Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R C Donehower

Publications and source records attributed to R C Donehower.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumors.

OBJECTIVES: To assess retrospectively whether laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in patients with clinical Stage I nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumor (NSGCT) provides useful pathologic staging information on which subsequent management can be based. Approximately 30% of patients with clinical Stage I NSGCT will have pathologic Stage II disease. METHODS: A retrospective review of 29 patients with clinical Stage I NSGCT who underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic RPLND by a single surgeon was performed. Selection criteria included the presence of embryonal carcinoma in the primary tumor or vascular invasion. A modified left (n = 18) or right (n = 11) template was used. RESULTS: Positive retroperitoneal nodes were detected in 12 (41%) of 29 patients. Ten of these patients received immediate adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy, and 2 patients refused chemotherapy. The nodes were negative in 1 7 (59%) of 29 patients; all but 2 patients (one with recurrence in the chest, the other with biochemical recurrence) have undergone observation. No evidence of disease recurrence has been found in the retroperitoneum of any patient (follow-up range 1 to 65 months). Prospectively, the dissection was limited if grossly positive nodes were encountered; therefore, the total number of nodes removed was significantly different if the nodes were positive or negative (14 +/- 2 and 25 +/- 3, respectively; P <0.004). Two patients required an open conversion because of hemorrhage. Complications included lymphocele (n = 1) and flank compartment syndrome (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic RPLND is a feasible, minimally invasive surgical alternative to observation or open RPLND for Stage I NSGCT. Disease outcomes are favorable to date. Longer follow-up in a larger series is necessary to determine therapeutic efficacy.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Absorption, metabolism, and excretion of 14C-temozolomide following oral administration to patients with advanced cancer.

The purpose of this study is to characterize the absorption, metabolism, and excretion of carbon 14-labeled temozolomide (14C-TMZ) administered p.o. to adult patients with advanced solid malignancies. On day 1 of cycle 1, six patients received a single oral 200-mg dose of 14C-TMZ (70.2 microCi). Whole blood, plasma, urine, and feces were collected from days 1-8 and on day 14 of cycle 1. Total radioactivity was measured in all samples. TMZ, 5-(3-methyltriazen-1-yl)imidazole-4-carboxamide (MTIC), and 4-amino-5-imidazole-carboxamide (AIC) concentrations were determined in plasma, and urine and plasma samples were profiled for metabolite/degradation products. Maximum TMZ plasma concentrations were achieved between 0.33 to 2 h (mean, 1.2 h), and half-life, apparent volume of distribution, and oral clearance values averaged 1.9 h, 17 liters/m2, and 104 ml/min/m2, respectively. A first-order absorption, one-compartment linear model, which included first-order formation of MTIC from TMZ and elimination of MTIC via degradation to AIC, and a peripheral distribution compartment for AIC, adequately described the plasma TMZ, MTIC, and AIC concentrations. MTIC systemic clearance was estimated to be 5384 ml/min/m2, and the half-life was calculated to be 2.5 min. Metabolite profiles of plasma at 1 and 4 h after treatment showed that 14C-derived radioactivity was primarily associated with TMZ, and a smaller amount was attributed to AIC. Profiles of urine samples from 0-24 h revealed that 14C-TMZ-derived urinary radioactivity was primarily associated with unchanged drug (5.6%), AIC (12%), or 3-methyl-2,3-dihydro-4-oxoimidazo[5,1-d]tetrazine-8-carboxyl ic acid (2.3%). The recovered radioactive dose (39%) was principally eliminated in the urine (38%), and a small amount (0.8%) was excreted in the feces. TMZ exhibits rapid oral absorption and high systemic availability. The primary elimination pathway for TMZ is by pH-dependent degradation to MTIC and further degradation to AIC. Incomplete recovery of radioactivity may be explained by the incorporation of AIC into nucleic acids.

Absorption↗
PubMed1998

A phase I and pharmacologic study of DMP 840 administered by 24-hour infusion.

