Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Krumlauf

Publications and source records attributed to R Krumlauf.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Positive cross-regulation and enhancer sharing: two mechanisms for specifying overlapping Hox expression patterns.

Vertebrate Hox genes display nested and overlapping patterns of expression. During mouse hindbrain development, Hoxb3 and Hoxb4 share an expression domain caudal to the boundary between rhombomeres 6 and 7. Transgenic analysis reveals that an enhancer (CR3) is shared between both genes and specifies this domain of overlap. Both the position of CR3 within the complex and its sequence are conserved from fish to mammals, suggesting it has a common role in regulating the vertebrate HoxB complex. CR3 mediates transcriptional activation by multiple Hox genes, including Hoxb4, Hoxd4, and Hoxb5 but not Hoxb1. It also functions as a selective HOX response element in Drosophila, where activation depends on Deformed, Sex combs reduced, and Antennapedia but not labial. Taken together, these data show that a Deformed/Hoxb4 autoregulatory loop has been conserved between mouse and Drosophila. In addition, these studies reveal the existence of positive cross-regulation and enhancer sharing as two mechanisms for reinforcing the overlapping expression domains of vertebrate Hox genes. In contrast, Drosophila Hox genes do not appear to share enhancers and where they overlap in expression, negative cross-regulatory interactions are observed. Therefore, despite many well documented aspects of Hox structural and functional conservation, there are mechanistic differences in Hox complex regulation between arthropods and vertebrates.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Elements both 5' and 3' to the murine Hoxd4 gene establish anterior borders of expression in mesoderm and neurectoderm.

In this report, we show that a lacZ reporter spanning 12.5 kb of murine Hoxd4 genomic DNA contains the major regulatory elements controlling Hoxd4 expression in the mouse embryo. Mutational analysis revealed multiple regulatory regions both 5' and 3' to the coding region. These include a 3' enhancer region required for expression in the central nervous system (CNS) and setting the anterior border in the paraxial mesoderm, and a 5' mesodermal enhancer that directs expression in paraxial and lateral plate mesoderm. A previously defined retinoic acid response element (RARE) is a component of the 5' mesodermal enhancer. Our results support a model in which retinoic acid receptors (RARs) and HOX proteins mediate the initiation and maintenance of Hoxd4 expression.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Organization of the Fugu rubripes Hox clusters: evidence for continuing evolution of vertebrate Hox complexes.

The clustered organization of Hox genes provides a powerful opportunity to examine gene gain and loss in evolution because physical linkage is a key diagnostic feature which allows homology to be established unambiguously. Furthermore, Hox genes play a key role in determination of axial and appendicular skeletal morphology and may be a key component of the evolution of diverse metazoan body forms. Despite suggestions that changes in Hox gene number played a role in evolution of metazoan body plans, there has been a general lack of evidence for such variation amongst gnathostomes (or indeed any vertebrate) and it has therefore been widely assumed that differential regulation may be the key element in all vertebrate Hox evolution. We have studied the Hox gene clusters of a teleost fish, Fugu rubripes, to test the possibility that Hox organization may have varied since the origin of jawed vertebrates. We have identified four Hox complexes in Fugu and found an unprecedented degree of variation when compared with tetrapod clusters. Our data show that: Fugu clusters are widely variant with respect to length; at least nine genes have been lost; there is a new group-2 paralogue; and pseudo-gene remnants of group-1 and group-3 paralogues were found in the Hoxc complex, when compared with the present mammalian clusters. We show that gene loss after duplication of the prototypical vertebrate Hox clusters is a key feature of both tetrapod and fish evolution.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1997

Switching the in vivo specificity of a minimal Hox-responsive element.

The homeodomain proteins encoded by the Hox complex genes do not bind DNA with high specificity. In vitro, Hox specificity can be increased by binding to DNA cooperatively with the homeodomain protein extradenticle or its vertebrate homologs, the pbx proteins (together, the PBC family). Here we show that a two basepair change in a Hox-PBC binding site switches the Hox-dependent expression pattern generated in vivo, from labial to Deformed. The change in vivo correlates with an altered Hox binding specificity in vitro. Further, we identify similar Deformed-PBC binding sites in the Deformed and Hoxb-4 genes and show that they generate Deformed or Hoxb-4 expression patterns in Drosophila and mouse embryos, respectively. These results suggest a model in which Hox-PBC binding sites play an instructive role in Hox specificity by promoting the formation of different Hox-PBC heterodimers in vivo. Thus, the choice of Hox partner, and therefore Hox target genes, depends on subtle differences between Hox-PBC binding sites.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Cell movements, neuronal organisation and gene expression in hindbrains lacking morphological boundaries.

