Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R L Schilsky

Publications and source records attributed to R L Schilsky.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

A phase I study of antisense oligonucleotide GTI-2040 given by continuous intravenous infusion in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: This study of GTI-2040, a 20-mer phosphorothioate oligonucleotide complementary to the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) of the R2 subunit of ribonucleotide reductase (RNR), was conducted to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of the agent in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma. Plasma pharmacokinetics of GTI-2040 and suppression of RNR expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were also studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: GTI-2040 was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion for 21 days every 4 weeks. Dose escalation was performed using an accelerated, dose-doubling schedule until any drug related toxicity > or = grade 2 was observed; subsequent dose escalation followed a more conservative dose escalation scheme with three patients/cohort. RESULTS: A total of 49 cycles of therapy were administered to 36 patients at GTI-2040 doses ranging from 18.5 mg/m(2)/day to 222 mg/m(2)/day. GTI-2040 was generally well tolerated. At the highest dose level examined, two patients experienced dose limiting reversible hepatic toxicity. Constitutional toxicities consisting of fatigue and anorexia were the most common toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose of GTI-2040 given on this infusion schedule is 185 mg/m(2)/day. GTI-2040 appears to have a manageable toxicity profile and is generally well tolerated as a single agent.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase III trials.

This study evaluates the efficacy of capecitabine using data from a large, well-characterised population of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated in two identically designed phase III studies. A total of 1207 patients with previously untreated mCRC were randomised to either oral capecitabine (1250 mg m(-2) twice daily, days 1-14 every 21 days; n=603) or intravenous (i.v.) bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV; Mayo Clinic regimen; n=604). Capecitabine demonstrated a statistically significant superior response rate compared with 5-FU/LV (26 vs 17%; P<0.0002). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that capecitabine consistently resulted in superior response rates (P<0.05), even in patient subgroups with poor prognostic indicators. The median time to response and duration of response were similar and time to progression (TTP) was equivalent in the two arms (hazard ratio (HR) 0.997, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.885-1.123, P=0.95; median 4.6 vs 4.7 months with capecitabine and 5-FU/LV, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified younger age, liver metastases, multiple metastases and poor Karnofsky Performance Status as independent prognostic indicators for poor TTP. Overall survival was equivalent in the two arms (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84-1.06, P=0.48; median 12.9 vs 12.8 months, respectively). Capecitabine results in superior response rate, equivalent TTP and overall survival, an improved safety profile and improved convenience compared with i.v. 5-FU/LV as first-line treatment for MCRC. For patients in whom fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is indicated, capecitabine should be strongly considered. Following encouraging results from phase I and II trials, randomised trials are evaluating capecitabine in combination with irinotecan, oxaliplatin and radiotherapy. Capecitabine is a suitable replacement for i.v. 5-FU as the backbone of colorectal cancer therapy.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2004

