Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R C Landis

Publications and source records attributed to R C Landis.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Aprotinin and the protease-activated receptor 1 thrombin receptor: antithrombosis, inflammation, and stroke reduction.

Cardiopulmonary bypass, although remaining an indispensable asset in cardiac surgery, especially in more complex and repeat operations, is associated with significant thrombin generation in the bypass circuit, leading to the activation of platelets, the coagulation system, an inflammatory response, and perioperative stroke. Recent clinical studies and meta-analyses of clinical trials in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery have confirmed that aprotinin not only reduces transfusion requirements in cardiac surgery but also confers significant protection against platelet dysfunction, activation of the systemic inflammatory response, and perioperative stroke when administered at the full (or "Hammersmith") dose. This article reviews research from several independent groups to propose a novel mechanism through which the antithrombotic, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective mechanism might be mediated, via protection of the high-affinity thrombin receptor protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1).

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Clinical inhibition of the seven-transmembrane thrombin receptor (PAR1) by intravenous aprotinin during cardiothoracic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR1) is the principal thrombin receptor in the vasculature, and antagonists against this receptor are in preclinical trials. Aprotinin, already approved for clinical use to reduce transfusion requirements in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery, has been shown to inhibit PAR1 activation in vitro. Here, we exploit CPB as a model for thrombin generation in humans to examine whether aprotinin can inhibit platelet PAR1 activation clinically. METHODS AND RESULTS: PAR1 expression and function on platelets was examined in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients randomized into 2 groups: (1) those receiving saline infusion during CPB (n=17) and (2) those receiving aprotinin (2x10(6) kallikrein inhibitor units [KIU] in pump prime, 2x10(6) KIU loading dose, followed by 0.5x10(6) KIU/h [n=13]). Platelets in the saline group showed loss of PAR1-specific function at 2 hours after CPB, but this was preserved in the aprotinin group (P<0.001). These effects were most likely targeted at PAR1 receptor cleavage, because (1) the level of thrombin generated during CPB did not vary significantly between groups, (2) expression of SPAN12, which detects only uncleaved PAR1 receptors, was preserved in the aprotinin but not the placebo group (P<0.05), and (3) supporting evidence in vitro showed reduced thrombin-induced PAR1 cleavage (P<0.001) and platelet aggregation (P<0.001) in the presence of aprotinin. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that platelet PAR1 activation by thrombin can be inhibited by aprotinin. Our results extend the clinical mechanism of action of aprotinin and provide the first proof of principle that PAR1 can be inhibited clinically. This has implications beyond cardiac surgery for the development of therapeutic PAR1 blockade.

Aprotinin↗
PubMed2004

Distinct yet complementary mechanisms of heparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors on platelet activation and aggregation: implications for restenosis during percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of unfractionated heparin (UFH) versus low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in combination with glycoprotein (Gp) IIb/IIIa blockers on platelet activation and aggregation. METHODS: Washed platelets were stimulated with thrombin in the presence or absence of UFH (monoparin), LMWH (enoxaparin), and a Gp IIb/IIIa blocker (abciximab, eptifibatide, or tirofiban). RESULTS: Although Gp IIb/IIIa antagonists blocked the final common pathway of thrombin induced platelet aggregation, UFH and LMWH were better at blocking upstream platelet activation. UFH was significantly more effective than LMWH at inhibiting P selectin expression (p = 0.001) and platelet derived growth factor release from thrombin activated platelets (p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: UFH and LMWH exert complementary effects to Gp IIb/IIIa blockers by inhibiting afferent pathways of platelet activation. Coadministration of heparin with Gp IIb/IIIa blockers provides improved protection against persistent platelet activation, thereby improving outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention. Judging from these data, UFH may be more effective in this regard than LMWH, at least in vitro. The use of LMWH in preference to UFH during percutaneous coronary intervention, although initially attractive, may inadequately protect against platelet activation despite the presence of Gp IIb/IIIa blockers.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2003

Hemoglobin scavenger receptor CD163 mediates interleukin-10 release and heme oxygenase-1 synthesis: antiinflammatory monocyte-macrophage responses in vitro, in resolving skin blisters in vivo, and after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

