Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R C Moellering

Publications and source records attributed to R C Moellering.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

SME-type carbapenem-hydrolyzing class A beta-lactamases from geographically diverse Serratia marcescens strains.

Three sets of carbapenem-resistant Serratia marcescens isolates have been identified in the United States: 1 isolate in Minnesota in 1985 (before approval of carbapenems for clinical use), 5 isolates in Los Angeles (University of California at Los Angeles [UCLA]) in 1992, and 19 isolates in Boston from 1994 to 1999. All isolates tested produced two beta-lactamases, an AmpC-type enzyme with pI values of 8.6 to 9.0 and one with a pI value of approximately 9.5. The enzyme with the higher pI in each strain hydrolyzed carbapenems and was not inhibited by EDTA, similar to the chromosomal class A SME-1 beta-lactamase isolated from the 1982 London strain S. marcescens S6. The genes encoding the carbapenem-hydrolyzing enzymes were cloned in Escherichia coli and sequenced. The enzyme from the Minnesota isolate had an amino acid sequence identical to that of SME-1. The isolates from Boston and UCLA produced SME-2, an enzyme with a single amino acid change relative to SME-1, a substitution from valine to glutamine at position 207. Purified SME enzymes from the U. S. isolates had beta-lactam hydrolysis profiles similar to that of the London SME-1 enzyme. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis revealed that the isolates showed some similarity but differed by at least three genetic events. In conclusion, a family of rare class A carbapenem-hydrolyzing beta-lactamases first described in London has now been identified in S. marcescens isolates across the United States.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2000

Diversity of domain V of 23S rRNA gene sequence in different Enterococcus species.

The highly conserved central loop of domain V of 23S RNA (nucleotides 2042 to 2628; Escherichia coli numbering) is implicated in peptidyltransferase activity and represents one of the target sites for macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin B antibiotics. DNA encoding domain V (590 bp) of several species of Enterococcus was amplified by PCR. Twenty enterococcal isolates were tested, including Enterococcus faecium (six isolates), Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus avium, Enterococcus durans, Enterococcus gallinarum, Enterococcus casseliflavus (two isolates of each), and Enterococcus raffinosus, Enterococcus mundtii, Enterococcus malodoratus, and Enterococcus hirae (one isolate of each). For all isolates, species identification by biochemical testing was corroborated by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The sequence of domain V of the 23S rRNA gene from E. faecium and E. faecalis differed from those of all other enterococci. The domain V sequences of E. durans and E. hirae were identical. This was also true for E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus. E. avium differed from E. casseliflavus by 23 bases, from E. durans by 16 bases, and from E. malodoratus by 2 bases. E. avium differed from E. raffinosus by one base. Despite the fact that domain V is considered to be highly conserved, substantial differences were identified between several enterococcal species.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

A cluster of VanD vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium: molecular characterization and clinical epidemiology.

VanD-mediated glycopeptide resistance has been reported for an isolate of Enterococcus faecium, BM4339. Three clinical isolates of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium collected from 3 patients during a 6-week period in 1993 had agar dilution MICs of vancomycin and teicoplanin of 128 and 4 microg/mL, respectively. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using degenerate primers complementary to genes encoding d-Ala-d-X ligases yielded a 630-bp product that was similar to the published partial sequence of vanD. By use of inverse PCR, vanD, vanHD, and two partial flanking open-reading frames were sequenced. The deduced amino acid sequence of VanD showed 67% identity with VanA and VanB. vanD appeared to be located on the chromosome and was not transferable to other enterococci. The 3 isolates were indistinguishable by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and differed from BM4339. No other isolates carrying vanD were found in a subset of 875 recent US isolates of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1999

The efficacy and safety of quinupristin/dalfopristin for the treatment of infections caused by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Synercid Emergency-Use Study Group.

