Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R K Jarecky

Publications and source records attributed to R K Jarecky.

15 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

The relationship between medical students' academic achievement and patterns of initial postgraduate placement.

PURPOSE: To explore the relationship between various levels of academic achievement and the spectrum of initial specialty placements for graduates. METHOD: The authors studied the initial specialty placements of all 1984-1994 graduates of the University of Kentucky College of Medicine. Statistical analyses were used to determine the nature and strength of the relationships between initial specialty selection and students' achievement indicators and changes in that relationship over time. RESULTS: Students tended to aggregate across time into discernible levels of achievement. The relationships between academic achievement levels and initial specialty placements were highly variable. CONCLUSION: Although students with higher levels of achievement had broader choices available to them, graduates at every level of achievement entered a wide variety of specialties. Thus, the authors believe that academic achievement should not be used to the exclusion of other performance characteristics in determining how students and residencies should be matched.

Career Choice↗
PubMed1997

The Kentucky medical curriculum. A response to the call for educational reform: a GPEP report card.

The resources of an important educational grant provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, as well as designated local college and medical center funds, provided support for the renewal of the undergraduate medical education program at the University of Kentucky College of Medicine. The fully revised medical curriculum, adapted to changing professional and societal needs and completely in place by the 1994-95 academic year, was influenced by the recommendations of the General Professional Education of the Physician (GPEP) Report, issued by the Association of American Medical Colleges in 1984. This paper details each of the student-centered curricular changes in the context of the GPEP recommendation that it particularly addresses.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed1996

Developing generalists for Kentucky.

Since 1985, nearly half of the graduates of the University of Kentucky College of Medicine have chosen generalist careers, even though its students received almost no outpatient ambulatory training in primary care before 1990. This study determined the factors influencing the choice of generalist specialties in the absence of ambulatory training experience. A questionnaire was mailed to the 516 graduates of the classes of 1964 through 1989 who had entered a generalist specialty. A three-way ANOVA with one repeated measure was used to determine whether there were statistically significant differences in the responses of practitioners in the three generalist specialties (family practice, general internal medicine, or general pediatrics). Sufficiently complete responses were received from 187 graduates (116 family practitioners, 40 general pediatricians, and 31 general internists). Many of the physicians who had spent formative years in rural areas were practicing in rural communities. Many respondents had already decided upon a generalist career before entering medical school. Clerkships in internal medicine and pediatrics were an important influence, as was mentor role modeling. For pediatricians, an elective ambulatory care experience was also important. Educational experiences exert meaningful influences on students interested in a generalist career. Formal ambulatory care training experiences, while not critical for the selection of a generalist career, may heighten or confirm interest. Efforts that encourage students from rural communities to enter medical school appear to produce rural physicians.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1996

Factors influencing medical students' choice of academic medicine as a career.

The purpose of this study was to identify the characteristics of physicians who chose academic medicine as a career. A questionnaire was sent to all graduates of the University of Kentucky College of Medicine who held full-time positions in academic medical centers (n = 143). Ninety graduates (63%) returned usable questionnaires. Most of the physicians grew up in urban areas. Seventy-seven percent of the graduates entered academic medicine directly from their residency or fellowship programs. The most important factors cited by respondents as influencing a career choice of academic medicine were an interest in teaching and a belief that their personality and skills suited them to an academic environment. An interest in doing research was not a very important factor. Respondents also indicated why they chose their particular specialty. The two most important factors were the content of the specialty and intellectual stimulation. Most of these physicians (64%) were very satisfied with their careers in academic medicine.

Academic Medical Centers↗
PubMed1994

Defining the surgical personality: a preliminary study.

Noting that noncognitive factors may be more predictive of success in a medical career than is intellectual ability or cognitive performance, we undertook a study to determine whether a surgical personality exists and to delineate the temperament and personality traits that contribute to its definition. The Krug Adult Personality Inventory, the Strelau Temperament Inventory, and Barclay's adjective checklist were administered to 110 physicians, 35 in a "controllable lifestyle" specialty, 28 in primary care, and 47 in surgery or a surgery subspecialty. In addition, participants completed a stress inventory. Results showed that surgeons form a distinct and homogeneous group based on temperament and personality traits. We suggest that noncognitive factors can be of use to medical educators in the selection, counseling, training, and evaluation of medical personnel.