A phase I study of the oral combination of CI-994, a putative histone deacetylase inhibitor, and capecitabine.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to determine the toxicity profile, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics of the putative histone deacetylase inhibitor CI-994 in combination with capecitabine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients were treated according to three different dosing schemes in which the capecitabine dose was fixed and the CI-994 dose was escalated. Capecitabine was administered in twice daily divided doses, and CI-994 was given as a single daily dose. In schedule A, 26 patients were treated with capecitabine 1650 mg/m2/day and CI-994 for 2 weeks of a 3-week cycle. In schedule B, six patients received capecitabine 1650 mg/m2/day for two 3-week cycles and CI-994 for 5 of 6 weeks. In schedule C, 22 patients were treated with capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/day and CI-994 for 2 of 3 weeks. RESULTS: At the MTD, the principal dose-limiting toxicity was thrombocytopenia. The pharmacokinetics of CI-994 were unaltered by capecitabine, and there was no correlation between body surface area and major pharmacokinetic parameters. Platelet count nadir was best predicted by the observed maximal concentration (C(max)) of CI-994. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended phase II dose is 6 mg/m2 (or 10 mg) of CI-994 in combination with capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/day for 2 weeks of a 3-week cycle.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of 24-hour infusion 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with organ dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction are often treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), but there are few data to confirm the safety of this practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with solid tumors were eligible if they were able to fit into one of three organ dysfunction cohorts: I, creatinine >1.5 but < or =3.0 mg/dl and normal bilirubin; II, bilirubin >1.5 but <5.0 mg/dl with normal creatinine; or III, bilirubin > or =5.0 mg/dl with normal creatinine. 5-FU doses were escalated separately within each of the three cohorts. Leucovorin (LV) dosage was fixed at 500 mg/m(2). 5-FU was given as a 24-h infusion at 1000, 1800 or 2600 mg/m(2), and plasma concentrations were measured every 3 h during the first two infusions for each patient. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were treated. Toxicities did not appear to be related to organ dysfunction cohort. A weekly dose of of 5-FU 2600 mg/m(2) produced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in six of 20 evaluable patients. These DLTs included grade 3 fatigue (n = 3), grade 2 neutropenia precluding weekly dosing (n = 1), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (n = 1) and grade 3 mental status changes (n = 1). There was no relationship between serum bilirubin or serum creatinine and 5-FU clearance. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with elevated bilirubin may be safely started on a weekly regimen of 5-FU 2600 mg/m(2) with leucovorin 500 mg/m(2) as a 24-h continuous infusion.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

UGT1A1*28 polymorphism as a determinant of irinotecan disposition and toxicity.

The metabolism of irinotecan (CPT-11) involves sequential activation to SN-38 and detoxification to the pharmacologically inactive SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G). We have previously demonstrated the role of UGT1A1 enzyme in the glucuronidation of SN-38 and a significant correlation between in vitro glucuronidation of SN-38 and UGT1A1 gene promoter polymorphism. This polymorphism (UGT1A1*28) is characterized by the presence of an additional TA repeat in the TATA sequence of the UGT1A1 promoter, ((TA)7TAA, instead of (TA)6TAA). Here we report the results from a prospective clinical pharmacogenetic study to determine the significance of UGT1A1*28 polymorphism on irinotecan disposition and toxicity in patients with cancer. Twenty patients with solid tumors were treated with a 90 min i.v. infusion of irinotecan (300 mg m(-2)) once every 3 weeks. The frequency of UGT1A1 genotypes was as follows: 6/6--45%, 6/7--35% and 7/7--20%, with allele frequencies of 0.375 and 0.625 for (TA)7TAA and (TA)6TAA, respectively. Patients with the (TA)7TAA polymorphism had significantly lower SN-38 glucuronidation rates than those with the normal allele (6/6>6/7>7/7, P = 0.001). More severe grades of diarrhea and neutropenia were observed only in patients heterozygous (grade 4 diarrhea, n = 1) or homozygous (grade 3 diarrhea/grade 4 neutropenia, n = 1 and grade 3 neutropenia, n = 1) for the (TA)7TAA sequence. The results suggest that screening for UGT1A1*28 polymorphism may identify patients with lower SN-38 glucuronidation rates and greater susceptibility to irinotecan induced gastrointestinal and bone marrow toxicity.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

