Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R L Kane

Publications and source records attributed to R L Kane.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Primary care outcomes in patients treated by nurse practitioners or physicians: a randomized trial.

CONTEXT: Studies have suggested that the quality of primary care delivered by nurse practitioners is equal to that of physicians. However, these studies did not measure nurse practitioner practices that had the same degree of independence as the comparison physician practices, nor did previous studies provide direct comparison of outcomes for patients with nurse practitioner or physician providers. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes for patients randomly assigned to nurse practitioners or physicians for primary care follow-up and ongoing care after an emergency department or urgent care visit. DESIGN: Randomized trial conducted between August 1995 and October 1997, with patient interviews at 6 months after initial appointment and health services utilization data recorded at 6 months and 1 year after initial appointment. SETTING: Four community-based primary care clinics (17 physicians) and 1 primary care clinic (7 nurse practitioners) at an urban academic medical center. PATIENTS: Of 3397 adults originally screened, 1316 patients (mean age, 45.9 years; 76.8% female; 90.3% Hispanic) who had no regular source of care and kept their initial primary care appointment were enrolled and randomized with either a nurse practitioner (n = 806) or physician (n = 510). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient satisfaction after initial appointment (based on 15-item questionnaire); health status (Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36), satisfaction, and physiologic test results 6 months later; and service utilization (obtained from computer records) for 1 year after initial appointment, compared by type of provider. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in patients' health status (nurse practitioners vs physicians) at 6 months (P = .92). Physiologic test results for patients with diabetes (P = .82) or asthma (P = .77) were not different. For patients with hypertension, the diastolic value was statistically significantly lower for nurse practitioner patients (82 vs 85 mm Hg; P = .04). No significant differences were found in health services utilization after either 6 months or 1 year. There were no differences in satisfaction ratings following the initial appointment (P = .88 for overall satisfaction). Satisfaction ratings at 6 months differed for 1 of 4 dimensions measured (provider attributes), with physicians rated higher (4.2 vs 4.1 on a scale where 5 = excellent; P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: In an ambulatory care situation in which patients were randomly assigned to either nurse practitioners or physicians, and where nurse practitioners had the same authority, responsibilities, productivity and administrative requirements, and patient population as primary care physicians, patients' outcomes were comparable.

Adult↗

Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence.

PURPOSE: This goal of this research was to develop and evaluate the psychometrics of a health-related quality of life scale developed to address issues related specifically to fecal incontinence, the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. METHODS: The Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale is composed of a total of 29 items; these items form four scales: Lifestyle (10 items), Coping/Behavior (9 items), Depression/Self-Perception (7 items), and Embarrassment (3 items). RESULTS: Psychometric evaluation of these scales demonstrates that they are both reliable and valid. Each of the scales demonstrate stability over time (test/retest reliability) and have acceptable internal reliability (Cronbach alpha >0.70). Validity was assessed using discriminate and convergent techniques. Each of the four scales of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale was capable of discriminating between patients with fecal incontinence and patients with other gastrointestinal problems. To evaluate convergent validity, the correlation of the scales in the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale with selected subscales in the SF-36 was analyzed. The scales in the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale demonstrated significant correlations with the subscales in the SF-36. CONCLUSIONS: The psychometric evaluation of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale showed that this fecal incontinence-specific quality of life measure produces both reliable and valid measurement.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Factor analysis of computerized and traditional tests used in mild brain injury research.

The present study examines the relation between a set of computerized neuropsychological measures, Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM), and a set of traditional clinical neuropsychological tests. Both sets of tests have been employed in recent studies of mild brain injury. Factor analysis and stepwise regression indicate that both sets of tests measure similar underlying constructs of cognitive processing speed, resistance to interference, and working memory. The present findings indicate strong concordance between computerized and traditional neuropsychological measures and support the construct validity of ANAM and similar procedures.

