Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R I Hall

Publications and source records attributed to R I Hall.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Midazolam-sufentanil vs sufentanil-enflurane for induction of anaesthesia for CABG surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of midazolam-sufentanil (Group I) and sufentanil-enflurane (Group II) anaesthesia on myocardial oxygenation and metabolism in patients with preserved ventricular function undergoing CABG surgery. METHODS: Patients randomized to Group I (n = 16) received midazolam 0.3 mg.kg-1 at induction of anaesthesia, 0.15 mg.kg-1 after tracheal intubation, followed by an infusion of 2.5-10.0 micrograms.kg-1.min-1. Supplemental sufentanil (cumulative maximum of 5 micrograms.kg-1) was given for adverse haemodynamic responses. Group II (n = 16) received 5 micrograms.kg-1 sufentanil at induction. Additional sufentanil (maximum 5 micrograms.kg-1), and enflurane (0-3% inspired concentration) were administered for adverse haemodynamic responses. Haemodynamics, myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2), and lactate extraction were determined at the following times: I) awake (AWA), 2) after induction (IND), and 3) after tracheal intubation (ETT). RESULTS: Systemic haemodynamics and myocardial metabolism were similar at AWA. Heart rate response was attenuated and MVO2 reduced in Group I at IND (P < 0.05). Following AWA, myocardial lactate production (MLP) occurred more frequently in Group II vs Group I patients (9/16 vs 2/16) and at more individual measurement points (Group II: 10/64 vs Group I: 3/64). Myocardial lactate flux demonstrated a deleterious trend in Group II at ETT. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with sufentanil-enflurane, midazolam-sufentanil anaesthesia resulted in comparable and acceptable haemodynamics and myocardial oxygenation in CABG patients.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1998

Effect of pressure on myocardial function after 6-hour preservation with blood cardioplegia.

BACKGROUND: This study examined the return of cardiac function in pig hearts after 6 hours' preservation by continuous perfusion with blood cardioplegia at two perfusion pressures compared with preservation with crystalloid solutions. METHODS: Isolated pig hearts were randomly divided into five groups (n = 8 per group) according to the following treatments: group 1 = fresh hearts (control); group 2 = hearts arrested with Queen's cocktail cardioplegia and then immersion in 0 degrees C saline solution (QS group); group 3 = hearts arrested with (5 degrees C) and simple immersion in 0 degrees C University of Wisconsin solution (UW group); and groups 4 and 5 = hearts arrested with blood cardioplegia at 10 degrees C and then continuously perfused at a pressure of 80 cm H2O or 40 cm H2O, respectively (groups BC80 and BC40). After preservation for 6 hours, donor hearts were reperfused by a cross-circulation support pig. Thereafter, cardiac function and metabolism were examined every half hour for 2 hours. A three-way mixed general linear model was used to analyze data with repeated measures. Bonferroni test was used to determine differences (p < or = 0.05) between groups. RESULTS: Only 4 hearts recovered electric activity in the BC80 group (p < or = 0.05 versus other groups). There was poor recovery of left ventricular work in the BC80 group compared with the other groups (p < 0.001). Left ventricular work in the QS and UW groups was also lower than in the control and BC40 groups. Left ventricular work in the BC40 group fully recovered. Maximum elastance did not differ between groups. Compliance was reduced in the QS, BC80, and BC40 groups versus controls after preservation (p < 0.006). Coronary flow decreased and coronary vascular resistance increased in the BC80 group versus the other groups (p < or = 0.001). Coronary flow in the QS, UW, and BC40 groups was lower than in the control group (p < 0.001). The magnitude of lactate release was much higher in the BC80 group than in the other groups (p < or = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous perfusion with 10 degrees C blood cardioplegia at 40 cm H2O pressure for 6 hours provided adequate preservation of systolic function in this model. University of Wisconsin solution provided the best protection of diastolic function.

Adenosine↗
PubMed1997

Factors influencing MAC reduction after cardiopulmonary bypass in dogs.

