Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Coker

Publications and source records attributed to R Coker.

58 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Ethical approval for health research in central and eastern Europe: an international survey.

UNLABELLED: Research ethics committees in central and eastern Europe are increasing in importance as institutions in this region host a growing and more diverse range and volume of health-related research, with funding from an increasingly wide variety of sources. AIM: To describe the arrangements for ethical supervision of research in eleven countries of central and eastern Europe, so as to identify examples of good practice and areas of weakness. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to key informants known to be active in health-related research in Albania, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Russia, and Ukraine in October 2000. It sought information on the composition and functioning of ethics committees, their training and any public concerns about the ethics of health-related research. RESULTS: All countries except Ukraine confirmed that decision-making committee structures operate to oversee the ethics of research on human subjects. In all countries except Albania committees are comprised of medical and non-medical members. Members received specific training in bioethics in Estonia, Hungary, and Lithuania. Countries had made different degrees of progress in implementing arrangements for coordinating multi-site research and for monitoring research once it had commenced. Public concern about ethical issues arising from health-related research was rare. CONCLUSION: The development of ethical supervision of health-related research in central and eastern Europe varies considerably. In some countries there are significant weaknesses that should be addressed. Other countries could serve as examples of good practice in the region. A major challenge is how the public can be involved in this process.

Bioethics↗

After the funding is gone: evaluating the sustainability of a community-based project.

The Rural Elderly Enhancement Project was a nurse-initiated grant funded by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation and administered by an urban school of nursing. The major purpose of the nine-year grant was the development of a model of community participation and empowerment. An informal evaluation was conducted to assess the communities' perception of the project and to determine the sustainability of the project's initiatives. A random sample of individuals from community agencies, schools, and churches were interviewed by six senior baccalaureate nursing students enrolled in a community nursing course. Results demonstrated that the communities had a very positive view of the project and that many project initiatives were sustained and have expanded.

Aged↗

Evaluation of sampling plans used in the United States, United Kingdom, and The Netherlands to test raw shelled peanuts for aflatoxin.

The United States is a large producer and exporter of peanuts. The United Kingdom and The Netherlands are major importers of U.S. peanuts. Each country has a different guideline or legal limit for peanut products containing aflatoxin. Peanuts are tested for aflatoxin in each country by using specifically designed aflatoxin sampling plans to determine if the aflatoxin concentration in a lot of raw shelled peanuts is less than the guideline or legal limit. For raw shelled peanuts, the U.S. plan has the highest sample acceptance limit of 15 ng total aflatoxin/g, the UK plan has a sample acceptance limit of 10 ng total aflatoxin/g, and the Dutch Code of Practice (called the Dutch plan) has the lowest sample acceptance limit at 3 ng aflatoxin B1/g. The U.S. plan uses a maximum of 3 sampling units, each weighing 21.8 kg; the UK plan uses a single sampling unit of 10 kg; and the Dutch plan uses 4 sampling units, each weighing 7.5 kg. The sampling variance is lowest for the U.S. plan and highest for the Dutch plan. The sample preparation variance is lowest for both the Dutch and UK plans and highest for the U.S. plan, primarily because of the mill type used to comminute the kernels in the sample. For a given distribution among lot concentrations, the U.S. plan accepts the greatest number of lots and the Dutch plan rejects the greatest number of lots. The average aflatoxin concentration among accepted lots is highest for the U.S. plan and lowest for the Dutch plan.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aflatoxins↗