Adolescent↗

Using structured implicit review to assess quality of care in the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE)

OBJECTIVE: To develop a quality assessment tool for care rendered to enrollees in the Program for All-inclusive Care of the Elderly (PACE) that can discriminate care quality ratings across PACE sites. DESIGN: Structured implicit review (SIR) of medical records by trained geriatricians and geriatric nurse practitioners. SETTING: Eight PACE sites. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults enrolled in a PACE program for at least 6 months (n = 313). MEASUREMENTS: Process and outcome measures for both overall care and 14 specific conditions (tracers) managed up to 1 year. RESULTS: Overall care quality was judged to be above a community standard in 56% and below standard in 8% of cases. Process of care was rated as very good or good in 70% of the cases. Outcomes depended on how questions were phrased: only 19% of cases improved, whereas 28% were judged to have fared better than expected given their condition at baseline. The SIR method produced ratings demonstrating considerable variability across the sites; three of the sites consistently showed poorer quality ratings than the other five. CONCLUSIONS: PACE care was generally assessed to be of good quality, but with room for improvement. Despite significant limitations of poor interrater reliability for process of care measures, excessive time involved for the reviews, and lack of a control group, the SIR method was able to consistently discriminate quality ratings among PACE sites. A modified version of the assessment instrument could prove useful in a quality improvement program for PACE care.

Aged↗

Assessment in long-term care.

Long-term care has begun to rely heavily on assessment as a basis for determining eligibility and payment for services, as well as for planning needed care. Mandated assessments have been introduced into nursing homes and will soon be required for home health care and rehabilitation. Many states use a formal structured assessment process to establish clients' eligibility for institutional or community-based care. The common feature of such assessment is attention to physical functioning, but other domains are also relevant, including affect, social function, cognition, pain and discomfort, and satisfaction. Taken together, this cluster is often referred to as quality of life. While some measures attempt to infer this information from clients' behavior, it is best obtained directly from clients' responses whenever possible. The other major component of a long term care assessment relates to obtaining information on clients' preferences and values. These data are important both for weighting the individual components of an assessment and for directly addressing preferences about the care and lifestyle available.

Activities of Daily Living↗

The implementation of the EverCare demonstration project.

EverCare represents a creative approach to providing medical services to long-stay nursing home patients. It offers a capitated package of Medicare-covered services with more intensive primary care provided by nurse practitioners. The program's underlying premise is that better primary care will result in reduced hospital use. This work examines the implementation of the program in six locations. It identifies some of the issues that must be addressed if the program is to succeed both operationally and financially.

Aged↗

The optimal outcomes of post-hospital care under medicare.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the differences in functional outcomes attributable to discharge to one of four different venues for post-hospital care for each of five different types of illness associated with post-hospital care: stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), hip procedures, and hip fracture, and to estimate the costs and benefits associated with discharge to the type of care that was estimated to produce the greatest improvement. STUDY SETTING/DATA SOURCES: Consecutive patients with any of the target diagnoses were enrolled from 52 hospitals in three cities. Data sources included interviews with patients or their proxies, medical record reviews, and the Medicare Automated Data Retrieval System. ANALYSIS: A two-stage regression model looked first at the factors associated with discharge to each type of post-hospital care and then at the outcomes associated with each location. An instrumental variables technique was used to adjust for selection bias. A predictive model was created for each patient to estimate how that person would have fared had she or he been discharged to each type of care. The optimal discharge location was determined as that which produced the greatest improvement in function after adjusting for patients' baseline characteristics. The costs of discharge to the optimal type of care was based on the differences in mean costs for each location. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Data were collected from patients or their proxies at discharge from hospital and at three post-discharge follow-up times: six weeks, six months, and one year. In addition, the medical records for each participant were abstracted by trained abstractors, using a modification of the Medisgroups method, and Medicare data were summarized for the years before and after the hospitalization. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In general, patients discharged to nursing homes fared worst and those sent home with home health care or to rehabilitation did best. Because the cost of rehabilitation is high, greater use of home care could result in improved outcomes at modest or no additional cost. CONCLUSIONS: Better decisions about where to discharge patients could improve the course of many patients. It is possible to save money by making wiser discharge planning decisions. Nursing homes are generally associated with poorer outcomes and higher costs than the other post-hospital care modalities.

