Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R C Brunken

Publications and source records attributed to R C Brunken.

39 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

The incidence of scintigraphically viable and nonviable tissue by rubidium-82 and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic imaging in patients with prior infarction and left ventricular dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Although reversible perfusion defects, perfusion-metabolism mismatch and match patterns are important for differentiating viable from nonviable myocardium, the frequency of these scintigraphic patterns has not been reported. The study objective was to establish the incidence of these scintigraphic patterns to estimate the clinical need for metabolic positron emission tomography for evaluating tissue viability in patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS AND RESULTS: 82Rb perfusion images were interpreted to identify reversible or irreversible defects, followed by determination of their 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) uptake pattern. In 155 patients with prior MI, analysis of 613 abnormal segments showed reversible perfusion defects in 13%. The 87% irreversible defects, 18% showed perfusion-metabolism mismatch, whereas 69% showed the match pattern. Reversible perfusion defects and perfusion-metabolism mismatches were noted in 20% (31/155) and 29% (45/155) of patients, respectively, whereas the match pattern was noted in 51% (79/155) of patients. CONCLUSION: Irreversible perfusion defects were common in our patients with prior MI, and distinction between viable and nonviable tissue was not possible by perfusion imaging alone. The identification of hibernating myocardium was possible only with the additional 18F-FDG imaging in about one third of patients. This indicates a significant clinical demand for 18F-FDG imaging that identifies patients who will benefit from revascularization.

Adult↗

Relation of myocardial perfusion at rest and during pharmacologic stress to the PET patterns of tissue viability in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Stress perfusion imaging can assess effectively the amount of jeopardized myocardium, but its use for identifying underperfused but viable myocardium has yielded variable results. We evaluated the relation between measurements of myocardial perfusion at rest and during pharmacologic stress and the patterns of tissue viability as determined by positron emission tomographic (PET) imaging. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 33 patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (LV ejection fraction, 30%+/-8%). PET imaging was used to evaluate regional myocardial perfusion at rest and during pharmacologic stress with [13N]-ammonia as a flow tracer, and to delineate patterns of tissue viability (i.e., perfusion-metabolism mismatch or match) using [18F]-deoxyglucose (FDG). We analyzed 429 myocardial regions, of which 229 were dysfunctional at rest. Of these, 30 had normal perfusion and 199 were hypoperfused. A severe resting defect (deficit >40% below normal) predicted lack of significant tissue viability; 31 of 35 regions (89%) had a PET match pattern denoting transmural fibrosis. Although regions with mild or moderate resting defects (deficit <40% below normal) showed evidence of metabolic activity, perfusion measurements alone failed to identify regions with PET mismatch (reflecting hibernating myocardium). Reversible stress defects were observed with slightly higher frequency in regions with a PET mismatch (10 of 37) than in those with a PET match (36 of 162) pattern of viability. A reversible stress defect was a specific (78%) marker, but was a relatively insensitive marker (27%) of viable myocardium as defined by the PET mismatch pattern. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LV dysfunction, the severity of regional contractile abnormalities correlates with the severity of flow deficit at rest. Severe reductions in resting blood flow in these dysfunctional regions identify predominantly nonviable myocardium that is unlikely to have improved function after revascularization. Although dysfunctional myocardium with mild to moderate flow reductions contains variable amounts of viable tissue (as assessed by FDG uptake), flow measurements alone do not distinguish between regions with PET mismatch (potentially reversible dysfunction) and PET match (irreversible dysfunction). The presence of an irreversible defect on stress imaging is a relatively specific (78%) marker of PET match, whereas a reversible stress defect is a rather insensitive (27%) marker of viability, as defined by the PET mismatch pattern.

Aged↗