Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R F Hess

Publications and source records attributed to R F Hess.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Is the visual field temporally homogeneous?

We asked the question "is the visual field temporally homogeneous when the well known spatial inhomogeneity is taken into account?" Our results show that the visual field exhibits inhomogeneity for stimuli of low spatial frequency for which the spatial inhomogeneity is minimal. This inhomogeneity takes the form of a reduction in sensitivity for stimuli of low temporal frequency in the periphery and an enhancement of sensitivity for stimuli of high temporal frequency in the periphery. The low temporal frequency loss in the periphery is post-receptoral and must involve a selective loss of sensitivity of the low pass filter. The enhanced high frequency sensitivity may be post-receptoral or purely receptoral. The consequence of such an inhomogeneity for subsequent stages of visual processing is discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

The coding of spatial position by the human visual system: effects of spatial scale and contrast.

In this study we investigate the nature of the computations that underlie the encoding of spatial position by the human visual system. Specifically, we explore the relationship between alignment accuracy and spatial scale on the one hand, and between alignment accuracy and contrast on the other. We do this for stimuli where local luminance, local contrast, and orientation cues do not underlie performance. The results suggest that spatial localisation is independent of spatial scale and weakly dependent on contrast. We present subsequent models based on the properties of some classes of visual cortical neurones, namely multiplicative noise and contrast energy detection of complex cells, which describe the form of these relationships.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1992

Binocular integration of contrast information in amblyopia.

We asked whether suppression in amblyopia could be accounted for by dichoptic masking as described in normals, operating in the presence of a contrast threshold difference between the two eyes. A dichoptic masking paradigm was employed to investigate binocular interaction in a mixed group of amblyopic subjects. Normal dichoptic masking was not seen after threshold differences between the two eyes were accounted for in the majority of subjects studied. We found that the binocular dysfunction did not merely follow as a consequence of the known monocular loss and that it depended upon the aetiology of the amblyopia and the spatial frequency of the stimulus.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Temporal properties of human visual filters: number, shapes and spatial covariation.

The temporal properties of the foveal visual filters were revealed using a method which is a variant on previously used noise masking paradigms. This enables the temporal properties of the mechanisms underlying threshold detection of a spatio-temporal probe to be measured. In accord with recent suggestions these results support the existence of three temporal mechanisms. The evidence for the third, higher temporal mechanism is only persuasive at low spatial frequencies. Furthermore, the results suggest that although there is some degree of spatio-temporal covariation in the filtering properties either of individual filters or across the filter population, the well known spatio-temporal covariation in human detection sensitivity is adequately explained by a sensitivity scaling of individual temporal filters with approximately invariant temporal properties.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1992

Temporal frequency filters in the human peripheral visual field.

The temporal filtering properties of the human peripheral field were investigated by means of measuring: (1) modulation transfer functions for a range of spatial frequencies at four visual field locations (0, 10, 30 and 50 degrees), (2) the contrast of a masking stimulus required to extinguish the visibility of just suprathreshold probes. Results suggest that the number of temporal filters governing detection threshold is dependent upon both eccentricity and spatial frequency. For near-foveal viewing three temporal filters were found (one low-pass and two band-pass), whereas at far eccentricities only one was found (band-pass). A similar result was obtained by modeling the modulation transfer function by simply scaling the sensitivities of three independently derived filters. Our data suggest that (1) changes in the modulation transfer function with respect to spatial frequency and eccentricity can be adequately explained by the changes in sensitivity of a small number of spatio-temporal separable filters; (2) the peripheral field is not merely a coarser version of the fovea but has qualitative differences which may be thought to emphasize the transient properties of the stimulus.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1992

The spatial localization deficit in amblyopia.

There have now been numerous reports of a spatial localization deficit in amblyopia but none so far have tackled (1) the relationship between the contrast sensitivity and spatial localization deficits and (2) whether the spatial localization deficit is best described in units of visual angle or in terms of the underlying filter size. These issues are germane because they lie at the very heart of our understanding of the underlying deficit in amblyopia. To answer these questions we use spatially bandpass stimuli so that we can readily compare detection and localization for the same stimuli at each of a number of spatial scales. For some amblyopes (all strabismics and a minority of anisometropes) the contrast sensitivity defect neither underlies nor covaries with the spatial localization deficit. In the majority of anisometropic amblyopes, the contrast sensitivity loss is a complete description. The spatial localization deficit in amblyopia is of two independent kinds; positional inaccuracy and positional distortion. The positional inaccuracy deficit which can occur in varying degrees in both strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia, affects all spatial scales equally and therefore is best thought of in terms of a constant fraction of the underlying filter size in the space-frequency plane. The positional distortion deficit which can also occur to varying degrees in both strabismic and anisometropic forms can not be easily understood within this metric at least for strabismics.