PURPOSE: DMP 840, a novel bisnaphthalimide, has demonstrated promising schedule dependent anti-tumor activity in vitro and in vivo against several tumor cell lines. A phase I study was conducted to evaluate the effect of a 24-hour infusion schedule repeated every three weeks, on the therapeutic efficacy of DMP 840. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with refractory solid tumor malignancies were treated with DMP 840 at doses of 20, 40, 50 and 60 mg/m2. RESULTS: A combination of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and stomatitis were dose-limiting at doses of 50 and 60 mg/m2 in both minimally- and extensively-pretreated patients. In contrast, all courses at lower dose levels were well tolerated. Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated that DMP 840 had a prolonged terminal half life (median 39 hours; range 25-86) and that dose-limiting events were significantly related to several indices of systemic DMP 840 exposure (P < 0.01, Wilcoxon Rank Sum test). CONCLUSION: The recommended dose of DMP 840 for further disease oriented evaluations is 40 mg/m2 administered over 24 hours every three weeks. The infusion duration evaluated in this study did not result in a substantial increase in the tolerable dose compared to shorter, less cumbersome schedules.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

High-dose topotecan with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in fluoropyrimidine-refractory colorectal cancer: a phase II and pharmacodynamic study.

PURPOSE: The premise for this study was that topotecan (TPT) resistance in preclinical studies is associated with low level expression of the p-glycoprotein (Pgp) multi-drug transporter conferred by the multi-drug resistant (MDR) phenotype, which might be overcome in clinical practice by administering moderately (2.3-fold) higher doses of TPT that have shown to be feasible with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. This phase II study evaluated the anti-tumor activity of TPT administered at its highest possible solid tumor dose with G-SCF in patients with fluoropyrimidine-refractory advanced colorectal carcinoma. The study also sought to identify pharmacodynamic (PD) determinants of both activity and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TPT was administered as a 30-minute infusion daily for five days every three weeks at a dose of 3.5 mg/m2/day to patients with advance colorectal carcinoma who developed progressive disease either during treatment with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for advanced disease or within six months after receiving fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy. This dose of TPT was previously determined to be the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) with G-CSF support in a phase I study involving solid tumor patients with similar risk factors for myelosuppression. Plasma sampling with performed during course 1 to characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) and PD behavior of TPT. RESULTS: Seventeen patients who received 89 courses of TPT and G-CSF were evaluable for toxicity; 16 patients were evaluable for anti-tumor response. Toxicity, particularly myelosuppression, was substantial. At the 3.5 mg/m2/day dose level, absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) were less than 500/microliters for longer than 5 days in 17% of courses involving seven of seventeen (41%) patients. Severe neutropenia associated with fever occurred in 12.3% of courses; and platelet counts below 25,000/microliters were noted in 26.9% of courses. These toxicities resulted in dose reductions in seven of 17 (41%) patients. Nevertheless, 90% of the planned total dose of TPT was administered. No major responses were observed, though minor activity was noted in several patients. Both the median time to progression and the median survival time were short--2.5 and 4 months respectively. Although interindividual variability in the disposition of total TPT was observed, the lack of objective responses precluded PD assessments related to disease activity. Total TPT exposure was significantly higher than drug exposure achieved in similar patients at an identical dose in a previous phase I study of TPT and G-CSF, which may explain why more severe myelosuppressive effects occurred in the present study. There were no PD relationships evident between relevant PK parameters and the percent decrements in platelets and ANC's during course 1, although patients with severe toxic effects (ANC below 500/microliters for more than five days and/or platelets < 25,000/microliters) had higher drug exposure than patients with less severe toxicity (P < 0.018 and P = 0.09, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, the true response rate of TPT at its solid tumor MTD with G-CSF support is unlikely to approach 20%. Although a response rate of less than 20% might be viewed as significant in this disease setting and might be confirmed with sufficient statistical certainty by treating additional patients, the substantial toxicity, inconvenience, and cost associated with this high dose TPT/G-CSF regimen does not warrant the acceptance of a lower level of anti-tumor activity as a criterion for further development.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Sequence-dependent hematological toxicity associated with the 3-hour paclitaxel/cyclophosphamide doublet.