General Surgery↗
PubMed1993

Changes in the patterns of specialties selected by high and low academic performers before and after 1980.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to examine whether recently observed changes in the distribution of medical school graduates' choices are linked to level of academic achievement, graduation year, or both. METHOD: The authors studied the specialty selections made by two groups of graduates of the University of Kentucky College of Medicine: 319 who were elected to Alpha Omega Alpha and 276 who ranked academically in the bottom 10% of their classes. They also divided the groups into two time frames: 1964-1979 and 1980-1991. Two-way factorial analyses of variance compared the distributions of specialty selections according to time frame and to academic group. RESULTS: Significantly higher percentages of students in the low-achievement group selected primary care specialties (F = 14.76, p < .001), and this difference between the academic groups increased in recent years: 67% versus 41% in 1980-1991 compared with 53% versus 46% in 1964-1979. CONCLUSIONS: The specialty options most readily available to academically low-achieving medical school graduates are narrowing. Low achievers may be funneled into primary care simply because they cannot compete for other specialties. The authors recommend that: (1) recruitment and selection into primary care specialties should be made only after each candidate has been assessed over a broad range of cognitive and noncognitive factors and (2) academically low-ranking graduates should not end up in primary care specialties simply because no other specialty options are available to them.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1991

Stability of medical specialty selection at the University of Kentucky.

In the fall of 1989, all graduates of a 30-year-old medical college were surveyed by questionnaire concerning their motivations for their original selections of specialties, motivations for changing their specialties when such changes had occurred, and factors involved in their current choices of specialties. The 723 respondents were grouped by specialty response into one of three groups (primary care plus medicine and pediatrics subspecialties; surgery; or controllable lifestyle), and responses were statistically analyzed. The most important factors influencing initial specialty selection were perceived match of personality and specialty; technology and methodology characteristic of the specialty; and time for family activities, in that order. The ratings of the 175 respondents who stated that they had changed specialties indicated that time for avocational pursuits and time for family activities were the most important reasons for change. The reasons for selecting a different specialty varied. This study's findings suggest that a student's likelihood of making an inappropriate specialty choice may be reduced by a broad undergraduate medical education with realistic experiences in clinical activity. Students' lack of awareness of the lifestyle of a particular specialty may be a significant factor in the flow of physicians from noncontrollable lifestyle specialty areas. Those who counsel medical students need to be aware of the increasing importance of controllable lifestyle features, changing attitudes, faculty role-modeling, and mentors as strong influences on students' choices of specialties.

Career Choice↗
PubMed1990

The controllable lifestyle factor and students' attitudes about specialty selection.

Questionnaires were distributed to 346 fourth-year students in nine medical schools. The students were asked to state their selected specialty and to rank the importance that each of 25 influences, listed as questionnaire items, had had in making their choice of specialty. Factor analysis showed that particular items were significantly associated with particular factors. The first factor emphasized perceived lifestyle (items in this category gave importance to remuneration, personal time, and prestige); the second factor emphasized cerebral activities and a practice orientation; and the third factor stressed altruistic values and attitudes. The authors classified the selected specialties into three groups: those characterized as having a non-controllable lifestyle (NCL), those with a controllable lifestyle (CL), and surgery. (CL specialties were defined as those that allow the physician to control the number of hours devoted to practicing the specialty.) Data were analyzed using factor analysis, and analysis of variance, and the Scheffé method. Analysis indicated that the perceived lifestyle factor was most closely associated with the responses of those students choosing CL specialties. Furthermore, this factor received the highest total loading of the three factors from all the students, thus indicating the level of interest in lifestyle factors. Responses to items that defined the cerebral and practice factor were highest from the group of students choosing CL specialties and lowest from the group choosing NCL specialties. The NCL students scored highest in the altruism factor and the CL students scored the lowest. The surgery and NCL groups were similar in attitude patterns, and both were substantially different in attitude patterns from those of the CL groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Altruism↗
PubMed1989

Career change: in quest of a controllable lifestyle.