BACKGROUND: Anaesthetic requirements may be reduced following surgery employing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). This study, in dogs, determined the role of a) volatile agents (enflurane [E] vs isoflurane [I]), b) oxygenator (bubble [B] vs membrane [M]), and c) presence [FL] vs absence [NoFL] of an in-line arterial filter in the bypass circuit in altering anaesthetic requirements following CPB. METHODS: Male mongrel dogs were anaesthetized with either enflurane (n = 24) or isoflurane (n = 24). They were randomly assigned to one of eight groups (n = 6 per group); Group 1 (E/B/FL), Group 2 (E/M/FL), Group 3 (E/M/NoFL), Group 4 (E/B/NoFL), Group 5 (I/M/FL), Group 6 (I/B/FL), Group 7 (I/M/NoFL) or Group 8 (I/B/NoFL). MAC was determined using the tail-clamp method at hourly intervals, twice before and three times after a one hour normothermic perfusion using aortoatrial cannulation and CPB. RESULTS: Prior to CPB, MAC was reproducible (enflurane: MAC1 2.17 +/- 0.29 vs MAC2 2.14 +/- 0.28%; isoflurane: MAC1 1.42 +/- 0.31 vs MAC2 1.41 +/- 0.33%) and differed among groups only for the volatile agent employed. Following CPB, MAC was reduced in all groups (P < 0.05 vs pre-CPB measurements) except Group 1 (E/B/FL). The degree of MAC reduction in other groups ranged from 39-64% and was not different based on type of agent employed, use of a membrane or bubble oxygenator, or presence or absence of an in-line arterial filter. CONCLUSION: In dogs, MAC reduction following CPB was variable, not related to type of volatile agent employed, use of a membrane or bubble oxygenator, or presence or absence of an in-line arterial filter. The explanation for reductions in anaesthetic requirements following CPB in this model remains speculative.

Anesthetics↗
PubMed1997

Light versus heavy sedation after cardiac surgery: myocardial ischemia and the stress response. Maritime Heart Centre and Dalhousie University.

UNLABELLED: The influence of light versus heavy sedation after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery on the development of postoperative myocardial ischemia has not been described. After uncomplicated CABG surgery, 50 patients were randomly assigned to receive LOW (n = 24; target Ramsay Sedation Score [RSS] = 2) or HIGH (n = 26; target RSS = 4) sedation with propofol. Analgesia was provided to maintain a visual analog scale (VAS) pain score <7. Myocardial ischemia was identified perioperatively using continuous 3-lead Holter monitoring. By measuring creatine kinase (CK) MB levels preoperatively, at entry to the intensive care unit (ICU), and every 12 h for 48 h; and by obtaining serial 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECG) (preoperatively; 2, 4, 12, 24, and 48 h after ICU admission, 8:00 AM the morning after surgery; and 5 min pre- and postextubation), myocardial infarction was identified. Endocrine stress response was assessed by measuring serum cortisol levels preoperatively, on admission to the ICU, and 24 h postoperatively. In a subset of patients (LOW n = 10, HIGH n = 11), plasma and urinary catecholamine levels were also measured. There were no between-group differences in demographics, operative course, hemodynamic variables, or cortisol levels while in the ICU. The VAS pain score and target RSS were achieved and sustained, and they differed between groups. There were three myocardial infarctions in each group by CKMB criteria alone. No ECG-identifiable myocardial infarction occurred. The ST segment versus time curve (LOW 187 +/- 295 versus HIGH 1071 +/- 2137 mm/min) differed between groups. Urinary and plasma catecholamine levels were similar between groups over the observation period. We conclude that the use of a reduced sedation regimen in combination with adequate analgesia did not result in an increased endocrine stress response or risk of myocardial ischemia. IMPLICATIONS: This randomized study of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery examined whether light (versus heavy) sedation with propofol in the intensive care unit was associated with an increased degree of myocardial ischemia. Using techniques to detect myocardial ischemia, including Holter monitoring, electrocardiogram, and myocardial enzyme measurements, no differences were found. We conclude that light sedation does not increase the endocrine stress response or the risk of myocardial infarction.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Detection of intraoperative myocardial ischaemia--a comparison among electrocardiographic, myocardial metabolic, and haemodynamic measurements in patients with reduced ventricular function.

