Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R L Parks

Publications and source records attributed to R L Parks.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Compliance with Universal Precautions among emergency department personnel: implications for prevention programs.

BACKGROUND: We developed a 50-item questionnaire to assess emergency department (ED) staff members' knowledge of bloodborne pathogen transmission, compliance with Universal Precautions, and the use of personal protective equipment. METHOD: A questionnaire was administered to 103 ED staff members including physicians, nurses, and technicians at Barnes-Jewish Hospital in St Louis, a Level-I trauma center. RESULTS: ED personnel had inadequate knowledge of bloodborne pathogen infection risk, underreported exposures, and underused personal protection equipment during trauma cases. CONCLUSION: Further educational interventions for ED personnel are needed to increase their compliance with Universal Precautions.

Cross Infection↗

Use of personal protective equipment and operating room behaviors in four surgical subspecialties: personal protective equipment and behaviors in surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Universal Precautions (UP) compliance in the operating room (OR). DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort. Trained observers recorded information about (1) personal protective equipment used by OR staff; (2) eyewear, glove, or gown breaks; (3) the nature of sharps transfers; (4) risk-taking behaviors of the OR staff; and (5) needlestick injuries and other blood and body-fluid exposures. SETTING: Barnes-Jewish Hospital, a 1,000-bed, tertiary-care hospital affiliated with Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. PARTICIPANTS: OR personnel in four surgical specialties (gynecologic, orthopedic, cardiothoracic, and general). Procedures eligible for the study were selected randomly. Hand surgery and procedures requiring no or a very small incision (eg, arthroscopy, laparoscopy) were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 597 healthcare workers' procedures were observed in 76 surgical cases (200 hours). Of the 597 healthcare workers, 32% wore regular glasses, and 24% used no eye protection. Scrub nurses and medical students were more likely than other healthcare workers to wear goggles. Only 28% of healthcare workers double gloved, with orthopedic surgery personnel being the most compliant. Sharps passages were not announced in 91% of the surgical procedures. In 65 cases (86%), sharps were adjusted manually. Three percutaneous and 14 cutaneous exposures occurred, for a total exposure rate of 22%. CONCLUSION: OR personnel had poor compliance with UP. Although there was significant variation in use of personal protective equipment between groups, the total exposure rate was high (22%), indicating the need for further training and reinforcement of UP to reduce occupational exposures.

Adolescent↗

Diflunisal versus naproxen in the management of rheumatoid arthritis.

Diflunisal (500 mg orally, twice daily) and naproxen (375 mg orally, twice daily) were compared for efficacy and tolerability in a 12-week open-label study in 33 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Both drugs resulted in marked reduction in the number of swollen, tender, and painful joints and comparable improvement in patients' assessment of disease activity and pain. There were no significant differences between the two medications in the measured indices of disease activity. No adverse experiences were reported by patients in either treatment group. The results indicate that both diflunisal and naproxen were equally effective and that both agents are generally well tolerated in this group of patients with RA.

Adult↗