A progressive increase in the incidence of vancomycin resistance in strains of Enterococcus faecium (VREF) has severely constrained treatment options for patients with infection caused by this emerging pathogen. Quinupristin/dalfopristin (Synercid), the first injectable streptogramin antibiotic, is active in vitro against VREF, with an MIC90 of 1.0 mg/L. We studied the clinical efficacy and safety of quinupristin/dalfopristin in the treatment of VREF infection. Two prospective studies were conducted simultaneously. The first enrolled only patients with VREF infection; the second included patients with infection caused by other gram-positive bacterial pathogens in addition to VREF. Patients were enrolled if they had signs and symptoms of active infection and no appropriate alternative antibiotic therapy. The recommended treatment regimen of quinupristin/dalfopristin was 7.5 mg/kg i.v. every 8 h for a duration judged appropriate by the investigator. A total of 396 patients with VREF infection were enrolled. The most frequent indications for treatment included intra-abdominal infection, bacteraemia of unknown origin, urinary tract infection, catheter-related bacteraemia, and skin and skin structure infection. This patient population had a high prevalence of severe underlying illness, including a history of diabetes mellitus, transplantation, mechanical ventilation, dialysis, chronic liver disease with cirrhosis and oncological disorders. The mean (+/- S.D.) duration of treatment was 14.5 +/- 10.7 days (range: 1-108). The majority of patients (82.1%) were treated every 8 h, as assessed on day 2 of treatment, while 15.9% were treated every 12 h. The clinical success rate was 73.6% [142/193 clinically evaluable patients; 95% confidence interval (CI): 67.4%, 79.8%], the bacteriological success rate 70.5% (110/156 bacteriologically evaluable patients; 95% CI: 63.4%, 77.7%) and the overall success (both clinical and bacteriological success) rate 65.8% (102/156 bacteriologically evaluable patients; 95% CI: 57.9%, 72.9%). VREF bacteraemia at entry, mechanical ventilation and laparotomy were associated with a worse outcome. Quinupristin/dalfopristin was generally well tolerated. The most common systemic adverse events related to treatment were arthralgias (9.1%) and myalgias (6.6%). Related laboratory abnormalities were infrequent. In these severely ill patients with VREF infection and no other clinically appropriate therapeutic alternatives, quinupristin/dalfopristin demonstrated substantial efficacy and a good nervous system, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic tolerability.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Quinupristin/dalfopristin: therapeutic potential for vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections.

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) is an opportunistic pathogen, which causes infections among severely ill, hospitalized patients, in whom it is likely to increase the risk of progressive local or systemic disease and to worsen the prognosis. Because these organisms are often highly resistant to penicillin, ampicillin and many other antimicrobials including the glycopeptides, there are few proven therapeutic alternatives for the treatment of infection caused by VREF. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is highly active against VREF in vitro. A prolonged post-antibiotic effect, good polymorphonuclear leucocyte/macrophage penetration and slow release, and active metabolites allow this agent to be used with an 8 or 12 h dosing interval. The combined results from a Phase III non-comparative study and an emergency-use study of quinupristin/dalfopristin for the treatment of VREF infection produced a clinical response rate (cure or improvement) in 142 (73.6%) of 193 clinically evaluable patients. The baseline pathogen was eradicated or presumed eradicated from 110 of 156 (70.5%) bacteriologically evaluable patients. Fifty-two per cent of the severely ill patients in these two studies died, but no death was attributed to quinupristin/dalfopristin therapy. The most common adverse event was arthralgia (9.1%). Quinupristin/dalfopristin has demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of serious VREF infections, including those that have failed conventional therapy.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1999

Activities of the oxazolidinones linezolid and eperezolid in experimental intra-abdominal abscess due to Enterococcus faecalis or vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium.

The in vivo effectiveness of oxazolidinones eperezolid (U-100592) and linezolid (U-100766) against one strain each of Enterococcus faecalis and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium was examined in a rat model of intra-abdominal abscess. MICs of both drugs were 2 microg/ml for each strain. At doses of 25 mg/kg of body weight twice daily intravenously or orally, linezolid produced small but statistically significant reductions in abscess bacterial density for E. faecalis. The reduction in viable cells observed would not likely be clinically relevant. Eperezolid was ineffective at this dose. At a dosage of 100 mg/kg/day, linezolid treatment led to an approximately 100-fold reduction in viable cells per gram of abscess. Against E. faecium infections, intravenous eperezolid and oral linezolid were effective, reducing densities approximately 2 log(10) CFU/g. Both oxazolidinones demonstrated activity against enterococci in this model. However, results were modest with the dosing regimens employed.