This study determined the sensitivity and specificity of haemodynamic and ECG monitors to detect the development of intraoperative myocardial ischaemia utilizing myocardial lactate production as the standard. In 29 patients with reduced ejection fraction (0.27-0.50) undergoing coronary artery revascularization, measurements were made at the awake, post-induction, post-intubation, first skin incision, post-sternotomy, pre-protamine, immediately post-cardiopulmonary bypass, and skin suture intervals. At each interval, measurement of a haemodynamic profile (including pulmonary artery occlusion (PAOP) and central venous (CVP) pressures, heart rate, and pressure rate quotient); myocardial lactate extraction and flux; changes in ST segments in ECG leads, V5 and II utilizing a Siemens 1280 intraoperative monitor, and a Marquette 8500 Holter monitor utilizing leads V5, V2, and AVF were made. "Ischaemia" was considered to be present when myocardial lactate production (MLP) occurred, PAOP or CVP increased by 5 mmHg above the baseline value, the pressure rate quotient was < 1, or ST segment deviation (> 1 mm) occurred in any lead for > 1 min. Variables positive when MLP was positive were the pressure rate quotient (sensitivity 32.8%, specificity 71.9%), CVP (sensitivity 10.9%, specificity 92.6%), and PAOP (sensitivity 1.6%, specificity 99.2%). Holter monitoring had a 100% positive predictive value but poor sensitivity (1.6%). The ECG (Lead V5 + II) measures of ischaemia were insensitive (17.5%) and relatively non-specific (87.7%). We conclude that, in this patient group and using myocardial lactate production as the standard, the pressure rate quotient, elevations in CVP or PAOP, or ST segment changes are insensitive measures of intraoperative myocardial ischaemia.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Does hemoglobin concentration affect perioperative myocardial lactate flux in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery?

Increasing concern over complications related to blood transfusions has prompted a reevaluation of what constitutes an "adequate" perioperative hemoglobin concentration, particularly in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Data from 224 patients with preserved ventricular function (ejection fraction > 50%), undergoing CABG surgery, previously studied under a variety of anesthetic protocols, were reexamined to determine the effect of hemoglobin (HGB) concentration on myocardial lactate flux (MLF) (as an index of ischemia). The interaction of MLF and HGB concentration, anesthetic technique (ANES), and hemodynamic variables (including systemic and pulmonary arterial pressures (SAP and PAP), cardiac output (CO), and myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) was determined from a pool of 1598 data sets obtained from 224 patients. Data were collected from just prior to induction of anesthesia until 24 h postoperatively. Univariate analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between MLF and HGB concentration (P < 0.001) but the correlation coefficient was only 0.09. Multiple regression analysis did not determine HGB concentration to be a significant independent term affecting MLF in either the overall group or in a subgroup of 22 patients having an adverse outcome (myocardial infarction, stroke, or death). For patients undergoing CABG surgery, HGB concentrations within the range of 58-172 g/L were not a significant variable in production of global myocardial ischemia as evidenced by MLF. This suggests that HGB concentrations as low as 60-70 g/L in the perioperative period are well tolerated and are not associated with an increased incidence of myocardial ischemia.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Anaesthesia for coronary artery surgery--a plea for a goal-directed approach.