Activities of Daily Living↗

An exploration of the construct validity of the Heaton memory tests.

The Heaton techniques for assessing memory differ from most other memory measures by employing the combination of learning trials, repeated exposure to test stimuli, and 4-hour recall measures. The present study was designed to explore the relationship between the Heaton Story and Figure memory procedures, the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT), and measures of attention, word fluency, and spatial perception. Data from 126 individuals were analyzed. Three separate factor analyses were performed that examined measures of attention, learning, and recall. Each revealed a three-factor solution accounting for 71, 70, and 72% of the variance, respectively. Regression analyses supported the visual components of Figure Memory and the verbal components of Story Memory obtained in the factor analyses. Overall, the findings supported the independence of the Heaton Memory procedures and the role of spatial factors in performance of Figure Memory. Additionally, both Figure and Story Memory shared variance with the CVLT, supporting the validity of both procedures as memory measures.

Journal Article↗

Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to develop and evaluate a severity rating score for fecal incontinence, the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index. METHODS: The Fecal Incontinence Severity Index is based on a type x frequency matrix. The matrix includes four types of leakage commonly found in the fecal incontinent population: gas, mucus, and liquid and solid stool and five frequencies: one to three times per month, once per week, twice per week, once per day, and twice per day. The Fecal Incontinence Severity Index was developed using both colon and rectal surgeons and patient input for the specification of the weighting scores. RESULTS: Surgeons and patients had very similar weightings for each of the type x frequency combinations; significant differences occurred for only 3 of the 20 different weights. The Fecal Incontinence Severity Index score of a group of patients with fecal incontinence (N = 118) demonstrated significant correlations with three of the four scales found in a fecal incontinence quality-of-life scale. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index indicates that the index is a tool that can be used to assess severity of fecal incontinence. Overall, patient and surgeon ratings of severity are similar, with minor differences associated with the accidental loss of solid stool.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Adding values: an experiment in systematic attention to values and preferences of community long-term care clients.

OBJECTIVES: We tested the effects of providing case managers with tools to assess and respond to client values and preferences on their subsequent knowledge of clients' values and their practices in arranging long-term care. METHOD: Using a quasi-experimental design with newly enrolled, cognitively intact clients, we compared case managers, clients, and care plans at the experimental and control agency. RESULTS: Three weeks after enrollment, experimental clients were significantly more likely to report that case managers had asked them about their own preferences and offered them choices about services. Actual client values reported at the 3-month follow-up were similar for the two groups, with experimental case managers only slightly more accurate judges of their clients' responses to values questions. At follow-up, experimental case managers reported more case activity tailoring plans to client preferences, a finding confirmed by record reviews. Client acuity, measured by ADL functioning and prior hospital use, was associated with less perceived discussion of client preferences during the initial care planning process, but more case activity related to client preferences during the first three months. DISCUSSION: The study suggests it is possible to sensitize case managers to the importance of assessing and acting on client values. Getting them to do so consistently, however, may require changes in the practice environment.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Do hip replacements improve outcomes for hip fracture patients?

