Current attitudes towards cementing in TKR: a national survey amongst members of the BASK.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to R B Smith.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We performed a prospective study on 129 knees with a selective approach to patellar resurfacing. One hundred and five knees were followed up at an average of 57 months. Of these, 48 knees met the eligibility criteria, thus leaving 57 knees with unresurfaced patellas. Mean follow up was 57 months. Parameters studied included HSS scores, pain, function, range of motion and patellofemoral symptoms including the ability to rise from a chair and to negotiate stairs. Approximately 90% good to excellent results were observed in both groups. The incidence of anterior knee pain and patellofemoral related problems was lower than the average reported in literature. None of the knees was revised for patellofemoral problems. Our findings suggest that the results of patellofemoral resurfacing with modern TKR designs are dependent on a careful patient selection and meticulous surgical technique. With a selective approach to resurfacing, one can achieve a high percentage of good results in both groups. Post-operative anterior knee pain is probably not related to the fact as to whether the patella is resurfaced or not.
UNLABELLED: In this 12-week study with 29 subjects, the effect of Prokarin (n=22), a proprietary blend of histamine and caffeine, was compared to placebo group (n=7) for the following outcomes: 1) fatigue as measured by the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS); 2) lower limb function as measured by timed walk test; 3) upper limb function as measured by the pegboard test; 4) cognitive function as measured by the Paced Auditory Serial Additions Test (PASAT); 5) serum caffeine level; 6) change in brain chemistry as measured by quantitative magnetic resonance spectroscopy assay of N-acetyl aspartate (NAA); and 7) safety as measured by routine blood chemistry, TSH and urinalysis. Data were acquired at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. The Prokarin group MFIS mean was significantly different rom the mean of the placebo group at 12 weeks (df=24, t=2.08, P=<0.02), with respective means of 37.40, SD=15.18, for the Prokarin group and 53.2, SD=11.39 for the controls. For the secondary endpoints (PASAT, 25 foot timed walk, peg test, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy [MRS]), there were no significant differences between the Prokarin-treated group and the placebo group. However, there were significant improvements within the Prokarin group for each of these measures for the pre- versus posttreatment comparison at 12 weeks. Serum caffeine data indicated that caffeine exerted no independent effect on performance. No laboratory abnormalities were seen, and the treatment was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: There was a modest-size statistical effect of Prokarin on fatigue in multiple sderosis (MS) compared with the placebo group. A larger trial is warranted, based on this pilot study.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of either single or combined local therapeutic modalities for poorly differentiated (Gleason score 8 to 10) prostate cancer. METHODS: Between 1987 and 1996, 156 patients were diagnosed with biopsy proven, poorly differentiated (Gleason score 8 to 10), clinically localized prostate cancer. Of these patients, 87 were treated with radical prostatectomy alone, 19 with radiotherapy, and 24 with both prostatectomy and postoperative radiotherapy. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 74.6 months. The 5-year biochemical progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with a Gleason score of 8 to 10 was 65%, 30%, and 20% for patients treated with surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy, radiotherapy alone, and surgery alone, respectively (P <0.0001 between postoperative radiotherapy and all other groups, P = 0.6131 between surgery and radiotherapy). The 5-year clinical PFS was 80%, 60%, and 35% for patients treated with surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy, radiotherapy alone, and surgery alone (P <0.0001 between postoperative radiotherapy and all others, P = 0.1975 between surgery and radiotherapy). The independent prognosticators for biochemical failure included serum prostate-specific antigen level greater than 20 ng/mL and seminal vesicle invasion; only seminal vesicle invasion was prognostic for clinical failure. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high-grade prostate cancer (Gleason score 8 to 10) have uniformly poor, but apparently similar, biochemical and clinical PFS rates when treated by either prostatectomy or radiotherapy alone. The addition of postoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of these patients may be associated with improved biochemical and clinical PFS compared with either modality alone.
Paravaginal delivery is extremely rare. Perineal delivery was reported in just fewer than 100 cases, most of which occurred in the 19th and early 20th century. To our knowledge this is the first case of labial delivery to be reported. The baby delivered through a lateral vaginal tear and through the labia majora with little trauma to the underlying tissues. Explanations of how this could have happened and how to prevent it are discussed.