The purpose of the current literature review was to examine whether changes in current anaesthetic techniques are warranted for patients undergoing coronary artery surgery in light of recent information presented in the literature. The objectives of a cardiac anaesthetic technique are to maintain haemodynamic stability and myocardial oxygen balance, minimize the incidence and severity of ischaemic episodes, be aware of cardiopulmonary bypass-induced pharmacokinetic changes, and facilitate early tracheal extubation if appropriate. Many techniques have been utilized. Provided attention is paid to the details of managing myocardial oxygen supply and demand, none has emerged as superior in preventing intraoperative myocardial ischaemia. Silent myocardial ischaemia (i.e., ischaemia occurring in the absence of haemodynamic aberrations) is common throughout the perioperative period and may occur even in the presence of an appropriately used anaesthetic technique. The incidence and severity appear to be greatest in the postoperative period when the effects of anaesthesia are dissipating. The use of high-dose opioid anaesthesia may no longer be the most appropriate technique to facilitate the anaesthetic objectives. The role of pain management in altering the incidence of ischaemia requires further study. Increased waiting lists for cardiac surgery and ever-diminishing resources should prompt a re-evaluation of early extubation (i.e., within eight hours) as a method of improving utilization of scarce ICU resources. It is suggested that this should be possible with currently available agents to achieve the anaesthetic objectives. Future suggestions for research in this area are made.

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed1993

Does hypothermia or hyperventilation affect enflurane MAC reduction following partial cardiopulmonary bypass in dogs?

This study in dogs determined the effect of systemic cooling and arterial hypocarbia during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on the requirements for enflurane anaesthesia (MAC) before and after CPB. Twelve mongrel dogs were each anaesthetized with enflurane in oxygen on two separate occasions. End-tidal enflurane concentration was measured with a Puritan-Bennett Anaesthesia Agent Monitor. Using the tail-clamp method, MAC was determined twice with a one-hour interval between measurements (MAC 1 and MAC 2). Partial CPB was then initiated using femoral arterio-venous cannulation and maintained for one hour. Following separation from CPB, MAC was again determined twice with a one hour interval between measurements (MAC 3 and MAC 4). Dogs were randomly assigned according to PaCO2 management during CPB (low, 17.6 +/- 8.6 mmHg vs high, 38.9 +/- 11.5 mmHg), and then subjected to two experimental conditions. The first experiment on each dog was undertaken using normothermia during CPB (warm, 35-37 degrees C) while the second experiment (at least two weeks later) was conducted using hypothermia during CPB (cold, 30 degrees C). Analysis of the data, using ANOVA for repeated measures, revealed MAC 3 (1.95 +/- 0.33%, post-CPB) to be reduced when compared with MAC 1 (2.18 +/- 0.28%, P < 0.01) or MAC 2 (2.10 +/- 0.22%, P < 0.01), determined before CPB. Multivariate repeated measures analysis revealed no independent effects of hypothermia or arterial hypocarbia during CPB, on MAC reduction. By the time of the second experiment in each dog (two weeks later), MAC had returned to baseline levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Anesthesia, Inhalation↗
PubMed1993

Fentanyl plasma concentrations maintained by a simple infusion scheme in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

The ability of a simple infusion scheme for fentanyl to achieve and maintain one of two target concentrations of fentanyl in plasma was studied in 17 patients having cardiac surgery that required the use of moderate hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). All patients received preanesthetic medication including morphine, a benzodiazepine, and/or scopolamine. Anesthesia was induced and maintained by one of two fentanyl infusion regimens: HIGH-FEN (n = 6), a priming infusion of 2.4 micrograms.kg-1 x min-1 for 20 min in combination with a continuous infusion of 0.3 microgram.kg-1.min-1 for the duration of the operation to produce a plasma fentanyl concentration of 20-25 ng/mL; or LOW-FEN (n = 11), priming and maintenance infusions of 2.4 and 0.15 micrograms.kg-1 x min-1 designed to produce a fentanyl concentration of 12-15 ng/mL of plasma. The six patients receiving HIGH-FEN had plasma fentanyl concentrations maintained between 20 and 27 ng/mL and none required anesthetic supplementation before CPB; one patient required a single dose of thiopental 50 mg after the termination of CPB. The total fentanyl dose for the operation (3.2 +/- 0.1 h) averaged 107 +/- 2 micrograms/kg (range 100.5-115.5 micrograms/kg). The 11 patients receiving LOW-FEN had a plasma fentanyl concentration maintained below 20 ng/mL (range 13-17 ng/mL). Eight patients before and 10 patients after CPB required anesthetic supplementation for adverse hemodynamic or somatic responses. For comparison purposes, another eight patients received a single 75 micrograms/kg dose of fentanyl during 20 min for induction of anesthesia, and 7 of the 8 required supplemental anesthetic agents before and after CPB.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed1993

Myocardial metabolic and hemodynamic changes during propofol anesthesia for cardiac surgery in patients with reduced ventricular function.

