Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R H Brook

Publications and source records attributed to R H Brook.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

The appropriateness of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in academic medical centers. Working Group of the Appropriateness Project of the Academic Medical Center Consortium.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the appropriateness of use of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in Academic Medical Center Consortium hospitals as judged 1) according to criteria developed by an expert panel, 2) according to revisions of those criteria made by cardiac surgeons from the Academic Medical Center Consortium, and 3) by review of cases by the surgeons responsible for those cases. DESIGN: Retrospective, randomized medical record review. SETTING: 12 Academic Medical Center Consortium hospitals. PATIENTS: Random sample of 1156 patients who had had isolated CABG surgery in 1990. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 1) Percentage of patients with indications for which CABG surgery was classified as appropriate, Inappropriate, or of uncertain appropriateness and 2) percentage of cases in which CABG surgery was judged inappropriate or uncertain for which ratings changed after local case review. RESULTS: Data were retrieved from medical records by trained abstractors using an explicit data collection instrument. Cases in which CABG surgery was judged to be inappropriate or uncertain were individually reviewed by the responsible surgeons. According to the expert panel ratings, 83% of the CABG operations (95% CI, 81% to 85%) were necessary, 9% (CI, 8% to 10%) were appropriate, 7% (CI, 5% to 8%) were uncertain, and 1.6% (CI, 0.6% to 2.5%) were inappropriate. These rates are almost identical to those found in a previous study that was done in New York State and that used the same criteria (in that study, 91% of operations were classified as necessary or appropriate, 7% were classified as uncertain, and 2.4% were classified as inappropriate). Rates of inappropriate procedures varied from 0% to 5% among the 12 member hospitals (P = 0.02). The Academic Medical Center Consortium cardiac surgeons revised 568 (24%) of the indications used by the expert panel. However, because those revisions altered the appropriateness ratings in both directions and affected only 50 cases (4%), the net effect of the revisions was slight: The rate of inappropriate CABG surgery increased from 1.6% to 1.9%. Local review found that data collection errors had caused erroneous ratings in 12.5% of 64 cases in which surgery had been classified as inappropriate or uncertain. CONCLUSIONS: The Academic Medical Center Consortium hospitals had low rates of inappropriate and uncertain use of CABG surgery, regardless of the criteria used for assessment. Even though surgeons from the Consortium revised the appropriateness ratings extensively, their revisions had a negligible effect on the overall assessment of appropriateness. However, because of potential data collection errors, appropriateness criteria should be used for individual case audits only if supplemented by subsequent physician review.

Academic Medical Centers↗
PubMed1996

Documentation patterns before cataract surgery at ten academic centers.

PURPOSE: To determine the adequacy of documenting the preoperative evaluation for cataract surgery using criteria derived from published practice guidelines. METHODS: In 1990, 1139 surgeries that were performed on 1139 patients at ten institutions of the Academic Medical Center Consortium were reviewed for completeness of documentation of the preoperative evaluation. Criteria for completeness were derived from the American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern on cataract evaluation and the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research-sponsored guidelines. RESULTS: Twenty-six percent of charts lacked documentation of at least one of four basic elements of the preoperative evaluation. These four elements are (1) vision in the surgical eye; (2) vision in the fellow eye; (3) evaluation of the fundus, macula, or visual potential in the surgical eye: and (4) presence of some form (general or specific) of functional visual impairment. If, as stated in the guideline, a specific deficit in visual functioning should be identified, then 40% of charts fail to meet criteria. CONCLUSION: Documentation of the ocular preoperative assessment for cataract surgery is inadequate in more than one quarter of cases. The relation between lack of documentation and incompleteness of the examination is unknown. Improved documentation is needed to better measure and enhance the quality of care.

Academic Medical Centers↗
PubMed1996

Determinants of emergency department use: are race and ethnicity important?