Rhombomeres are segmental units of the hindbrain that are separated from each other by a specialised zone of boundary cells. Retinoic acid application to a recently segmented hindbrain leads to disappearance of posterior rhombomere boundaries. Boundary loss is preceded by changes in segmental expression of Krox-20 and Cek-8 and followed by alterations in Hox gene expression. The characteristic morphology of boundary cells, their expression of follistatin and the periodic accumulation of axons normally associated with boundaries are all lost. In the absence of boundaries, we detect no change in anteroposterior dispersal of precursor cells and, in most cases, no substantial cell mixing between former rhombomeric units. This is consistent with the idea that lineage restriction can be maintained by processes other than a mechanical barrier composed of boundary cells. Much of the early organisation of the motor nuclei appears normal despite the loss of boundaries and altered Hox expression.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Misexpression of Cwnt8C in the mouse induces an ectopic embryonic axis and causes a truncation of the anterior neuroectoderm.

Transgenic embryos expressing Cwnt8C under the control of the human beta-actin promoter exhibit duplicated axes or a severely dorsalised phenotype. Although the transgene was introduced into fertilised eggs all duplications occurred within a single amnion and, therefore, arose from the production of more than one primitive streak at the time of gastrulation. Morphological examination and the expression of diagnostic markers in transgenic embryos suggested that ectopic Cwnt8C expression produced only incomplete axis duplication: axes were always fused anteriorly, there was a reduction in tissue rostral to the anterior limit of the notochord, and no duplicated expression domain of the forebrain marker Hesx1 was observed. Anterior truncations were evident in dorsalised transgenic embryos containing a single axis. These results are discussed in the light of the effects of ectopic Xwnt8 in Xenopus embryos, where its early expression leads to complete axis duplication but expression after the mid-blastula transition causes anterior truncation. It is proposed that while ectopic Cwnt8C in the mouse embryo can duplicate the primitive streak and node this only produces incomplete axis duplication because specification of the anterior aspect of the axis, as opposed to maintenance of anterior character, is established by interaction with anterior primitive endoderm rather than primitive streak derivatives.

Actins↗
PubMed1997

HOXD4 and regulation of the group 4 paralog genes.

From an evolutionary perspective, it is important to understand the degree of conservation of cis-regulatory mechanisms between paralogous Hox genes. In this study, we have used transgenic analysis of the human HOXD4 locus to identify one neural and two mesodermal 3' enhancers that are capable of mediating the proper anterior limits of expression in the hindbrain and paraxial mesoderm (somites), respectively. In addition to directing expression in the central nervous system (CNS) up to the correct rhombomere 6/7 boundary in the hindbrain, the neural enhancer also mediates a three rhombomere anterior shift from this boundary in response to retinoic acid (RA), mimicking the endogenous Hoxd4 response. We have extended the transgenic analysis to Hoxa4 identifying mesodermal, neural and retinoid responsive components in the 3' flanking region of that gene, which reflect aspects of endogenous Hoxa4 expression. Comparative analysis of the retinoid responses of Hoxd4, Hoxa4 and Hoxb4 reveals that, while they can be rapidly induced by RA, there is a window of competence for this response, which is different to that of more 3' Hox genes. Mesodermal regulation involves multiple regions with overlapping or related activity and is complex, but with respect to neural regulation and response to RA, Hoxb4 and Hoxd4 appear to be more closely related to each other than Hoxa4. These results illustrate that much of the general positioning of 5' and 3' flanking regulatory regions has been conserved between three of the group 4 paralogs during vertebrate evolution, which most likely reflects the original positioning of regulatory regions in the ancestral Hox complex.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Patterning the vertebrate neuraxis.

Neuraxial patterning is a continuous process that extends over a protracted period of development. During gastrulation a crude anteroposterior pattern, detectable by molecular markers, is conferred on the neuroectoderm by signals from the endomesoderm that are largely inseparable from those of neural induction itself. This coarse-grained pattern is subsequently reinforced and refined by diverse, locally acting mechanisms. Segmentation and long-range signaling from organizing centers are prominent among the emerging principles governing regional pattern.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Hoxb-2 transcriptional activation in rhombomeres 3 and 5 requires an evolutionarily conserved cis-acting element in addition to the Krox-20 binding site.

