Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Blake

Publications and source records attributed to R Blake.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1991

Discriminating binocular fusion from false fusion.

In a series of psychophysical experiments, observers discriminated between briefly flashed stimuli (cosine gratings, cosine plaids) that were either identical to the two eyes (dioptic) or differed between the two eyes (dichoptic). Although dioptic and dichoptic binocular stimuli were perceptually similar, they were distinguishable well above chance at exposure durations too brief for the onset of binocular rivalry. Random variations in display contrast did not alter this pattern of results. These results show that the neural events that signal false fusion of dissimilar monocular stimuli are not equivalent to those that underlie binocular fusion of matched monocular views.

Humans↗
PubMed1990

Preattentive vision and perceptual groups.

Recent evidence suggests that preattentive processing may not be limited to the analysis of simple stimulus features as previously suggested. To explore this idea a visual search task was used to test whether the shapes of several perceptual groups can be processed in parallel. Textured displays that give rise to strong perceptual grouping were used to create figures on a background. Search times for a target figure distinguished by a unique shape were found to be independent of the number of distractor figures in the display. This result indicates that perceptual groups may be processed in parallel and suggests an expanded role for preattentive processing in vision.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Detection and discrimination of coherent motion.

When viewing a pair of bars defined by the difference of spatial Gaussian functions (DOGs), human observers can discriminate accurately the relative movements of the bars, even when they differ in spatial frequency. On each trial, observers viewed two brief presentation intervals in which a pair of vertically oriented DOGs moved randomly back and forth within a restricted range. During one interval, both bars moved in the same horizontal direction and by the same magnitude (correlated movements); in the other interval, their movements were uncorrelated. When discrimination accuracy is related to the simultaneous detection of two independent movements, it was found that, if observers can detect the movements of spatially separated bars, they can tell whether their relative movements are correlated. Performance remained remarkably accurate even when the two bars differed in spatial frequency by more than two octaves or were presented separately to the two eyes. Apparently, the accurate discrimination of coherent motion involves an efficient spatial integration of optical motion information over multiple spatial locations and multiple spatial scales.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Temporal perturbations of binocular rivalry.

Successive durations of binocular rivalry are sequentially independent, random variables. To explore the underlying control process, we perturbed the cycle during a 30-sec viewing period by immediately forcing an eye to return to dominance whenever it became suppressed. During this period of forced dominance, that eye's individual dominance durations were unusually brief, but immediately following the period of forced dominance that eye's suppression durations were unusually long. However, no long-term change in the sequential pattern of rivalry occurred, and the stochastic independence of successive durations was maintained during and following the period of forced dominance. The same pattern of results was obtained with even longer periods of forced dominance. These results are consistent with the existence of a short-term adaptation, or fatigue, process responsible for transitions from dominance to suppression.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

The neural site of binocular rivalry relative to the analysis of motion in the human visual system.

Neural processing is disrupted during suppression phases of binocular rivalry, as evidenced by the temporary invisibility of an otherwise complex, high-contrast visual stimulus. This paper investigates the locus of this disruption relative to the processing of information about image motion. In one experiment, observers tracked binocular rivalry between a stationary textured field and a plaid composed of 2 drifting cosine gratings, with the angle between components varied to produce different pattern speeds. (Plaid speed is given by the ratio of the component speed to the cosine of the angle between the 2 directions of motion.) Predominance of the moving plaid increased with pattern speed, even though the speed of the individual components remained constant. Control measures verified that this influence of plaid speed was not attributable to specific component orientations. Information about coherent motion influences the rivalry process, implying that the site of coherent motion analysis, presumably the middle temporal area (MT), received input during dominance phases of rivalry. A second experiment investigated the effect of suppression on the processing of complex, nonlinear motion. Observers tracked rivalry phases for a rotating spiral, then indicated the duration of the subsequently perceived spiral aftereffect (SAE) for both rivalry and nonrivalry conditions. The SAE was reduced when adaptation occurred under the rivalry condition, with aftereffect duration proportional to the total duration of spiral visibility during adaptation. Earlier work places rivalry after the site of the linear motion aftereffect, and the present results show that rivalry suppression occurs prior to the site of spiral motion processing.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed1989

Neural integration of information specifying structure from stereopsis and motion.