Paclitaxel is active in metastatic breast cancer. Combination studies have demonstrated complex interactions between paclitaxel and other cytotoxic agents, including sequence-dependent cytotoxic, toxicological, and pharmacological effects. The principal objectives of this study were to determine the maximum tolerated doses of paclitaxel (3-h infusion) and cyclophosphamide (1-h infusion) administered every 3 weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (Filgrastim) and to determine if the sequence-dependent toxicological effects that have previously been observed with this combination when paclitaxel was administered over 24 h were evident when paclitaxel was administered over 3 h. Fifteen women with metastatic breast cancer were treated. Starting doses were 200 mg/m2 paclitaxel and 1600 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (5 micrograms/kg/day) given s.c. beginning 24 h after chemotherapy. Doses of both drugs were escalated in cohorts of at least four patients. The sequence of drug administration was alternated with each consecutive patient and with each subsequent course of therapy in each individual patient, enabling the evaluation of sequence-dependent toxicological and pharmacological effects. Severe myelosuppression was the principal dose-limiting toxicity for this regimen, precluding dose escalation above 200 mg/m2 paclitaxel and 1600 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, the maximum tolerated dose for this combination on this schedule. As has been previously demonstrated with this combination, when paclitaxel is administered over 24 h, the hematopoietic toxicity was sequence dependent. Paired analysis of toxicity data using each patient as her own control indicated more severe hematological toxicity in courses in which paclitaxel was administered first. There was no evidence of sequence-dependent effects on the pharmacokinetics of these drugs that might account for this phenomenon. The impact of drug sequencing on toxicity should be considered in the further development of combination therapy containing alkylating agents and paclitaxel, when the latter is administered over 3 h.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

A phase II "window" study of topotecan in untreated patients with high risk adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

To further evaluate the activity of topotecan (TPT) in acute leukemia, TPT was administered (2.1 mg/m2/day for 5 days by continuous i.v. infusion) to adult patients with previously untreated acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with high-risk features (13 patients) or relapsed ALL (1 patient). Patients achieving a partial response or significant hematological improvement received a second course. All patients subsequently received standard treatment for ALL. Because complete response was achieved in only 1 of 14 patients, the study was terminated prematurely. An additional patient achieved minimal response, and a third patient normalized her hemogram despite ongoing leukemia in the marrow. Overall, six patients had significant hematological improvement (normalization of platelet and/or absolute neutrophil count). Two patients expired due to infections during induction chemotherapy. The primary nonhematological toxicities were mucositis and diarrhea. Exposure to TPT did not appear to influence the response to subsequent standard chemotherapy. The mean steady-state TPT plasma concentration, 16.1+/-1 nM, overlapped the range of LD90 values of primary human leukemia specimens. Cellular topo I content varied over a 3-fold range, encompassing levels found previously in relapsed patients. No relationship was found between topo I expression and markers of cellular proliferation or response to therapy. In contrast, low expression of the apoptosis inhibitor Bcl-2 was associated with response to TPT therapy. TPT has significant, albeit modest, single-agent activity against high-risk adult ALL. This study demonstrates the feasibility of evaluating promising new therapeutic agents in untreated patients with acute leukemia at high risk for failure with conventional therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Phase I and pharmacologic study of penclomedine, a novel alkylating agent, in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), principal toxicities, and pharmacologic behavior of penclomedine, a novel alkylating agent. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Penclomedine (45 to 550 mg/ m2/d every 3 weeks) was administered as a 1- or 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion for 5 consecutive days to patients with solid tumors. RESULTS: On a 1-hour dosing schedule, ataxia, vertigo, nystagmus, and a motor aphasia were the principal toxicities of penclomedine. These neurologic effects were dose-related, and evolved from complaints of somnolence and dizziness, to more pronounced signs and symptoms of cerebellar dysfunction. Up to and including doses of 415 mg/m2, these effects were well tolerated and resolved within 2 hours posttreatment. In contrast, both patients treated at the 550-mg/m2 dose level experienced a dose-limiting constellation of perinfusional aphasia and vertigo, with either ataxia of over 2 weeks' duration or recurrent dizziness. Prolongation of the infusion duration to 3 hours at this dose level resulted in less neurotoxicity; however, delayed trilineage hematologic toxicity precluded timely administration on this schedule. A statistically significant relationship was demonstrated between the development of ataxia and maximum plasma concentrations of penclomedine. CONCLUSION: Neurotoxicity was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of penclomedine administered as a 1-hour infusion daily for 5 days every 3 weeks, and the recommended dose for further evaluations was 415 mg/m2. The nature of the principal toxicities and the lack of any detectible antitumor activity indicate that phase II evaluations of penclomedine on this administration schedule should be focused on specific disease settings, such as breast cancer and intracerebral tumors, in which antitumor activity has been demonstrated.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Phase I and pharmacological study of CI-980, a novel synthetic antimicrotubule agent.

