Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R H Howland

Publications and source records attributed to R H Howland.

39 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Early- versus late-onset dythymic disorder: comparison in out-patients with superimposed major depressive episodes.

BACKGROUND: This study examined the validity of the early-late onset subtyping distinction in dysthymic disorder. METHODS: Participants were 340 out-patients meeting DSM-III-R criteria for dysthymia and a concurrent major depressive episode (MDE). The sample was drawn from a 12-site double-blind randomized parallel group trial comparing the efficacy of sertraline and imipramine in the treatment of chronic depression. All patients received comprehensive evaluations using semi-structured interviews and rating scales. RESULTS: 73% of the sample met criteria for the early-onset, and 27% for the late-onset, subtype. The early-onset patients had a significantly longer index MDE, significantly higher rates of personality disorders and lifetime substance use disorders, and a significantly greater proportion had a family history of mood disorder. The subgroups did not differ in symptom severity or functional impairment at baseline, nor in response to a 12-week trial of antidepressants. LIMITATIONS: Further work is needed to extend these findings to dysthymic disorder without superimposed MDEs. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the distinction between early-onset and late-onset dysthymic disorder.

Adult↗

Dysthymia: clinical picture, extent of overlap with chronic fatigue syndrome, neuropharmacological considerations, and new therapeutic vistas.

Dysthymia, as defined in the American Psychiatric Association and International Classification of Mental Disorders, refers to a prevalent form of subthreshold depressive pathology with gloominess, anhedonia, low drive and energy, low self-esteem and pessimistic outlook. Although comorbidity with panic, social phobic, and alcohol use disorders has been described, the most significant association is with major depressive episodes. Family history is loaded with affective, including bipolar, disorders. The latter finding explains why dysthymia, especially when onset is in childhood, can lead to hypomanic switches, both spontaneously and upon pharmacologic challenge in as many as 30%. Indeed, antidepressants from different classes -tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase A (RIMAs), selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and, more recently, amisulpride, and spanning noradrenergic, serotonergic as well as dopaminergic mechanisms of action - have been shown to be effective against dysthymia in an average of 65% of cases. This is a promising development because social and characterologic disturbances so pervasive in dysthymia often, though not always, recede with continued pharmacotherapy beyond acute treatment. Despite symptomatic overlap of dysthymia with chronic fatigue syndrome - especially with respect to the cluster of symptoms consisting of low drive, lethargy, lassitude and poor concentration - neither the psychopathologic status, nor the pharmacologic response profile of the latter syndrome is presently understood. Chronic fatigue today is where dysthymia was two decades ago. We submit that the basic science - clinical paradigm that has proven so successful in dysthymia could, before too long, crack down the conundrum of chronic fatigue as well. At a more practical level, we raise the possibility that a subgroup within the chronic fatigue group represents a variant of dysthymia.

Antidepressive Agents↗

Is cognitive behavior therapy just a 'nonspecific' intervention for depression? A retrospective comparison of consecutive cohorts treated with cognitive behavior therapy or supportive counseling and pill placebo.

BACKGROUND: There is a dearth of placebo-controlled studies of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) of depression and the largest such study, by Elkin et al. (Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 46 (1989) 971-982), failed to find a significant difference between CBT and a clinical management plus placebo condition. METHODS: The outcomes of two consecutive cohorts of out-patients with major depressive disorder, treated with either CBT (n=90) or a nonspecific control condition (support-counseling-placebo; SCP: n=100), were compared. Although the principal comparisons between the CBT and SCP conditions were delimited to the first 4 weeks of treatment, a secondary set of analyses addressed the subset of 16 patients who received 12 additional weeks of supportive therapy. RESULTS: A consistent pattern of statistically and clinically significant differences favoring CBT over SCP was found in both weeks 4 and 16. LIMITATIONS: Interpretation of these findings are subject to several potential confounds, including the non-randomized nature of the groups and the greater amount of therapeutic contact during the first 4 weeks of CBT. CONCLUSIONS: While these results do not lessen the need for additional prospective studies, our findings do suggest that CBT has therapeutic effects beyond those attributable to placebo-expectancy and other nonspecific factors.

Adult↗