PubMedDate not supplied
AIM OF THE STUDY: Since MRI-studies had begun to establish the diagnosis of transitory bone marrow edema syndrome of the hip orthopedic surgeons have tried to integrate this new syndrome into the internationally accepted system of musculoskeletal diseases. Particularly, the relation to non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head and the possibilities in therapy were investigated in our clinical trial. METHODS: Our clinical trial encompassed 106 patients suffering from the transitory bone marrow edema syndrome diagnosed in our department between the years 1985 and 2000. In order to confirm this diagnosis we used the patients' histories, their clinical courses, MRI studies, scintigraphic bone scans, intraosseal pressure measurements, phlebographies, laboratory data, and histologic specimens. One half of our collective positive for transient bone marrow edema of the hip underwent core-decompression surgery (50 patients), the other half (56 patients) was treated conservatively by analgesic medication combined with restriction of weight-bearing in the affected extremity. RESULTS: Patients positive for transitory bone marrow edema syndrome of the hip are middle-aged individuals with a male to female predominance of 60 : 40. This group has no or only few risk factors usually associated with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Thus, the missing alcoholic abuse is striking. All patients suffering from transitory bone marrow edema syndrome of the hip recovered completely independent of the therapy we initiated and none of them showed any signs of osteonecrosis. The one half undergoing surgical decompression of the edema by using a 4.5 mm drill experienced an markedly accelerated relief of their clinical symptoms as well as their signal changes on MRI studies. Conventional X-ray pictures and scintigraphic bone scans are not useful for early differentiation between early stages of osteonecrosis and bone marrow edemas. This also accounts for the historical measurements of intraosseal pressure determinations and phlebographies. In contrast to that, MRI studies are effective in early differentiation between osteonecrosis and bone marrow edema syndrome of the hip, especially when contrast medium (gadolinium) is administrated intravenously and fat-suppressed MRI-sequences find use. Beginning osteonecrosis of the femoral head shows a segmental loss of contrast medium, a "double line sign" interface to the intact bone marrow, and only in a few cases they are associated with a huge symptomatic edema. The histologic examination of specimens obtained from 43 patients with transitory bone marrow edema syndrome of the hip revealed no signs of osteonecrosis. CONCLUSION: MRI studies are useful in differentiation between bone marrow edema syndrome of the hip and non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head in each stage of these two diseases. The thorough differentiation between these two diseases is of extraordinary importance for the clinical work-up of the patients as well as for scientific reasons. The course of primary bone marrow edema is benign as it results in entire recovery. The core decompression surgery offers the chance to shorten the course of the disease.