First-line oral capecitabine therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a favorable safety profile compared with intravenous 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety profile of capecitabine using data from a large, well-characterized population of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated in two phase II studies. In these trials, capecitabine achieved significantly superior response rates, equivalent time to disease progression and equivalent survival compared with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 1207) were randomized to either oral capecitabine (1250 mg/m2 twice daily, on days 1-14 every 21 days) or intravenous (i.v.) bolus 5-FU/leucovorin (Mayo Clinic regimen). RESULTS: Capecitabine demonstrated a safety profile superior to that of 5-FU/leucovorin, with a significantly lower incidence of diarrhea, stomatitis, nausea, alopecia and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia leading to significantly fewer neutropenic fever/sepsis cases and fewer hospitalizations. All patients in the capecitabine group received a starting dose of 1250 mg/m2 twice daily and the majority (66%) did not require dose modification for adverse events. In the 5-FU/leucovorin group, 58% of patients did not require dose reduction for toxicities. The capecitabine dose-modification scheme reduced the recurrence of key toxicities without compromising efficacy. In both treatment arms, patients with moderate renal impairment at baseline (estimated creatinine clearance 30-50 ml/min) experienced a higher incidence of grade 3 or 4 toxicities. This increase was more pronounced with 5-FU/leucovorin. CONCLUSIONS: Capecitabine is at least as effective, better tolerated and more convenient than i.v. 5-FU/leucovorin as treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Analysis of data from two large phase III trials demonstrates that efficacy is not compromised in patients requiring a dose reduction for adverse events. The phase III data and an additional pharmacokinetic study support a lower starting dose in patients with moderate renal impairment at baseline (calculated creatinine clearance 30-50 ml/min) and a contra-indication in patients with severely impaired creatinine clearance at baseline (<30 ml/min). For patients with normal or mildly impaired renal function at baseline, the standard starting dose is well tolerated. The incidence and severity of adverse events in patients with moderate renal impairment at baseline who were treated with 5-FU/leucovorin was more pronounced, indicating that capecitabine provides a better-tolerated alternative.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Phase I study to evaluate multiple regimens of intravenous 5-fluorouracil administered in combination with weekly gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors: a potential broadly active regimen for advanced solid tumor malignancies.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity profile of gemcitabine given on a weekly schedule with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with advanced solid tumors received escalating doses of gemcitabine 200 and 300 mg/m(2) weekly as a 30-minute infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks (schedule 1) or 450, 600, 800, 1000, 1250, 1500, 1800, and 2200 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8 (schedule 2) every 3 weeks, respectively. At the completion of gemcitabine infusion (Day 1), patients received fixed dose continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil at either 300 mg/m(2) (Days 1-21) or 200 mg/m(2) (Days 1-21; schedule 1) every 4 weeks or 200 mg/m(2) (Days 1-14; schedule 2] every 3 weeks, respectively. Toxicity assessments were performed weekly on study, and efficacy measurements were performed every 6-8 weeks. RESULTS: Seventy patients with advanced solid malignancies received a total of 220 cycles of combination chemotherapy. Eleven (14.3%) patients received no more than 1 treatment cycle of combination therapy. Schedule 1 maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine was 600 mg/m(2)/week when combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at 200 mg/m(2)/day (Days 1-21) repeated every 4 weeks. The schedule 2 maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine was 2200 mg/m(2)/week when combined with 5-FU dosed at 200 mg/m(2)/day (Days 1-14) repeated every 3 weeks. In schedule 1, the limiting factor for gemcitabine delivery was the Day 15 dose that often was omitted because of myelosuppression and/or mucositis. In schedule 1 cycle 1, nonhematologic toxicity was common and included Grade 3-4 toxicities: mucositis (8 patients), fatigue (2 patients), and anorexia (1 patient). One patient had Grade 3-4 neutropenia at dose level 5 (maximum tolerated dose). In schedule 2 cycle 1, hematologic toxicities were more common than nonhematologic toxicity and included Grade 3 anemia (3 patients), Grade 3 neutropenia (4 patients), and Grade 3 thrombocytopenia (2 patients). The nonhematologic toxicities included Grade 3 mucositis (3 patients), Grade 3 fatigue (2 patients), and Grade 3 dehydration (1 patient). Overall, antitumor activity was observed in seven patients. Three of 30 patients with cytokine refractory renal cell carcinoma (RCC; relative risk [RR] 10 %; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-22%) had a partial response. Of the remaining 27 patients with RCC, 4 patients had a minor response, and 10 patients had stable disease lasting a median of 6.4 (range, 4-12) months. The remaining 5 responses occurred in 40 patients (RR, 12.5%; 95% CI, 4.2-26.8%): 2 patients with 5-FU refractory colon carcinoma, 1 patient with hepatoma, 1 patient with paclitaxel-cisplatin-resistant ovarian carcinoma, and 1 patient with cisplatin-resistant head and neck squamous cell carcinoma had a partial response. CONCLUSIONS: For Phase II development, gemcitabine 450-600 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8, and 15 can be safely combined with 5-FU 200 mg/m(2) given as a continuous infusion (Days 1-21) of a 28-day cycle or gemcitabine 1800 mg/m(2) Days 1 and 8 given with 5-FU 200 mg/m(2) as a continuous infusion (Days 1-14) of a 21-day cycle. The observed antitumor activity in several solid tumors, especially in renal cell carcinoma, warrants broad Phase II evaluation.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Phase II study of oral eniluracil, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The oral administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is hindered by erratic bioavailability due to catabolism of 5-FU by the enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) in the gastrointestinal tract. Eniluracil is a potent inactivator of DPD which results in 100% oral bioavailability of 5-FU. Leucovorin (LV) is another biochemical modulator of 5-FU that potentiates inhibition of thymidylate synthase, the primary target of 5-FU. The goal of this study was to determine the antitumor activity and toxicity of an oral regimen containing eniluracil, 5-FU, and LV in patients with colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: Sixty eligible patients who had previously untreated, measurable, metastatic colorectal carcinoma were treated with oral eniluracil 50 mg on Days 1-7, 5-FU 20 mg/m(2) on Days 2-6, and LV 50 mg on Days 2-6. Cycles were repeated at 28-day intervals. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 13% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 6, 25%), with 1 complete response and 7 partial responses. Three additional patients had partial responses that were not confirmed at subsequent evaluations. The median time to progression of disease was 4.4 months (95% CI = 3.45, 7.69) and the median survival time was 12.6 months (95% CI = 9.1, 14.75). Grade 3-5 toxicity (1 toxic death) occurred in 51 patients (85%). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 25 patients (42%), and 18 patients (30%) had Grade 3-4 diarrhea. Twenty-one patients (35%) were hospitalized for toxicity, and 12 (20%) had febrile neutropenia. Baseline creatinine clearance was associated inversely with severe toxicity (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although antitumor activity was observed, the frequent occurrence of severe toxicity with this regimen limited its clinical utility. Alternate schedules with a more favorable therapeutic index are undergoing clinical testing and should be pursued. The high level of toxicity observed with orally administered low dose 5-FU underscored the potency of eniluracil as a biochemical modulator.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Phase I clinical and pharmacogenetic study of weekly TAS-103 in patients with advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: TAS-103 is an inhibitor of both topoisomerase I and II enzymes with broad antitumor activity. It is metabolized to TAS-103-glucuronide (TAS-103-G) predominantly by uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase isoform 1A1 (UGT1A1). We conducted a phase I study to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of TAS-103 when administered on a weekly schedule to patients with advanced cancer. In addition, we evaluated the influence of UGT1A1 genotype on the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of TAS-103. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients were treated with escalating doses (50 to 200 mg/m(2)) of TAS-103, administered intravenously over 1 hour each week for 3 weeks. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed at the 130-, 160-, and 200-mg/m(2) dose levels. UGT1A1 genotypes were determined using reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction techniques. RESULTS: DLT (grade 3 neutropenia) was observed in 5 of 12 patients at 160 mg/m(2) and in 3 of 6 patients at 200 mg/m(2). At 160 mg/m(2), there was a significant correlation between areas under the curve (AUCs) for TAS-103 and TAS-103-G (r = 0.76, P <.05) and an apparent relationship between TAS-103 AUC and D 15 absolute neutrophil count (r = -0.63, P <.05, n = 11, one outlier excluded). UGT1A1 genotype did not influence clearance of TAS-103. CONCLUSION: We recommend a dose of 130 to 160 mg/m(2), or 250 to 300 mg administered using the above weekly schedule for phase II studies. Further studies to characterize the pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenetics of TAS-103 are warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Phase I study of ZD9331 on short daily intravenous bolus infusion for 5 days every 3 weeks with fixed dosing recommendations.