Segmentation is a key feature of the development of the vertebrate hindbrain where it involves the generation of repetitive morphological units termed rhombomeres (r). Hox genes are likely to play an essential role in the specification of segmental identity and we have been investigating their regulation. We show here that the mouse and chicken Hoxb-2 genes are dependent for their expression in r3 and r5 on homologous enhancer elements and on binding to this enhancer of the r3/r5-specific transcriptional activator Krox-20. Among the three Krox-20 binding sites of the mouse Hoxb-2 enhancer, only the high-affinity site is absolutely necessary for activity. In contrast, we have identified an additional cis-acting element, Box1, essential for r3/r5 enhancer activity. It is conserved both in sequence and in position respective to the high-affinity Krox-20 binding site within the mouse and chicken enhancers. Furthermore, a short 44 bp sequence spanning the Box1 and Krox-20 sites can act as an r3/r5 enhancer when oligomerized. Box1 may therefore constitute a recognition sequence for another factor cooperating with Krox-20. Taken together, these data demonstrate the conservation of Hox gene regulation and of Krox-20 function during vertebrate evolution.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

The conserved role of Krox-20 in directing Hox gene expression during vertebrate hindbrain segmentation.

Transient segmentation in the hindbrain is a fundamental morphogenetic phenomenon in the vertebrate embryo, and the restricted expression of subsets of Hox genes in the developing rhombomeric units and their derivatives is linked with regional specification. Here we show that patterning of the vertebrate hindbrain involves the direct upregulation of the chicken and pufferfish group 2 paralogous genes, Hoxb-2 and Hoxa-2, in rhombomeres 3 and 5 (r3 and r5) by the zinc finger gene Krox-20. We identified evolutionarily conserved r3/r5 enhancers that contain high affinity Krox-20. binding sites capable of mediating transactivation by Krox-20. In addition to conservation of binding sites critical for Krox-20 activity in the chicken Hoxa-2 and pufferfish Hoxb-2 genes, the r3/r5 enhancers are also characterized by the presence of a number of identical motifs likely to be involved in cooperative interactions with Krox-20 during the process of hindbrain patterning in vertebrates.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

An extradenticle-induced conformational change in a HOX protein overcomes an inhibitory function of the conserved hexapeptide motif.

HOX homeoproteins control cell identities during animal development by differentially regulating target genes. The homeoprotein encoded by the extradenticle (exd) gene can selectively modify HOX DNA binding, suggesting that it contributes to HOX specificity in vivo. HOX-EXD interactions are in part mediated by a conserved stretch of amino acids termed the hexapeptide found in many HOX proteins. Here, we demonstrate that a 20 bp oligonucleotide from the 5' region of the mouse Hoxb-1 gene, a homolog of Drosophila labial (lab), is sufficient to direct an expression pattern in Drosophila that is very similar to endogenous lab. In vivo, this expression requires lab and exd and, in vitro, LAB requires EXD to bind this oligonucleotide. In contrast, LAB proteins with mutations in the hexapeptide bind DNA even in the absence of EXD. Moreover, a hexapeptide mutant of LAB has an increased ability to activate transcription in vivo. Partial proteolysis experiments suggest that EXD can induce a conformational change in LAB. These data are consistent with a mechanism whereby the LAB hexapeptide inhibits LAB function by inhibiting DNA binding and that an EXD-induced conformational change in LAB relieves this inhibition, promoting highly specific interactions with biologically relevant binding sites.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1996

Transposon tools for recombinant DNA manipulation: characterization of transcriptional regulators from yeast, Xenopus, and mouse.

Transposon Tn1000 has been adapted to deliver novel DNA sequences for manipulating recombinant DNA. The transposition procedure for these "tagged" Tn1000s is simple and applicable to most plasmids in current use. For yeast molecular biology, tagged Tn1000s introduce a variety of yeast selective markers and replication origins into plasmids and cosmids. In addition, the beta-globin minimal promoter and lacZ gene of Tn(beta)lac serve as a mobile reporter of eukaryotic enhancer activity. In this paper, Tn(beta)lac was used to localize a mouse HoxB-complex enhancer in transgenic mice. Other tagged transposons create Gal4 DNA-binding-domain fusions, in either Escherichia coli or yeast plasmids, for use in one- and two-hybrid tests of transcriptional activation and protein-protein interaction, respectively. With such fusions, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Swi6 G1/S-phase transcription factor and the Xenopus laevis Pintallavis developmental regulator are shown to activate transcription. Furthermore, the same transposon insertions also facilitated mapping of the Swi6 and Pintallavis domains responsible for transcriptional activation. Thus, as well as introducing novel sequences, tagged transposons share the numerous other applications of transposition such as producing insertional mutations, creating deletion series, or serving as mobile primer sites for DNA sequencing.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Reprogramming Hox expression in the vertebrate hindbrain: influence of paraxial mesoderm and rhombomere transposition.

The developing vertebrate hindbrain consists of segments known as rhombomeres, which express combinations of Hox genes implicated in specifying segmental identity. Using chick-chick and chick-transgenic mouse graftings, we show that anterior to posterior rhombomere transpositions result in a progressive posterior transformation and coordinate induction of new Hox expression. This shows that hindbrain plasticity is evolutionarily conserved and implies rhombomeres may be undergoing continual assessment of their identities. The nature of the changes is dependent on both the anteroposterior position of the graft and its origin. Transposed somites from specific axial levels and developmental stages have a graded ability to induce changes in Hox expression, indicating that paraxial mesoderm is a source of the environmental signal responsible for the plasticity.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Paralogous Hox genes: function and regulation.