CI-980 (NSC 613862) is one of a novel class of 1,2-dihydropyrido[3, 4-b]pyrazines that inhibits tubulin polymerization, presumably by binding to the colchicine binding site of tubulin. In a Phase I and pharmacological study, 16 patients with advanced solid neoplasms were treated with CI-980 on a continuous 72-h infusion schedule at doses ranging from 3.0-5.4 mg/m2/day every 3 weeks. High rates of central nervous system (CNS) toxicity and neutropenia occurred in both minimally and heavily pretreated patients who were treated with CI-980 doses above 3.75 mg/m2/day, which is the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended dose for additional evaluations. CNS effects, characterized by neurocortical, mood, and cerebellar manifestations, were generally observed toward the end of the infusion and immediately posttreatment and usually resolved within 48 h after the completion of treatment. Toxicity was mild to modest at the 3.75 mg/m2/day dose level. Neither clinical nor pharmacological risk factors that may predispose patients to the development of CNS effects were evident. Although no objective antineoplastic activity was observed in this Phase I study, CI-980 steady-state plasma concentrations achieved at the recommended dose of 3.75 mg/m2/day (mean +/- SE, 5.74 +/- 0.54 nM) approached and exceeded concentrations that have been associated with significant activity in preclinical studies, indicating that additional disease-directed evaluations of CI-980 may be warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Cytotoxic synergy between pyrazoloacridine (NSC 366140) and cisplatin in vitro: inhibition of platinum-DNA adduct removal.

Pyrazoloacridine (PA), an acridine congener that has shown selective toxicity in solid tumor cells, full activity against noncycling and hypoxic cells, and promising activity in a recent Phase I trial, is currently undergoing Phase II testing as a solid tumor-selective agent. In the present study, clonogenic assays were used to examine the cytotoxic effects when PA was combined with other antineoplastic agents in A549 human non-small cell lung cancer cells in vitro. Data were analyzed by the median effect method. Combinations of PA with antimetabolites (5-fluorouracil, methotrexate, and cytarabine) or with antimicrotubule agents (paclitaxel and vincristine) failed to exhibit synergy. Likewise, combinations of PA with alkylating agents (melphalan, 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide) were less than additive. In contrast, the combination of PA and cisplatin exhibited cytotoxicity that was additive or synergistic over a broad range of clinically achievable concentrations. Moreover, studies involving sequential exposure to PA and cisplatin revealed a synergistic interaction when cells were exposed to the two agents in either sequence. Synergy was likewise observed with this combination in T98G human glioblastoma cells and HCT8 human intestinal adenocarcinoma cells as well as AuxB1 hamster ovary cells. Flow microfluorimetry revealed that PA caused arrest of A549 cells in G1 and G2 phases of the cell cycle, providing a potential explanation for the antagonism between PA and antimetabolites or antimicrotubule agents. Further studies revealed that PA inhibited removal of platinum-DNA adducts in A549 cells in a dose-dependent fashion, with almost complete inhibition occurring at 1 microM PA. These latter observations provide a mechanistic explanation for the synergy between PA and cisplatin and suggest that this combination warrants further preclinical and clinical investigation.