PURPOSE: To conduct a phase I study of ZD9331, a potent, nonpolyglutamatable thymidylate synthase inhibitor using a short daily infusion for 5 consecutive days every 21 days. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with refractory cancer or cancer for which no standard therapy was available were treated in escalating doses using an accelerated titration design. Plasma and urine samples were collected at timed intervals in the first cycle for pharmacokinetic analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were enrolled at 12 dose levels from a starting dose of 0.4 mg/m(2)/d to 16 mg/m(2)/d and 25 mg/d fixed dosing, of which 67 were assessable for toxicity. Maximum-tolerated dose was reached at 16 mg/m(2)/d. Myelosuppression was dose-limiting, consisting of thrombocytopenia associated with neutropenic fever. Body-surface area did not correlate with drug clearance; therefore, fixed daily dosing of 25 mg/d was studied and found to be tolerable, with two of 12 dose-limiting events. Dose-limiting nonhematologic toxicity consisted of grade 3 erythematous maculopapular rash observed in one patient at 12 mg/m(2)/d and one patient at 25 mg/d. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed nonlinearity, with clearance increasing with dose. The mean clearance and terminal half-life of the drug were 6.6 +/- 2.0 mL/min and 71.3 +/- 27.0 hours, respectively. Area-under-the concentration-time curve was a better predictor of toxicity than dose, using multiple linear regression analyses. Minor response (40% shrinkage of tumor) was observed in one patient with colorectal cancer treated at 12 mg/m(2)/d. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose for ZD9331 on this schedule is 25 mg/d. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and rash were dose-limiting, and efficacy studies in colorectal cancer are indicated.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Oral fluoropyrimidine treatment of colorectal cancer.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) has been utilized as part of standard chemotherapy for treatment of early-stage and metastatic colorectal cancer for more than 4 decades. The oral fluoropyrimidines have been studied extensively as an alternative to intravenous 5-FU. The goal of such an approach is to simplify drug administration and to improve the toxicity profile while maintaining efficacy that is at least equivalent to intravenous therapy. The goal of this article is to review the features of the main oral 5-FU prodrugs, which include capecitabine, uracil and tegafur (UFT)/leucovorin, S-1, and BOF-A2 and to describe their potential efficacy in treating colorectal cancer.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

