Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

R G Meulenbroek

Publications and source records attributed to R G Meulenbroek.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Adaptation of a reaching model to handwriting: how different effectors can produce the same written output, and other results.

This report shows how a model initially developed for the control of reaching can be adapted for the control of handwriting. The main problem addressed by the model is how people can produce essentially the same written output with different effectors (e.g., the preferred or nonpreferred hand, the foot, or even the mouth). The model is based on the assumption that writers strive for invariant graphic outputs when they write with different effectors, when they write on surfaces with different orientations, or when they write large or small script; such output invariance is an essential requirement for later recognition of the written result. Given this assumption, the question is how the motor system enables the relevant effectors to generate the necessary pen strokes. The adapted model provides one possible answer to this question. It is first fully working model of multijoint activity underlying writing and related graphic tasks. We describe how the model differs from other models developed in the past, and we review the model's strengths and weaknesses.

Female

Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures.

This article describes a theory of the computations underlying the selection of coordinated motion patterns, especially in reaching tasks. The central idea is that when a spatial target is selected as an object to be reached, stored postures are evaluated for the contributions they can make to the task. Weights are assigned to the stored postures, and a single target posture is found by taking a weighted sum of the stored postures. Movement is achieved by reducing the distance between the starting angle and target angle of each joint. The model explains compensation for reduced joint mobility, tool use, practice effects, performance errors, and aspects of movement kinematics. Extensions of the model can account for anticipation and coarticulation effects, movement through via points, and hierarchical control of series of movements.

Biomechanical Phenomena

Exploitation of elasticity as a biomechanical property in the production of graphic stroke sequences.

In the present study we report several findings which indicate that subjects exploit elasticity of muscles and tendons as a biomechanical property of the motor system in the execution of graphic stroke sequences. The drawing movements of 15 right-handed subjects were analyzed, who copied a geometrical pattern consisting of four line segments. Three of these segments were connected by an acute and an obtuse angle. A first analysis concerning stroke-direction preferences shows that subjects tended to produce final strokes in preferred movement directions and obeyed an end-state stability constraint. Subsequently, we analyzed the copying movements with respect to (1) pauses at acute and obtuse angles, (2) local deviations in angle size, and (3) size variations of the strokes surrounding the angles. The results reveal a higher incidence of pauses at obtuse than at acute angles. Furthermore, a local sharpening of angles was found which was most pronounced at obtuse angles. Finally, systematic size variations of the strokes surrounding the angles were found. The results are considered to reflect the functional use of elasticity during task performance. It is concluded that biomechanical properties of the motor system significantly influence higher-order preparatory processes involved in multi-trajectory control.

Adult

Limb-segment selection in drawing behaviour.

How do we select combinations of limb segments to carry out physical tasks? Three possible determinants of limb-segment selection are hypothesized here: (1) optimal amplitudes and frequencies of motion for the effectors; (2) preferred movement axes for the effectors; and (3) a tendency to continue using already-recruited limb-segments. We tested these factors in a graphic production task. Seven subjects produced back-and-forth drawing movements of gradually changing amplitude. The largest amplitude to be covered, trial duration, movement axis, and direction of amplitude change (from small to large or vice versa) were varied between trials. Selspot recordings were used to study the relative contributions of the fingers, hand, and arm to displacements of the pen. The temporal order of limb-segment involvement was also studied. The results confirmed the predicted effects of the three limb-segment selection factors. We conclude that limb-segment coordination is adaptively related to biomechanical features of the motor system and to the computational demands of movement selection itself.

Adult