Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Hornick

Publications and source records attributed to R Hornick.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

A randomized study of a flexible booster dosing regimen of VAQTA in adults: safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity.

BACKGROUND: VAQTA (hepatitis A vaccine inactivated, Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, PA) is licensed for use in healthy adults in a two-dose schedule at 0 and 6 months. OBJECTIVE: to determine whether the responses to a booster dose of VAQTA administered to adults 12 or 18 months after the first dose were similar to the response when the booster dose was administered 6 months after the first dose. METHODS: healthy adults were randomized to receive 50-U of VAQTA at 6 (Group I), 12 (Group II), or 18 months (Group III) following receipt of Dose 1 on Day 0. Blood samples were collected immediately prior to Doses 1 and 2 and then, 4 weeks following Dose 2. Seropositivity rates (SPRs), geometric mean titers (GMTs) in milli-international units per milliliter (mIU/ml) and booster response rates (BRRs) were compared among treatment groups. Safety data were collected on Vaccination Report Cards. RESULTS: no serious adverse experiences were reported, and the vaccine was well-tolerated by subjects in the three treatment groups. One month following the booster dose, SPRs and GMTs for Groups I, II, and III, respectively, were, 100% (102/102) and 6726.4 mIU/ml; 97.9% (93/95) and 4863.8 mIU/ml; 100% (86/86) and 6068.3 mIU/ml. The BRRs were 88.2% (Group I), 90.2% (Group II) and 94.2% (Group III). CONCLUSION: responses to the booster dose were comparable regardless of the timing (i.e. 6, 12, or 18 months following Dose 1). Flexibility in the timing of the booster dose of VAQTA in adults would allow the vaccination schedule to be the same for adults, adolescents, and children and may increase the likelihood that adults receive the booster dose.

Adult↗

Randomized, double-blind study in healthy adults to assess the boosting effect of Vaqta or Havrix after a single dose of Havrix.

A randomized, double-blind, multicenter study was conducted to investigate the boosting effect of Vaqta or Havrix in 537 healthy adults 18-53 years of age who had received a single dose of Havrix either 24 or 52 weeks earlier. Subjects were randomized in a 2 : 1 ratio to receive either Vaqta or Havrix for their second dose of vaccine and followed for clinical reactions for 14 days after dose 2 was administered. Serum samples were collected immediately before dose 2 was administered and again 4 weeks later and evaluated for hepatitis A antibody (modified hepatitis A virus antibody assay). The booster response rate after administration of the second dose of either vaccine was similar (86.1% for Vaqta vs. 80.1% for Havrix). The geometric mean titers were also similar: 3274 mIU/mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 2776-3858) for Vaqta versus 2423 mIU/mL (95% CI, 1911-3074) for Havrix. The proportion of subjects who reported > or =1 injection-site adverse experiences was lower in the patients receiving Vaqta than in those receiving Havrix (36.6% vs. 59.7%; P<.001). The results of this study indicate that a regimen of Havrix followed by Vaqta is generally well tolerated and highly immunogenic.

Adolescent↗

Influenza vaccination in patients with rheumatic diseases. Safety and efficacy.

The safety and efficacy of influenza vaccination were studied in 32 healthy volunteers and in 62 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis, degenerative joint disease, and other rheumatic diseases. These individuals, none of whom was acutely ill, were examined at the time of immunization and one week, three weeks, and four months later. Flare-ups of rheumatic disease following immunization were infrequent and usually minor. Seroconversion to A/New Jersey/76 developed in 62% to 87% of all individuals and to A/Victoria/75 in 62% to 69%. Antibody responses to A/New Jersey/76 were significantly lower in young patients taking glucocorticoids compared to those not taking glucocorticoids. The antibody responses to A/New Jersey/76 and A/Victoria/75 in patients with SLE were not different from normal responses. Administration of these vaccines was safe in these patients with stable disease and induced antibody responses in most individuals.

Acute Disease↗

Impact on the family of children who are technology dependent and cared for in the home.

PURPOSE: To compare the impact on family of four categories of technology-dependent children. METHOD: A purposive sample of families receiving both public and private services in 13 cities representing census regions included 848 primary caregivers of technology-dependent children ages 3 months to 19 years being cared for at home. A structured telephone interview was used. FINDINGS: A significant difference among the four types of technology dependency for impact on the family was found (MANOVA F test = 9.43; p = 0.0001). One-way ANOVA F tests showed that the means among the four groups varied on the subscale: financial burden, family social impact, and personal strains. CONCLUSION: The findings have implications for nurses who provide support and assistance to families with technology-dependent children.

Activities of Daily Living↗