A multicenter phase II study of a five-day regimen of oral 5-fluorouracil plus eniluracil with or without leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a five-day regimen of oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus eniluracil (776C85) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-five patients with metastatic CRC that was previously untreated or refractory to 5-FU-leucovorin (LV) were enrolled and divided into two strata based upon their treatment history. Twenty-four had not previously received chemotherapy or had received adjuvant chemotherapy that ended > 6 months prior to enrollment on study (previously untreated stratum). Fifty-one patients had disease refractory to intravenous (i.v.) 5-FU-LV (previously treated stratum). All patients received seven consecutive daily doses of eniluracil (20 mg/day) with once daily oral 5-FU given on days 2-6, repeated every four weeks. One-half of the patients in each stratum also received 50 mg/day oral LV on days 2-6. The 5-FU dose was 25 mg/m2 when administered without LV and 20 mg/m2 when administered with LV. RESULTS: Partial response (PR) was noted in 2 of 12 patients receiving eniluracil-5-FU and in 3 of 12 patients receiving eniluracil-5-FU-LV in the previously untreated stratum. No responses were observed in the refractory disease stratum, however, 15 patients (30%) demonstrated stable disease over 2-18+ courses of therapy. Non-hematologic toxicities were mild; only 7% of patients experienced grade 3 diarrhea. Myelosuppression was frequent and dose limiting. Neutropenic sepsis was reported in 13.5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Eniluracil with 5-FU administered orally with or without LV on a five-day schedule is active and well tolerated when given as primary therapy to patients with metastatic CRC.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Multicenter phase II study to evaluate a 28-day regimen of oral fluorouracil plus eniluracil in the treatment of patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of fluorouracil (5-FU) plus eniluracil when administered to patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this single-arm phase II study, patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer received oral eniluracil plus 5-FU (10:1 dose ratio), at 5-FU doses of 1.00 mg/m(2) or 1.15 mg/m(2) twice daily (every 12 hours) for 28 consecutive days repeated every 5 weeks (one cycle). Treatment continued until there was documented disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Thirty and 25 patients were enrolled at a starting dose of 1.00 mg/m(2) and 1.15 mg/m(2), respectively. Fourteen (25%) of 55 patients (95% confidence interval, 15% to 39%) had a partial response, and 20 patients (36%) had stable disease. The median durations of the partial responses and stable disease were 23.9 weeks (range, 12.3 to 52.1+ weeks) and 24.1 weeks (range, 17.1 to 55.6+ weeks), respectively. The median durations of progression-free and overall survival were 22.6 weeks (range, 21.0 to 29.0 weeks) and 59 weeks (range, 4 to 84+ weeks), respectively. The response rate in the 1.15 mg/m(2)-dose group was similar to the 1.00 mg/m(2)-dose group (28% v 23%, respectively). Severe (grade 3/4) nonhematologic treatment-related toxicity included diarrhea (nine patients), nausea/vomiting (one patient each), mucositis (two patients), and anorexia (one patient). Severe hematologic toxicities were rare. At the 1.15 mg/m(2)-dose level, two patients exhibited grade 3 granulocytopenia, and two patients had grade 3 anemia. CONCLUSION: The response rate with oral 5-FU plus eniluracil is comparable with that observed with infusional 5-FU or bolus 5-FU and leucovorin. The toxicity profile of this oral regimen is acceptable for use in an outpatient home-based setting.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Eniluracil: an irreversible inhibitor of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase.