Amblyopia↗
PubMed1992

Mutual rod-cone suppression within the central visual field.

Under mesopic conditions the contrast sensitivity of the central visual field is reduced as the result of a non-linear interaction between rod- and cone-mediated signals, each of which is capable of higher sensitivity in isolation. The interaction is produced only when the rod-mediated system is driven at flicker rates above 6 Hz. This finding bears upon how rod and cone signals are combined and therefore affects our interpretation of the significance of the relationship between retinal illuminance and both contrast sensitivity and temporal resolution.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1991

The site and nature of suppression in squint amblyopia.

A significant percentage of humans have a misaligned eye (squint) due to a disruption of early visual development. In later adult life these people do not experience double vision because the visual information from their misaligned eye is actively suppressed within their visual system. Here I utilize a phenomenon called spatial adaptation which is known to have its site in the striate cortex to answer the question "is the site of suppression before, at, or after the site of adaptation?" Strabismic amblyopes who display spatial adaptation when viewing monocularly with their amblyopic eye fail to display adaptation through their amblyopic eyes under binocular viewing conditions. The lack of adaptation depends on the orientational difference between the adapting stimuli seen by each eye under binocular viewing conditions. These results suggest that suppression occurs at rather than before or after the first site of adaptation.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed1991

Human peripheral spatial resolution for achromatic and chromatic stimuli: limits imposed by optical and retinal factors.

1. The aim of this study was to determine whether optical, receptoral or higher-order neural properties limit spatial resolution (acuity) in human vision, especially in the peripheral regions of the visual field. 2. Both achromatic and chromatic stimuli were used, and measures were taken to ensure that the resolution estimates were not contaminated by the detection of spatial sampling artifacts. Spatial contrast sensitivity functions were measured at retinal locations from 0 to 55 deg along the naso-temporal meridian for: (i) discriminating the direction of drift of luminance-modulated (black-white) sinusoidal stimuli drifting at 8 Hz (achromatic task); and (ii) for detecting isoluminant red-green sinusoidal stimuli drifting at 0.4 Hz (chromatic task). Achromatic contrast sensitivity functions were also measured along the vertical meridian for eccentricities of 8 and 40 deg. Each achromatic function was extrapolated to a contrast sensitivity of one (100% contrast) to estimate achromatic acuity. Chromatic acuities were obtained by expressing chromatic contrast in terms of cone contrasts and using the same method of extrapolation. We compared the results with recent data on human optical properties and retinal anatomy. 3. Both achromatic and chromatic acuity decline with distance from the fovea, but at a faster rate than that dictated by the known optical and/or receptoral properties of the human eye. We conclude that, for stimuli of either achromatic or chromatic contrast, peripheral spatial resolution is limited by post-receptoral mechanisms. Also, chromatic acuity declines more steeply than luminance acuity with eccentricity suggesting that there are additional post-receptoral limitations on colour resolution in the periphery. 4. A clear naso-temporal asymmetry is seen in the resolution whose dependence is qualitatively, but not quantitatively, similar to the Nyquist limits imposed by the asymmetric density of human retinal ganglion cells. We discuss the possibility that in peripheral vision (beyond the optic nerve head) the spacing of ganglion cells may pose a fundamental limit on the resolution of achromatic stimuli, but not chromatic stimuli.

Color Perception↗
PubMed1991

Residual motion perception in a "motion-blind" patient, assessed with limited-lifetime random dot stimuli.

A neurological patient (L.M.) suffering a specific loss of visual motion perception (Zihl et al., 1983) due to extrastriate cortical damage was studied using random dot "limited-lifetime" stimuli with a direction discrimination task. With a stimulus like that of Newsome and Pare (1988), the patient exhibited a severe deficit for motion perception, only being able to perform well for very high values of coherence. Different versions of the stimulus were employed to separate out the effects of limited lifetime versus the effects of additive noise as coherence was lowered. When all "signal" dots had a fixed, specified value of lifetime, and varying percentages of "noise" dots were added, the patient showed a profound deficit. In contrast, a stimulus consisting of no noise dots at all, and signal dots having fixed values of lifetime, revealed relatively good performance for surprisingly brief dot lifetimes. Thus, it is the presence of noisy, incoherent dot motion, rather than brief lifetimes, that causes such poor performance on the stimulus of Newsome and Pare (1988). Most surprising was the finding that the presence of even very small percentages of stationary noise dots was sufficient to disrupt totally direction discrimination of moving signal dots. The findings reported here suggest that one major role of extrastriate cortical processing might be the interpretation of stimuli that suffer from an impaired signal-to-noise ratio; the most commonly encountered form of "noise" would presumably be contamination by irrelevant directional spatio-temporal frequency components.

