantage was associated with the use of high-dose chemotherapy, and morbidity was increased with its use. Thus, high-dose chemotherapy is not indicated outside a clinical trial.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Breast cancer during pregnancy.

The concurrent diagnosis of breast cancer and pregnancy is a challenging clinical situation that historically has placed the welfare of the mother in conflict with that of the fetus. Modified radical mastectomy, the preferred surgical option in women with breast cancer during pregnancy, can be accomplished with minimal fetal risk. Although breast-conserving surgery (lumpectomy or quadrantectomy) can be performed, the radiation therapy required to complete local therapy for the breast must be delayed until after delivery because of the risks associated with fetal exposure to radiation. Although much of the literature on the pharmacologic treatment of breast cancer during pregnancy is anecdotal, recently published data from our institution support the premise that breast cancer can be treated safely during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy with combination chemotherapy consisting of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC). Therapeutic abortion does not appear to improve survival for the mother, but it may be an option if maternal health is jeopardized or fetal anomalies are seen or suspected.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed2000

Doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly breast cancer patients: the M.D. Anderson experience, with long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly breast cancer patients and to compare results in elderly patients with those in younger patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients aged 50 years or older treated in trials of doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy between 1974 and 1988. Old age was not an exclusion criterion for these trials. Patient characteristics, hematologic and nonhematologic side effects, patterns of recurrence, and causes of death were determined for patients aged 50-64 years and for patients aged 65 years or older, and results were compared between these two groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted, and tested by the generalized Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: A total of 390 patients aged 50 years or older were treated with doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy during the study period. Of these, 325 were aged 50-64 years (group 1), and 65 were aged 65 years or older (group 2). The median follow-up period for group 1 was 185 months (range 29-272+ months), and the median follow-up period for group 2 was 169 months (range 128-240+ months). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to performance status, hormone receptor profile, tumor size, nodal status, or type of locoregional therapy. There also were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in recurrence patterns, disease-free survival, or overall survival. The granulocyte and platelet nadirs of cycles 1, 3, and 6 were similar between the two groups. No cumulative hematologic side effects were seen in either group. The occurrence of second malignancies was extremely low in both groups. In both groups, the majority of deaths were due to progression of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant doxorubicin-based chemotherapy is well tolerated in elderly breast cancer patients who have good performance status and normal cardiac ejection fraction. Adjuvant doxorubicin-based chemotherapy in these patients results in disease-free and overall survival rates similar to those seen in younger patients.

Age Factors↗

PubMed2000

Synchronous primary cancers of the breast and cervix: planning multidisciplinary primary treatment [clinico-pathological conference].

Multiple metachronous primary malignancies are becoming increasingly frequent; however, multiple synchronous primary malignancies are still unusual. We report the case of a 61-year-old woman with synchronous stage IIIB ductal carcinoma of the left breast and FIGO stage IB2 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. The patient was treated initially every 4 weeks with a 24-h intravenous infusion of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) followed by a 1-h infusion of carboplatin (area under the curve of 5 mg/ml x min) with concurrent irradiation of the pelvis. Significant toxic reactions including nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea required hospitalization or outpatient intravenous fluids and antiemetics. After four cycles of chemotherapy, the breast cancer was in complete clinical remission, and the patient underwent a modified radical mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection. Pathologic findings revealed a few microscopic foci of residual infiltrating ductal carcinoma exhibiting a marked treatment effect; none of the 14 axillary lymph nodes removed showed evidence of metastatic tumor. A near-complete pathologic response of the breast cancer and a complete clinical response of the cervical cancer were obtained. Adjuvant chemotherapy for the breast cancer was then initiated, followed by radiation and hormonal therapy.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed2000

Phase I study of vinorelbine by 96-hour infusion in advanced metastatic breast cancer.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose and the toxicity profile of vinorelbine administered by continuous infusion for 96 hours to patients who had received prior chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Forty-three patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with vinorelbine 8 mg intravenously for 10 minutes (day 1) followed by continuous infusion of vinorelbine for 96 hours. Treatments were repeated every 3 weeks. Eighty-eight percent of the patients had had two or more prior chemotherapeutic regimens: 91% had prior doxorubicin therapy and 77% had prior paclitaxel therapy. All 43 patients were evaluable for toxicity. The median age was 49 years. All patients had a performance status less than or equal to 2 and a life expectancy more than 12 weeks. Eight dose levels were evaluated, and a total of 182 cycles were given. National Cancer Institute grade III or IV granulocytopenia was observed in 64 (35%) cycles, neutropenic fever in 27 (15%) cycles, fatigue (National Cancer Institute grade III or IV) in 18 (10%) cycles, and hand-foot syndrome in 8 (4%) cycles. In 17 (9%) cycles, patients were hospitalized. The maximum tolerated dose of this regimen was determined to be vinorelbine 8 mg intravenously for 10 minutes (day 1) followed by continuous vinorelbine infusion 11 mg/m2 for 96 hours. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenic fever and stomatitis.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Phase II study of vinorelbine administered by 96-hour infusion in patients with advanced breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Vinorelbine given by weekly bolus injection is active and less toxic than bolus vinblastine in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma. Vinblastine given by 5-day continuous infusion showed a steep dose-response curve. Pharmacokinetic studies of vinorelbine showed that it is possible to achieve a comparable antitumor effect with a smaller amount of the drug if it is given by continuous infusion. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of vinorelbine given by 96-hour continuous infusion to patients with refractory metastatic breast carcinoma patients. METHODS: Between May 1996 and August 1997, 47 patients with metastatic breast carcinoma were registered into the study. All patients previously had received doxorubicin and 70% had undergone prior paclitaxel treatment. Approximately 56% of the patients had >/=2 metastatic sites. All patients received vinorelbine according to the following dose schedule: 8 mg bolus followed by 11 mg/m(2) by continuous infusion over 24 hours every 4 days every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were evaluable for response. A total of 193 cycles were administered. The overall response rate was 16% (2 patients achieved a complete response and 5 patients achieved a partial response). The median duration of response was 4.3 months and the median overall survival was 8.6 months. Patients with visceral metastases and/or multiple sites of involvement had shorter durations of response than patients with only soft tissue disease or single-site metastasis (3.1 months vs. 4. 9 months) and shorter overall survival (8.1 months vs. 12 months). Dose reductions were necessary due to cumulative stomatitis and/or fatigue in 12 cycles and neutropenia and/or infection in 13 cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Due to toxicity, a revised maximum tolerated dose for continuous infusion vinorelbine is proposed by the authors: 8 mg intravenously over 10 minutes followed by 10 mg/m(2) by continuous infusion over 24 hours every 4 days. The current dose schedule did not offer an advantage either in response rates or survival over the weekly vinorelbine bolus injection in doxorubicin-resistant and paclitaxel-resistant patients.

Adult↗