Abdominal Abscess↗
PubMed1998

The specter of glycopeptide resistance: current trends and future considerations.

Two glycopeptide antibiotics, vancomycin and teicoplanin, are currently available for clinical use in various parts of the world, whereas a third, avoparcin, is available for use in agricultural applications and in veterinary medicine in some countries. Because of their outstanding activity against a broad spectrum of gram-positive bacteria, vancomycin and teicoplanin have often been considered the drugs of "last resort" for serious infections due to drug-resistant gram-positive pathogens. Glycopeptides had been in clinical use for almost 30 years before high-level resistance, first reported in enterococcal species, emerged. More recently, there have been disturbing reports of low- and intermediate-level resistance to vancomycin in strains of Staphylococcus aureus. A review of earlier reports reveals, however, that S. aureus strains with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides were first identified >40 years ago. Such strains may occur in nature or may have developed low-level mutational resistance in response to the selection pressure of glycopeptide therapy. Of considerably greater concern is the possibility that vancomycin resistance genes found in enterococci may be transferred to more virulent organisms such as staphylococci or Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1998

Perspectives on switching oral acyclovir from prescription to over-the-counter status: report of a consensus panel.

The proposed switching of oral acyclovir from prescription to over-the-counter (OTC) status for the 5-day episodic treatment of genital herpes was considered by a consensus panel. It was concluded that self-diagnosis/misdiagnosis, misuse, and adverse drug effects were potential problems with the OTC use of acyclovir. While acyclovir reduces asymptomatic shedding of herpes simplex virus type 2, the reduction in transmission of virus potentially resulting from increased acyclovir use was felt to be of unknown extent but likely to be of benefit overall. The availability of acyclovir would likely be improved. There were differences in opinion as to whether widespread availability of acyclovir (prescription or OTC) may speed the development of viral resistance. However, all panel members felt that granting OTC status may set an undesirable precedent for the switch from prescription to OTC use of other systemically administered antiinfective agents. The effect of this precedent, in terms of accelerating development of multidrug-resistant bacteria, was a major concern of all panel members. The consensus was that the switch of acyclovir to OTC status could not be supported.

Acyclovir↗
PubMed1998

Antibiotic resistance: lessons for the future.

It is clear that emergence of resistant bacterial strains will continue to be a problem as long as clinicians use the currently available antimicrobial agents. Past and current policies for dealing with resistance have, at best, been only partially effective. Thus, novel approaches to the problem of antimicrobial resistance are badly needed. Development of novel "classic" antimicrobial agents, chemical modification of currently known agents to overcome resistance, and the development of potentiators of known antimicrobials represent three areas that have been partially exploited in the past and continue to represent fertile fields for additional investigation. In addition, a number of investigators are working to develop inhibitors of new bacterial targets and to develop inhibitors of genes relating to virulence or pathogenesis. Although the deployment of antisense nucleotides as antimicrobial agents is theoretically appealing, to date, it has not been possible to develop any of these agents for clinical use.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1998

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Enterococci, a part of normal gut flora, are not particularly pathogenic organisms in humans. For example, they do not cause respiratory tract infections. The most frequent enterococcal infections are urinary tract infections. Despite their lack of pathogenicity, enterococci have emerged as significant nosocomial pathogens in the United States and elsewhere. Enterococci are formidable pathogens because of their resistance to antimicrobial agents. Enterococci are intrinsically resistant to beta-lactam agents and aminoglycosides and were the first bacteria to acquire vancomycin resistance. Infection control measures have been far from effective at preventing the dissemination of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in the hospital. Therapy for infections due to vancomycin-resistant enterococci presents real challenges. Most isolates remain susceptible to nitrofurantoin, but this agent is useful only for urinary tract infections. The greatest threat posed by vancomycin-resistant enterococci is the potential to transfer their resistance genes to more pathogenic gram-positive bacteria, which could produce truly frightening pathogens.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1998

Problems with antimicrobial resistance in gram-positive cocci.