There is increasing pressure within the United Kingdom for transparent assessment of the performance of every doctor along with the procedures they perform. Unfortunately, the validation of the outcome measures used to assess such procedures has been questioned. This has been well illustrated in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficient knee. Over 54 different outcome measures used to assess the ACL deficient knee have been identified, few of which were formally assessed at their initial publication. For those most frequently used the Lysholm (I and II) knee scoring scale and Tegner activity score are the only ones to have been adequately validated prior to use. The Cincinnati rating system and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form were not assessed and the reliability of both measures has since been questioned. Appropriately tested newer measures include the IKDC subjective knee evaluation form, Mohtadi's ACL quality of life outcome measure and the Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS). We recommend use of the Lysholm II knee scoring scale and Tegner activity score for clinical follow-up of patients and for use as a gold standard to which future measures can be compared. These have their deficiencies and will ultimately require replacement. In view of the international standing of its authors, the IKDC subjective knee evaluation form is likely to be used in preference to the KOOS despite its attractions. For long-term clinical trials the SF-36 should also be used. Further research is required to produce suitable measures for assessing the ACL deficient knee and this work should be appropriately funded.
PURPOSE: This study estimated the association between age and in-hospital postoperative complications, controlling for known or suspected risk factors, in a series of patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic reconstructive surgery (AAR). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study of outcome data with multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted at Emory University Hospital, a tertiary care, university-affiliated hospital. All patients undergoing elective AAR between Jan 1, 1986, and Aug 1, 1996, were included (n = 856). An estimate of the odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI for the association between patient age and in-hospital major morbidity or mortality after elective AAR was made, controlling for significant risk factors. RESULTS: Among the 856 patients, 170 had a nonfatal complication (136 with major and 34 with minor complications), and 11 patients (1.3%) died. The final logistic regression model demonstrated a mild association between increasing age and rate of major postoperative complications, including death (for each increase in age of 10 years: OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.00-1.52; P =.052). Other significant covariates in the final model included cardiac disease (OR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.18-6.86; P =.020), pulmonary disease (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.35-2.84; P =.0004), and renal disease (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.66-3.99; P =.0001). Increasing age was associated with a moderate increase in the rate of death (for each increase in age of 10 years: OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.22-6.16; P =.015) in a model with cardiac disease as the only significant covariate (OR, 14.67; 95% CI, 3.46-62.16; P =.0003). CONCLUSION: For patients undergoing elective AAR, increasing patient age is associated with a small increase in risk for in-hospital morbidity or mortality. However, significant cardiac, pulmonary, or renal disease is associated with a much greater risk of postoperative complications, and, therefore, advanced age should not be the sole basis of exclusion for otherwise suitable candidates for elective AAR.
PURPOSE: As a minimally invasive strategy for the treatment of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), endovascular repair has been embraced with enthusiasm because of the promise of achieving a durable result with a reduced risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Our mid-term experience with endovascular AAA repair was assessed by examining early and late clinical outcome in concurrent cohorts of patients stratified either as low-risk or as at increased-risk for intervention. METHODS: From April 1994 to December 1999, endovascular AAA repair was performed in 104 patients with commercially available systems. A subset of patients considered at increased risk for intervention (n = 51) were categorized as such based on a pre-existing history of ischemic coronary artery disease (73%), with documentation of myocardial infarction (57%) or congestive heart failure (29%), or because of the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, liver disease, or malignancy. RESULTS: The perioperative mortality rate (30-day) was 7.8% for patients at increased risk compared with 1.9% among those classified as low-risk (P = NS). There was no difference between groups in age (72 +/- 7 years vs 74 +/- 7 years; mean +/- SD), surgical time (221 +/- 90 minutes vs 192 +/- 68 minutes), blood loss (437 +/- 402 mL vs 331 +/- 238 mL), postoperative hospital stay (4.4 +/- 2.7 days vs 4.2 +/- 2.5 days), or days in the intensive care unit (1.2 +/- 1.6 days vs 0.6 +/- 1.3 days). Patients at increased risk of intervention had larger aneurysms than patients at low risk (58 +/- 11 mm vs 52 +/- 12 mm; P < .05). Stent grafts were successfully implanted in 47 (92%) patients at increased risk versus 50 (94%) patients at low risk (P = NS). Conversion rates to open operative repair were similar in increased-risk and low-risk groups at 3.9% and 5.7%, respectively. The initial endoleak rate was 21% versus 18% based on the first computed tomography performed (either at discharge or 1 month; P = NS). To date, patients at increased risk have been monitored for 14.6 +/- 12.4 months, and patients at low risk have been monitored for 17.7 +/- 15.0 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis for cumulative patient survival demonstrated a reduced probability of survival among those patients initially classified as at increased risk for intervention (P < .05, Mantel-Cox test). Both cohorts had similar 2-year clinical success rates of approximately 75%. CONCLUSION: Despite the use of an endovascular approach for aneurysm treatment, the risk of perioperative death and morbidity remains present for all patients including those who have no significant medical comorbidity. Moreover, although clinical success rates are comparable in both patient groups, 2 years after endovascular repair was performed, at least one in four patients was classified as a clinical failure. Given the continued uncertainty associated with clinical outcome and the need for close life-long surveillance, caution is dictated in advocating endovascular treatment for the patient who is otherwise considered an ideal candidate for standard open surgical repair.
In cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES), micro-current levels of electrical stimulation are passed across the head via electrodes clipped to the ear lobes. After successful clinical use of CES with fibromyalgia patients in our clinic, it was decided to test these results with a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in which 60 randomly assigned patients were given 3 weeks of 1-hour-daily CES treatments, sham CES treatments, or were held as wait-in-line controls for any placebo effect in the sham-treated patients. Treated patients showed a 28% improvement in tender point scores, and a 27% improvement in self-rated scores of general pain level. The number of subjects rating their quality of sleep as poor dropped from 60% at the beginning of the study to 5%. In addition, there were significant gains in the self-rated feelings of well-being and quality of life, plus gains in six stress-related psychological test measures. No placebo effect was found among the sham-treated controls. A theoretical role of CES in affecting the brain's pain message mechanisms and/or neurohormonal control systems is discussed. It is concluded that CES is as effective as the drug therapies in several trials, with no negative side effects, and deserves further consideration as an additional agent for the treatment of fibromyalgia.
Evaluations assessing precertification by nurse gatekeepers and onsite monitoring by nurse sentinels report inconclusive unique effects of these programs on the utilization, expense, and appropriateness of inpatient medical care. By applying the fixed- and random-effects paradigm of meta-analysis, this article consolidates the results of all relevant quasi-experiments conducted by an evaluation group of a large private insurer from 1986 to 1990. It determines the difference in effect between the target and comparison groups, reports this effect and its statistical range, and determines the pooled effect and its range. The random effects indicate that precertification will reduce admissions, and onsite, concurrent review will reduce length of stay, bed days, and inpatient ancillary expense. The precertification and onsite programs may reduce negative iatrogenic effects, thereby enhancing the patients' well-being. If applied to privately insured populations who are still served on a fee-for-service basis, the gatekeeper and sentinel effects of these programs may reduce utilization and expense; however, inference of these results to Medicare fee-for-service care remains problematical.
AIM: To follow up patients without known diabetes, but with hyperglycaemia in hospital for diabetes at one year. METHODS: 159 patients with a random plasma glucose > or = 7.8 mmol/L recorded during hospital admission were sent a questionnaire and invited to have the following test one year following discharge: fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c and fasting lipid profile. Those with a fasting plasma glucose > or = 5.5 and < 7.0 mmol/L, and/or those with a HbA1c > or = 6.0%, were asked to have an oral glucose tolerance test. Those with a fasting plasma glucose > or = 7.0 mmol/L were defined as having diabetes. RESULTS: There were 88 full responses. Nineteen (21.6%) had diabetes and nine impaired glucose tolerance. Hb1Ac was > or = 6% in five subjects with a fasting plasma glucose < 5.5 mmol/L. Two had impaired glucose tolerance and one diabetes. If a random plasma glucose in-hospital of 10 mmol/L is used as a threshold for later testing, as suggested by previous studies, then 25% of those with an abnormal result would have been missed. CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of those with hyperglycaemia in hospital have diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance at one year. Initial testing with fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c avoided oral glucose tolerance test in 76% of cases. Use of HbA1c detected otherwise missed diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance. A random plasma glucose of > or = 7.8 mmol/L in hospital targets patients who should be tested for impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes following discharge.