One of the most widely used drugs in cancer chemotherapy is 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). 5-FU is optimally delivered via continuous iv. infusion, which is both cumbersome and expensive. Prolonged oral dosing of 5-FU could mimic continuous infusion with less inconvenience and cost. However, oral administration of 5-FU has been hampered by incomplete and erratic bioavailability due to substantial variability in the activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), the rate-limiting enzyme in 5-FU catabolism. Eniluracil (ethynyluracil, GlaxoWellcome, USA), a uracil analogue, which irreversibly inhibits DPD, increases the oral bioavailability of 5-FU to 100%, facilitating uniform absorption and predictable toxicity. Cytotoxicity is enhanced one- to five-fold in cell lines treated with eniluracil plus 5-FU compared with 5-FU alone. Though eniluracil is neither toxic nor active as a single agent in animals, it improves the antitumour efficacy and therapeutic index of 5-FU. In Phase I trials, eniluracil markedly reduced the maximum tolerated dose of oral 5-FU, increased the half-life 20-fold and decreased the clearance 22-fold. DPD is completely inactivated within 1 h of eniluracil administration. Two dosing schedules have been evaluated in combination with oral 5-FU: a 5-day schedule every 28 days and a 28-day schedule every 35 days. The dose-limiting toxicity on the first schedule is myelosuppression with diarrhoea being dose-limiting on the 28-day schedule. Phase II trials employing the 28-day schedule have been completed in cancers of the colon, breast, liver and pancreas. Phase III trials in colorectal and pancreatic carcinoma have been completed and await analysis. Eniluracil is a promising drug, which permits reliable and safe administration of oral 5-FU and has the potential to overcome 5-FU resistance mediated by overexpression of DPD.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Phase I clinical and pharmacological study of O6-benzylguanine followed by carmustine in patients with advanced cancer.