The recently described hemoglobin scavenger receptor CD163 mediates the endocytosis of hemoglobin:haptoglobin (Hb:Hp) complexes and thereby counters Hb-induced oxidative tissue damage after hemolysis. Although CD163 has been indirectly associated with antiinflammatory and atheroprotective activity, no ligand-receptor-effector pathway has yet been described for this receptor. To understand the significance of CD163 and more clearly define downstream pathways linked to inflammatory resolution, we studied the expression and function of CD163 in human monocytes/macrophages using both in vitro and in vivo models. Differentiation of human blood monocytes into macrophages either by in vitro culture or in resolving cantharidin-induced skin blisters led to an equivalent increase (>15x) in CD163 expression. Elevated CD163 levels were also noted on circulating monocytes in cardiac surgical patients during the resolution phase of the systemic inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. In each case, binding of Hb:Hp to CD163-bearing cells elicited potent interleukin-10 secretion, and this was inhibited by the anti-CD163 antibody RM3/1. Release of interleukin-10, in turn, induced heme oxygenase-1 stress protein synthesis via an autocrine mechanism. Such induction of heme oxygenase-1 was observed in vivo 24 to 48 hours after the onset of cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. These results identify novel antiinflammatory and cytoprotective effector pathways in human monocytes/macrophages related to Hb scavenging and metabolism, which may have relevance in atheroprotection, wound healing, and patient recovery postoperatively.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Pathogenesis of crystal-induced inflammation.

Crystals are an important cause of inflammatory rheumatic diseases and provide relatively simple paradigms for modelling inflammatory responses in general. Thus, in the case of gout, we know that hyperuricemia leads to precipitation of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals in joints, which are taken up by leukocytes, and then an acute attack of arthritis is triggered. However, fundamental questions remain unanswered. Why are only certain hyperuricemic individuals, and then only certain joints, affected? What factors maintain joints in a quiescent state, what prompts the resolution of an inflammatory attack, and are these related? This article draws on developments during the past year to support the idea that the mononuclear phagocyte may play a key role within the synovial compartment, tipping the balance from the asymptomatic state to acute inflammation, or vice versa, depending on their state of monocyte to macrophage differentiation.

Arthritis↗
PubMed2001

The antithrombotic and antiinflammatory mechanisms of action of aprotinin.

Aprotinin (Trasylol) is generally regarded to be an effective hemostatic agent that prevents blood loss and preserves platelet function during cardiac surgery procedures requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP). However, its clinical use has been limited by the concern that such a potent hemostatic agent might be prothrombotic, particularly in relation to coronary vein graft occlusion. In this review we present a mechanism of action that challenges such a viewpoint and explains how aprotinin can be simultaneously hemostatic and antithrombotic. Aprotinin achieves these two apparently disparate properties by selectively blocking the proteolytically activated thrombin receptor on platelets, the protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1), while leaving other mechanisms of platelet aggregation unaffected. We also review recent research leading to the discovery of novel antiinflammatory targets for aprotinin. A better understanding of its mechanisms of action has led to the conclusion that aprotinin is a remarkable drug with the capacity to correct many of the imbalances that develop in the coagulation system and the inflammatory system after CPB. Nonetheless, it has been clinically underused for fear of causing thrombotic complications, a fear that in light of recent evidence may be unfounded.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

New antiinflammatory and platelet-preserving effects of aprotinin.

The clinical benefit of aprotinin with respect to improved hemostasis, platelet function, and inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery has been well documented, but these benefits have been overshadowed by the concern that such a potently hemostatic agent might also be prothrombotic. In this article, we discuss recent advances in the understanding of the basic mechanism of aprotinin that have led to the identification of new antiinflammatory targets and the discovery that aprotinin is, in fact, antithrombotic with respect to platelets. Its antithrombotic action is mediated by the selective blocking of the major thrombin receptor, the protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1), but not other receptors of platelet activation (ie, collagen, adenosine diphosphate [ADP], or epinephrine receptors). The selective targeting of PAR1 enables aprotinin to protect platelets from unwanted activation by thrombin generated during CPB surgery (consistent with a role in platelet-preservation), while permitting the participation of platelets in the formation of hemostatic plugs at wound and suture sites, where collagen, ADP, and epinephrine are most likely to be expressed. Aprotinin therefore exerts a subtle hemostatic yet antithrombotic mechanism of action, which, when allied with its multitiered antiinflammatory effect, makes this drug a valuable companion to cardiac surgery.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗
PubMed2001

Effect of aprotinin on endothelial cell activation.

