Inducible error-prone repair: one of the cellular responses to DNA damage.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to R Devoret.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The metabolites of aflatoxin B1, the most potent hepatocarcinogen so far known, promote in E. coli K12 cells the reactivation of phage lambda damaged by ultraviolet (UV) radiation. This reactivation process is error prone; 25% of the phage DNA lesions are repaired, but mutagenesis, scored as clear plaque formation, is increased as much as 10-fold. Such reactivation of UV-damaged phage lambda, which occurs in wild-type and in uvrA but not in recA bacteria, is inducible: phage reactivation is obtained even after a long delay following treatment of the host by the short-lived metabolites. This induced reactivation of UV-damaged phage in hosts treated with metabolites of aflatoxin B1 is similar to direct of indirect UV reactivation. Metabolites of aflatoxin B1 produce induced phage reactivation as well as prophage lambda induction in lysogens and cell filamentation in non-lysogens. These cellular events are also triggered by DNA lesions caused by UV radiation and result from the induction of a metabolic pathway (SOS functions). We postulate that, in eucaryotes, carcinogens may induce cellular SOS functions similar to those in E. coli. Induction of such functions might be responsible for the transformation of mammalian cells.
Two mutations have been located at the recA locus and phenotypically characterized along with a third one, previously called rec-34. The three mutants behaved similarly to lexA mutants. They were sensitive to ultraviolet (UV) light and X rays, and lambdaFec- phages were able to plate on them. The three mutations were called lexB because they could be distinguished from recA mutations by the last property. lexB mutants were less sensitive to UV and X irradiations than were recA mutants and were, to various degrees, recombination proficient. UV light failed to induce prophage lambda in all three lexB lysogens. In contrast, thymine starvation induced lexB31 and lexB34 lysogens. In lexB34 mutants, but not in lexB30 and lexB31 mutants, UV reactivation occurred at a low level. In Escherichia coli K-12, the recA gene has basic functions in the repair of deoxyribonucleic acid lesions, deoxyribonucleic acid recombination, and prophage induction. The three lexB mutations alter unequally and independently the three functions. This suggests that the recA and lexB mutations affect the same gene.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A simple, inexpensive, and sensitive test for potential carcinogens based upon the property of carcinogens to induce prophage lambda is described. By using chemicals activated with microsomal enzymes and E. coli K12 permeable (envA) tester bacteria also deficient in DNA repair (uvrB), the range of carcinogens detected in a lysogenic induction test (inductest) has been extended. We have provided the evidence that, after activation, carcinogenic polycyclic hydrocarbons such as benzo[a5pyrene and 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene induce prophage lambda. Three variants of the test have been developed (inductests I, II, and III), which are as sensitive as the mutagenicity test of Ames et al. [Ames, B. N., McCann, J. and Yamasaki, E. (1975) Mutat. Res. 31, 347-364]. Inductests II and III provide a quantitative estimation of the inducing activity of a carcinogen. With the latter test, one can determine: (i) the cellular toxic effect of a carcinogen and (ii) the kinetics of appearance and disappearance of active metabolites. For two series of chemicals, aflatoxins and benz[a]anthracenes, there is a good correlation between their carcinogenic activity in rodents and their prophage inducing activity in bacteria. The fact that the majority of the cell population is induced makes it possible to test the inducing activity of carcinogens at the biochemical level, e.g., by measuring lambda repressor inactivation.
Recovery of phage lambda from ultraviolet damage can occur, in the dark, through three types of repair processes as defined by microbiological tests: (1) host-cell reactivation, (2) prophage reactivation, and (3) UV reactivation. This paper reviews the properties of the three repair processes, analyzes their dependence on the functioning of bacterial and phase genes, and discusses their relationship. Progress in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the three repair processes has been relatively slow, particularly for UV reactivation. It has been shown that host-cell reactivation is due to pyrimidine dimer excision and that prophage reactivation is due to genetic recombination (prereplicative). We provide evidence showing that neither of these mechanisms accounts for UV reactivation of phage lambda. Furthermore, UV reactivation differs from the other repair processes in that it is inducible and error-prone. Whether UV-damaged bacterial DNA is subject to a similar repair process is still an open question.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Like most carcinogens, aflatoxin B1 must be activated by mammalian microsomal enzymes to give rise to coupounds active on bacteria. These compounds act as inducers of E. coli K12 (lambda) at a high efficiency, whereas unmodified aflatoxin B1 has no effect. Moreover, metabolites of aflatoxin B1 have a mutagenic action on phage lambda, as shown by the appearance of clear plaque mutants. We propose the hypothesis that the same derivative is responsible for carcinogenesis of liver cells by aflatoxin B1. Therefore, our system provides a simple way of measuring in vitro, in the same assay, the mutagenic and inducing activities of compounds to which the cells are permeable, thereby detecting potentially carcinogenic agents.
When an F(-) recipient Escherichia coli K12 bacterium receives Hfr or F-lac(+) DNA from an ultraviolet-irradiated donor, its capacity to promote DNA repair and mutagenesis of ultraviolet-damaged phage lambda is substantially increased. We call this phenomenon indirect ultraviolet-reactivation, since its features are essentially the same as those of ultraviolet-reactivation; this repair process occurs in pyrimidine dimer excision-deficient strains and produces clear plaque mutations of the restored phage. Moreover, this process is similar to indirect ultraviolet-induction of prophage lambda, since it is promoted by conjugation. However, contrarily to indirect induction, it is produced by Hfr donors and occurs in recipients restricting the incoming ultraviolet-damaged donor DNA. The occurrence of indirect ultraviolet-reactivation provides evidence for the existence in E. coli of an inducible error-prone mechanism for the repair of DNA.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.