Acridines↗
PubMed1996

Phase I and pharmacologic studies of topotecan in patients with impaired hepatic function.

BACKGROUND: Topotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor that has demonstrated anticancer activity toward leukemias and solid tumors in clinical trials, is eliminated via hepatic and renal routes. However, dosing guidelines for the administration of topotecan to patients with impaired hepatic function have not yet been established. PURPOSE: We compared the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs), the toxic effects, and the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of topotecan in patients who had refractory, malignant, solid tumors and who either had or lacked hepatic injury. The potential role of three substrate markers of liver function (indocyanin green [ICG]-- a marker of hepatic blood flow; lorazepam--a substrate marker of hepatic glucuronidation; and antipyrine--a substrate marker for cytochrome P450 activity) in optimizing topotecan doses for patients with liver injury was also evaluated. METHODS: Twenty-one cancer patients, 14 of whom had hepatic injury due to metastatic disease, biliary obstruction, or cirrhosis, were treated with intravenously delivered courses of topotecan consisting of 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 mg/m2 of drug per day for 5 days. Most patients received more than one course of treatment, with new courses initiated at 3-week intervals. Patient responses (evaluated by tumor measurements) and treatment-induced toxic effects were assessed. Prior to the initiation of topotecan treatment, patients were given intravenous injections of ICG, lorazepam, and antipyrine to determine the plasma pharmacokinetics of these compounds. The pharmacokinetics of topotecan (both the lactone and the carboxylate forms) were determined by analysis of plasma and urine samples collected on the first day of the first course of drug treatment. Scatter plots of area under the plasma concentration versus time curves in relation to percent decreases in either absolute neutrophil count or platelet count were used to explore the pharmacodynamics of topotecan. The Student's t test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare pharmacokinetic parameters between patients with and without abnormal hepatic function. Correlations were assessed using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rs). Reported P values are based on two-tailed tests of significance. RESULTS: Patients with hepatic injury tolerated topotecan doses up to 1.5 mg/m2, i.e., the MTD of this drug established in previous studies. The nature and severity of treatment-induced toxic effects and the pharmacokinetics of topotecan were similar in patients with and without liver injury. No differences were observed in the urinary excretion of topotecan between the two patient groups. Clearances of total topotecan and its lactone species correlated only with clearance of ICG (rs = .64, P = .004; and rs = .68, P = .0017, respectively). The pharmacodynamic effects of topotecan were not altered by liver dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Cancer patients with hepatic injury can be treated with topotecan at a starting dose of 1.5 mg/m2, given daily for 5 days and administered every 3 weeks. Topotecan dose modifications do not appear to be required for patients with hepatic dysfunction and normal renal function.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Cytotoxic effects of topotecan combined with various anticancer agents in human cancer cell lines.