O6-benzylguanine (BG) is a potent inactivator of the DNA repair protein O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT) that enhances sensitivity to nitrosoureas in tumor cell lines and tumor-bearing animals. The major objectives of this study were to define the optimal modulatory dose and associated toxicities of benzylguanine administered alone and in combination with carmustine; to define the maximally tolerated dose and associated toxicities of carmustine administered with benzylguanine and to describe the pharmacokinetics of BG in humans and its effects on AGT depletion and recovery in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Patients with histologically confirmed advanced solid tumors or lymphoma that had failed to respond to standard therapy or for which no standard therapy was available were eligible to participate in this study. Patients initially received BG as a 1-h i.v. infusion without carmustine. After a 14-day washout (ie., without therapy) period, patients received BG as a 1-h i.v. infusion followed, 1 h later, by a 15-min i.v. infusion of carmustine. Cycles of chemotherapy were repeated every 6 weeks. Cohorts of patients received BG doses ranging from 10 to 120 mg/m2 and carmustine doses ranging from 13 to 50 mg/m2. Plasma and urine samples were collected and analyzed for BG, and O6-benzyl-8-oxoguanine concentrations and AGT activity was determined in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. There was no toxicity attributable to BG alone at any dose tested. Bone marrow suppression was the primary and dose-limiting toxicity of BG combined with carmustine and was cumulative in some patients. The neutrophil nadir occurred at a median of day 27, with complete recovery in most patients by day 43. Nonhematological toxicity included fatigue, anorexia, increased bilirubin, and transaminase elevation. Recommended doses for Phase II testing are 120 mg/m2 BG given with carmustine at 40 mg/m2. BG rapidly disappeared from plasma and was converted to a major metabolite, O6-benzyl-8-oxoguanine, which has a 2.4-fold higher maximal concentration and 20-fold higher area under the concentration versus time curve than BG. AGT activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was rapidly and completely suppressed at all of the BG doses. The rate of AGT regeneration was more rapid for patients treated with the lowest dose of BG but was similar for BG doses ranging from 20-120 mg/m2. In conclusion, coadministration of BG and carmustine is feasible in cancer patients, but the maximal dose of carmustine that can be safely administered with BG is approximately one-third of the standard clinical dose. Bone marrow suppression, which may be cumulative, is the dose-limiting toxicity of the combination. Prolonged AGT suppression is likely attributable primarily to the effect of O6-benzyl-8-oxoguanine.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Pharmacology and clinical status of capecitabine.

Capecitabine (Xeloda) is a new, orally administered, enzyme-activated fluoropyrimidine carbamate designed to generate high levels of fluorouracil (5-FU) in tumor cells. Selective tumor activation of 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine, the last enzymatic step of a three-enzyme process, is catalyzed by thymidine phosphorylase, a tumor-associated angiogenic growth factor. Since levels of thymidine phosphorylase are often higher in tumors than in surrounding normal tissues, this stepwise process provides tumor selectivity and potentially decreases toxicity to normal tissues. Preclinical studies show that capecitabine has significant activity against a variety of tumor types when used as monotherapy and in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. Capecitabine is currently approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to paclitaxel (Taxol) and in whom further anthracycline therapy is contraindicated. It has demonstrated efficacy in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma, and studies are ongoing in other tumor types.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Antineoplastic drugs administered during pregnancy.

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in women during their reproductive years. Thus, antineoplastic drugs may be administered to pregnant women. The effects these agents have on the developing fetus depend on the type of agent and the timing of exposure during embryogenesis. In particular, antifolate antimetabolites should be avoided. However, the literature contains many reports of successful fetal outcomes after exposure to other types of agents. The decision to begin antineoplastic therapy must be carefully considered by all physicians and the patient involved.

Antineoplastic Agents↗