Over the past decade, top medical students are selecting "controllable lifestyle" (CL) specialties at an increasing rate. CL specialties include anesthesiology, dermatology, emergency medicine, neurology, ophthalmology, pathology, psychiatry, and radiology. The choice of "noncontrollable lifestyle" (NCL) specialties such as family practice, internal medicine, obstetrics/gynecology, and pediatrics was negatively affected by this trend. The effect of CL on the selection of surgical training by top medical students was variable. The purpose of this study was to determine if CL is a factor in career change by young surgeons during and after residency. Graduates of the University of Kentucky College of Medicine from 1975 to 1983 (n = 796) were questioned regarding the specialty they entered after graduation and whether they remained in that specialty as of March, 1988. NCL and surgery specialties showed a net loss of practitioners during the study period (P less than 0.005) and CL showed a net gain (P less than 0.005). When physicians changed specialties, the direction of change occurred from NCL and surgery to CL (P less than 0.05). Change from CL to NCL and surgery occurred infrequently.

Career Choice↗
PubMed1989

Controllable lifestyle: a new factor in career choice by medical students.

To determine whether control of work hours (controllable lifestyle) was becoming an increasingly important factor in choices of specialties by medical students, data from three medical schools over the past ten, ten, and six years, respectively, were reviewed for the types of specialty training entered by students in the top 15% of their classes. Since students in the upper 15% of the class are likely to obtain the specialties of their choice, any change in the pattern of their specialty preferences probably reflects a general trend. Specialties that feature a controllable lifestyle (CL) were defined as anesthesiology, dermatology, emergency medicine, neurology, ophthalmology, otolaryngology, pathology, psychiatry, and radiology. Non-CL specialties were surgery, medicine, family practice, pediatrics, and obstetrics-gynecology. The results showed that the percentages of students entering CL specialties increased significantly at all three schools, the percentages of students entering non-CL specialties decreased significantly at all three schools, and there was no significant change in the percentage of students entering surgical specialties.

Achievement↗
PubMed1986

Faculty members' evaluations of sabbaticals.

Seventy medical school faculty members at seven institutions who had taken a sabbatical leave were interviewed about their sabbatical experiences, and 15 who were eligible but had not taken a sabbatical were asked their reasons for abstaining. Nineteen of 35 medical schools solicited also provided information about sabbaticals. The sabbatical experience was viewed very favorably by 80 percent of the participants; and three out of four were judged by the authors of the present paper as having accomplished something substantial, such as writing research papers or books or reorganizing teaching programs, following the sabbaticals. Presabbatical planning was emphasized by the respondents as the key to a satisfying sabbatical. Postsabbatical depression was common but not severe. At the 19 responding schools, sabbaticals were taken by an average of less than one-sixth of the eligible faculty members. Faculty members who had not taken sabbaticals gave a variety of reasons for the modest level of participation. Responses of the faculty members who had taken sabbaticals indicated that most medical school administrations did not capitalize on the opportunity to make the results of sabbaticals of maximum value to their institutions.

Faculty, Medical↗
PubMed1985

Curriculum change in the 1980s. A report of 40 southern US medical schools.

Forty southern medical schools were surveyed to evaluate the nature and mechanisms of curricular change during 1980 to 1983. Ninety percent of schools experienced change in some aspect of curriculum. Faculty, curriculum committees, the dean, and external forces were stimuli for change. Internal self-review or self-criticism seemed to be the most important reasons for change. Proposals were considered by curriculum committees and the dean, but veto power often rested with the dean, although departmental chairmen and faculty occasionally had veto power. Types of change were divided equally between content, timing of courses, and the educational process. Half the schools stated that they had evaluated the changes or planned to do so. Thirteen of 38 changes in curriculum were in the direction of curricular innovations of the 1960s and 1970s and 25 were in the opposite direction.

Curriculum↗