BACKGROUND: Topotecan (TPT) is a topoisomerase I poison that exhibits antineoplastic activity. Analysis of the cytotoxic effects of combinations of TPT and other anticancer agents has been limited. PURPOSE: We assessed the cytotoxic effects produced by combinations of TPT and other antineoplastic agents in experiments involving multiple human cancer cell lines of diverse histologic origins. METHODS: The cytotoxic effects of various antimetabolites (fluorouracil, methotrexate, or cytarabine), antimicrotubule agents (vincristine or paclitaxel [Taxol]), DNA alkylating agents (melphalan, bis[chloroethyl]nitrosourea [BCNU], or 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide [4HC]), and a DNA-platinating agent (cisplatin), alone and in combination with TPT, were measured in clonogenic (i.e., colony-forming) assays. HCT8 ileocecal adenocarcinoma, A549 non-small-cell lung carcinoma, NCI-H82ras(H) lung cancer, T98G glioblastoma, and MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines were used in these assays. The data were analyzed by the median effect method, primarily under the assumption that drug mechanisms of action were mutually nonexclusive (i.e., completely independent of one another). For each level of cytotoxicity (ranging from 5% to 95%), a drug combination index (CI) was calculated. A CI less than 1 indicated synergy (i.e., the effect of the combination was greater than that expected from the additive effects of the component agents), a CI equal to 1 indicated additivity, and a CI greater than 1 indicated antagonism (the effect of the combination was less than that expected from the additive effects of the component agents). RESULTS: When the mechanisms of drug action were assumed to be mutually nonexclusive, virtually all CIs for combinations of TPT and either antimetabolites or antimicrotubule agents revealed cytotoxic effects that were less than additive. The CIs calculated at low-to-intermediate levels of cytotoxicity for combinations of TPT and the DNA alkylating agents melphalan, BCNU, and 4HC also showed drug effects that were less than additive; in most cases, however, nearly additive or even synergistic effects were observed with these same drug combinations at high levels of cytotoxicity (i.e., at > or = 90% inhibition of colony formation). Results obtained with combinations of TPT and cisplatin varied according to the cell line examined. With A549 cells, less than additive effects were seen at low-to-intermediate levels of cytotoxicity, and more than additive effects were seen at high levels of cytotoxicity. With NCI-H82ras(H) cells, synergy was observed over most of the cytotoxicity range. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: TPT cytotoxicity appears to be enhanced more by combination with certain DNA-damaging agents than by combination with antimetabolites or antimicrotubule agents. Interactions between TPT and other drugs can vary depending on the cell type examined. Further investigation is required to determine the basis of the observed effects and to determine whether these in vitro findings are predictive of results obtained in vivo.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed1996

The clinical development of paclitaxel: a successful collaboration of academia, industry and the National Cancer Institute.

The successful development of paclitaxel as an important new antineoplastic agent with the potential to have an impact on a number of human cancers was possible as a result of significant contributions from individuals and groups with diverse areas of interest and expertise. The advancement of paclitaxel through the preclinical and clinical evaluation which ultimately led to its approval, as well as surmounting the regulatory hurdles which were faced required the close collaboration of individual investigators at academic institutions, the pharmaceutical industry (Bristol-Myers Squibb) and the National Cancer Institute. The latter stages of this developmental effort can be viewed as a prime example of the potential of the Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) mechanism to bring novel therapies to patients with serious illnesses in a timely fashion. It is also tangible evidence of the vision and perseverance of a number of members of the Division of Cancer Treatment (DCT) under the direction of Dr. Bruce Chabner, in whose honor this symposium is given.

Academic Medical Centers↗
PubMed1996

The effects of food and divided dosing on the bioavailability of oral vinorelbine.

