Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R C Goris

Publications and source records attributed to R C Goris.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1989

Substance P immunoreactivity in the vagal nerve of mice.

After horseradish peroxidase was applied to the main trunk of the mouse vagal nerve, anterogradely labeled cells in the vagal ganglia and fibers in the solitary complex, and retrogradely labeled cells in the dorsal motor nucleus and the ambiguous nucleus were observed. Most of the cells in the nodose ganglion were labeled, but only a few cells in the jugular ganglion were labeled. Heavily labeled nerve terminals and fibers were found in 3 areas in the solitary nucleus: i.e., the lateral half of the medial nucleus, the ventrolateral nucleus, and the commissural nucleus. There was only weak labeling in the dorsolateral nucleus, ventral nucleus, and intermediate nucleus. Substance P immunoreactive neurons in the vagal ganglia were found in the jugular ganglion and the dorsal part of the nodose ganglion, but not in the ventral part of the nodose ganglion. Substance P immunoreactivity in the solitary nucleus was moderate in the commissural nucleus and the intermediate nucleus, but was lacking or very weak in the lateral half of the medial nucleus, ventral nucleus, dorsolateral nucleus, and ventrolateral nucleus. We conclude that most substance P containing fibers in the main trunk of the vagal nerve project centrally to the commissural nucleus and peripherally to some of the thoracic viscera.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Somatotopic organization of the primary sensory trigeminal neurons in the hagfish, Eptatretus burgeri.

Primary sensory trigeminal projections were investigated in the hagfish following application of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) to the sensory branches. In our control preparations we were able to distinguish five sensory ganglia and their respective nerves. HRP application confirmed the almost exclusive relation of each of these nerves to their respective ganglia, with very little overlap. In normal frontal sections of the medulla oblongata, five columns of fibers surrounded by neuronal cell bodies could be clearly distinguished, but the number is probably fortuitous, for there was no one-on-one relationship with the five trigeminal ganglia. From their peripheral connections, we surmised that columns 1 and 3 handle general cutaneous sensation, columns 2, 4, and 5 handle taste sensation, and column 5 handles general mucous cutaneous sensation conveyed by utricular ganglion cells. Dorsally located columns received projections from nerves with dorsal peripheral connections, and more ventrally located columns received projections from nerves with ventral peripheral connections. This relation is the reverse of that seen in other vertebrates.

Afferent Pathways↗
PubMed1988

Substance P-like immunoreactivity in the trigeminal sensory nuclei of an infrared-sensitive snake, Agkistrodon blomhoffi.

With the peroxidase-antiperoxidase immunohistochemical method we ascertained the presence of substance P-like immunoreactivity (SPLI) in fibers and cell bodies of the trigeminal sensory system of the pit viper, Agkistrodon blomhoffi. There are a few SPLI fibers each in the principal sensory nucleus and the main neuropil of the lateral descending nucleus (i.e., the infrared sensory nucleus); a moderate number in the descending nucleus; and a large number in the caudal subnucleus, the medial edges of the interpolar subnucleus, and the marginal neuropil of the lateral descending nucleus. About 30% of the cell bodies in the ophthalmic and maxillo-mandibular ganglia show SPLI, and of the two craniocervical ganglia, the proximal ganglion has many more cells with SPLI than the distal ganglion. The SPLI distribution in the common trigeminal sensory system is similar to that of mammals, and suggests that the function of this system is also similar. In the infrared that the function of this system is also similar. In the infrared sensory system, the differing distribution in the main and marginal neuropils suggests separate functions for these two structures in the system.

Afferent Pathways↗
PubMed1988

Giant lateral-line afferent terminals in the electroreceptive dorsal nucleus of lampreys.

In HRP studies of the lateral line nerve in lampreys, the dorsal nucleus of the area octavolateralis received projections mainly from the recurrent branch of the anterior lateral line nerve. Furthermore, the recurrent branch projected exclusively to the dorsal nucleus. Besides the common type (1-3 micron) of nerve terminals, a hitherto unreported type of giant (10-30 micron) nerve terminal was found aggregated at the rostral and caudal ends of the nucleus. Since the dorsal nucleus mediates electroreception in lampreys, we conclude that the giant terminals are very probably the terminals of the electroreceptive primary fibers.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Substance P-like immunoreactivity in the central retinal artery of the rabbit.

Substance P-like immunoreactive nerve fibers were identified in the central retinal artery of the rabbit using the peroxidase-antiperoxidase method. The fibers were seen to encircle the central retinal artery throughout its course in the main trunk of the optic nerve. No labeled fibers were seen in the central retinal vein or in the retinal blood vessels. It appears, therefore, that the central retinal artery and the retinal blood vessels are innervated by different nerve systems: the central retinal artery by one of the peripheral nerves, and the retinal vessels by the central nervous system.