The development of antimicrobial resistance has almost invariably accompanied the therapeutic use of antimicrobial agents. Newer antimicrobials have succeeded partly but not entirely in overcoming the problem of resistance. Antimicrobial resistance in gram-positive cocci has achieved its greatest prominence in the past 15 years. There has been a steady erosion of antimicrobial activity against gram-positive cocci. The presentations in this symposium dealt with some of the important problems of antimicrobial resistance in gram-positive cocci, including methicillin resistance and multidrug resistance in staphylococci, penicillin resistance in pneumococci, and vancomycin resistance in enterococci. A related problem that warrants attention is the potential for explosive development of macrolide resistance in gram-positive cocci. This potential is particularly pertinent because the popularity of a number of new macrolides has led to a striking increase in their use. This occurrence will almost certainly be accompanied by a generalized increase in resistance in gram-positive cocci.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1998

In-vitro activity of the new ketolide antibiotic HMR 3647 against gram-positive bacteria.

The comparative in-vitro activity of HMR 3647, a new ketolide antibiotic, was investigated against 492 clinical isolates of gram-positive bacteria, including multiply resistant strains, by an agar-dilution technique. All streptococci tested were inhibited by the new ketolide at concentrations < or = 0.5 mg/L. HMR 3647 was more potent than erythromycin against staphylococci. For enterococci the new compound yielded an MIC90 of 8 mg/L. Erysipelothrix spp., Pediococcus spp., Leuconostoc spp., Lactobacillus spp., JK diphtheroids and Listeria monocytogenes were also susceptible to the new ketolide.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1998

Characterization of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates from the United States and their susceptibility in vitro to dalfopristin-quinupristin.

In the course of clinical studies with the investigational streptogramin antimicrobial dalfopristin-quinupristin, isolates of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium were referred to our laboratory from across the United States. Seventy-two percent of the strains were of the VanA type, phenotypically and genotypically, while 28% were of the VanB type. High-level resistance to streptomycin or gentamicin was observed in 86 and 81%, respectively, of the VanA strains but in only 69 and 66%, respectively, of the VanB strains. These enterococci were resistant to ampicillin (MIC for 50% of the isolates tested [MIC50] and MIC90, 128 and 256 microg/ml, respectively) and to the other approved agents tested, with the exception of chloramphenicol (MIC90, 8 microg/ml) and novobiocin (MIC90, 1 microg/ml). Considering all of the isolates submitted, dalfopristin-quinupristin inhibited 86.4% of them at concentrations of < or = 1 microg/ml and 95.1% of them at < or = 2 microg/ml. However, for the data set comprised of only the first isolate submitted for each patient, 94.3% of the strains were inhibited at concentrations of < or = 1 microg/ml and 98.9% were inhibited at concentrations of < or = 2 microg/ml. Multiple drug resistance was very common among these isolates of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium, while dalfopristin-quinupristin inhibited the majority at concentrations that are likely to be clinically relevant.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1998

Susceptibilities of Legionella spp. to newer antimicrobials in vitro.

The in vitro activities of 13 antimicrobial agents against 30 strains of Legionella spp. were determined. Rifapentine, rifampin, and clarithromycin were the most potent agents (MICs at which 90% of isolates are inhibited [MIC90s], < or = 0.008 microgram/ml). The ketolide HMR 3647 and the fluoroquinolones levofloxacin and BAY 12-8039 (MIC90s, 0.03 to 0.06 microgram/ml) were more active than erythromycin A or roxithromycin. The MIC90s of dalfopristin-quinupristin and linezolid were 0.5 and 8 micrograms/ml, respectively. Based on class characteristics and in vitro activities, several of these agents may have potential roles in the treatment of Legionella infections.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