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether race/ethnicity is an important determinant of emergency department use. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in a public ED to determine self-reported ED visits over the preceding 3 months. The study group comprised consecutive ambulatory patients (N = 1,049) with nonemergency medical problems. RESULTS: Blacks, whites, and Hispanics were equally likely to report one or more visits to an ED in the 3 months before study enrollment. Blacks were the most likely to report two or more ED visits in the preceding 3 months (19.0%), followed by whites (13.5%) and Hispanics (11.4%) (P = .01; unadjusted odds ratio, 1.82 for blacks versus Hispanics). In multivariate analysis, older age (P < .001), health insurance coverage (P < .001), regular source of care (P < .001), and difficulty obtaining transportation to a physician's office (P = .011) were positively associated with two or more previous ED visits. After adjustment for these variables, race/ethnicity was not significantly associated with ED use (P = .23; adjusted odds ratio for blacks versus Hispanics, 1.48 [95% confidence interval, .95 to 2.30]). CONCLUSION: Race/ethnicity was not an important determinant of ED use after adjustment for age, health insurance coverage, regular source of care, and barriers to health care. Population-based studies of ED use should be conducted to further evaluate whether racial/ethnic differences in ED use exist that are not explained by differences in demographics, health, socioeconomic status, access to care, or other determinants of ED use.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Adapting practice patterns to a managed care environment: carotid endarterectomy--a case example.

The way American medicine is practiced is changing rapidly. By the beginning of the next century, most Americans may be enrolled in for-profit managed care plans in which physicians are responsible for both a budget and a population of patients. As health care is revolutionized, the overriding issue is whether the mission of health care organizations will be simply to contain costs, or whether it will be to increase the value (i.e., the quality) that we get for the money we are willing to spend on health care. The purpose of this article is to illustrate for carotid endarterectomy how quality can remain on the health care reform agenda. Vascular surgeons must assume a leadership role, and they must be willing to alter their practice patterns. More specifically, they should: (1) support and facilitate the development of clinically-detailed multispecialty criteria that describe under what circumstances carotid endarterectomy is both appropriate and necessary; (2) support the development of a system for publicly reporting outcome data by physician and hospital; (3) support regionalization of carotid endarterectomy; (4) conduct a prospective assessment of appropriateness before the procedure is performed; (5) consider changing the system by which carotid angiographies are read to increase their reliability; and (6) help develop a system to ensure that people who need carotid endarterectomy are offered the procedure.

Cost Control↗
PubMed1996

Appropriateness and diagnostic yield of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in an open-access endoscopy unit.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: This prospective study tested the appropriateness of referrals for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in an open-access endoscopy unit, using the criteria of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. It also examined whether there was any relationship between appropriateness of use and the presence of significant lesions detected by endoscopy. METHODS: Four hundred fifty consecutive upper gastrointestinal endoscopies were studied prospectively. The referral indication was recorded by the endoscopist before the procedure was performed, and was compared with the current criteria of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and with endoscopic findings. RESULTS: The appropriateness of referral was assessed in 442 consecutive endoscopies. Of these, 252 (57%) were judged to be appropriate. In 168 (88%) of the 190 endoscopies rated as inappropriate, the reason was that the patient had not undergone empirical anti-ulcer therapy before endoscopy. The probability of finding a significant lesion did not differ between the endoscopies judged to be appropriate (50%) and those judged to be inappropriate (46%) CONCLUSIONS: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was frequently used for inappropriate indications. The main reason for inappropriate use was insufficient treatment, or no treatment, of dyspeptic symptoms prior to endoscopy. In this study, the criteria for appropriateness did not predict the probability of finding a significant endoscopic lesion.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Variations by specialty in physician ratings of the appropriateness and necessity of indications for procedures.

The authors compare the appropriateness ratings and mutual influence of panelists from different specialties rating a comprehensive set of indications for six surgical procedures. Nine-member panels rated each procedure: abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery, carotid endarterectomy, cataract surgery, coronary angiography, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery/percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (common panel). Panelists individually rated the appropriateness of indications at home and then discussed and re-rated the indications during a 2-day meeting. Subsequently, they rated the necessity of those indications scored by the group as appropriate. There were 45 panelists, including specialists (either performers of the procedure or members of a related specialty) and primary care providers, all drawn from nominations by their respective specialty societies. Main outcome measures included: individual panelists' mean ratings over all indications, mean change and conformity scores between rounds of ratings, and the percentage of audited actual procedures rated appropriate or necessary. Performers had the highest mean ratings, followed by physicians in related specialties, trailed by primary care providers. One fifth of all actual procedures were for indications rated appropriate by performers and less than appropriate by primary care providers. At the panel meetings, primary care providers and related specialists showed no greater tendency to be influenced by other panelists than did performers. Multispecialty panels provide more divergent viewpoints than panels composed entirely of performers. This divergence means that fewer actual procedures are deemed performed for appropriate or necessary indications.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed1996

The effect of race and ethnicity on the use of selected health care procedures: a comparison of south central Los Angeles and the remainder of Los Angeles county.