The Hox homeobox gene family plays a pivotal role in regulating patterning and axial morphogenesis in vertebrates. Molecular characterization of the four Hox clusters has shown that they are evolutionarily related with respect to sequence, organization, and expression, suggesting they arose by duplication and divergence. Transgenic analysis has clearly demonstrated the functional roles of individual genes in a broad range of embryonic tissues, and in compound mutants has addressed the issues of cooperativity and redundancy. There is an emerging picture of the cis-regulatory elements underlying Hox expression, and for the 3' members of the clusters there is a considerable degree of conservation between paralogous genes with respect to their functional roles and regulatory control.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Segmental expression of Hoxa-2 in the hindbrain is directly regulated by Krox-20.

The hindbrain is a segmented structure divided into repeating metameric units termed rhombomeres (r). The Hox family, vertebrate homologs of the Drosophila HOM-C homeotic selector genes, are expressed in rhombomere-restricted patterns and are believed to participate in regulating segmental identities. Krox-20, a zinc finger gene, has a highly conserved pattern of expression in r3 and r5 and is functionally required for their maintenance in mouse embryos. Krox-20 has been shown to directly regulate the Hoxb-2 gene and we wanted to determine if it was involved in regulating multiple Hox genes as a part of its functional role. Hoxa-2 is the only known paralog of Hoxb-2, and we examined the patterns of expression of the mouse Hoxa-2 gene with particular focus on r3 and r5 in wild type and Krox-20-/- mutant embryos. There was a clear loss of expression in r3, which indicated that Hoxa-2 was downstream of Krox-20. Using transgenic analysis with E. coli lacZ reporter genes we have identified and mapped an r3/r5 enhancer in the 5' flanking region of the Hoxa-2 gene. Deletion analysis narrowed this region to an 809 bp Bg/II fragment, and in vitro binding and competition assays with bacterially expressed Krox-20 protein identified two sites within the enhancer. Mutation of these Krox-20 sites in the regulatory region specifically abolished r3/r5 activity, but did not affect neural crest and mesodermal components. This indicated that the two Krox-20 sites are required in vivo for enhancer function. Furthermore, ectopic expression of Krox-20 in r4 was able to transactivate the Hoxa 2/lacZ reporter in this rhombomere. Together our findings suggest that Krox-20 directly participates in the transcriptional regulation of Hoxa-2 during hindbrain segmentation, and is responsible for the upregulation of the r3 and r5 domains of expression of both vertebrate group 2 Hox paralogs. Therefore, the segmental phenotypes in the Krox-20 mutants are likely to reflect the role of Krox-20 in directly regulating multiple Hox genes.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Rhombomere of origin determines autonomous versus environmentally regulated expression of Hoxa-3 in the avian embryo.

We have investigated the pattern and regulation of Hoxa3 expression in the hindbrain and associated neural crest cells in the chick embryo, using whole mount in situ hybridization in conjunction with DiI labeling of neural crest cells and microsurgical manipulations. Hoxa3 is expressed in the neural plate and later in the neural tube with a rostral border of expression corresponding to the boundary between rhombomeres (r) 4 and 5. Initial expression is diffuse and becomes sharp after boundary formation. Hoxa3 exhibits uniform expression within r5 after formation of rhombomeric borders. Cell marking experiments reveal that neural crest cells migrating caudally, but not rostrally, from r5 and caudally from r6 express Hoxa3 in normal embryo. Results from transposition experiments demonstrate that expression of Hoxa3 in r5 neural crest cells is not strictly cell-autonomous. When r5 is transposed with r4 by rostrocaudal rotation of the rhomobomeres, Hoxa3 is expressed in cells migrating lateral to transposed r5 and for a short time, in condensing ganglia, but not by neural crest within the second branchial arch. Since DiI-labeled cells from transposed r5 are present in the second arch, Hoxa3-expressing neural crest cells from r5 appear to down-regulate their Hoxa3 expression in their new environment. In contrast, when r6 is transposed to the position of r4 after boundary formation, Hoxa3 is maintained in both migrating neural crest cells and those positioned within the second branchial arch and associated ganglia. These results suggest that Hoxa3 expression is cell-autonomous in r6 and its associated neural crest. Our results suggest that neural crest cells expressing the same Hox gene are not eqivalent; they respond differently to environmental signals and exhibit distinct degrees of cell autonomy depending upon their rhombomere of origin.

Animals↗