When one views a two-dimensional parallel projection of dots on the surface of a rotating globe, the direction of rotation is ambiguous, and the perceived direction of rotation of the two-dimensional figure is unstable over time. Stability can be temporarily induced by adaptation to a three-dimensional globe with a direction of rotation unambiguously specified by stereo disparity; adaptation causes the two-dimensional figure to appear to rotate in the direction opposite that experienced during stereoscopic adaptation. This adaptation effect is selective for axis of rotation but is not shape-specific. It does depend on simultaneous stimulation by multiple depth planes defined by elements moving in different directions. Evidently information about stereopsis and information about structure from motion are integrated within a common neural site in the brain.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed1989

A fresh look at the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry.

Human observers viewed dichoptic orthogonal sine-wave gratings and indicated when exclusive visibility occurred in either eye. Contrast was held constant in one eye and was increased or decreased in the other eye for a number of alternation cycles (continuous presentation) or for only the duration of a single period of exclusive visibility (synchronous presentation). The synchronous presentation condition allowed us to identify the differing effects of contrast during the suppressed and during the dominant periods. Mixed phases were recorded as distinct from suppressed and dominant phases, and new classifications of compound-dominant and compound-suppressed phases are defined. The results indicate that binocular rivalry responds to stimulus contrast in two ways. 1) The duty-cycle of dominance and suppression is determined by the relative image contrast between the two eyes, with dominance of the higher contrast image being favored, and 2) the overall rate of alternation is driven by monocular image contrast during the suppressed phase (increased monocular contrast increases the alternation rate) and to a lesser extent by monocular contrast during the dominant phase (increased monocular contrast decreases the rate). A model is developed to reflect these ideas. These results support a reciprocal inhibition oscillator as the underlying mechanism of binocular rivalry.

Functional Laterality↗
PubMed1989

A neural theory of binocular rivalry.

When the two eyes view discrepant monocular stimuli, stable single vision gives way to alternating periods of monocular dominance; this is the well-known but little understood phenomenon of binocular rivalry. This article develops a neural theory of binocular rivalry that treats the phenomenon as the default outcome when binocular correspondence cannot be established. The theory posits the existence of monocular and binocular neurons arrayed within a functional processing module, with monocular neurons playing a crucial role in signaling the stimulus conditions instigating rivalry and generating inhibitory signals to implement suppression. Suppression is conceived as a local process happening in parallel over the entire cortical representation of the binocular visual field. The strength of inhibition causing suppression is related to the size of the pool of monocular neurons innervated by the suppressed eye, and the duration of a suppression phase is attributed to the strength of excitation generated by the suppressed stimulus. The theory is compared with three other contemporary theories of binocular rivalry. The article closes with a discussion of some of the unresolved problems related to the theory.

Attention↗
PubMed1988

Cats see subjective contours.

Behavioural techniques were used to determine whether cats are able to see subjective contours. Through several stages of testing with increasingly complex displays, cats continued to respond to a figure defined by subjective contours. This result provides the first direct evidence that a nonhuman perceives subjective contours.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Binocular reaction times to contrast increments.

Binocular and monocular reaction times were measured in response to an abrupt increment in the standing contrast of a grating. For near threshold contrast increments the advantage of binocular over monocular viewing was substantial when the standing contrast was low, but this advantage was reduced at higher standing contrasts. With high contrast increments the advantage of binocular over monocular viewing was uninfluenced by standing contrast and exceeded the level expected from probability summation.

Form Perception↗
PubMed1988

Limits of binocular fusion in the short wave sensitive ("blue") cones.

Stereoscopic depth perception is possible when the short wave sensitive (SWS or "Blue") cones are isolated using a yellow adapting field. We have measured the maximum disparity that can be fused (the diplopia threshold) as a function of the separation between pairs of dots or lines. Under all conditions, these diplopia thresholds are the same for the isolated SWS cones as for the entire visual system. In addition, SWS diplopia thresholds vary as a linear function of dot or line separation, so that they exhibit disparity scaling. Further experiments show that disparity scaling is dependent upon the presence of low spatial frequencies in the stimulus and not upon the retinal eccentricity of stimulation. These data indicate that the SWS cones provide information to the disparity processing system through more than one low spatial frequency channel but not through high frequency ones.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed1988

Mislocalization of diplopic images.