The purpose of this study was to compare the use of eight hospital-based procedures (appendectomy, cesarean section, coronary artery angioplasty (PTCA), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), carotid endarterectomy, hysterectomy, mastectomy, and transurethral prostate resection) in South Central Los Angeles (SCLA) to the remainder of Los Angeles County. The authors used age- and gender-adjusted procedure rates and population-weighted multivariate regression techniques, adjusting for illness proxies, physician distribution, hospital distance, income, and ethnicity variation to quantitate the effect of SCLA residence. Four procedures were performed at significantly lower rates among residents of SCLA: PTCA, CABG, carotid endarterectomy, and cesarean section. In multivariate regression models, SCLA was also a significant predictor for appendectomy, mastectomy, and transurethral prostatectomy (TURP). The SCLA effect was diminished but not eliminated when ethnicity variables were incorporated into regression models. The use of selected procedures by residents of SCLA frequently differs from that of residents of the remainder of Los Angeles Country. Some differences are not attributable to level of health, income, ethnicity, or the availability of medical resources.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Outcomes in 248 patients who had diagnostic evaluations for epilepsy surgery.

Surgery for intractable epilepsy is a widely used treatment that is not readily assessed by randomised trials. We evaluated the impact of epilepsy surgery on seizures, medication use, employment, and the quality of life in 248 adults and adolescents consecutively referred to one medical centre between 1974 and 1990. Outcomes were determined through self-administered questionnaire and medical record review for 202 surgery and 46 non-surgery patients whose treatment was usually determined by the presence or absence of an epileptogenic focus. Surgery and non-surgery patients differed at baseline only in median monthly seizure frequency (surgery lower than non-surgery). After adjustment for baseline covariates, surgery patients at follow-up had greater decline in average monthly seizure frequency (-11.9 vs - 1.5; difference -10.4, 95% CI -20.5, -0.3) and took fewer antiepileptic medications (average number 1.4 vs 2.0; difference -0.67, 95% CI -0.94, -0.40). Although quality-of-life scores were higher (p < 0.05) with surgery on 5 of 11 scales that were administered only at follow-up, there were no significant differences in employment status or prospectively assessed quality of life. Relative to a non-surgery group, patients treated surgically had better seizure control with less antiepileptic medication. The impact of epilepsy surgery on quality of life and employment needs to be assessed in larger prospective studies.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Effect of physician specialty on use of necessary coronary angiography.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether having a cardiologist as a regular source of care influences likelihood of undergoing necessary coronary angiography. BACKGROUND: An important element of the current health policy debate is the respective roles of primary care and specialist physicians. However, there are few data on interspecialty differences in quality of care for patients with ischemic heart disease. METHODS: We contacted 243 patients by telephone (response rate 72%) who had positive (or very positive) exercise stress test results and met additional clinical criteria for necessary coronary angiography. Study patients were randomly sampled from those undergoing exercise stress testing at one university and three public hospitals in Los Angeles between January 1, 1990 and June 30, 1991. Patients were asked whether they had a regular source of care during the time after their exercise stress test and, if so, whether that provider was a cardiologist or cardiology clinic. RESULTS: Among survey responders, 47% underwent necessary coronary angiography within 3 months of exercise testing and 61% within 12 months. After adjustment for sociodemographics and clinical presentation, patients with a cardiologist as a regular source of care were more likely than all other patients to have undergone necessary angiography within 3 months (52% vs. 38%, p = 0.05) and within 12 months (74% vs. 44%, p = 0.0001) of the exercise test. At 3 months, there was a trend toward a more pronounced effect of ongoing cardiologic care within the public hospitals compared with the private hospital (p = 0.09 for interaction between hospital types). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a cardiologist as a regular source of care were more likely than all other patients to undergo clinically necessary coronary angiography within both 3 and 12 months of exercise stress testing.

