Biomedical subjects

R Kulier

Publications and source records attributed to R Kulier.

26 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2000

Abdominal decompression in normal pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal decompression was developed as a means of pain relief during labour. It has also been used for complications of pregnancy, and in healthy pregnant women in an attempt to improve fetal wellbeing and intellectual development. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of prophylactic abdominal decompression on admission for pre-eclampsia, fetal growth, perinatal morbidity and mortality and childhood development. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched. Date of last search: February 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing abdominal decompression with dummy decompression or no treatment in healthy pregnant women. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Eligibility and trial quality were assessed by one reviewer. MAIN RESULTS: Three studies were included. There was no difference between the abdominal decompression groups and the control groups for low birth weight (relative risk 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.27 to 1.77) and perinatal mortality (relative risk 2.47, 95% confidence interval 0.77 to 7.92). There were no differences in admission for pre-eclampsia, Apgar score and childhood development. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence to support the use of abdominal decompression in normal pregnancies. Future research should be directed towards the use of abdominal decompression during labour, and during complicated pregnancies.

Female↗

PubMed2000

Hands/knees posture in late pregnancy or labour for fetal malposition (lateral or posterior).

BACKGROUND: Lateral and posterior position of the fetal presenting parts may be associated with more painful, prolonged or obstructed labour and difficult delivery. It is possible that maternal posture may influence fetal position. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review is to assess the effects of adopting a hands and knees maternal posture in late pregnancy when the presenting part of the fetus is in a lateral or posterior position. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Date of last search: February 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of hands and knees maternal posture compared to other postures. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both reviewers assessed trial eligibility and quality. MAIN RESULTS: One trial involving 100 women was included. Four different postures (four groups of 20 women) were combined for the comparison with the control group of 20 women. Lateral or posterior position of the presenting part of the fetus was less likely to persist following 10 minutes in the hands and knees position compared to a sitting position (relative risk 0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.17 to 0.37). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Hands and knees maternal posture for lateral or posterior fetal presentation appears to result in short term effects ion fetal position. No other perinatal or maternal outcomes were reported. There is not enough evidence to evaluate the effectiveness of a hands and knees maternal posture when the fetal presenting part is lateral or posterior, on clinically important outcomes.

Female↗

PubMed2000

Piracetam for fetal distress in labour.

BACKGROUND: Piracetam is thought to promote the metabolism of brain cells when they are hypoxic. It has been used to prevent adverse effects of fetal distress. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of piracetam for suspected fetal distress in labour on method of delivery and perinatal morbidity. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched. Date of last search: February 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of piracetam compared with placebo or no treatment for suspected fetal distress in labour. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both reviewers assessed eligibility and trial quality. MAIN RESULTS: One study of 96 women was included. Piracetam compared with placebo was associated with a trend to reduced need for caesarean section (relative risk 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 1.03). There were no statistically significant differences in relative risk between the piracetam and placebo group for neonatal morbidity (measured by neonatal respiratory distress) or Apgar score. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is not enough evidence to evaluate the use of piracetam for fetal distress in labour.

Delivery, Obstetric↗

PubMed2000

Operative versus conservative management for 'fetal distress' in labour.

BACKGROUND: Suspected fetal distress usually results in expedited delivery of a baby (often operatively). The potential harm to a mother and baby from operative delivery may not always be justified especially when fetal distress may be misdiagnosed. Even with a correct diagnosis it is not clear whether an operative or conservative approach is better. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of operative management for fetal distress on maternal and perinatal morbidity. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched. Date of last search: October 1997. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of operative (caesarean section or expedited vaginal delivery) versus conservative management of suspected fetal distress. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality assessment and data extraction were done by both reviewers. MAIN RESULTS: One study of 350 women was included. This trial was carried out in 1959. There was no difference in perinatal mortality (relative risk 1.18, 95% confidence interval 0.56 to 2.48). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There have been no contemporary trials of operative versus conservative management of suspected fetal distress. In settings without modern obstetric facilities, a policy of operative delivery in the event of meconium-stained liquor or fetal heart rate changes has not been shown to reduce perinatal mortality.

Cesarean Section↗

PubMed2000

Minilaparotomy and endoscopic techniques for tubal sterilisation.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate laparoscopic tubal sterilisation, as compared to minilaparotomy in terms of operative morbidity and mortality. Trials comparing laparoscopy or minilaparotomy with culdoscopy were also included in the review. Different methods used to interrupt tubal patency (excision, occlusion and coagulation) and comparison of different forms of anaesthesia will be considered in different reviews. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been identified by using the search strategy of the Cochrane Collaboration. The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register has been searched. Reference lists of identified trials have been searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials comparing laparoscopy, minilaparotomy and/or culdoscopy for tubal sterilisation. Except in one trial [Taner 1994] where 4 women underwent curettage at the same time, all women requested tubal sterilisation as an interval procedure. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trials under consideration were evaluated for methodological quality and appropriateness for inclusion. Data were extracted independently by the reviewers. Results are reported as odds ratio for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: Minilaparotomy vs laparoscopy: There was no difference in major morbidity between the 2 groups. Minor morbidity was significantly less in the laparoscopy group (Peto OR 1.89; 95% CI 1.38, 2.59). Duration of operation was about 5 minutes shorter in the laparoscopy group (WMD 5.34; 95% CI 4. 52, 6.16). Minilaparotomy vs culdoscopy: Women undergoing culdoscopy had more major morbidity than women for whom minilaparotomy was performed (Peto OR 0.14; 95% CI 0.02, 0.98). Duration of operation was about 5 minutes shorter in women undergoing culdoscopy (WMD 4. 91; 95% CI 3.82, 6.01). Laparoscopy vs culdoscopy: In the one trial comparing the two interventions there were no significant differences between the groups with regard to major morbidity. Significantly more women suffered from minor morbidities in the culdoscopy group compared to the laparoscopy group (Peto OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.05, 0.77). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Major morbidity seems to be a rare outcome for both, laparoscopy and minilaparotomy. The included studies had limited power to demonstrate significant differences especially for the relatively rare but potentially serious outcomes. Personal preference of the woman and/or of the surgeon can guide the choice of technique. Practical aspects (e.g. cost, maintenance, and sterilisation of the instruments) must be taken into account before implementing the more sophisticated endoscopic techniques in settings with limited resources. Culdoscopy is not recommended as it carries a higher complication rate.