PURPOSE: We determine independent prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma using the revised 1997 TNM staging criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 643 consecutive patients undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy at our institution between 1987 and 1998 were reviewed. Preoperative evaluation of functional status using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) criteria was performed in all cases. Renal cell carcinoma grade and stage were evaluated using the 1997 American Joint Committee on Cancer grading and TNM staging criteria, respectively. Patients were followed for a mean plus or minus standard deviation of 47+/-40 months (median 87). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to determine 5-year cancer specific survival for all patient groups. Univariate analysis using log rank sum tests was performed to evaluate the prognostic significance of overall TNM stage, tumor stage, disease grade and ECOG status. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine which factors had an independent impact on survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma. RESULTS: The 5-year cancer specific survival rate was 91%, 74%, 67% and 32% for TNM stages I, II, III and IV lesions, respectively (p<0.001). Analysis demonstrated a survival rate of 83% for stage T1, 57% for stage T2, 42% for stage T3 and 28% for stage T4 disease (p<0.001), and 89% for grade 1, 65% for grade 2, and 46% for grades 3 and 4 (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that overall TNM stage and grade of disease were the most important prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma (p<0.001). ECOG classification was a less significant predictor (p = 0.031) and tumor stage was not shown to have any independent impact on patient survival (p = 0.138). CONCLUSIONS: Better survival rates of patients with localized and advanced renal cell carcinoma can be demonstrated with recent advances in diagnosis and treatment. The revised 1997 TNM criteria manifest an appropriate adjustment in staging renal cell carcinoma based on these improvements, with overall stage correlating with cancer specific survival. In contrast, while effectively predicting survival, tumor stage did not demonstrate an independent impact on renal cell carcinoma prognosis under multivariate analysis. Instead, other factors, such as ECOG status and more importantly grade of disease, appeared to affect survival significantly as independent elements. Based on our recent experience with patients treated for renal cell carcinoma in the era of enhanced technology and improved survival, tumor grade and molecular markers may serve as useful adjuncts to TNM staging in guiding treatment and predicting survival outcomes.
PURPOSE: We determined the prognostic significance of incidentally discovered renal cell carcinoma in the era of increased incidental detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 633 consecutive patients who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma at our institution between 1987 and 1998. Patients were divided into those who were asymptomatic and tumor was diagnosed incidentally and those diagnosed after presenting with any of the classic symptoms of renal cell carcinoma or subsequent metastasis. All renal cell carcinoma lesions were assigned a stage and grade according to 1997 TNM criteria. All patients were followed postoperatively to assess survival rates, and monitor recurrence and metastasis. RESULTS: Of the 633 patients 95 (15%) were treated for incidentally discovered renal cell carcinoma and 538 (85%) presented with symptoms secondary to renal cell carcinoma at diagnosis. Patient age and sex distribution were similar in the 2 groups. Stage I lesions were observed in 62.1% of patients with incidental renal cell carcinoma and in 23% with symptomatic renal cell carcinoma. In contrast, stage IV lesions were present in 27.4% of patients with incidental versus 54% with symptomatic renal cell carcinoma. Thus, incidental lesions were of significantly lower stage than those causing symptoms (p <0.001). Similarly 15.8% of incidental but 42.4% of symptomatic lesions were grade 3 or 4 (p = 0.006). Patients were followed postoperatively for a mean of 47 months plus or minus 40 months. The 5-year cancer specific survival rate was significantly higher for incidental than for symptomatic tumors (85.3% versus 62.5%). Likewise, the local and distal recurrence rates were higher for symptomatic lesions. When adjusted for stage, no difference in survival was noted in the 2 groups for stages I to III disease and a minimally significant difference was noted for stage IV cancer. Multivariate analysis of stage and grade attributed the survival difference in stage IV disease to the significantly higher grade of symptomatic lesions. CONCLUSIONS: At presentation incidental tumors are of significantly lower stage and grade than tumors producing symptoms. Subsequently these clinically and histologically less aggressive lesions lead to better patient survival and decreased recurrence. Thus, the detection of renal cell carcinoma before symptom onset enables treatment of less aggressive tumors and provides a better prognosis for patients. Given these data efforts should be directed toward the development of a screening protocol to detect these lesions early, so that they may be prevented from progressing to the point when symptoms are apparent and prognosis becomes worse. In addition, the significant correlation of tumor grade with survival in our study further demonstrates the prognostic value of tumor grade and molecular markers for the future evaluation and treatment of renal cell carcinoma.