This study examined the hypothesis that the use of propofol for induction and maintenance of anesthesia in patients with reduced ejection fraction (< 0.5) undergoing coronary artery revascularization would not be associated with a greater degree or incidence of myocardial ischemia as compared to patients receiving a moderate dose sufentanil-enflurane anesthetic technique. Two groups of patients were assigned randomly to receive one of two propofol anesthetic regimes. Group A (n = 21) received propofol 1-2 mg/kg as the induction drug and sufentanil 0.03 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 (fixed rate) plus propofol 50-200 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 (variable rate) infusions for maintenance of anesthesia. Group B (n = 21) received sufentanil 5 micrograms/kg for induction and propofol 50-200 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 (variable rate) infusion for maintenance of anesthesia. For comparison, a third group (Group C, n = 18) was studied subsequently. This group received sufentanil 5 micrograms/kg for induction of anesthesia which was maintained with enflurane. Adverse hemodynamic changes (hypertension, tachycardia) were managed by additional propofol (Groups A and B), sufentanil (Group C), or vasopressors (hypotension). Hemodynamic and myocardial metabolic profiles were measured when awake and sedated and at postinduction, postintubation, postincision, poststernotomy, and precardiopulmonary bypass times. Ischemia was assessed by measuring myocardial lactate production. The incidence of myocardial lactate production was reduced in Group B as compared to Group C (Group A, 45/126; Group B, 23/126; Group C, 58/107; P < 0.05). Myocardial lactate flux declined in all groups as surgery progressed; but apart from the reduction in flux (indicative of increased ischemia) noted in Group C versus Group B postinduction, no between-group differences were detected.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗
PubMed1991

A comparison of the myocardial metabolic and haemodynamic changes produced by propofol-sufentanil and enflurane-sufentanil anaesthesia for patients having coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

The purpose of this study was to compare propofol-sufentanil with enflurane-sufentanil anaesthesia for patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery with respect to changes in (1) haemodynamic variables; (2) myocardial blood flow and metabolism; (3) serum cortisol, triglyceride, lipoprotein concentrations and liver function; and (4) recovery characteristics. Forty-seven patients with preserved ventricular function (ejection fraction greater than 40%, left ventricular end diastolic pressure less than or equal to 16 mmHg) were studied. Patients in Group A (n = 24) received sufentanil 0.2 microgram.kg-1 and propofol 1-2 mg.kg-1 for induction of anaesthesia which was maintained with a variable rate propofol (50-200 micrograms.kg-1.min-1) infusion and supplemental sufentanil (maximum total 5 micrograms.kg-1). Patients in Group B (n = 23) received sufentanil 5 micrograms.kg-1 for induction of anaesthesia which was maintained with enflurane and supplemental sufentanil (maximum total 7 micrograms.kg-1). Haemodynamic and myocardial metabolic profiles were determined at the awake-sedated, post-induction, post-intubation, first skin incision, post-sternotomy, and pre-cardiopulmonary bypass intervals. Induction of anaesthesia produced a larger reduction in systolic blood pressure in Group A (156 +/- 22 to 104 +/- 20 mmHg vs 152 +/- 26 to 124 +/- 24 mmHg; P less than 0.05). No statistical differences were detected at any other time or in any other variable including myocardial lactate production (n = 13 events in each group), time to tracheal extubation and time to discharge from the ICU. We concluded that, apart from hypotension on induction of anaesthesia, propofol-sufentanil anaesthesia produced anaesthetic conditions equivalent to enflurane-sufentanil anaesthesia for CABG surgery.

Adult↗