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary bypass surgery is often accompanied by a systemic inflammatory response, which can lead to postoperative complications in high-risk patients. This is mediated in part through a systemic rise in inflammatory cytokine levels and the sequestration of leukocytes within organs. Aprotinin has previously been shown to exert an anti-inflammatory effect by preventing the capacity of leukocytes to transmigrate through vascular endothelium. Here we have focused on whether aprotinin has an effect on endothelial cell activation and adhesion molecule expression in response to tumor necrosis factor-alpha, particularly with reference to whether aprotinin inhibits tumor necrosis factor-stimulated neutrophil transendothelial migration. METHODS AND RESULTS: Intercellular adhesion molecule-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, and E-selectin expression was studied in tumor necrosis factor-alpha-activated human umbilical vein endothelial cells in the presence of aprotinin at 200, 800, and 1600 kIU/mL. Aprotinin inhibited tumor necrosis factor-alpha-stimulated expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (P =.019 at 1600 kIU/mL) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (P =.003 at 1600 kIU/mL) but not E-selectin. Similar results were obtained in the dermal microvascular endothelial cell line, HMEC-1, which exhibited diminished intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression in the presence of aprotinin (P =.040 at 800 kIU/mL and P <.001 at 1600 kIU/mL). Aprotinin also significantly inhibited neutrophil transmigration across tumor necrosis factor-alpha-activated human umbilical vein endothelial cells (P =.046 at 1600 kIU/mL). CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that aprotinin inhibits intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, but not E-selectin, expression on tumor necrosis factor-alpha-activated endothelial cells and that transendothelial migration by neutrophils is also specifically suppressed under these conditions. Our results indicate that endothelial cells can be specifically targeted by aprotinin, therefore adding to our understanding of the anti-inflammatory mechanism of action of aprotinin during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Aprotinin↗
PubMed2001

Aprotinin: is it prothrombotic?

Controversy continues as to whether aprotinin (Trasylol) is prothrombotic. The recent discovery of the thrombin receptor family, known as the protease-activated receptor family (PAR) has been essential in aiding our understanding of the mechanism of action of aprotinin. Our results show that aprotinin has no effect on platelet aggregation induced by adrenaline, adenosine diphosphate, phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate, collagen or PAR 1 agonist peptide. However, aprotinin inhibits thrombin-induced platelet activation as assessed by macroaggregation, microaggregation and platelet membrane calcium flux. Aprotinin inhibits proteolytic activation of platelets, but platelets can still be activated by non-proteolytic mechanisms.

Adenosine Diphosphate↗
PubMed2001

Effect of aprotinin (trasylol) on the inflammatory and thrombotic complications of conventional cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

Before the discovery of its hemostatic properties, aprotinin was thought of as a potential anti-inflammatory agent. Its clinical introduction in 1987 to prevent blood loss during cardiac surgery [Royston 1987, van Oeveren 1987] led to its anti-inflammatory benefits being largely overlooked in favor of a vigorous debate centering on whether aprotinin may be pro-thrombotic when given to patients. In this article, we summarize evidence for the anti-inflammatory activity of aprotinin and discuss our recent contributions in this area. We also summarize the state of the thrombosis debate and discuss our recent evidence from purified platelets which shows that aprotinin is simultaneously hemostatic yet anti-thrombotic.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Cloning of porcine intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and characterization of its induction on endothelial cells by cytokines.

BACKGROUND: The transplantation of pig organs into humans requires a detailed knowledge of similarities and differences between the two species in the molecular physiology of host defense mechanisms. We therefore set out to identify porcine intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 and to characterize its expression by endothelial cells. METHODS: Porcine ICAM-1 cDNA was isolated from an endothelial cell cDNA library. An anti-pig ICAM-1 monoclonal antibody was generated and used to investigate the regulation by cytokines of ICAM-1 expression by porcine aortic endothelial cells (PAEC), using flow cytometry. RESULTS: We found that porcine ICAM-1 was similar in primary structure to human ICAM-1, with five Ig-like domains. COS-7 cells transfected with porcine ICAM-1 supported beta2 but not alpha4 integrin-dependent adhesion of human T lymphoblasts. There was a low-level surface expression of ICAM-1 on unstimulated PAEC and increased expression after stimulation with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha. However expression of ICAM-1 seemed to be significantly lower than that of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, both on unstimulated and TNF-alpha-activated PAEC. Recombinant porcine interferon-gamma weakly stimulated ICAM-1 expression when incubated alone with PAEC but had an inhibitory effect on the increase in ICAM-1 due to TNF-alpha, both at 8 and 24 hr. CONCLUSIONS: Our observations confirm the existence of ICAM-1 in the pig and provide novel insights into how porcine and human endothelial cells differ in terms of adhesion molecule expression and cytokine responsiveness. Such differences are potentially important in interpreting models of inflammation in the pig and also in understanding the process of rejection of porcine xenografts.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2000

TNF-alpha, IL-4, and IFN-gamma regulate differential expression of P- and E-selectin expression by porcine aortic endothelial cells.