Animals↗
PubMed1987

Organization of sensory and motor nuclei of the trigeminal nerve in lampreys.

Anterograde and retrograde HRP transport were used to elucidate the primary central projections of the trigeminal nerve in a lamprey, Lampetra japonica, by application to the ophthalmic, apical, basilar, suborbital, and mandibular branches of the trigeminal nerve. (1) Most of the trigeminal and a few facial ganglion cells were labeled. The ganglion cells of each nerve were distributed in separate areas within their respective ganglia. (2) Some ipsilateral medullary and spinal dorsal cells were labeled after HRP application to the ophthalmic and apical nerves, but there was no contralateral labeling. (3) Most of the neurons of the trigeminal motor nucleus were labeled, and when the apical or the basilar nerve was labeled, in each case a cluster of small motor neurons was found ventrolateral to the classic motor nucleus. (4) Miscellaneous neurons were found scattered along the course of the descending trigeminal tract and nucleus in all cases except after application to the mandibular branch. The shape, size, and distribution patterns of these neurons were varied, and several characteristics indicated that they were sensory in nature. (5) In the rostral part of the medulla, sensory fibers of each nerve showed restricted localization within the descending trigeminal tract and nucleus. When compared to the distribution of the same fibers in the hagfish Eptatretus burgeri, another member of the cyclostomes, the distribution pattern in the lampreys studied was closer to the type seen in gnathostomes.

Animals↗
PubMed1987

Primary neurons of the lateral line nerves and their central projections in hagfishes.

The hagfish lateral line system was studied by horseradish peroxidase transganglionic transport. The anterior lateral line nerve innervates the group of lateral line canals situated anteriorly to the eye, and the posterior lateral line nerve innervates the group of canals situated posteriorly to the eye. Although both nerves pass through the muscle fascia at the same point, each runs a different course to the brain. The anterior lateral line nerve runs near the trigeminal nerve and its ganglion is closely attached to the trigeminal ganglion, but both systems are completely independent. The posterior lateral line nerve runs independently of any other cranial nerve and makes a peculiar U-turn at the point of entry to the brain capsule. The anterior lateral line ganglion contains both cutaneous sensory cells (small to large cells) and lateral line sensory cells (small cells); from this ganglion projections run to both the trigeminal sensory nucleus (fine and thick fibers) and medial nucleus of the area acousticolateralis (fine fibers). The posterior lateral line ganglion contains only small lateral line cells that project fine fibers to the medial nucleus of the area acousticolateralis. There are no efferent components in this lateral line system, and its only afferent terminal field is the medial nucleus of the area acousticolateralis.

Afferent Pathways↗
PubMed1987

Chemoarchitectonics of the brainstem in infrared sensitive and nonsensitive snakes.

The crotaline snake Agkistrodon possesses infrared receptors, whereas the colubrid Elaphe quadrivirgata does not. We compared the histochemical activity of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), monoamine oxidase (MAO), and acetylcholinesterase (AChE) in the brainstem of these 2 species, by the method of Nachlas et al. (1957), Glenner et al. (1957), and Koelle and Friedenwald (1949), respectively, and made the following observations. Visual system: The tectum opticum (TO) exhibited strong or moderate AChE and SDH activity in areas receiving retinal projections, i.e. the str. zonale (sz), str. fibrosum et griseum superficiale (sfgs), and narrow areas between small tight fasciculi of the tr. opticus. The sfgs was divided into 2 sublayers, a superficial and a deep, by the intensity of AChE activity. The deep sublayer of the sfgs and sfc of Agkistrodon were stained more strongly than other layers. Numerous fibers within the TO showed MAO activity. The entire sfgs of Agkistrodon was thinner than in Elaphe. The nucl. posterodorsalis showed moderate AChE, and weak SDH and MAO activity in Agkistrodon, but lack of AChE, weak SDH, and moderate MAO activity in Elaphe. Infrared system: This system was present only in Agkistrodon. The nucl. of the lateral descending trigeminal tract (dlV) and the nucl. reticularis caloris (rc) showed to moderate SDH activity in the main neuropil and/or perikarya. These nuclei were not conspicuous in AChE preparations. The marginal neuropil of the dlV had weak SDH, and moderate AChE and MAO activity. Common sensory trigeminal system: Moderate activity of the 3 enzymes was seen in the nucl. tr. descendens n. trigemini (dl). In the dorsomedial part of the nucl. interpolaris, the round limited portion was stained strongly for SDH and AChE. Cells of the nucl. tr. mesencephalicus n. trigemini showed strong SDH and AChE activity. Other regions: In Elaphe, there was strong to moderate AChE and SDH activity in the nucl. of the fasciculus longitudinalis medialis, nucl. centralis superior, raphe nuclei, and reticular nuclei, but only weak activity in Agkistrodon. We also found the following similarities in the 2 species. Strong to moderate AChE and SDH activity was observed in the motor nuclei of the cranial nerves, pretectal nuclei excepting the nucl. posterodorsalis, nucl. opticus basalis, and nucl. posterolateralis tegmentalis. Strong to moderate activity of the 3 enzymes together was detected in the nucl. interpeduncularis as found in other animals previously studied, and in the nucl. commissurae cornae dorsalis, nucl. cochlearis angularis, and the molecular and granular layer of the cerebellum.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Acetylcholinesterase↗
PubMed1986