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Thirteen subjects (seven men, six women) completed a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, crossover study to determine whether an interaction occurs between clonazepam and sertraline. Ten days of once-daily doses of either clonazepam 1 mg and placebo (CZ + PL) or clonazepam 1 mg and sertraline 100 mg (CZ + SR) were administered; there was an 11-day washout period. Sertraline did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of clonazepam (p > 0.13). Clonazepam apparent oral clearance, volume of distribution, and half-life were 3.9 +/- 0.2 L/hr, 233 +/-11 L, and 40.5 +/- 0.3 hours, respectively. The kinetics of the inactive metabolite 7-aminoclonazepam were marginally affected by sertraline, with a 21% decrease in the elimination half-life (p = 0.03) relative to CZ + PL and no significant difference between treatments in area under the curve or metabolite ratio. Card sorting (CS), digit-symbol substitution test (DSST), nurse-rated sedation scale (NRSS), and self-rated sedation scores were assessed four times daily on days -1 (PL + PL), 1, 4, 7, and 10. There were no differences between treatments in area under the effect curve or maximum observed effect for CS, DSST, or NRSS. Maximum impairment on all assessment days was low, with a less than 10% change from the drug-free values for CS and DSST. Despite higher clonazepam concentrations, predose (time 0) psychomotor and sedation scores did not differ among days -1, 1, 4, 7, and 10 or between treatments. These results in healthy volunteers indicate that sertraline does not affect the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of clonazepam.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: We assessed blood loss and subsequent transfusion associated with nephrectomy performed for suspected renal cell carcinoma to establish guidelines for preoperative autologous blood donation and identify a subgroup of patients that may benefit from erythropoietin administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 211 patients who underwent partial (73%) or radical (23%) nephrectomy for presumed renal cell carcinoma at our institution between 1990 and 1999. Patients were divided into groups 1-44.5% treated with radical nephrectomy for localized disease, 2-21.3% radical nephrectomy for metastatic lesions invading the renal vasculature or inferior vena cava, 3-8% radical nephrectomy for metastatic disease with locally extensive lesions and 4-26.5% partial nephrectomy for localized lesions. Patient charts were evaluated for preoperative and postoperative hematocrit, estimated blood loss, transfusions received, surgical complications and underlying disease. RESULTS: Median estimated blood loss was 200, 400, 250 and 555 cc in groups 1 to 4, respectively. However, patients in groups 2 and 3 had a substantially greater range of blood loss than those in groups 1 and 4, respectively. The incidence of those with a blood loss of greater than 1 l. was 7%, 36%, 24% and 11% in groups 1, to 4, respectively. The incidence of those requiring transfusion was significantly lower in group 1 than in groups 2 to 4 (18% versus 44%, 24% and 30%, respectively, p <0.009). Mean transfusion requirement plus or minus standard deviation was significantly greater in groups 2 and 3 than in 1 and 4 (2.3 +/- 1.08, 5.5 +/- 4.4, 11.3 +/- 9.6 and 2.3 +/- 1.7 units, respectively, p <0.05). No significant difference was noted in the change in hematocrit as a result of surgery in the 4 groups (p >0.05). Similarly underlying disease and operative complications did not have a significant effect on blood loss or transfusion (p >0. 05). CONCLUSIONS: Radical or partial nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma leads to consistent and well tolerated operative blood loss that rarely results in the need for substantial transfusion. In contrast, nephrectomy for advanced disease may cause a risk of greater blood loss and subsequent need for the transfusion of multiple units of blood. While preoperative autologous blood donation may have limited value in this regard due to the high cost and number of units needed, preoperative erythropoietin administration may be a viable option. Prospective randomized studies are currently planned.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.