The effects of food and divided dosing on the bioavailability of a liquid-filled gelatin capsule formulation of vinorelbine (Navelbine), a semisynthetic vinca alkaloid with broad clinical activity, was evaluated in patients with advanced solid tumors. A group of 13 patients were randomized to treatment with the oral formulation at the recommended phase II dose of 80 mg/m2 per week either in the fasting state or after ingestion of a standard meal. Patients were treated 1 week later in the alternate state relative to their first dose. The effects of divided dosing were assessed during the 3rd week, at which time vinorelbine was administered in two divided doses. After the completion of pharmacokinetic and bioavailability studies, patients received the oral formulation at a dose of 80 mg/m2 per week in two divided doses to evaluate the feasibility of chronic oral drug administration. Both manipulations resulted in small, albeit statistically significant, reductions in the relative bioavailability of this oral formulation. The relative bioavailability decreased by 22 +/- 28% when treatment followed the ingestion of a standard meal, possibly due to a delay in gastrointestinal transit time. The mean time of maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) increased from 1.3 +/- 1.6 h in the fasting state to 2.5 +/- 1.6 h in the fed state, although this difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, the relative bioavailability declined by 16 +/- 51% when vinorelbine was administered in two divided doses. An analysis of dose proportionality revealed disproportionate increases in dose-normalized Cmax and AUC values with single oral doses above 120 mg, which may account for this phenomenon. The high clearance of vinorelbine, which approaches hepatic blood flow, and the lack of dose proportionality after oral administration, indicate that there is a large first-pass effect which may be saturable, or nonlinear, above single doses of 120 mg. In addition, the toxicological and pharmacological characteristics of oral vinorelbine indicate that treatment after a standard meal or on a divided dosing schedule is safe. Chronic oral administration of the agent in two divided doses was also well tolerated. However, the small reduction in the relative bioavailability following the ingestion of a standard meal and with divided dosing suggest the need for further pharmacodynamic studies to determine if reductions in drug exposure of this magnitude may portend diminished antitumor activity.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1996

A phase II trial of topotecan in patients with previously untreated pancreatic cancer.

Because currently available chemotherapeutic agents are largely ineffective in the treatment of pancreatic cancer, novel treatments are urgently needed to improve outcomes in this disease. The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate the anti-tumor activity of topotecan, a hydrophilic camptothecin analog that has demonstrated a wide range of anti-tumor activity in preclinical and phase I studies. Topotecan was administered as a 30 min infusion at a dose of 1.5 mg/m2/day for five consecutive days every 3 weeks, to chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Neutropenia was the principal toxicity of topotecan on this dosing schedule. No significant anti-tumor responses were observed in 27 patients with measurable disease. The median time to disease progression was 7 weeks and the median survival duration was 17.5 weeks. Thus, topotecan, administered on this schedule, is ineffective for patients with pancreatic carcinoma.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Phase I and pharmacologic study of topotecan in patients with impaired renal function.

PURPOSE: To determine the toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and recommended doses of the topoisomerase I inhibitor, topotecan, in patients with varying degrees of renal excretory dysfunction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with normal renal function [creatinine clearance (CrCl) > or = 60 mL/min] and 28 patients with varying degrees of renal dysfunction were treated with topotecan 0.4 to 2.0 mg/m2/d as a 30-minute infusion for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Plasma and urine samples were obtained to determine the disposition of topotecan. RESULTS: In patients with mild renal dysfunction (CrCl = 40 to 59 mL/min), dose-limiting hematologic toxicity was observed in three of eight patients receiving topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d and in two of five patients receiving topotecan 1.5 mg/m2/d. In patients with moderate renal dysfunction (CrCl = 20 to 39 mL/min), dose-limiting hematologic toxicity was observed in three of eight patients who received topotecan 0.5 mg/m2/d, and in two of four patients receiving topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d; these events were more frequently observed in extensively pretreated patients. Pharmacokinetic analyses showed significant correlations between CrCl and the plasma clearance of both total topotecan [Spearman's correlation coefficient (r2) = 0.65, P = .00001] and topotecan lactone (r2 = 0.65, P = .00003). Mean systemic plasma clearance of total topotecan was significantly reduced in patients with mild (P = .04) and moderate (P = .00006) renal dysfunction. There was no evidence of changes in the pharmacodynamic relationship between topotecan exposure (AUC) and myelotoxicity. CONCLUSION: Dose adjustments are required in patients with moderate, but not mild, renal impairment. For patients with moderate renal dysfunction, the recommended starting dose of topotecan is 0.75 mg/m2/d for 5 days every 3 weeks. Moreover, extensively pretreated patients need further dose reductions.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Sequences of topotecan and cisplatin: phase I, pharmacologic, and in vitro studies to examine sequence dependence.