P- and E-selectin are surface glycoproteins that mediate leukocyte rolling on the surface of endothelium in inflammation. We have cloned porcine P-selectin cDNA and generated a mAb, 12C5, with which to examine P-selectin expression by porcine aortic endothelial cells (PAEC) in comparison with that of E-selectin. Basal expression by PAEC of P-selectin was greater than that of E-selectin, whereas E-selectin expression was more prominently enhanced than that of P-selectin by stimulation with TNF-alpha or IL-1alpha. Both human or porcine IL-4 led to an increase in P-selectin expression, with kinetics that were delayed compared with those seen following stimulation with TNF-alpha or IL-1alpha, but IL-4 did not stimulate expression of E-selectin. When cells were stimulated with TNF-alpha in the presence of IL-4, we observed enhanced P-selectin expression with a parallel reduction in E-selectin expression. Finally, the increase in P-selectin expression due to human IL-4 was reduced in the presence of porcine but not human IFN-gamma. These observations show that E-selectin and P-selectin expression are differentially regulated in PAEC, and that IL-4 leads to a shift in the relative surface density of the two molecules toward P-selectin. The ability of porcine IFN-gamma to inhibit IL-4-induced P-selectin expression suggests that the balance between Th1 and Th2 cytokine production may determine the relative densities of the two selectins in chronic immune-mediated inflammation. Because the increased expression of P-selectin induced by human IL-4 was not inhibited by human IFN-gamma, this balance may be shifted toward P-selectin expression in porcine xenografts infiltrated by human lymphocytes.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2000

Noninflammatory phagocytosis of monosodium urate monohydrate crystals by mouse macrophages. Implications for the control of joint inflammation in gout.

OBJECTIVE: We have hypothesized that the process of monocyte to macrophage differentiation may alter the inflammatory response of mononuclear phagocytes to the uptake of monosodium urate monohydrate (MSU) crystals. METHODS: Eight mouse monocyte/macrophage cell lines were arranged in increasing order of differentiation, as judged by expression of the macrophage markers F4/80 and BM 8 and by phagocytic capacity. Secretion of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) in response to MSU was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: The panel of monocyte/macrophage cell lines revealed a close linkage between the state of differentiation and the capacity of the cells to ingest MSU crystals. TNFalpha production, however, was not linked to phagocytic ability. Peak TNFalpha levels were synthesized by cells at an intermediate state of differentiation (3.2-14.1 ng/ml), whereas mature macrophages, which efficiently phagocytosed crystals, did not secrete TNFalpha. Mature cell lines produced TNFalpha when stimulated with zymosan (5.9-6.2 ng/ml), but this was abolished by coincubation with MSU crystals. Suppression of the zymosan response was not due to apoptosis or steric hindrance by MSU crystals. Culture supernatants from mature macrophages did not stimulate endothelial cell activation, in contrast to MSU-treated cells at an earlier stage of differentiation, which stimulated intercellular adhesion molecule 1 expression on sEND endothelioma cells through the release of TNFalpha (inhibited 80.6% by anti-TNFa). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that phagocytosis and TNFalpha production are distinct events in the response of mononuclear phagocytes to urate crystals, and these events can be distinguished at the level of macrophage differentiation. The noninflammatory removal of urate crystals by mature macrophages defines a new pathway that may be important in controlling the development of acute gout in patients with hyperuricemia.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Leukocyte integrin expression in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass.

BACKGROUND: The recruitment of leukocytes to vascular endothelium is controlled by adhesion events mediated through the beta2 integrins, whereas the response of extravasated leukocytes within the tissues is controlled through the beta1 integrins. Although cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has been shown to be associated with a systemic inflammatory response and elevated levels of beta2 integrins on leukocytes, its effect on the beta1 integrins is not known. This study investigated the effect of the protease inhibitor aprotinin on the expression of the beta1 and beta2 integrins on circulating leukocytes in patients undergoing CPB. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary elective coronary artery bypass grafting were randomized into full-dose aprotinin or placebo groups. Blood samples were obtained at nine time points preoperatively, intraoperatively, and up to 6 days postoperatively. The surface expression of the beta1 integrins VLA-1, -3, -4, -5, and -6 and of the beta2 integrins CD11a/CD18, CD11b/CD18, and CD11c/CD18 was measured by flow cytometry on gated neutrophil and monocyte subpopulations in whole blood. RESULTS: Expression of the beta1 integrins was not significantly altered during the study period and, therefore, aprotinin had no effect on the expression of these molecules. Of the beta2 integrins, CD11b/CD18 expression was significantly increased on neutrophils at 15 minutes after onset of CPB in the placebo group (p < 0.01) but not in the aprotinin group. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that expression of the beta1 integrins on neutrophils and monocytes did not alter during the first 6 days after CPB. Expression of the beta2 integrin CD11b/CD18 increased significantly on neutrophils during CPB in control patients but not in patients treated with full-dose aprotinin.