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture is a common problem among older Americans. Two types of procedures are available for repairing hip fractures: hip replacement and open or closed reduction with or without internal fixation. The assumption has been that hip replacement produces better functional outcomes. Although that is the common wisdom, outcome studies evaluating hip replacement for treatment of hip fracture are few and have not clearly documented its superiority. OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes of hip fracture patients who receive hip replacement versus another stabilizing procedure (open or closed reduction with or without internal fixation). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: We studied 332 patients (age, > 65) who were hospitalized for a femoral neck fracture and discharged alive. MEASUREMENTS: We examined 2 treatment groups, hip replacement versus another procedure, on 6 outcomes [Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), walking, living situation (institutionalized or not), perceived health (excellent/good vs. fair/poor), rehospitalization, and mortality] at 3 postdischarge times (6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year). RESULTS: Mean age was 80, 80% were female, 96% White, 28% married, and 71% had a hip replacement. The treatment groups were similar at baseline (3 months before admission as reported at discharge) on ADLs, walking, living situation, and perceived health (all P > 0.24). After adjusting for demographics, clinical characteristics, fracture characteristics, and prior ADLs, walking ability, living situation, and perceived health, patients with a hip replacement did not do better at 6 weeks, 6 months, or 1 year post-discharge on any of the 6 outcome measures (all 18 P > 0.10). A global test of all 6 outcomes finds hip replacement patients doing less well at one year (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the commonly held belief that hip replacement is a superior treatment for hip fracture, we found no suggestion of better outcomes for hip replacement on any of 6 key outcomes.

Activities of Daily Living↗

HMO membership and patient age and the use of specialty care for hospitalized patients with acute stroke: The Minnesota Stroke Survey.

BACKGROUND: The number of older patients enrolling in health maintenance organizations (HMOs) is increasing. Concerns have been raised that older patients may be targeted by HMOs for more stringent cost-containment mechanisms, including reduced access to expensive specialty care. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the relationship between membership in an HMO and the decision to consult with a neurologist or admit to a neurology ward for patients hospitalized with acute stroke. We then compared 1-year mortality of patients who received neurology care to the 1-year mortality of those who did not receive neurology care. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. SUBJECTS: A sample of hospitalized acute stroke patients (age range, 30-79 years) who were discharged from Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan hospitals with a diagnosis code of acute cerebrovascular disease from 1991 to 1993. MEASURES: Trained nurses abstracted the medical records. Stroke events (n = 2,320) were validated using clinical criteria and neuroimaging reports. Mortality data were obtained from the Minnesota Death Index. RESULTS: Among patients enrolled in HMOs, 30% of validated stroke patients did not receive neurology care in comparison with 19% of patients not enrolled in HMOs. After adjusting for patient mix and hospital characteristics, the odds of receiving neurology care were half as great for patients enrolled in HMOs as compared with patients not enrolled in HMOs (odds ratio [OR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-0.74). The association of membership in HMOs with lower use of neurology care was concentrated in older patients. Within each age group, the odds ratios and 95% CI of receiving neurology care for patients enrolled in HMOs versus patients not enrolled in HMOs were: < 55 years (1.06, 0.42-2.67), 55 to 64 years (0.54, 0.34-0.87), 65 to 74 years (0.51, 0.36-0.71), and >75 years (0.40, 0.24-0.68). Using Cox regression, 30-day mortality did not differ between patients who received neurology care and those who did not. Among 30-day survivors, the mortality hazards ratio (HR) during the next 11 months for patients who received neurology care was 71% of the hazard for patients who did not receive neurology care (HR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.55-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that membership in an HMO was associated with reduced access to neurology care for older patients with acute stroke and that patients who received neurology care had a lower risk of death during the year after their stroke. It remains to be determined if these differences in outcome are caused by true differences in stroke management or by unmeasured characteristics.

Acute Disease↗

Examining the efficiency of home care.

This article focuses on the "efficiency" or cost-effectiveness of home care. Because home care encompasses a range of services targeted to many populations, it is necessary to take cognizance of case mix and clarify its goals to assess effectiveness. Goals for home care can be thought of as meeting and/or compensating for client dependency needs or making a difference in the client's clinical trajectory. The latter implies comparing actual to expected outcomes, where outcomes can cover a wide range of domains addressing quality of care and quality of life. Inferring the effect of treatment (i.e., home care) on various outcomes will likely rely heavily on epidemiological techniques that, in turn, rely on sophisticated statistical techniques. Problems measuring the costs of care include how to handle the costs of informal care and deciding whose costs should be of primary concern. Better data about the costs, and experimentation with different forms of caregiving, need to be pursued.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