When observers dichoptically view bar stimuli at disparities beyond the fusion limit, the bars are perceived as being closer together than they really are. When 6.0-cycle/deg vertical derivative-of-Gaussian bars are adjusted into apparent alignment with binocularly presented spots, the mislocalization of each bar's half-image is typically 2-5 arcmin for disparities below 60 arcmin. The effect does not generalize to an additional monocular probe bar at more-eccentric locations, thus excluding reflex vergence eye movements as an explanation. Instead, the results indicate a process of interocular matching that seeks to attribute similar directions as well as depths to matching half-images.

Depth Perception↗
PubMed1988

Disparity range for binocular summation.

Binocular summation of contrast and stereopsis have been linked because they both disappear under certain pathological conditions. The dependence of stereopsis on spatial frequency prompted us to examine how binocular summation varies with both spatial frequency and binocular disparity. We therefore measured binocular summation at different disparities using spatially localized stimuli which were also restricted in their Fourier composition. Contrast thresholds were measured using three interleaved forced-choice staircases for left and right eye monocular stimuli and a binocular stimulus composed of the two monocular stimuli presented simultaneously. At zero disparity binocular thresholds were 1.4 to 1.6 times lower than monocular. As disparity was increased the ratio between the thresholds became smaller, such that at large disparities it was near 1.2, the value expected from probability summation. The range of disparities over which probability summation was exceeded varied with the spatial frequency of the stimulus. At 6.0 cpd the range was 2-3 deg, but at 2.0 cpd or 0.75 cpd the range increased to 4-6 deg. These values closely parallel the range of disparities over which stereoscopic depth sensations occur, but they exceed the limits within which disparate images of an object can be fused into a single percept. The results support the contentions that "neural" summation occurs in the mechanism for stereopsis, that this mechanism uses spatial frequency selective channels, and that this mechanism is separate from the mechanism which mediates fusion.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Clinical suppression and amblyopia.

In individuals with abnormal binocular vision, such as strabismics and anisometropes, it is common for all or part of one eye's view to be suppressed so binocular confusion and diplopia are eliminated. We examined the relation between the depth of suppression (the amount by which the monocular contrast increment threshold for an eye was elevated by stimulation in the contralateral eye) and the degree of amblyopia (difference in monocular contrast thresholds for the two eyes). There was a significant negative correlation between suppression and amblyopia, so that clinical suppressors with no amblyopia exhibited deep suppression (ie, large threshold elevation) while observers with amblyopia exhibited weaker or no suppression. This negative correlation was found when the two eyes viewed orthogonally oriented contours as well as identically oriented contours. These results suggest that when an eye is amblyopic there is no longer a need for strong suppression of that eye by the contralateral eye.

Amblyopia↗
PubMed1987

What causes stereoscopic tilt from spatial frequency disparity.

A controversy still exists concerning whether the tilt created with interocular spatial frequency disparity arises from a computation of spatial frequency differences or from cumulative positional disparity. In a first experiment, we examined the influence of positional disparity on tilt created with frequency disparity, reasoning that if tilt were computed from spatial frequency differences, the perceived angle should remain unaltered since adding a positional disparity does not change the harmonic content of the stimulus. The results indicated that positional disparity weakened perceived tilt. In a second experiment, we tested the idea that tilt results from the calculation of increasing positional disparity across the display, arguing if local matches of features in the two eyes are made in computing tilt, then the solution to binocular correspondence may be less ambiguous if the same number of cycles was displayed for both spatial frequencies. Perceived tilt increased when the number of cycles was equal, although the angle of tilt still decreased with positional disparity. In Experiment 3, we further reduced potential sources of ambiguity for the binocular matching process by employing D10s (the tenth derivative of a Gaussian) instead of grating patterns. Positional disparity exerted essentially no influence on the perceived angle of tilt of the D10s. Taken together, the results of these experiments suggest that tilt from frequency disparity can be explained solely on the basis of positional disparity.

Depth Perception↗