Aprotinin↗
PubMed2000

An anti-inflammatory property of aprotinin detected at the level of leukocyte extravasation.

BACKGROUND: Aprotinin is a serine protease inhibitor used extensively in cardiac operations to reduce postoperative bleeding. It has also been used in trials aimed at reducing the systemic inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. It remains unclear whether the anti-inflammatory action of aprotinin is related to its general ability to suppress leukocyte activation or whether aprotinin can exercise effects during the leukocyte-endothelial cell adhesion cascade. METHODS: We used intravital microscopy to study the 3 main stages of the adhesion cascade (leukocyte rolling, firm adhesion, and extravasation) within the mesenteric microcirculation of rats. This in vivo technique allows leukocyte recruitment to be viewed directly through the transparent mesentery of anesthetized animals. RESULTS: Aprotinin, given by continuous infusion at a clinically relevant dose, exerted no effect on the rolling or firm adhesion responses toward local chemoattractant N -formyl-methyl-leucyl-phenylalanine but significantly inhibited extravasation of leukocytes (73% at 40 minutes, P =.04) into surrounding tissues. In parallel in vitro experiments, aprotinin (used at 200, 800, and 1600 kIU/mL) dose dependently inhibited neutrophil transmigration through cultured endothelial cells in response to 3 different chemoattractants: N -formyl-methyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (P <.001 at 800 and 1600 kIU/mL), interleukin 8 (P <.05 at 200 kIU/mL and P <.001 at 800 and 1600 kIU/mL), and platelet-activating factor (P <.05 at 1600 kIU/mL). CONCLUSIONS: Our studies have therefore revealed a novel anti-inflammatory mechanism of aprotinin operating at the level of leukocyte extravasation. These findings may be relevant in the prevention of systemic inflammation after cardiopulmonary bypass through the use of protease inhibitors.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2000

The antithrombotic effect of aprotinin: actions mediated via the proteaseactivated receptor 1.

BACKGROUND: Despite aprotinin being in widespread clinical use to prevent bleeding during cardiac surgery, there remains concern that such a powerful hemostatic agent may also be prothrombotic, particularly in relation to coronary vein graft occlusion. The major thrombin receptor on platelets, protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) requires proteolytic cleavage to transmit activating signals. Here we have investigated the effect of aprotinin on thrombin-induced PAR1 activation of platelets. METHODS AND RESULTS: Proteolysis-dependent and -independent responses of washed platelets were studied in vitro. Platelet aggregation induced by trypsin was dependent on PAR1 (inhibited by the PAR1-specific antagonist peptide, FLLRN) and was completely blocked by aprotinin at doses more than 100 KIU/mL. Aggregation in response to thrombin, 1 nmol/L, was predominantly mediated through PAR1 and was inhibited 42.6% to 86.6% (P <.05-.001) by pharmacologic doses of aprotinin (50-160 KIU/mL). Aprotinin did not inhibit the nonproteolytic agonists collagen, epinephrine, adenosine diphosphate, or phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate. Furthermore, blockade of the thrombin response by aprotinin did not prevent subsequent platelet aggregation through collagen or epinephrine. Experiments with intraplatelet Ca(2+) fluxes, which provided an earlier measure of platelet activation, placed the effect of aprotinin proximal to the PAR1 activation event. Since aprotinin did not inhibit platelet responses to the nonproteolytic PAR1 agonist peptide, SFLLRN, this implied that aprotinin acted by preventing PAR1 receptor cleavage by thrombin. CONCLUSIONS: Aprotinin inhibits thrombin-induced platelet activation by preventing proteolysis of the PAR1 receptor. These findings argue against aprotinin being prothrombotic and suggest instead that aprotinin may have significant antithrombotic effects.

Analysis of Variance↗