Cardiology↗
PubMed1995

Outcomes of patients with do-not-resuscitate orders. Toward an understanding of what do-not-resuscitate orders mean and how they affect patients.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcomes of hospitalized patients with do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders and to identify variables that may elucidate the high mortality of patients with DNR orders. METHODS: Among a nationally representative sample of Medicare patients hospitalized with congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, pneumonia, cerebrovascular accident, or hip fracture, we retrospectively studied in-hospital and 180-day mortality and hospital lengths of stay for patients without DNR orders, with early (day 1 or 2) DNR orders, and with late (day 3 or later) DNR orders, before and after adjustment for sickness at hospital admission and patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality for patients with DNR orders exceeded that for patients without DNR orders before adjustment (59% vs 8%, P < .001), and after accounting for differences in sickness at admission and patient and hospital characteristics (40% vs 9%, P < .001). Sicker patients were assigned earlier DNR orders. Yet, patients with early DNR orders had a lower adjusted in-hospital mortality (31% vs 49%, P < .001) and shorter hospital stay (10 vs 18 days, P < .001) than did patients with late DNR orders. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized older patients with DNR orders have a much higher mortality than predicted by admission demographic and clinical characteristics. The differential association of early and late DNR orders with mortality indicates that DNR orders represent a heterogeneous group of interventions that may be a marker of unmeasured sickness and a determinant of quality of care. A better understanding of what the DNR order represents and its effect on patient care is needed to ensure optimal use.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Managed care and capitation in California: how do physicians at financial risk control their own utilization?

OBJECTIVE: To describe the structure and range of utilization management methods initiated by physicians in response to capitation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional questionnaire. SETTING: A large network-model health maintenance organization (133 contracting physician groups) in California. PARTICIPANTS: 94 (71%) physician groups caring for 2.9 million capitated patients. MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported use of five major utilization management methods. RESULTS: All physician groups reported using gate-keeping and preauthorization for certain referrals or tests. Most also used profiling of utilization patterns (79%), guidelines (70%), and managed care education (69%). Most physician groups asked gatekeepers to submit preauthorization requests for specialty referrals and restricted patient self-referral. For example, 60% of groups required preauthorization for an internal medicine subspecialty referral, and 7% allowed patient self-referral. Most groups also asked gatekeepers to obtain preauthorization for many tests (for example, 95% for magnetic resonance imaging and 53% for pulmonary function tests). Preauthorization requests were denied infrequently (less than 10% of the time) by more than 75% of groups. Of the 54 groups reporting utilization profiles to their physicians, 61% never adjusted for case-mix among patients and more than 60% suggested practice changes to their physicians based on utilization. Fewer than 35% of the groups used written guidelines for expensive tests that required preauthorization (such as angiography). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians are responding to capitation by using utilization management techniques, some at early stages of development, that were previously used only by insurers. This physician-initiated management approach represents a fundamental transformation in the practice of medicine.

California↗
PubMed1995

Quality-of-life outcomes in men treated for localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in men treated for clinically localized prostate cancer. DESIGN: A cross-sectional analysis of HRQOL after treatment with radical prostatectomy, pelvic irradiation, or observation alone for clinically localized prostatic adenocarcinoma, and in age-matched comparison patients. SETTING: A large managed care population in California. SUBJECTS: A total of 528 men, including 214 treated for clinically localized prostate cancer (41 with evidence of metastatic disease were excluded from this analysis) and 273 age-matched, ZIP code-matched comparison patients without prostate cancer. Cancer patients were analyzed in three treatment groups: radical prostatectomy (n = 98), primary pelvic irradiation (n = 56), and observation alone (n = 60). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: General HRQOL was measured with the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Cancer-specific HRQOL was measured with the CAncer Rehabilitation Evaluation System-Short Form and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General form. Disease-targeted quality of life was measured with a new instrument assessing function and bother in three organ systems: sexual, urinary, and bowel. RESULTS: No differences among treatment groups were seen in comparisons of general HRQOL: Significant differences among treatment groups were seen in both function and bother in the prostate-targeted measures of sexual, urinary, and bowel domains. When cancer patients were compared with men of similar age without prostate cancer, differences were seen in the sexual, urinary, and bowel function and bother but not in general HRQOL measures. Although cancer-free men were found not to have full potency or continence, prostate cancer patients treated with surgery or radiation reported significantly worse sexual, urinary, and bowel function than men without cancer. Men who had undergone nerve-sparing prostatectomy did not differ from those who had undergone standard prostatectomy, but the power to detect a difference was low. CONCLUSIONS: Although no differences were seen in general HRQOL, three disease-targeted domains were found to differ significantly among the treatment groups and comparison patients. Even after controlling for the sexual and urinary dysfunction experienced by older men without cancer, those receiving therapeutic interventions for their prostate cancer were found to have poorer disease-targeted HRQOL: We conclude that in addition to general HRQOL, disease-targeted measures must be used to assess outcomes of care in men treated for localized prostate cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1995

