Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R D Chessick

Publications and source records attributed to R D Chessick.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

What is intensive psychotherapy?

The fundamental practical premises underlying the practice of intensive psychotherapy are investigated in this article. Based on ego-psychology orientation, mental illness is classified in terms of premature ego development, ego distortions, ego deviations, ego regression, and ego defects. General healing factors are reviewed, first as presented, for example, in Frank's "demoralization hypothesis." The forms of psychotherapy may be classified in terms of how they approach the problem of demoralization and failure of ego adaptation, into counseling, supportive, reeducative, and psychoanalytic. Intensive psychotherapy is conceived of as a derivative discipline of psychoanalysis. It is different in that the goals are more limited, and active interventions ("parameters" or "departures") are often unavoidably called for, making it less "neat and orderly," more taxing on the therapist, and more of an art. It is similar in that an emphasis on the patients' spontaneous associations and an attempt to retain analytic neutrality as much as possible leads to the formation of transferences and resistances which may be dealt with by interpretation. However, full-blown transference neuroses usually do not form as in classical psychoanalysis, limiting the depth and extensiveness of the procedure. Intensive psychotherapy is the treatment of choice for selected cases of schizophrenia, severe personality disorders, and psychosomatic conditions.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Some philosophical assumptions of intensive psychotherapy.

This paper moves from general considerations about the task of philosophy and epistemology to specific considerations of the postulates and principles that lie behind certain selected psychotherapeutic systems. In a field in which there is so much disagreement it is mandatory to review the fundamental premises behind various forms of psychotherapeutic endeavors for, whether we like it or not, we are forced in the practice of psychotherapy to make certain philosophical assumptions and conceptions. These differ and conflict, and our choices will affect our clinical work.

Behaviorism↗

The problematical self in Kant and Kohut.

Kant and Kohut each present an earlier and a later philosophical system. Each author bases his two systems on a conception of the self which is importantly different from the earlier system to the later system. The later systems are more or less incompatible with the earlier systems but have the advantage of elegance and explanatory power beyond the earlier systems. This recognition of a fundamental change in paradigm is mandatory in order to avoid confusion in hopelessly trying to reconcile the later system of Kohut with traditional psychoanalysis, and to render clear the fact that Kohut's psychology of the self in the broad sense represents a fundamental departure from classical psychoanalysis and Freud's psychodynamic theory, just as Kant's ethical philosophy cannot be reconciled with Kant's critical philosophy. Psychiatrists and psychoanalysts will have to make a choice.

Ego↗

A practical approach to the psychotherapy of the borderline patient.

Guidelines for the ordinary psychotherapist in the day-to-day office treatment of so-called borderline patients are presented. Practical pointers for handling problems of diagnosis, working alliance, transferences, middle phase, and termination are given, followed by a brief discussion of the future of the concept of borderline patient.

Diagnosis, Differential↗

Effects of the therapist's philosophical premises on psychotherapeutic process.

This article focuses on differences in assumptions forming the philosophical foundations of psychotherapy leading to profound differences in the interpretation of the clinical data of psychotherapy and corresponding variations of basic technique. These differences are not reconcilable because they are directly opposed; only the principle of complementarity, as described in the paper, permits a constructive approach to the antinomies.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Intensive psychotherapy for the psychiatrist's family.

A series of intensive psychotherapy cases of wives and children of psychiatrists reveals that the special problems they present may be divided into those at the onset of treatment, those in the process of the treatment, and special countertransference problems. Paradoxically, early recognition and acceptance of psychotherapy are a foremost problem involving the psychiatrist as father or spouse. During therapy, narcissistic injuries to the psychiatrist father or spouse and loyalty problems in the patient emerge as special problems. Countertransference revolves around peer relationships and "psychopolitics," as well as referrals of other patients.

Adolescent↗