Organization of the trigeminal and facial motor nuclei in the hagfish, Eptatretus burgeri: a retrograde HRP study.

We studied the trigeminal and facial motor nuclei of the hagfish by the retrograde HRP method. We distinguished 4 components in a single column of the motor nuclei of the trigeminal nerve and the facial nerve, viz., the pars magnocellularis of the trigeminal motor nucleus (mVm), the anterior part of the pars parvocellularis of the trigeminal motor nucleus (mVp1), the posterior part of the pars parvocellularis of the trigeminal motor nucleus (mVp2) and the facial motor nucleus (mVII). Although in Nissl preparations only the mVm could be distinguished from the rest of the nucleus, the boundaries of the other 3 components were clearly demarcated in HRP preparations. Intramuscular injections into two representative antagonistic jaw muscles revealed that there was no apparent topological organization of the neurons pertaining to the opening and closing muscles in the mVm and mVp1, but both antagonistic muscles were innervated bilaterally. Although the hagfish does possess a cartilaginous jaw, the organization pattern of the motor nuclei of the jaw muscles seems to be the most primitive of all living vertebrates.

Animals↗
PubMed1985

Primary sensory ganglion cells projecting to the principal trigeminal nucleus in the mallard, Anas platyrhynchos.

The trigeminal and glossopharyngeal ganglia of the adult mallard were studied following HRP injections into the principal trigeminal nucleus (PrV). The PrV consists of the principal trigeminal nucleus proper (prV) and the principal glossopharyngeal nucleus (prIX). After an injection into the prV, the labeled cells were found in the ipsilateral trigeminal ganglion. After an injection into the prIX, labeled cells were found in the ipsilateral distal glossopharyngeal ganglion, but not in the proximal ganglion of the IX and X cranial nerve (pGIX + X). In Nissl preparations, two types of ganglion cells in the trigeminal ganglion, pGIX + X, and distal ganglion of N IX could be distinguished: larger light cells and smaller dark cells. We could not determine whether the HRP-labeled cells belonged to both types or to one of them; but because all the labeled cells were over 20 microns, we concluded that the smallest cells (10-19 microns) in the trigeminal ganglion and distal ganglion of N IX did not project to the PrV. The labeling of the cells in the distal ganglion of N IX (average 34.5 microns) was uniformly moderate. In the trigeminal ganglion there were two types of labeled cells: heavily labeled cells (average 29.1 microns) and moderately labeled cells (average 35.1 l microns). These two types of labeling (moderate and heavy) may reflect two types of primary sensory neurons: cells with ascending, nonbifurcating axons, and cells with bifurcating axons. We speculate that the former are proprioceptive neurons and the latter tactile neurons. Labeled bifurcating axons in the sensory trigeminal complex gave off collaterals to all parts of the descending trigeminal nucleus except to the caudalmost laminated spinal part.

Animals↗
PubMed1985

Primary vestibular projections in the hagfish, Eptatretus burgeri.

The VIIIth cranial nerve projections in the hagfish, which has only one circular canal in the ear, were studied by transganglionic HRP transport. This nerve has two branches, the nervus utricularis (N. utr.) and the nervus saccularis (N. sac.), each with its own ganglion, the ganglion utriculare (G. utr.) and the ganglion sacculare (G. sac.), respectively. Although the G. sac. has uniformly small cells, the G. utr. consists of two separate cell masses, a ventral mass of large cells and a dorsal mass of small cells. The small cells were labeled in both ganglia after horseradish peroxidase (HRP) injection into the endolymphatic space. The greater part of the terminal areas of these two branches overlapped in the ventral nucleus of the area acoustico-lateralis, but the terminals of the N. sac. extended slightly further in a caudal direction. No projections to the primordial cerebellum and no retrogradely labeled cells in the brain were found. The large cells in the ventral part of the G. utr. seem to be general cutaneous neurons, and the dorsal part of the area acousticolateralis seems to receive lateral line input.