Humans↗
PubMed1990

Post-receptoral undersampling in normal human peripheral vision.

In human far peripheral vision, drifting stimuli of particular periodicities appear to move in the opposite direction from their true direction of motion. This "reverse motion illusion" is a consequence of spatial undersampling of the retinal image. The illusion occurs for spatial frequencies an order of magnitude lower than that expected on the basis of anatomical measurements of human photoreceptor density. We conclude that for naturally imaged stimuli the site of undersampling in far peripheral vision must be post-receptoral.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1990

Regional distribution of the mechanisms that underlie spatial localization.

In order to understand the regional distribution of the mechanisms which underlie localization accuracy we (1) chose a task which is known to involve localization accuracy (2) optimized stimulus parameters for ecentric loci and (3) determined how two key spatial factors which affect localization accuracy vary as a function of ecentricity. These involve Gaussian blur and Gaussian jitter. These results suggest that there are three different functions with ecentricity for the mechanisms underlying this task which we relate to the spatial properties of the retina, namely mean cone density, receptoral convergence and regularity.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1990

The optimal displacement for the detection of motion.

The optimal spatial displacement for the detection of motion by the human visual system was investigated using spatially narrow band stimuli. Direction discrimination was used for abruptly displaced stimuli. An optimal spatial displacement was found for the detection of motion and this bore a characteristic relationship to the spatial wavelength of the stimuli in motion; it was equivalent to 1/6 of the spatial wavelength of the stimulus for low contrast stimuli and 1/5 of the spatial wavelength for higher contrast stimuli. This finding, which in turn suggests that the spatial subunits of motion detectors may be separated by less than 1/4 spatial wavelength, receives some support from other psychophysical and neurophysiological studies.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1990

Luminance contrast and motion detection.

Direction discrimination was used to measure the minimum and maximum displacement for the detection of motion (Dmin and Dmax) for abruptly displaced sinewave gratings. This was measured for a range of contrast levels from 2 to 32 times the detection threshold for a range of spatially narrow band stimuli. Performance for Dmin (but not Dmax) was found to deteriorate with an increase in contrast, with the most sensitive values for Dmin obtained at contrast levels of 4-8 times detection threshold. This dependence on luminance contrast is thought to be due to the physiology of the visual system, rather than the physics of the stimulus.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1990

The Edridge-Green lecture vision at low light levels: role of spatial, temporal and contrast filters.

One of the most impressive features of our vision is the fact that we see with good sensitivity over such a large range of light levels. This process is usually termed light adaptation by which it is meant that the sensitivity of individual neurones within the retina automatically adapts to suit the prevailing lighting conditions. Although this is usually thought about in terms of single neurones, its effectiveness is greatly enhanced by the fact that individual neurones have distinctive properties. The fact that individual neurones can be considered as acting as neural filters along the dimensions of size, time, orientation and contrast means that visual information is distributed across the whole neuronal population which in turn plays an important role in extending our dynamic range. In this paper the distributed nature of visual processing is emphasized and its role in extending the range of light levels over which we can see is highlighted.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed1989

The contrast sensitivity gradient across the human visual field: with emphasis on the low spatial frequency range.

The regional variation of contrast sensitivity along the greater extent of each of the four principal hemi-meridia of the normal human eye was determined under photopic conditions using horizontally-orientated sinusoidal grating stimuli. The stimuli were well localized in space and frequency, and special attention was paid to the low spatial frequency range. The results confirm that contrast sensitivity is maximal for central vision for all test spatial stimuli. Extra-foveal fall-off in sensitivity can be represented as a linear function of eccentricity if the latter is expressed in relative units (i.e. periods of the stimulus). The regional variation parameter depends upon whether the horizontal or vertical field is tested and upon the spatial frequency of stimulation. The visible spatial frequency range (0.05-24 c/deg) can be approximately described by just three different rules. The fact that more than one rule is found bears upon current models of the functional organization of the visual system.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1989

Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity in hemianopia. A comparative study of the sighted and blind hemifields.

Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity was measured, under identical test conditions using spatially and temporally localized stimuli, in 4 normally sighted human subjects and in 3 healthy hemianopic subjects whose stable visual field loss exhibited foveal sparing. Testing was undertaken at central fixation and at a variety of eccentric loci along the horizontal meridian of the sighted and perimetrically blind field. In comparison with the normal (control) sensitivities obtained in this study, spatial and temporal sensitivities in the sighted hemifield in subjects with striate cortical lesions were both reduced; in addition, we were unable to demonstrate greater-than-chance performance at any extrafoveal locations in the blind hemifield.

Contrast Sensitivity↗