Female↗

PubMed2000

Induced abortion and psychosexuality.

Little information exists on the impact of induced abortion on psychosexuality. Negative psychological effects and psychiatric complications due to termination of pregnancy seem to be rare. The objective of this study was to review the impact of induced abortion on sexuality and couple relationships. A systematic search of the literature was performed. Studies had to report a quantitative or qualitative evaluation of sexuality after pregnancy termination. Four studies were included. In the one prospective study using a control group, no difference in sexual functioning between groups after 1 year was reported. In the remaining observational studies, sexual dysfunction was reported in up to 30% of women after termination. Women undergoing abortion had significantly more conflicts in their partnerships. This was similar in all studies. Separation occurred in about one-quarter of all couples. Some studies report sexual dysfunction after termination of pregnancy. In about half of the couples separated after termination, abortion seemed not to have led to the separation. Psychological factors, together with relationship problems, might have played a role in failed contraception. The impact of induced abortion on sexuality needs to be studied in greater detail with rigorous methodology to draw firm conclusions.

Abortion, Induced↗

PubMed1998

Nutritional interventions for the prevention of maternal morbidity.

OBJECTIVE: To review the effectiveness of nutritional interventions to prevent maternal morbidity. METHODS: This is an overview of systematic reviews and individual randomized controlled trials (if no systematic review available) of nutritional interventions during pregnancy. For each nutrient intervention the main maternal morbidity data reported were extracted. These were pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, pregnancy-induced hypertension, hemorrhage, anemia, infection and obstructed labor. In addition, the trial settings, the number of trials and participants' characteristics were systematically extracted. RESULTS: The systematic reviews considered in this paper had only few trials that reported the selected maternal outcomes. Outcome measures are based sometimes on one trial only. Most of the interventions compared single micronutrient supplementation with placebo/no treatment and did not show significant benefits for the supplementation groups. Calcium supplementation in women at high risk of pregnancy hypertension reduced the incidence of high blood pressure (RR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.21-0.57) and pre-eclampsia (RR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.11-0.43). Similarly, in women with low dietary calcium intake, calcium supplementation resulted in a significant reduction in the incidence of high blood pressure (RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.38-0.62) and pre-eclampsia (RR, 0.32; CI, 0.21-0.49). In women at low risk of pregnancy hypertension or with adequate baseline calcium intake, the beneficial effects of calcium supplementation are small and unlikely to be of clinical significance. Both, iron and folate supplementation reduced the number of women with low pre-delivery hemoglobin. CONCLUSIONS: Routine calcium supplementation seems to be a promising intervention for pregnant women at risk of developing preeclampsia or have low calcium intake, but these findings need to be confirmed with a trial with adequate power in different settings. In populations with high incidence of nutritional anemia routine iron and folate supplementation should be recommended during ante-natal care. It is unclear at this stage if adding vitamin A to iron and folate supplementation in anemia prevalent areas provides further benefits. There is inadequate data on the benefits or harms of routine iron or folate supplementation in adequately nourished populations. With regard to other micronutrient supplementation, such as zinc, magnesium and fish oil, randomized controlled trials with sufficient power to detect clinically important differences in maternal and infant outcomes are needed.

Calcium↗

PubMed1997

Betamimetics in fetal distress: randomised controlled trial.

The objective of the study was to investigate if a single dose of Hexoprenaline administered to patients diagnosed as having fetal distress improves neonatal outcome and whether there are any side effects and complications related to hexoprenaline injection. Patients with fetal distress diagnosed by electronic fetal heart rate monitoring with a gestational age of 35 weeks or more in active labor were eligible. Once the decision to deliver the patient by Cesarean section was made, patients were approached and randomised by sealed opaque envelopes to hexoprenaline or control groups. Ten micrograms of hexoprenaline were administered intravenously to study patients. Main outcomes were cord blood gas values, Apgar scores, the need for resuscitation and admission to intensive care. There were no statistically significant differences in the main outcome measures between the two groups. Fewer babies in the hexoprenaline group had a pH of < 7.2 and a base excess of < -10, but this was not statistically significant. The fetal heart rate pattern was improved in significantly more patients after hexoprenaline administration than controls. In conclusion, despite the statistically significant improvement in fetal heart rate tracings, Apgar scores and blood gas values showed only a trend towards improvement in the hexoprenaline group.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