Animals↗
PubMed1984

Vagal afferent C fibers projecting to the lateral descending trigeminal complex of crotaline snakes.

The primary vagal axons and terminals in the lateral descending trigeminal complex (dlv-DLV complex) in crotaline snakes were studied following HRP injections into the vagal nerve. Labeled fibers and terminals were found in the marginal neuropil, which was made up entirely of unmyelinated fibers, i.e., C fibers. The general features of vagal input to the dlv-DLV complex in snakes with infrared sensitivity (Boidae and Crotalinae) are discussed.

Afferent Pathways↗
PubMed1983

Static response of infrared neurons of crotaline snakes--normal distribution of interspike intervals.

Background discharges (static responses) of warm fibers in the pit organs (infrared receptive organs) of two species of crotaline snakes were recorded at various temperatures (water, 18-33 degrees C; air, 19-28 degrees C). Mean interspike intervals (means), standard deviations (SD), and coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated, and the goodness of fit of interspike interval histograms to a corresponding normal distribution (i.e., one having the same mean and SD) were tested. Means, SD, and CV were smallest at a certain temperature, which might be the optimum receptor temperature for the species. More than half of the histograms (22/42 for water, 7/10 for air) showed a normal distribution at a significance level of 0.01. This suggests that the spike intervals generated at the spike initiation site are constant, with some random error. Background discharges of three pure infrared secondary neurons from the lateral descending nucleus were analyzed in the same way and compared to the peripheral discharges. There were no histograms with a normal distribution in these central neurons, which might indicate that the constant interspike intervals which appear in the primary afferent fibers are not utilized for information processing at this level but occur only as part of a receptor mechanism which is still unknown. The discharge patterns of primary afferent fibers are also discussed in relation to the known discharge patterns of cold fibers in other animals.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed1982

Infrared sensory neurons in the trigeminal ganglia of crotaline snakes: transganglionic HRP transport.

Trigeminal neurons were labeled by inserting HRP into holes cut in the pit receptor membranes of a crotaline snake, Agkistrodon blomhoffi brevicaudus. Neurons were labeled in the ophthalmic ganglion and the maxillary division of the maxillo-mandibular ganglion, and the HRP was further transported across the ganglia and through the lateral descending trigeminal tract (dlv) to label axon terminals exclusively in the dlv nucleus (DLV). In 6 successful preparations, 7.1-19.3% of totals of 5568-5986 cells in the maxillary division of the ganglion were labeled, but none at all were labeled in the mandibular division. Only a few or none at all were labeled in the ophthalmic ganglion. Cells in the two ganglia ranged in size from 10 to 55 micrometers, but large cells (greater than or equal to 40 micrometers) were scarce (4.9% of the total population). All HRP-labeled neurons fell in the median range of 20-39 micrometers. We concluded that these ganglion cells were infrared neurons, and were therefore the origin of the A delta fibers in the pit membrane. There were no HRP-labeled neurons above or below this range, in spite of the fact that smaller cells (less than or equal to 19 micrometers) made up 35.8% of the total population. In normal Nissl preparations we found both light- and dark-staining cells, but the size range of neither corresponded to the size range of infrared neurons.

Animals↗
PubMed1981

Python pit organs analyzed as warm receptors.

The infrared receptor neurons of Python reticulatus pit organs were all found to have bimodal sensitivity, responding to both infrared and touch stimuli with fairly rapid adaptation. The majority (22 of 29 neurons) had no background discharges at any temperature between 20 and 33 degrees C. The receptive areas were 150-250 micrometers in diameter and identical for both modalities. There was only one receptive area for each neuron. These facts suggest the possibility that some kinds of temperature sensitive neurons can also function as touch neurons and vice versa, not only in this species, but also in other animals.

Animals↗
PubMed1981

Crotaline pit organs analyzed as warm receptors.

Afferent impulses from single-fiber preparations of the trigeminal nerve in Agkistrodon blomhoffi brevicaudus were recorded during steady and dynamic temperature stimulation of the sensory membrane in the facial pit. The thermoreceptors of the pit showed high sensitivity to the rate of change in receptor temperature. Changing the heat capacity of the pit membrane (a drop of water in the pit in the case of the laser and halogen lamp, and a drop of water covered by a plastic film in the case of flowing water) changed the pattern of response. When the heat capacity of the pit membrane is increased, responses approach those obtained in other warm receptors. The spatial gradient theory of Williams, whereby a reversal of heat energy flow is supposed to produce a reverse of response, was shown to be inapplicable to the pit receptors. Reversal of heat energy flow in the pits produced neither off-silence nor depression of response, and therefore direction of heat flow is not an important component of the stimulus for these receptors.

Afferent Pathways↗