Benefits and costs of screening and treatment for early breast cancer. Development of a basic benefit package.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a basic benefit package for detection and treatment of early breast cancer by evaluating the effectiveness and costs for screening mammography, primary surgery, adjuvant therapy, and follow-up care. DATA SOURCES: Published articles were retrieved through MEDLINE; additional articles were obtained through searches of their bibliographies. Cancer statistics were taken from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program data, population statistics were taken from US Census data, and charges from 1993 Southern California Medicare fees were used to represent costs. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were selected on the basis of their design. Preference, in decreasing order, was given to meta-analyses of randomized trials, individual randomized clinical trials, prospective cohort studies, retrospective cohort studies, and case series. DATA EXTRACTION: Studies were examined for the effect of the intervention on overall survival, disease-free survival, and health-related quality of life. We evaluated effects on survival in terms of number of lives saved at 10 years and average years of life saved. Costs were related to the benefits observed and modeled onto a hypothetical health care organization of 500,000 lives. RESULTS: Based on this analysis, we recommend a basic benefit plan for the detection and treatment of early breast cancer that would include the following: (1) screening mammography only for women aged 50 to 69 years; (2) choice of mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery with radiation therapy for all women with early breast cancer; (3) adjuvant therapy for all women at risk of recurrence; and (4) only clinical follow-up without routine testing for metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: By choosing which services they provide to specific groups of patients, providers can substantially reduce their expenses and still provide quality health benefits.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Outcome assessment for epilepsy surgery: the impact of measuring health-related quality of life.

Epilepsy surgery is an increasingly common treatment for intractable epilepsy; yet there is no clear consensus among experts on how to report epilepsy surgery outcome. Most published outcome reporting systems focus on seizure frequency and type but differ in how they define clinically distinct outcome categories. We used a reliable and valid measure of self-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL), the Epilepsy Surgery Inventory (ESI)-55, as an external standard by which to evaluate seven previously published, seizure-based outcome classification systems. The ESI-55 was administered to 133 adults who had previously undergone surgery for intractable epilepsy, and results were linked to data on their seizure occurrence before and after surgery (over the year prior to their HRQOL reports). These 133 patients were classified according to each seizure-based outcome system, and variation in HRQOL across outcome groups was evaluated using analysis of variance. Results reveal noteworthy variation in the extent to which different systems reflect patients' HRQOL at follow-up. We modified existing systems to derive a seizure-based surgery outcome system that most closely reflects HRQOL when applied over the latest 1-year postoperative interval.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Determinants of emergency department use by ambulatory patients at an urban public hospital.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine emergency department patients' perceptions of their illness urgency, their attempts to get care elsewhere, and the proportion of patients referred to the ED. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design with self-administered questionnaires or interviews. SETTING: Public hospital in Los Angeles County, California. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive ambulatory patients totaling 1,190. RESULTS: Most patients thought that they required immediate medical attention, even if they said that their condition was not serious, painful, or debilitating. Half of all patients sought care elsewhere before coming to the ED, and 38.2% had seen a doctor. Forty-four percent of all patients said they were referred to the ED by a doctor or a nurse. Referred patients had illness acuteness similar to that of patients who came to the ED on their own. CONCLUSION: In addition to their lack of access to other providers, patients' perceived need for immediate care and referrals by health professionals contribute to ED use for nonemergency conditions.

Adult↗