PURPOSE: A phase I and pharmacologic study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of administering the topoisomerase I (topo I) inhibitor topotecan (TPT) in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) in minimally pretreated adults with solid tumors. The study was designed to evaluate the magnitude of the toxicologic and pharmacologic differences between the two sequences of drug administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: TPT was administered as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days and CDDP was given either before TPT on day 1 or after TPT on day 5. Each patient was treated with both schedules on an alternating basis every 3 weeks. Sequential dose escalation of TPT or CDDP resulted in three dosage permutation of TPT/CDDP (mg/m2): 0.75/50, 1/50, and 0.75/75. After the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) level was achieved, the feasibility of using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to permit further dose escalation was studied. To examine the interaction of TPT and CDDP in vitro, human A549 lung cancer cells were exposed to these agents concurrently and sequentially. RESULTS: Dose-limiting neutropenia and thrombocytopenia resulted after the doses of TPT or CDDP were increased to greater than 0.75 and 50 mg/m2, respectively, without and with G-CSF. The sequence of CDDP before TPT induced significantly worse neutropenia and thrombocytopenia than the alternate sequence. In vitro studies failed to provide any evidence for the differences in the cytotoxicity of these two sequences. Instead, pharmacokinetic studies suggested that the differences in toxicity were due, in part, to lower TPT clearance and exposure when CDDP preceeds TPT, possibly due to subclinical renal tubular toxicity induced by CDDP. CONCLUSION: The sequence of CDDP before TPT at doses of 50 and 0.75 mg/m2, respectively, is recommended for subsequent clinical trials in tumor types in which both agents have significant single-agent activity. The potential for sequence-dependent cytotoxic, toxicologic, and pharmacologic effects should be evaluated in concurrent clinical and laboratory studies in the course of developing combination chemotherapy regimens that consist of topo I-targeting agents and other antineoplastic agents, particularly DNA-damaging agents.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1996

Pharmacokinetic, oral bioavailability, and safety study of fluorouracil in patients treated with 776C85, an inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase.

PURPOSE: To study the absolute bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of an oral solution of fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients treated with 776C85, an oral inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and to evaluate the feasibility of administering oral 5-FU and 776C85 on a multiple-daily dosing schedule. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with refractory solid tumors were enrolled onto this three-period study. In periods 1 and 2, patients were randomly assigned to treatment with 5-FU 10 mg/m2 on day 2 given by either the oral or intravenous (IV) route with oral 776C85 3.7 mg/m2/d on days 1 and 2. In period 3, patients received escalating doses of 5-FU (10 to 25 mg/ m2/d) orally for 5 days (days 2 to 6) with 776C85 3.7 mg/m2/d orally (days 1 to 7) every 4 weeks. Pharmaco-kinetic studies were performed in periods 1 and 2, and after the fifth oral dose of 5-FU in period 3. RESULTS: Twelve patients completed the bioavailability and pharmacokinetic studies. Following oral 5-FU 10 mg/m2, the bioavailability was 122% +/- 40% (mean +/- SD), the terminal half-life (t1/2 beta) was 4.5 +/- 1.6 hours, the apparent volume of distribution (V beta) was 21.4 +/- 5.9 L/ m2, and the systemic clearance (Clsys) was 57.6 +/- 16.4 mL/min/m2. A correlation was observed between oral 5-FU systemic clearance and calculated creatinine clearance (r = .74; P = .009). Multiple-daily dosing did not appear to affect the pharmacokinetics of oral 5-FU. Neutropenia was the principal toxicity of oral 5-FU and 776C85, precluding escalation of oral 5-FU to doses greater than 25 mg/m2/d for 5 days every 4 weeks with 776C85. CONCLUSION: The oral DPD inactivator 776C85 enables oral administration of 5-FU and may alter conventional 5-FU administration practices.

Absorption↗